Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Bhav Chalit

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear learned astrologers,

I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

" BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

Thanks!

 

Regards

Shaaswat

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Shaaswat.

 

Are you referring to Drekkans (ten degrees of each bhav)? I am not

familiar yet with Falit Jyotish. Please explain.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

 

On Jul 2, 2008, at 10:41 AM, OK wrote:

 

> Dear learned astrologers,

> I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> Thanks!

>

> Regards

> Shaaswat

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Mr.Vic,

It is referring to " NIRAYAN BHAV CHALIT " or Cuspal Chart

not Drekkans.

 

Yours

Shaaswat

 

 

--- On Thu, 7/3/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Re: Bhav Chalit

jyotish-vidya

Thursday, July 3, 2008, 11:01 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Shaaswat.

 

Are you referring to Drekkans (ten degrees of each bhav)? I am not

familiar yet with Falit Jyotish. Please explain.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

On Jul 2, 2008, at 10:41 AM, OK wrote:

 

> Dear learned astrologers,

> I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> Thanks!

>

> Regards

> Shaaswat

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Shaaswat,

 

I find it strange that you are a newcomer,

and yet asking about Bhav Start and Bhava

Middle, which is not a subject matter of

discussion for the newcomers. I do not

know even many Experts who would be able

to dicsuss about this convincingly,

in my years of journey into astrology.

This is based on mathematical

divsions of House Borders.

 

What do you already know about this, if

you are able to tell us, then you can

be helped better, if we may be able to.

 

But there are seperate approaches

to this in Falit jyotish.

 

Bhava Madhya or Bhava Middle is the

Parashari way of approach. Bhava

Start is the Placidus way of approach.

 

Both are equally important to those who

to each of these views.

 

I am sure you know about the House

divsions in vogue. In this Group

we are following the Parashari Vedic

system strictly.

 

Let us have your views now.

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

jyotish-vidya , OK <sincere_ok wrote:

>

> Dear learned astrologers,

> I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> Thanks!

>  

> Regards

> Shaaswat

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Bhaskar ji,

Thanks for explanation.In fact i am new to this

Group but i am trying to learn Astrology by books

from last two years.As you said it is used in Parashari

but Bhav start is used in KP too.What is the basic difference?

and its results of both in Falit.

As i know planets before 15 Anshas are placed in Bhav start

and after 15 degree placed in Bhav Madya but again result on

Falit and which is more authentic?

Thanks again!

 

Yours

Shaaswat 

 

--- On Fri, 7/4/08, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

 

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

Re: Bhav Chalit

jyotish-vidya

Friday, July 4, 2008, 12:04 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Shaaswat,

 

I find it strange that you are a newcomer,

and yet asking about Bhav Start and Bhava

Middle, which is not a subject matter of

discussion for the newcomers. I do not

know even many Experts who would be able

to dicsuss about this convincingly,

in my years of journey into astrology.

This is based on mathematical

divsions of House Borders.

 

What do you already know about this, if

you are able to tell us, then you can

be helped better, if we may be able to.

 

But there are seperate approaches

to this in Falit jyotish.

 

Bhava Madhya or Bhava Middle is the

Parashari way of approach. Bhava

Start is the Placidus way of approach.

 

Both are equally important to those who

to each of these views.

 

I am sure you know about the House

divsions in vogue. In this Group

we are following the Parashari Vedic

system strictly.

 

Let us have your views now.

 

Bhaskar.

 

jyotish-vidya, OK <sincere_ok@ ...> wrote:

>

> Dear learned astrologers,

> I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> Thanks!

>  

> Regards

> Shaaswat

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Shaswaat,

 

You first queried about what is different

between Bhav Madhya and Bhava start. After

you got a reply from me, you used

the word KP in Your reply, which means you

already know about what you are talking

about.

 

Just like any type of scissor is good in

the hands of a expert haircutter, any

approach is good in the hands of a expert

astrologer.

 

Authenticity is a seperate matter.

Falit is a seperate matter.

 

The best way to know the difference

between both, is to use your

own chart as a sample Chart, and make

2 charts by both methods. Next check

the results accruing from both approaches,

which ones match your Life better.

 

This is the way to check and

conclude,what you are asking for.

 

As mentioned, we are not talking about

any other methods of approaches in

this Forum, and as you already know

therotetically good enough on this subject,

I will now not answer any further,

on this subject matter.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

jyotish-vidya , OK <sincere_ok wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

> Thanks for explanation.In fact i am new to this

> Group but i am trying to learn Astrology by books

> from last two years.As you said it is used in Parashari

> but Bhav start is used in KP too.What is the basic difference?

> and its results of both in Falit.

> As i know planets before 15 Anshas are placed in Bhav start

> and after 15 degree placed in Bhav Madya but again result on

> Falit and which is more authentic?

> Thanks again!

>  

> Yours

> Shaaswat 

>

> --- On Fri, 7/4/08, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

> Re: Bhav Chalit

> jyotish-vidya

> Friday, July 4, 2008, 12:04 AM

Dear Shaaswat,

>

> I find it strange that you are a newcomer,

> and yet asking about Bhav Start and Bhava

> Middle, which is not a subject matter of

> discussion for the newcomers. I do not

> know even many Experts who would be able

> to dicsuss about this convincingly,

> in my years of journey into astrology.

> This is based on mathematical

> divsions of House Borders.

>

> What do you already know about this, if

> you are able to tell us, then you can

> be helped better, if we may be able to.

>

> But there are seperate approaches

> to this in Falit jyotish.

>

> Bhava Madhya or Bhava Middle is the

> Parashari way of approach. Bhava

> Start is the Placidus way of approach.

>

> Both are equally important to those who

> to each of these views.

>

> I am sure you know about the House

> divsions in vogue. In this Group

> we are following the Parashari Vedic

> system strictly.

