If Space was not here, then what would be ?

February 22, 2010

Empty space was always there.

The stars, planets and the space around it, what we call as outerspace has come into it.

We expanded from something (ether ?) in that nothing ( empty space ) - Rahu effect ?

And it is being feared that we will go back into that small spot/dot in nothingness - Ketu effect ? - according to those who are studying black holes.

All this is relative to time which is constant. If time is not factored in then ... we are being created and destroyed all the time.

Upto that time let us sit back and enjoy.

So even a small dot is full of a Universe.

The scriptures of ancient India have given a more plausible and exhaustive explanation than any modern science has.

But we are too cut off and r trying to reinvent the wheel.

There was a hindi poem in school extolling the virtues of the smallest - like a grain of sand, drop of water and second of time - ( Kshan ), ---- Kshan ko shudra na samjho bhai who jag ka nirmata hai.

Einstein Albert--- On Mon, 22/2/10, Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

Bhaskar <bhaskar_jyotish If Space was not here, then what would be ? Date: Monday, 22 February, 2010, 5:02 PM

Dear friends,This can be mind boggling, so do not think for more than 30 minutes, asit can make a person go mad.Just think, if the space with its stars, planets and Constellations andgalaxies, was NOT HERE, then what would have been in its place ?And suppose this place was not here, then what would have been in itsplace ?From where did this empty place-space come ? And if we remove thisplace-space then what would remain ?Bhaskar.

Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

February 22, 2010

Dear Bhaskar ji,//> Just think, if the space with its stars, planets and Constellations

and> galaxies, was NOT HERE, then what would have been in its place ?// Naturally the dilute STUFF as we can expect instead of the concentrated STUFF that is stars, planets and galaxies. i.e. Prakriti (Goddess Devi)//> And suppose this place was not here, then what would have been in its> place ?// Naturally Time and Chaitanya (Kala and Purusha; or better Kala-purusha) as we can expect. i.e. Purusha (Siva).//> From where did this empty place-space come ? And if we remove this> place-space then what would remain ?// It never came or went. There is nothing empty within or outside. Now science knows that that even vaccum is not EMPTY! It is the stuff from where a particles and anti particles such as electrons and positrons can take birth! Vacuum is pregnant with future possibilities and potential! Place alias space is three dimensional and is Prakriti (Devi) and Time (Kala) and chitanya (not energy; but Mahakala) that lies beyond is Purusha (Siva)! Now all this cannot make us mad, because it is our limitation and we CANNOT go beyond this conceptualization! I am an agnostic (one who know that things beyond a limit CANNOT be known). This is the very reason SANKHYA limits itself to Prakriti-Purusha concept alone and does not tries to go beyond (it is impossible). Brain is stuff coupled with time (space-time) and its limit ends with space-time. That forms 1/4th of the the complete and 3/4th lies beyond says Purusha sukta; the 3/4th that is agnostic (un-knowable)! Part of Kala we can TRY to comprehend but not Mahakala (it is beyond comprehension). The STUFF we can TRYto study and comprehend with the STUFF that is our brain, but not what lies beyond. Love and regards,Sreenadh , "Bhaskar" <bhaskar_jyotish wrote:>> > Dear friends,> > This can be mind boggling, so do not think for more than 30 minutes, as> it can make a person go mad.> > Just think, if the space with its stars, planets and Constellations and> galaxies, was NOT HERE, then what would have been in its place ?> > And suppose this place was not here, then what would have been in its> place ?> > From where did this empty place-space come ? And if we remove this> place-space then what would remain ?> > Bhaskar.>

February 22, 2010

I like this

// Now all this cannot make us mad, because it is our limitation and we CANNOT go beyond this conceptualization! I am an agnostic (one who know that things beyond a limit CANNOT be known). This is the very reason SANKHYA limits itself to Prakriti-Purusha concept alone and does not tries to go beyond (it is impossible). Brain is stuff coupled with time (space-time) and its limit ends with space-time. That forms 1/4th of the the complete and 3/4th lies beyond says Purusha sukta; the 3/4th that is agnostic (un-knowable)! Part of Kala we can TRY to comprehend but not Mahakala (it is beyond comprehension). The STUFF we can TRYto study and comprehend with the STUFF that is our brain, but not what lies beyond. //

Good.

Love and regards,

Bhaskar.

