Phaladeepika: Su/Sa in Lagna in own house/exaltation

[Guest guest]

Phaladeepika says:

If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person concerned will

be night-blind.

 

This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good

 

Phaladeepika says:

If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house identical

with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the king, a

chief or mayor of a city.

 

This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is very

good

 

Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own

sign/exaltation in lagna

 

Thanks

Kiran

[Guest guest]

Dont know. You please tell us...

 

, " kiran.rama " <kiran.rama

wrote:

>

>

> Phaladeepika says:

> If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person concerned will

> be night-blind.

>

> This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good

>

> Phaladeepika says:

> If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house identical

> with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the king, a

> chief or mayor of a city.

>

> This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is very

> good

>

> Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own

> sign/exaltation in lagna

>

> Thanks

> Kiran

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhaskar ji,

 

Can you stop being sarcastic please?

 

If you don't want to participate, it does'nt hurt to be silent.

Your non-participation does'nt hurt me

 

Thanks

Kiran

 

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dont know. You please tell us...

>

> , " kiran.rama " <kiran.rama@>

wrote:

> >

> >

> > Phaladeepika says:

> > If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person concerned will

> > be night-blind.

> >

> > This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good

> >

> > Phaladeepika says:

> > If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house identical

> > with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the king, a

> > chief or mayor of a city.

> >

> > This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is very

> > good

> >

> > Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own

> > sign/exaltation in lagna

> >

> > Thanks

> > Kiran

> >

>

[Guest guest]

People with sun (any sign) in lagna or influencing 2nd lord are often seen with

vision problems, high myopia etc. This should be treated as a starting point and

not black and white good or bad...

 

RR_,

 

vedic astrology , " kiran.rama " <kiran.rama wrote:

>

> Phaladeepika says:

> If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person concerned will

> be night-blind.

>

> This means that Sun in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is not good

>

> Phaladeepika says:

> If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house identical

> with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the king, a

> chief or mayor of a city.

>

> This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is very

> good

>

> Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own

> sign/exaltation in lagna

>

> Thanks

> Kiran

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Kran ji,

 

I am not being Sarcastic.

 

I am a very straightforward person. I did not know the answer hence

asked you to enlighten about the same.. You seem to know what most of us

do not know here, at least that is what the impression we have received

from your style of writing, hence my Queries are to be treated as

innocent seeking of doubts please.

 

I know my non-participation would not hurt you.. You would be glad on

the contrary, if some one does not question you.

 

But maybe your participaton does hurt me when I do not agree with all

whatever you write and your style of writing which gives the impressions

that all are dumb idiots o'er here..

 

best wishes,

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " kiran.rama "

<kiran.rama wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> Can you stop being sarcastic please?

>

> If you don't want to participate, it does'nt hurt to be silent.

> Your non-participation does'nt hurt me

>

> Thanks

> Kiran

>

> , " Bhaskar "

bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> >

> > Dont know. You please tell us...

> >

> > , " kiran.rama "

<kiran.rama@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person

concerned will

> > > be night-blind.

> > >

> > > This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good

> > >

> > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house

identical

> > > with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the

king, a

> > > chief or mayor of a city.

> > >

> > > This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is

very

> > > good

> > >

> > > Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own

> > > sign/exaltation in lagna

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > > Kiran

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Namaste:

 

Here are the two versions for blindness:

 

By Shanmukha:

 

http://sutramritam.blogspot.com/2010/01/jaimini-on-blindness.html

 

By Rafal Gendarz:

 

http://rohinaa.com/om/index.php/categoryblog/144-loss-of-sigth

 

Regards:

Hemanth

----

 

" Sense of Distinction and of good and evil is bound to persist so long as

one does not realize God " - Ramakrishna Paramahamsa

 

 

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 5:25 PM, rohinicrystal <jyotish_vaniwrote:

 

>

>

> People with sun (any sign) in lagna or influencing 2nd lord are often seen

> with vision problems, high myopia etc. This should be treated as a starting

> point and not black and white good or bad...

>

> RR_,

>

>

> vedic astrology <vedic astrology%40>,

> " kiran.rama " <kiran.rama wrote:

> >

> > Phaladeepika says:

> > If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person concerned will

> > be night-blind.

> >

> > This means that Sun in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is not good

> >

> > Phaladeepika says:

> > If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house identical

> > with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the king, a

> > chief or mayor of a city.

> >

> > This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is very

> > good

> >

> > Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own

> > sign/exaltation in lagna

> >

> > Thanks

> > Kiran

> >

>

>

>

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Bhaskar ji,

 

I am sorry if my writing style has offended you.

 

I have a lot of respect for the group and you - there are learned folks like

Sreenadhji, Neelamji, Sunilji, Renuji and yourself on the forum and I look

forward to learning from all of you

 

thanks

Kiran

 

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

>

> Dear Kran ji,

>

> I am not being Sarcastic.