>

> Let us have your views now.

>

> Bhaskar.

>

> jyotish-vidya, OK <sincere_ok@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > Dear learned astrologers,

> > I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> > I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> > " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> > is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> > Thanks!

> >  

> > Regards

> > Shaaswat

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vic,

 

This is just off the top of my head, so apologies if incorrect. If I'm

not mistaken 'Falit Jyotish' simply means the predictive element of

jyotish, as opposed to the mathematical element...I stand corrected if in

error.

 

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

http://JyotishVidya.com

___

 

 

-

" Vic D " <vicdicara

<jyotish-vidya >

Friday, July 04, 2008 1:31 AM

Re: Re: Bhav Chalit

 

 

Dear Shaaswat.

 

Are you referring to Drekkans (ten degrees of each bhav)? I am not

familiar yet with Falit Jyotish. Please explain.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

 

On Jul 2, 2008, at 10:41 AM, OK wrote:

 

> Dear learned astrologers,

> I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> Thanks!

>

> Regards

> Shaaswat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Check out James Braha

He would have probably replied to the same query in 2 lines and made 10

times more sense.

 

ॠनमः शिवाय

RKM

www.EagleEyeTrade.com

 

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

 

> Dear Shaswaat,

>

> You first queried about what is different

> between Bhav Madhya and Bhava start. After

> you got a reply from me, you used

> the word KP in Your reply, which means you

> already know about what you are talking

> about.

>

> Just like any type of scissor is good in

> the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> approach is good in the hands of a expert

> astrologer.

>

> Authenticity is a seperate matter.

> Falit is a seperate matter.

>

> The best way to know the difference

> between both, is to use your

> own chart as a sample Chart, and make

> 2 charts by both methods. Next check

> the results accruing from both approaches,

> which ones match your Life better.

>

> This is the way to check and

> conclude,what you are asking for.

>

> As mentioned, we are not talking about

> any other methods of approaches in

> this Forum, and as you already know

> therotetically good enough on this subject,

> I will now not answer any further,

> on this subject matter.

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>, OK

> <sincere_ok wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > Thanks for explanation.In fact i am new to this

> > Group but i am trying to learn Astrology by books

> > from last two years.As you said it is used in Parashari

> > but Bhav start is used in KP too.What is the basic difference?

> > and its results of both in Falit.

> > As i know planets before 15 Anshas are placed in Bhav start

> > and after 15 degree placed in Bhav Madya but again result on

> > Falit and which is more authentic?

> > Thanks again!

> >

> > Yours

> > Shaaswat

> >

> > --- On Fri, 7/4/08, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

> >

> > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

> > Re: Bhav Chalit

> > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>

> > Friday, July 4, 2008, 12:04 AM

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Dear Shaaswat,

> >

> > I find it strange that you are a newcomer,

> > and yet asking about Bhav Start and Bhava

> > Middle, which is not a subject matter of

> > discussion for the newcomers. I do not

> > know even many Experts who would be able

> > to dicsuss about this convincingly,

> > in my years of journey into astrology.

> > This is based on mathematical

> > divsions of House Borders.

> >

> > What do you already know about this, if

> > you are able to tell us, then you can

> > be helped better, if we may be able to.

> >

> > But there are seperate approaches

> > to this in Falit jyotish.

> >

> > Bhava Madhya or Bhava Middle is the

> > Parashari way of approach. Bhava

> > Start is the Placidus way of approach.

> >

> > Both are equally important to those who

> > to each of these views.

> >

> > I am sure you know about the House

> > divsions in vogue. In this Group

> > we are following the Parashari Vedic

> > system strictly.

> >

> > Let us have your views now.

> >

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> > jyotish-vidya, OK <sincere_ok@ ...> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear learned astrologers,

> > > I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> > > I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> > > " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> > > is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> > > Thanks!

> > >

> > > Regards

> > > Shaaswat

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

If You mean that I have replied the query in

many more lines, and not made sense, then its

your view. But till the time James Braha ( I

do not know him )is not here, you will have to

make do with longer replies of less sense, or

else attempt to put the reply.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

jyotish-vidya , RKM <rajeevmundra wrote:

>

> Check out James Braha

> He would have probably replied to the same query in 2 lines and

made 10

> times more sense.

>

> ॠनमः शिवाय

> RKM

> www.EagleEyeTrade.com

>

> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

> wrote:

>

> > Dear Shaswaat,

> >

> > You first queried about what is different

> > between Bhav Madhya and Bhava start. After

> > you got a reply from me, you used

> > the word KP in Your reply, which means you

> > already know about what you are talking

> > about.

> >

> > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > astrologer.

> >

> > Authenticity is a seperate matter.

> > Falit is a seperate matter.

> >

> > The best way to know the difference

> > between both, is to use your

> > own chart as a sample Chart, and make

> > 2 charts by both methods. Next check

> > the results accruing from both approaches,

> > which ones match your Life better.

> >

> > This is the way to check and

> > conclude,what you are asking for.

> >

> > As mentioned, we are not talking about

> > any other methods of approaches in

> > this Forum, and as you already know

> > therotetically good enough on this subject,

> > I will now not answer any further,

> > on this subject matter.

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%

40>, OK

> > <sincere_ok@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > Thanks for explanation.In fact i am new to this

> > > Group but i am trying to learn Astrology by books

> > > from last two years.As you said it is used in Parashari

> > > but Bhav start is used in KP too.What is the basic difference?

> > > and its results of both in Falit.

> > > As i know planets before 15 Anshas are placed in Bhav start

> > > and after 15 degree placed in Bhav Madya but again result on

> > > Falit and which is more authentic?

> > > Thanks again!