, "sreesog" <sreesog wrote:>> Dear Bhaskar ji,> //> Just think, if the space with its stars, planets and Constellations > and> > galaxies, was NOT HERE, then what would have been in its place ?//> Naturally the dilute STUFF as we can expect instead of the> concentrated STUFF that is stars, planets and galaxies. i.e. Prakriti> (Goddess Devi)> //> And suppose this place was not here, then what would have been in > its> > place ?//> Naturally Time and Chaitanya (Kala and Purusha; or better> Kala-purusha) as we can expect. i.e. Purusha (Siva).> //> From where did this empty place-space come ? And if we remove this> > place-space then what would remain ?//> It never came or went. There is nothing empty within or outside. Now> science knows that that even vaccum is not EMPTY! It is the stuff from> where a particles and anti particles such as electrons and positrons can> take birth! Vacuum is pregnant with future possibilities and potential!> Place alias space is three dimensional and is Prakriti (Devi) and Time> (Kala) and chitanya (not energy; but Mahakala) that lies beyond is> Purusha (Siva)!> Now all this cannot make us mad, because it is our limitation and we> CANNOT go beyond this conceptualization! I am an agnostic (one who know> that things beyond a limit CANNOT be known). This is the very reason> SANKHYA limits itself to Prakriti-Purusha concept alone and does not> tries to go beyond (it is impossible). Brain is stuff coupled with time> (space-time) and its limit ends with space-time. That forms 1/4th of the> the complete and 3/4th lies beyond says Purusha sukta; the 3/4th that is> agnostic (un-knowable)! Part of Kala we can TRY to comprehend but not> Mahakala (it is beyond comprehension). The STUFF we can TRYto study and> comprehend with the STUFF that is our brain, but not what lies beyond.> Love and regards,> Sreenadh> > , "Bhaskar"> bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:> >> >> > Dear friends,> >> > This can be mind boggling, so do not think for more than 30 minutes,> as> > it can make a person go mad.> >> > Just think, if the space with its stars, planets and Constellations> and> > galaxies, was NOT HERE, then what would have been in its place ?> >> > And suppose this place was not here, then what would have been in its> > place ?> >> > From where did this empty place-space come ? And if we remove this> > place-space then what would remain ?> >> > Bhaskar.> >>

February 22, 2010

//So even a small dot is full of a Universe.//

Good.

Love and regards,

Bhaskar.

, chiranjiv mehta

<vchiranjiv wrote:

>

> Empty space was always there.

> The stars, planets and the space around it, what we call as outerspace

has come into it.

> We expanded from something (ether ?)Â in that nothing ( empty space

)Â - Rahu effect ?

> And it is being feared that we will go back into that smallÂ

spot/dot inÂ nothingness - Ketu effect ? - according to those who are

studying black holes.

> All this is relative to time which is constant. If time is not

factored in then ... we are being created and destroyed all the time.

> Â

> Upto that time let us sit back and enjoy.

> Â

> So even a small dot is full of a Universe.

> Â

> The scriptures of ancient India have given a more plausible and

exhaustive explanation than any modern science has.

> But we are too cut off and r trying to reinvent the wheel.

> There was a hindi poem in school extolling the virtues of the smallest

- like a grain of sand, drop of water and second of time - ( Kshan ),

---- Kshan ko shudra na samjho bhai who jag ka nirmata hai.

>

> Einstein Albert

>

> --- On Mon, 22/2/10, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

> Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish

> If Space was not here, then what

would be ?

>

> Monday, 22 February, 2010, 5:02 PM

>

> Â

>

> Dear friends,

>

> This can be mind boggling, so do not think for more than 30 minutes,

as

> it can make a person go mad.

>

> Just think, if the space with its stars, planets and Constellations

and

> galaxies, was NOT HERE, then what would have been in its place ?

>

> And suppose this place was not here, then what would have been in its

> place ?

>

> From where did this empty place-space come ? And if we remove this

> place-space then what would remain ?

>

> Bhaskar.

>

Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!

http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/

>

February 22, 2010

Dear Chiranjiv ji, //Kshan ko shudra na samjho bhai who jag ka nirmata hai.// I think may be the word used is here is kshudra (small; unworthy) and not shudra. In tune with your thoughts a small sanskrit saying comes to my mind - "Na kshudramiha kinchit, nanupayogi kinchit" (There is nothing unworthy in this universe, there is nothing useless in this universe). By the way, at times we use this statement to say "Na kshudramiha kinchit" (There is nothing called Kshudra in here) to console believers from an astrological perspective. Oh! I should explain the tantric astrological perspective of this word also then - Kshudra - meaning, "small bad deed". Possibly small tantric acts done to disturb others. Abhichara - meaning, "big bad deed". Possibly big tantric acts done to disturb and destroy others.Love and regards,Sreenadh , chiranjiv mehta <vchiranjiv wrote:>> Empty space was always there.> The stars, planets and the space around it, what we call as outerspace has come into it.> We expanded from something (ether ?)Â in that nothing ( empty space )Â - Rahu effect ?> And it is being feared that we will go back into that smallÂ spot/dot inÂ nothingness - Ketu effect ? - according to those who are studying black holes.> All this is relative to time which is constant. If time is not factored in then ... we are being created and destroyed all the time.> Â > Upto that time let us sit back and enjoy.> Â > So even a small dot is full of a Universe.> Â > The scriptures of ancient India have given a more plausible and exhaustive explanation than any modern science has.> But we are too cut off and r trying to reinvent the wheel.> There was a hindi poem in school extolling the virtues of the smallest - like a grain of sand, drop of water and second of time - ( Kshan ), ---- Kshan ko shudra na samjho bhai who jag ka nirmata hai.> > > Einstein Albert> > > --- On Mon, 22/2/10, Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish wrote:> > > Bhaskar bhaskar_jyotish If Space was not here, then what would be ?> > Monday, 22 February, 2010, 5:02 PM> > > Â > > > > > Dear friends,> > This can be mind boggling, so do not think for more than 30 minutes, as> it can make a person go mad.> > Just think, if the space with its stars, planets and Constellations and> galaxies, was NOT HERE, then what would have been in its place ?> > And suppose this place was not here, then what would have been in its> place ?> > From where did this empty place-space come ? And if we remove this> place-space then what would remain ?> > Bhaskar.> > > > > > > > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/>