>

> I am a very straightforward person. I did not know the answer hence

> asked you to enlighten about the same.. You seem to know what most of us

> do not know here, at least that is what the impression we have received

> from your style of writing, hence my Queries are to be treated as

> innocent seeking of doubts please.

>

> I know my non-participation would not hurt you.. You would be glad on

> the contrary, if some one does not question you.

>

> But maybe your participaton does hurt me when I do not agree with all

> whatever you write and your style of writing which gives the impressions

> that all are dumb idiots o'er here..

>

> best wishes,

>

> Bhaskar.

, " kiran.rama "

> <kiran.rama@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> >

> > Can you stop being sarcastic please?

> >

> > If you don't want to participate, it does'nt hurt to be silent.

> > Your non-participation does'nt hurt me

> >

> > Thanks

> > Kiran

> >

> > , " Bhaskar "

> bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > >

> > > Dont know. You please tell us...

> > >

> > > , " kiran.rama "

> <kiran.rama@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > > If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person

> concerned will

> > > > be night-blind.

> > > >

> > > > This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good

> > > >

> > > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > > If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house

> identical

> > > > with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the

> king, a

> > > > chief or mayor of a city.

> > > >

> > > > This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is

> very

> > > > good

> > > >

> > > > Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own

> > > > sign/exaltation in lagna

> > > >

> > > > Thanks

> > > > Kiran

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Kiran ji,

 

No please. I am not looking for any sorry. Its just that if someone is

poor, then please do not remind them of their poverty. We are really not

so knowledgable and every Posting of yours is a missile testing us for

inputs, which finally you answer. Instead of missiles if could have some

breakfast and brunch from you, we will be well fed and happy to discuss.

 

Discussions and analysis or predictive principles discussed without

references to texts or the why of same, could give us a better and

practical understanding.

 

But these are just my personal views which you need to have to follow or

be in conformity with. You may continue please with whatever you are

upto, and ignore my views as a rumbling of a person who is really poor.

I am sorry for disturbing the flow of your mails. Sincerely apologise

for same.

 

best wishes,

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " kiran.rama "

<kiran.rama wrote:

>

> Dear Bhaskar ji,

>

> I am sorry if my writing style has offended you.

>

> I have a lot of respect for the group and you - there are learned

folks like Sreenadhji, Neelamji, Sunilji, Renuji and yourself on the

forum and I look forward to learning from all of you

>

> thanks

> Kiran

>

> , " Bhaskar "

bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear Kran ji,

> >

> > I am not being Sarcastic.

> >

> > I am a very straightforward person. I did not know the answer hence

> > asked you to enlighten about the same.. You seem to know what most

of us

> > do not know here, at least that is what the impression we have

received

> > from your style of writing, hence my Queries are to be treated as

> > innocent seeking of doubts please.

> >

> > I know my non-participation would not hurt you.. You would be glad

on

> > the contrary, if some one does not question you.

> >

> > But maybe your participaton does hurt me when I do not agree with

all

> > whatever you write and your style of writing which gives the

impressions

> > that all are dumb idiots o'er here..

> >

> > best wishes,

> >

> > Bhaskar.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > , " kiran.rama "

> > <kiran.rama@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > >

> > > Can you stop being sarcastic please?

> > >

> > > If you don't want to participate, it does'nt hurt to be silent.

> > > Your non-participation does'nt hurt me

> > >

> > > Thanks

> > > Kiran

> > >

> > > , " Bhaskar "

> > bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dont know. You please tell us...

> > > >

> > > > , " kiran.rama "

> > <kiran.rama@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > > > If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person

> > concerned will

> > > > > be night-blind.

> > > > >

> > > > > This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good

> > > > >

> > > > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > > > If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house

> > identical

> > > > > with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the

> > king, a

> > > > > chief or mayor of a city.

> > > > >

> > > > > This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna

is

> > very

> > > > > good

> > > > >

> > > > > Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa

own

> > > > > sign/exaltation in lagna

> > > > >

> > > > > Thanks

> > > > > Kiran

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

//But these are just my personal views which you need to have to follow

or

be in conformity with.//

 

Please read above as -

 

//But these are just my personal views which you need NOT have to to

follow or

be in conformity with. //

 

 

 

 

 

 

, " Bhaskar "

<bhaskar_jyotish wrote:

>

>

> Dear Kiran ji,

>

> No please. I am not looking for any sorry. Its just that if someone is

> poor, then please do not remind them of their poverty. We are really

not

> so knowledgable and every Posting of yours is a missile testing us for

> inputs, which finally you answer. Instead of missiles if could have

some

> breakfast and brunch from you, we will be well fed and happy to

discuss.

>

> Discussions and analysis or predictive principles discussed without

> references to texts or the why of same, could give us a better and

> practical understanding.