> > >

> > > Yours

> > > Shaaswat

> > >

> > > --- On Fri, 7/4/08, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > Re: Bhav Chalit

> > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%

40>

> > > Friday, July 4, 2008, 12:04 AM

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Shaaswat,

> > >

> > > I find it strange that you are a newcomer,

> > > and yet asking about Bhav Start and Bhava

> > > Middle, which is not a subject matter of

> > > discussion for the newcomers. I do not

> > > know even many Experts who would be able

> > > to dicsuss about this convincingly,

> > > in my years of journey into astrology.

> > > This is based on mathematical

> > > divsions of House Borders.

> > >

> > > What do you already know about this, if

> > > you are able to tell us, then you can

> > > be helped better, if we may be able to.

> > >

> > > But there are seperate approaches

> > > to this in Falit jyotish.

> > >

> > > Bhava Madhya or Bhava Middle is the

> > > Parashari way of approach. Bhava

> > > Start is the Placidus way of approach.

> > >

> > > Both are equally important to those who

> > > to each of these views.

> > >

> > > I am sure you know about the House

> > > divsions in vogue. In this Group

> > > we are following the Parashari Vedic

> > > system strictly.

> > >

> > > Let us have your views now.

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > jyotish-vidya, OK <sincere_ok@ ...>

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear learned astrologers,

> > > > I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> > > > I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> > > > " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> > > > is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> > > > Thanks!

> > > >

> > > > Regards

> > > > Shaaswat

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Rajeev!!

 

This time I'm not requesting you tone down your rhetoric, I'm insisting

on it! Your response to members who put in the effort to answer queries

is unacceptable. If you had James Braha's comments on Bhava Chalit at

hand why did you not answer Shaaswat's query yourself? I want you to make

an effort to be polite!

 

It would also be appreciated if you could give a precise quote (in

context) along with chapter and verse for other's easy reference.

 

PS: It's an accepted dictum that one either uses bhava charts in

conjunction with natal chart (or) divisional charts in conjunction with

natal chart.

 

Thank You,

Mrs. Wendy

http://JyotishVidya.com

___

 

 

-

" RKM " <rajeevmundra

<jyotish-vidya >

Friday, July 04, 2008 1:08 PM

Re: Re: Bhav Chalit

 

 

Check out James Braha

He would have probably replied to the same query in 2 lines and made 10

times more sense.

 

ॠनमः शिवाय

RKM

www.EagleEyeTrade.com

 

 

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

 

> Dear Shaswaat,

>

> You first queried about what is different

> between Bhav Madhya and Bhava start. After

> you got a reply from me, you used

> the word KP in Your reply, which means you

> already know about what you are talking

> about.

>

> Just like any type of scissor is good in

> the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> approach is good in the hands of a expert

> astrologer.

>

> Authenticity is a seperate matter.

> Falit is a seperate matter.

>

> The best way to know the difference

> between both, is to use your

> own chart as a sample Chart, and make

> 2 charts by both methods. Next check

> the results accruing from both approaches,

> which ones match your Life better.

>

> This is the way to check and

> conclude,what you are asking for.

>

> As mentioned, we are not talking about

> any other methods of approaches in

> this Forum, and as you already know

> therotetically good enough on this subject,

> I will now not answer any further,

> on this subject matter.

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Mrs. Wendy

 

You wrote this in some forum which came up in search results.

The answer was clear and " made a point " .

 

 

> Wendy Vasicek wrote:

> Dear David and All,

>

> //He states that such position " cannot give the legendary wealth

which the

> native was able to accumulate. It is due to the fact that in the

Chalit

> Chakra Venus has shifted to the ascendant. This example again

demonstrates

> how risky it is to ignore the Chalit chakra. " //

>

> Braha states that the sages have declared this (Venus in 12th) to

be an

> excellent placement for wealth. The native will be a lavish spender,

> enjoying many luxuries, will sleep on fine beds with ornaments etc..

>

> Add to this Venus' dispositor (12th lord Sun) conjunct 11th lord

Moon in

> 11th (Surya-Chandr Yoga) and Venus participation in both Durudhara

and

> Ubhayachari Yoga, and we have the promise of great wealth (in Rasi).

>

*> I am of the belief that neither bhava nor divisional charts can

*<tr_1215156469692>

*

give what is* <tr_1215156469692>* not promised in Rasi.*

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

> http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/>

> jyotish-vidya

 

 

Om Namah Shivay

Rajeev

 

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya

wrote:

 

> Rajeev!!

>

> This time I'm not requesting you tone down your rhetoric, I'm insisting

> on it! Your response to members who put in the effort to answer queries

> is unacceptable. If you had James Braha's comments on Bhava Chalit at

> hand why did you not answer Shaaswat's query yourself? I want you to make

> an effort to be polite!

>

> It would also be appreciated if you could give a precise quote (in

> context) along with chapter and verse for other's easy reference.

>

> PS: It's an accepted dictum that one either uses bhava charts in

> conjunction with natal chart (or) divisional charts in conjunction with

> natal chart.

>

> Thank You,

> Mrs. Wendy

> http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/>

> ___

>

> -

> " RKM " <rajeevmundra <rajeevmundra%40gmail.com>>

> <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>>

> Friday, July 04, 2008 1:08 PM

> Re: Re: Bhav Chalit

>

> Check out James Braha

> He would have probably replied to the same query in 2 lines and made 10

> times more sense.

>

> ॠनमः शिवाय

> RKM

> www.EagleEyeTrade.com <http://www.eagleeyetrade.com/>

>

> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bhaskar

<bhaskar_jyotish<bhaskar_jyotish%40.co.in>

> >

> wrote:

>

> > Dear Shaswaat,

> >

> > You first queried about what is different

> > between Bhav Madhya and Bhava start. After

> > you got a reply from me, you used

> > the word KP in Your reply, which means you

> > already know about what you are talking

> > about.

> >

> > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > astrologer.

> >

> > Authenticity is a seperate matter.

> > Falit is a seperate matter.