>

> But these are just my personal views which you need to have to follow

or

> be in conformity with. You may continue please with whatever you are

> upto, and ignore my views as a rumbling of a person who is really

poor.

> I am sorry for disturbing the flow of your mails. Sincerely apologise

> for same.

>

> best wishes,

>

> Bhaskar.

>

>

, " kiran.rama "

> kiran.rama@ wrote:

> >

> > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> >

> > I am sorry if my writing style has offended you.

> >

> > I have a lot of respect for the group and you - there are learned

> folks like Sreenadhji, Neelamji, Sunilji, Renuji and yourself on the

> forum and I look forward to learning from all of you

> >

> > thanks

> > Kiran

> >

> > , " Bhaskar "

> bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Kran ji,

> > >

> > > I am not being Sarcastic.

> > >

> > > I am a very straightforward person. I did not know the answer

hence

> > > asked you to enlighten about the same.. You seem to know what most

> of us

> > > do not know here, at least that is what the impression we have

> received

> > > from your style of writing, hence my Queries are to be treated as

> > > innocent seeking of doubts please.

> > >

> > > I know my non-participation would not hurt you.. You would be glad

> on

> > > the contrary, if some one does not question you.

> > >

> > > But maybe your participaton does hurt me when I do not agree with

> all

> > > whatever you write and your style of writing which gives the

> impressions

> > > that all are dumb idiots o'er here..

> > >

> > > best wishes,

> > >

> > > Bhaskar.

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > , " kiran.rama "

> > > <kiran.rama@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Bhaskar ji,

> > > >

> > > > Can you stop being sarcastic please?

> > > >

> > > > If you don't want to participate, it does'nt hurt to be silent.

> > > > Your non-participation does'nt hurt me

> > > >

> > > > Thanks

> > > > Kiran

> > > >

> > > > , " Bhaskar "

> > > bhaskar_jyotish@ wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dont know. You please tell us...

> > > > >

> > > > > , " kiran.rama "

> > > <kiran.rama@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > > > > If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person

> > > concerned will

> > > > > > be night-blind.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Phaladeepika says:

> > > > > > If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house

> > > identical

> > > > > > with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with

the

> > > king, a

> > > > > > chief or mayor of a city.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in

lagna

> is

> > > very

> > > > > > good

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa

> own

> > > > > > sign/exaltation in lagna

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Thanks

> > > > > > Kiran

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

// If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person concerned willbe night-blind. //

 

What about the Sun being placed in Lagna in other signs. One must read well

before commenting as has been done in the below statement also said by

your goodself where you are putting blame and pointing the Sun and the Sage both,

as criminals for not being good in its own sign in Lagna. But did you do some research

work for placement fo the Sun in other signs in Lagna ?

 

If in Aries for instance eye disease will be there but not blind.

If in Leo night blind-yes. If in Libra again blind. If in Cancer then inflamed

eyes and tendency of catching cataract.

 

So if a husband is finicky towards his wife, he is not considered to be a bad

husband if he is behaving so with others too. This is His NATURE.

So Your statement below is false with no strength and talks of the

truth only partly. . BUT not the full truth.

// This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good //

 

Who says that its not good in its own sign ? Because my neighbour has got

certain habits like he smokes or gets angry, I must say that he is not good ?

What is your definition of being good ? Does it mean that the planet in its

own house must give totally good results in each area or department of life,

he signifies, or the house signifies. Is this possible ? Is this practical ? Is this

wise or mature thinking ? Is Sun in its own sign in Lagna not good in other

departments ????????????????//Phaladeepika says:If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house identicalwith the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the king, achief or mayor of a city.This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is verygood.Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa ownsign/exaltation in lagna //

 

Who says that the Sage has made distinctions. You are comparing results in Your above Mail

between effects of Saturn in own sign and Exaltation sign, but have NOT taken effects of

the Sun in its Exaltation sign ? Do You know what effects the Sun will give when identical with its

Exaltation sign in the Lagna in other matters ...????

 

And you are quoting about Night blindness and comparing Sun and Saturn ????

What is the sense of this foolishness ?

Do the Sun and Saturn both represent the eyes ???

If Not, then how can You compare so ????

Will you compare prices of a Black and white versus Colour Televison Set ???

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

, "kiran.rama" <kiran.rama wrote:>> > Phaladeepika says:> If the Sun be in Leo identical with the Lagna, the person concerned will> be night-blind. > > This means that Sun in its own sign in lagna is not good> > Phaladeepika says:> If at a birth Saturn occupies his exaltation or own house identical> with the Lagna, the person concerned will be on a par with the king, a> chief or mayor of a city.> > This means that Saturn in its own sign or exaltation in lagna is very> good> > Why did the learned sage make this distinction between Su/Sa own> sign/exaltation in lagna> > Thanks> Kiran>