> >

> > The best way to know the difference

> > between both, is to use your

> > own chart as a sample Chart, and make

> > 2 charts by both methods. Next check

> > the results accruing from both approaches,

> > which ones match your Life better.

> >

> > This is the way to check and

> > conclude,what you are asking for.

> >

> > As mentioned, we are not talking about

> > any other methods of approaches in

> > this Forum, and as you already know

> > therotetically good enough on this subject,

> > I will now not answer any further,

> > on this subject matter.

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

>

>

>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Bhaskar ji

 

As it is, by now I am sure every new comer in astro world knows, that there

are atleast 100 prominent astro theories and any planet placement can be

proved by some theory to give all kinds of effects.

 

> > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > astrologer.

 

Astrology as it is full of ifs and buts.

It will be much better if one gives his views and beliefs (which one follows

by his heart in his analysis) rather than making a general statement or

saying that all theories are good and use depends on user.

 

Also what is the fault if someone asks something stating that he is a " new

comer " and then he writes something which proves that he has " some knowhow " .

I hope that is not a sin, as it seems to have been pointed out many times to

different people in this and other groups.!!

 

I think it is an essential quality of any great astrologer to be able to

give short crisp replies (without too many gneralizations) which make a lot

of sense.

 

Anyhow your efforts are fully appreciated.

 

ॠनमः शिवाय

RKM

 

 

 

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

 

> If You mean that I have replied the query in

> many more lines, and not made sense, then its

> your view. But till the time James Braha ( I

> do not know him )is not here, you will have to

> make do with longer replies of less sense, or

> else attempt to put the reply.

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

>

> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>,

> RKM <rajeevmundra wrote:

> >

> > Check out James Braha

> > He would have probably replied to the same query in 2 lines and

> made 10

> > times more sense.

> >

> > ॠनमः शिवाय

> > RKM

> > www.EagleEyeTrade.com

> >

> > On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

>

> > wrote:

> >

> > > Dear Shaswaat,

> > >

> > > You first queried about what is different

> > > between Bhav Madhya and Bhava start. After

> > > you got a reply from me, you used

> > > the word KP in Your reply, which means you

> > > already know about what you are talking

> > > about.

> > >

> > > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > > astrologer.

> > >

> > > Authenticity is a seperate matter.

> > > Falit is a seperate matter.

> > >

> > > The best way to know the difference

> > > between both, is to use your

> > > own chart as a sample Chart, and make

> > > 2 charts by both methods. Next check

> > > the results accruing from both approaches,

> > > which ones match your Life better.

> > >

> > > This is the way to check and

> > > conclude,what you are asking for.

> > >

> > > As mentioned, we are not talking about

> > > any other methods of approaches in

> > > this Forum, and as you already know

> > > therotetically good enough on this subject,

> > > I will now not answer any further,

> > > on this subject matter.

> > >

> > > regards,

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > > jyotish-vidya

<jyotish-vidya%40><jyotish-vidya%

> 40>, OK

> > > <sincere_ok@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > Thanks for explanation.In fact i am new to this

> > > > Group but i am trying to learn Astrology by books

> > > > from last two years.As you said it is used in Parashari

> > > > but Bhav start is used in KP too.What is the basic difference?

> > > > and its results of both in Falit.

> > > > As i know planets before 15 Anshas are placed in Bhav start

> > > > and after 15 degree placed in Bhav Madya but again result on

> > > > Falit and which is more authentic?

> > > > Thanks again!

> > > >

> > > > Yours

> > > > Shaaswat

> > > >

> > > > --- On Fri, 7/4/08, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > Re: Bhav Chalit

> > > > jyotish-vidya

<jyotish-vidya%40><jyotish-vidya%

> 40>

> > > > Friday, July 4, 2008, 12:04 AM

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Dear Shaaswat,

> > > >

> > > > I find it strange that you are a newcomer,

> > > > and yet asking about Bhav Start and Bhava

> > > > Middle, which is not a subject matter of

> > > > discussion for the newcomers. I do not

> > > > know even many Experts who would be able

> > > > to dicsuss about this convincingly,

> > > > in my years of journey into astrology.

> > > > This is based on mathematical

> > > > divsions of House Borders.

> > > >

> > > > What do you already know about this, if

> > > > you are able to tell us, then you can

> > > > be helped better, if we may be able to.

> > > >

> > > > But there are seperate approaches

> > > > to this in Falit jyotish.

> > > >

> > > > Bhava Madhya or Bhava Middle is the

> > > > Parashari way of approach. Bhava

> > > > Start is the Placidus way of approach.

> > > >

> > > > Both are equally important to those who

> > > > to each of these views.

> > > >

> > > > I am sure you know about the House

> > > > divsions in vogue. In this Group

> > > > we are following the Parashari Vedic

> > > > system strictly.

> > > >

> > > > Let us have your views now.

> > > >

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > > > jyotish-vidya, OK <sincere_ok@ ...>

> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear learned astrologers,

> > > > > I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> > > > > I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> > > > > " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> > > > > is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> > > > > Thanks!

> > > > >

> > > > > Regards

> > > > > Shaaswat

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Rajeev,

 

The only forum I write in is Jyotish-Vidya. Unfortunately there are

certain unscrupulous sites on the internet that lift posts from all the

groups and reproduce them on their site. When you do a search for a

particular topic you may often come across these posts. The trouble with

these reproduced posts is that they're invariably " out of context " .

 

Looking at the post you found on one of these rogue sites it's clear that

the person named David was the one referring to Chalit Chakra...please

note the // enclosing David's comment. My response (that followed) was

regarding the role of Venus in 12th in regards to wealth.

 

You have, unfortunately, taken this conversation completely out of

context!

 

Thank You,

Mrs. Wendy

http://JyotishVidya.com

___

 

 

-

" RKM " <rajeevmundra

<jyotish-vidya >

Friday, July 04, 2008 3:47 PM

Re: Re: Bhav Chalit

 

 

Dear Mrs. Wendy

 

You wrote this in some forum which came up in search results.

The answer was clear and " made a point " .

 

 

> Wendy Vasicek wrote:

> Dear David and All,

>

> //He states that such position " cannot give the legendary wealth

which the

> native was able to accumulate. It is due to the fact that in the

Chalit

> Chakra Venus has shifted to the ascendant. This example again

demonstrates

> how risky it is to ignore the Chalit chakra. " //

>

> Braha states that the sages have declared this (Venus in 12th) to

be an

> excellent placement for wealth. The native will be a lavish spender,

> enjoying many luxuries, will sleep on fine beds with ornaments etc..

>

> Add to this Venus' dispositor (12th lord Sun) conjunct 11th lord

Moon in

> 11th (Surya-Chandr Yoga) and Venus participation in both Durudhara

and

> Ubhayachari Yoga, and we have the promise of great wealth (in Rasi).

>

*> I am of the belief that neither bhava nor divisional charts can

*<tr_1215156469692>

*

give what is* <tr_1215156469692>* not promised in Rasi.*

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

> http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/>

> jyotish-vidya

 

 

Om Namah Shivay

Rajeev

 

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya

wrote:

 

> Rajeev!!

>

> This time I'm not requesting you tone down your rhetoric, I'm insisting

> on it! Your response to members who put in the effort to answer queries

> is unacceptable. If you had James Braha's comments on Bhava Chalit at

> hand why did you not answer Shaaswat's query yourself? I want you to

> make

> an effort to be polite!

>

> It would also be appreciated if you could give a precise quote (in

> context) along with chapter and verse for other's easy reference.

>

> PS: It's an accepted dictum that one either uses bhava charts in

> conjunction with natal chart (or) divisional charts in conjunction with

> natal chart.

>

> Thank You,

> Mrs. Wendy

> http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/>

> ___

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Rajeev,

 

//Also what is the fault if someone asks something stating that he is a

" new

comer " and then he writes something which proves that he has " some

knowhow " .//

 

At the very least this is simple dishonesty. At worst it's a deliberate

deception in order to achieve an objective.

 

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

http://JyotishVidya.com

___

 

 

-

" RKM " <rajeevmundra

<jyotish-vidya >

Friday, July 04, 2008 5:05 PM

Re: Re: Bhav Chalit

 

 

Bhaskar ji

 

As it is, by now I am sure every new comer in astro world knows, that

there

are atleast 100 prominent astro theories and any planet placement can be

proved by some theory to give all kinds of effects.

 

> > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > astrologer.

 

Astrology as it is full of ifs and buts.

It will be much better if one gives his views and beliefs (which one

follows

by his heart in his analysis) rather than making a general statement or

saying that all theories are good and use depends on user.

 

Also what is the fault if someone asks something stating that he is a

" new

comer " and then he writes something which proves that he has " some

knowhow " .

I hope that is not a sin, as it seems to have been pointed out many times

to

different people in this and other groups.!!

 

I think it is an essential quality of any great astrologer to be able to

give short crisp replies (without too many gneralizations) which make a

lot

of sense.

 

Anyhow your efforts are fully appreciated.

 

ॠनमः शिवाय

RKM

 

 

 

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

 

> If You mean that I have replied the query in

> many more lines, and not made sense, then its

> your view. But till the time James Braha ( I

> do not know him )is not here, you will have to

> make do with longer replies of less sense, or

> else attempt to put the reply.

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Mrs. Wendy

 

Someone may have read a book or two & learned some terms and simple rules

but may still be a " new comer " due to lack of experience and use in real

life.

 

This would be the case with most of people who join astro groups.

And the worst most people can deceive (by loud crying or over display of

emotions and urgency) is to get some free views from multiple people, which

would also in the end lead to learning, which is good after all.

 

ॠनमः शिवाय

RKM

 

 

On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya

wrote:

 

> Rajeev,

>

> //Also what is the fault if someone asks something stating that he is a

> " new

> comer " and then he writes something which proves that he has " some

> knowhow " .//

>

> At the very least this is simple dishonesty. At worst it's a deliberate

> deception in order to achieve an objective.

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

> http://JyotishVidya.com

> ___

>

> -

> " RKM " <rajeevmundra <rajeevmundra%40gmail.com>>

> <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>>

> Friday, July 04, 2008 5:05 PM

> Re: Re: Bhav Chalit

>

> Bhaskar ji

>

> As it is, by now I am sure every new comer in astro world knows, that

> there

> are atleast 100 prominent astro theories and any planet placement can be

> proved by some theory to give all kinds of effects.

>

> > > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > > astrologer.

>

> Astrology as it is full of ifs and buts.

> It will be much better if one gives his views and beliefs (which one

> follows

> by his heart in his analysis) rather than making a general statement or

> saying that all theories are good and use depends on user.

>

> Also what is the fault if someone asks something stating that he is a

> " new

> comer " and then he writes something which proves that he has " some

> knowhow " .

> I hope that is not a sin, as it seems to have been pointed out many times

> to

> different people in this and other groups.!!

>

> I think it is an essential quality of any great astrologer to be able to

> give short crisp replies (without too many gneralizations) which make a

> lot

> of sense.

>

> Anyhow your efforts are fully appreciated.

>

> ॠनमः शिवाय

> RKM

>

> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Bhaskar

<bhaskar_jyotish<bhaskar_jyotish%40.co.in>

> >

> wrote:

>

> > If You mean that I have replied the query in

> > many more lines, and not made sense, then its

> > your view. But till the time James Braha ( I

> > do not know him )is not here, you will have to

> > make do with longer replies of less sense, or

> > else attempt to put the reply.

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

>

>

>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Rajeevji,

 

Without prolonging this thread and concluding it

from my end, I wish you had given me the following

advice when you spoke to me on length at dinner time,

a fortnight ago, for full 80 minutes,

( Having delayed my dinner at cost of trouble

to my wife) to have Your fathers horoscope rectified

and plus answers sought to more than 20 Queries, which

I did selflessly, though never knew

about you, and was talking to a stranger, at

that point of time , who was looking for help.

Also when i wrote in length about the chart,

in the other forum where you queried too,

I was not given this advice. I will keep

this advice in mind now, for actually I

too want to be a great astrologer some day,

in my Life, so let me learn to emulate what

is expected of great astrologers.

 

You have adviced me today -

// I think it is an essential quality of any

great astrologer to be able to > give short

crisp replies (without too many gneralizations)

which make a lot > of sense. //

 

In future I must not be expected to reply

to any query of yours for I will not be

able to meet the expectations for quite

many years, as I enjoy explaining and writing

in full flow as the thoughts arise in my mind,

so that the subject understands the object of

my literal endevaours though I may become the

object of ridicule at times, as seen today,

it would not matter to me, for I would have the

peace and contentment in my conscience

of having done my job honestly and with

full commitment to my duty undertaken.

 

best wishes,

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

jyotish-vidya , RKM <rajeevmundra wrote:

>

> Bhaskar ji

>

> As it is, by now I am sure every new comer in astro world knows,

that there

> are atleast 100 prominent astro theories and any planet placement

can be

> proved by some theory to give all kinds of effects.

>

> > > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > > astrologer.

>

> Astrology as it is full of ifs and buts.

> It will be much better if one gives his views and beliefs (which

one follows

> by his heart in his analysis) rather than making a general

statement or

> saying that all theories are good and use depends on user.

>

> Also what is the fault if someone asks something stating that he is

a " new

> comer " and then he writes something which proves that he has " some

knowhow " .

> I hope that is not a sin, as it seems to have been pointed out many

times to

> different people in this and other groups.!!

>

> I think it is an essential quality of any great astrologer to be

able to

> give short crisp replies (without too many gneralizations) which

make a lot

> of sense.

>

> Anyhow your efforts are fully appreciated.

>

> ॠनमः शिवाय

> RKM

>

>

>

> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 11:24 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish

> wrote:

>

> > If You mean that I have replied the query in

> > many more lines, and not made sense, then its

> > your view. But till the time James Braha ( I

> > do not know him )is not here, you will have to

> > make do with longer replies of less sense, or

> > else attempt to put the reply.

> >

> > regards,

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> >

> > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%

40>,

> > RKM <rajeevmundra@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Check out James Braha

> > > He would have probably replied to the same query in 2 lines and

> > made 10

> > > times more sense.

> > >

> > > ॠनमः शिवाय

> > > RKM

> > > www.EagleEyeTrade.com

> > >

> > > On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 10:09 AM, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> >

> > > wrote:

> > >

> > > > Dear Shaswaat,

> > > >

> > > > You first queried about what is different

> > > > between Bhav Madhya and Bhava start. After

> > > > you got a reply from me, you used

> > > > the word KP in Your reply, which means you

> > > > already know about what you are talking

> > > > about.

> > > >

> > > > Just like any type of scissor is good in

> > > > the hands of a expert haircutter, any

> > > > approach is good in the hands of a expert

> > > > astrologer.

> > > >

> > > > Authenticity is a seperate matter.

> > > > Falit is a seperate matter.

> > > >

> > > > The best way to know the difference

> > > > between both, is to use your

> > > > own chart as a sample Chart, and make

> > > > 2 charts by both methods. Next check

> > > > the results accruing from both approaches,

> > > > which ones match your Life better.

> > > >

> > > > This is the way to check and

> > > > conclude,what you are asking for.

> > > >

> > > > As mentioned, we are not talking about

> > > > any other methods of approaches in

> > > > this Forum, and as you already know

> > > > therotetically good enough on this subject,

> > > > I will now not answer any further,

> > > > on this subject matter.

> > > >

> > > > regards,

> > > > Bhaskar.

> > > >

> > > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%

40><jyotish-vidya%

> > 40>, OK

> > > > <sincere_ok@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > > > Thanks for explanation.In fact i am new to this

> > > > > Group but i am trying to learn Astrology by books

> > > > > from last two years.As you said it is used in Parashari

> > > > > but Bhav start is used in KP too.What is the basic

difference?

> > > > > and its results of both in Falit.

> > > > > As i know planets before 15 Anshas are placed in Bhav start

> > > > > and after 15 degree placed in Bhav Madya but again result on

> > > > > Falit and which is more authentic?

> > > > > Thanks again!

> > > > >

> > > > > Yours

> > > > > Shaaswat

> > > > >

> > > > > --- On Fri, 7/4/08, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish@>

> > > > > Re: Bhav Chalit

> > > > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%

40><jyotish-vidya%

> > 40>

> > > > > Friday, July 4, 2008, 12:04 AM

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Shaaswat,

> > > > >

> > > > > I find it strange that you are a newcomer,

> > > > > and yet asking about Bhav Start and Bhava

> > > > > Middle, which is not a subject matter of

> > > > > discussion for the newcomers. I do not

> > > > > know even many Experts who would be able

> > > > > to dicsuss about this convincingly,

> > > > > in my years of journey into astrology.

> > > > > This is based on mathematical

> > > > > divsions of House Borders.

> > > > >

> > > > > What do you already know about this, if

> > > > > you are able to tell us, then you can

> > > > > be helped better, if we may be able to.

> > > > >

> > > > > But there are seperate approaches

> > > > > to this in Falit jyotish.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhava Madhya or Bhava Middle is the

> > > > > Parashari way of approach. Bhava

> > > > > Start is the Placidus way of approach.

> > > > >

> > > > > Both are equally important to those who

> > > > > to each of these views.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am sure you know about the House

> > > > > divsions in vogue. In this Group

> > > > > we are following the Parashari Vedic

> > > > > system strictly.

> > > > >

> > > > > Let us have your views now.

> > > > >

> > > > > Bhaskar.

> > > > >

> > > > > jyotish-vidya, OK <sincere_ok@ ...>

> > wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear learned astrologers,

> > > > > > I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> > > > > > I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> > > > > > " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> > > > > > is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> > > > > > Thanks!

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Regards

> > > > > > Shaaswat

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear All,

 

So, " Bhava-Chalit " is essentially the " Divided House System " ??

 

- Vic

 

On Jul 2, 2008, at 10:41 AM, OK wrote:

 

> Dear learned astrologers,

> I am new to the Group and trying to learn Astrology.

> I have some confusions about " BHAV - Start " and

> " BHAAV-MIDDLE " which is more important and what

> is the significance of them in FALIT JYOTISH.

> Thanks!

>

> Regards

> Shaaswat

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Sorry for bringing this topic again. I am reading the book 'Jyotish Ganith evam

Khagol Shastra' by Sh Vimal Prasad Jain. An extremely good book indeed. I would

recommend to all newcomers to read this and clear your basics.

 

One question: this book explains how to calculate Bhav Madhya. This is done by

calculating the 10th (dasham) bhav madhya at the time of birth by seeing in

Lashiris Ephemeris and than calculating the diff with lagna and than dividing by

6 to arrive at a constant by which you can arrive at subsequent bhav sandhi or

madhya starting from 10th. Naturally the lagna calculated is treated as madhya

for 1st.

 

Is this the widely accepted method? Mr jain has not mentioned whose method is

this but he does mentions that there are several opinions. Can somebody please

put light on this? Who discovered bhav madhya? What are different opinions?

 

 

Sincerely Yours,

 

Amit Baid

 

Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respected Bhaskarji and other leraned members,As explained by bhsakar ji and amit baid ji :-Bhava Chalit is really is spcetroscopy which gives accurate posiiton of planet interms of houses and other relavite planetary positions.however if you have come acorss fortuna's software :1) chalit chart : Chalit chart displayed in kundali or j hora2) Niryana Bhava Chalit : Kind of cusp as shown in kundliBhaskar ji :What is difference in both method which is most prcise ?Thanks Vijay Purohit.--- On Wed, 6/1/10, amit.baid <amit.baid wrote:amit.baid <amit.baid Bhav Chalit Date: Wednesday, 6 January, 2010, 2:19 AMSorry for bringing this topic again. I am reading the book 'Jyotish Ganith evam Khagol Shastra' by Sh Vimal Prasad Jain. An extremely good book indeed. I would recommend to all newcomers to read this and clear your basics. One question: this book explains how to calculate Bhav Madhya. This is done by calculating the 10th (dasham) bhav madhya at the time of birth by seeing in Lashiris Ephemeris and than calculating the diff with lagna and than dividing by 6 to arrive at a constant by which you can arrive at subsequent bhav sandhi or madhya starting from 10th. Naturally the lagna calculated is treated as madhya for 1st. Is this the widely accepted method? Mr jain has not mentioned whose

method is this but he does mentions that there are several opinions. Can somebody please put light on this? Who discovered bhav madhya? What are different opinions?Sincerely Yours,Amit BaidSent from BlackBerry® on Airtel---

Link to comment
Share on other sites

//1) chalit chart : Chalit chart displayed in kundali or j hora

 

 

2) Niryana Bhava Chalit : Kind of cusp as shown in kundli

//

 

I think both are same

 

Vijay

 

 

, vijay Purohit

<vijaypurohit09 wrote:

>

> Respected Bhaskarji and other leraned members,

> As explained by bhsakar ji and amit baid ji :-

> Bhava Chalit is really is spcetroscopy which gives accurate posiiton of planet

interms of houses and other relavite planetary positions.

> however if you have come acorss fortuna's software :

> 1) chalit chart  : Chalit chart displayed in kundali or j hora

>

> 2) Niryana Bhava Chalit : Kind of cusp as shown in kundli

>

> Bhaskar ji :What is difference in both method which is most prcise ?

> Thanks Vijay Purohit.

> --- On Wed, 6/1/10, amit.baid <amit.baid wrote:

>

> amit.baid <amit.baid

> Bhav Chalit

>

> Wednesday, 6 January, 2010, 2:19 AM

>

> Sorry for bringing this topic again. I am reading the book 'Jyotish Ganith

evam Khagol Shastra' by Sh Vimal Prasad Jain. An extremely good book indeed.. I

would recommend to all newcomers to read this and clear your basics.

>

> One question: this book explains how to calculate Bhav Madhya. This is done by

calculating the 10th (dasham) bhav madhya at the time of birth by seeing in

Lashiris Ephemeris and than calculating the diff with lagna and than dividing by

6 to arrive at a constant by which you can arrive at subsequent bhav sandhi or

madhya starting from 10th. Naturally the lagna calculated is treated as madhya

for 1st.

>

> Is this the widely accepted method? Mr jain has not mentioned whose method is

this but he does mentions that there are several opinions. Can somebody please

put light on this? Who discovered bhav madhya? What are different opinions?

>

>

> Sincerely Yours,

>

> Amit Baid

>

> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

>

> ---

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Respected Vijay ji,I have a chart in which both have diffn :Say for example :Leo Lagna 12 :41 degeeMoon in 6th house 28 degree Mars in 2nd house 3 degreeVenus in 2nd house 9 degreeIn Chalit Chart :Moon is in 7th house Where as Niryana Bhava Chalit :Mars and Venus come back to 1st house where as moon is in 6th house.In parashar light 6.0 chlit version-chart as mentioned above comes in Shripati -Bhava Kindali.Kindly enlighten.Regards,Vijay Purohit.--- On Wed, 6/1/10, vijay.goel

<goyalvj wrote:vijay.goel <goyalvj Re: Bhav Chalit Date: Wednesday, 6 January, 2010, 5:22 PM

 

 

//1) chalit chart : Chalit chart displayed in kundali or j hora

 

2) Niryana Bhava Chalit : Kind of cusp as shown in kundli

//

 

I think both are same

 

Vijay

 

ancient_indian_ astrology, vijay Purohit <vijaypurohit09@ ...> wrote:

>

> Respected Bhaskarji and other leraned members,

> As explained by bhsakar ji and amit baid ji :-

> Bhava Chalit is really is spcetroscopy which gives accurate posiiton of planet interms of houses and other relavite planetary positions.

> however if you have come acorss fortuna's software :

> 1) chalit chart : Chalit chart displayed in kundali or j hora

>

> 2) Niryana Bhava Chalit : Kind of cusp as shown in kundli

>

> Bhaskar ji :What is difference in both method which is most prcise ?

> Thanks Vijay Purohit.

> --- On Wed, 6/1/10, amit.baid@.. . <amit.baid@. ..> wrote:

>

> amit.baid@.. . <amit.baid@. ..>

> [ancient_indian_ astrology] Bhav Chalit

> ancient_indian_ astrology

> Wednesday, 6 January, 2010, 2:19 AM

>

> Sorry for bringing this topic again. I am reading the book 'Jyotish Ganith evam Khagol Shastra' by Sh Vimal Prasad Jain. An extremely good book indeed.. I would recommend to all newcomers to read this and clear your basics.

>

> One question: this book explains how to calculate Bhav Madhya. This is done by calculating the 10th (dasham) bhav madhya at the time of birth by seeing in Lashiris Ephemeris and than calculating the diff with lagna and than dividing by 6 to arrive at a constant by which you can arrive at subsequent bhav sandhi or madhya starting from 10th. Naturally the lagna calculated is treated as madhya for 1st.

>

> Is this the widely accepted method? Mr jain has not mentioned whose method is this but he does mentions that there are several opinions. Can somebody please put light on this? Who discovered bhav madhya? What are different opinions?

>

>

> Sincerely Yours,

>

> Amit Baid

>

> Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

>

> ------------ --------- --------- ------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Purohitji,

 

Please check the various options in Jhora for erecting Bhava Chalit chart.

You will see the difference.

 

Thankyou,

Vijay Goel

Jaipur.

 

 

 

, vijay Purohit

<vijaypurohit09 wrote:

>

> Respected Vijay ji,

> I have a chart in which both have diffn :

> Say for example :

> Leo Lagna 12 :41 degee

> Moon in 6th house 28 degree 

> Mars in 2nd house 3 degree

> Venus in 2nd house 9 degree

> In Chalit Chart :

> Moon is in 7th house 

> Where as Niryana Bhava Chalit :

> Mars and Venus come back to 1st house where as moon is in 6th house.

> In parashar light 6.0  chlit version-chart as mentioned above comes in

Shripati -Bhava Kindali.

> Kindly enlighten.

> Regards,Vijay Purohit.

>

> --- On Wed, 6/1/10, vijay.goel <goyalvj wrote:

>

> vijay.goel <goyalvj

> Re: Bhav Chalit

>

> Wednesday, 6 January, 2010, 5:22 PM

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

>

>

>

//1) chalit chart : Chalit chart displayed in kundali or j hora

>

>

>

> 2) Niryana Bhava Chalit : Kind of cusp as shown in kundli

>

> //

>

>

>

> I think both are same

>

>

>

> Vijay

>

>

>

> ancient_indian_ astrology, vijay Purohit

<vijaypurohit09@ ...> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > Respected Bhaskarji and other leraned members,

>

> > As explained by bhsakar ji and amit baid ji :-

>

> > Bhava Chalit is really is spcetroscopy which gives accurate posiiton of

planet interms of houses and other relavite planetary positions.

>

> > however if you have come acorss fortuna's software :

>

> > 1) chalit chart  : Chalit chart displayed in kundali or j hora

>

> >

>

> > 2) Niryana Bhava Chalit : Kind of cusp as shown in kundli

>

> >

>

> > Bhaskar ji :What is difference in both method which is most prcise ?

>

> > Thanks Vijay Purohit.

>

> > --- On Wed, 6/1/10, amit.baid@ . <amit.baid@ ..> wrote:

>

> >

>

> > amit.baid@ . <amit.baid@ ..>

>

> > [ancient_indian_ astrology] Bhav Chalit

>

> > ancient_indian_ astrology

>

> > Wednesday, 6 January, 2010, 2:19 AM

>

> >

>

> > Sorry for bringing this topic again. I am reading the book 'Jyotish Ganith

evam Khagol Shastra' by Sh Vimal Prasad Jain. An extremely good book indeed.. I

would recommend to all newcomers to read this and clear your basics.

>

> >

>

> > One question: this book explains how to calculate Bhav Madhya. This is done

by calculating the 10th (dasham) bhav madhya at the time of birth by seeing in

Lashiris Ephemeris and than calculating the diff with lagna and than dividing by

6 to arrive at a constant by which you can arrive at subsequent bhav sandhi or

madhya starting from 10th. Naturally the lagna calculated is treated as madhya

for 1st.

>

> >

>

> > Is this the widely accepted method? Mr jain has not mentioned whose method

is this but he does mentions that there are several opinions. Can somebody

please put light on this? Who discovered bhav madhya? What are different

opinions?

>

> >

>

> >

>

> > Sincerely Yours,

>

> >

>

> > Amit Baid

>

> >

>

> > Sent from BlackBerry® on Airtel

>

> >

>

> > ------------ --------- --------- ------

>

> >

>

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...