Guest guest Posted August 19, 2005 Report Share Posted August 19, 2005 ~Dear Anshev ji~ I compliment you on your spontaneous service to the needy ppl. Wish more experts take out time and discuss problems along with discussing intricate nuances of lal kitab Astrology vis-a vis other branches of Astrology. I have been a regular visitor of this forum,as a student of astrology and also seeking redressal of certain problems .. Though u had mentioned earlier also regarding ur System Approach method, but can u explain it for me, how its different from other methods of Astrology, mainly from Vedic. ~Regards~ Priyaa SP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 20, 2005 Report Share Posted August 20, 2005 Dear Priyaa SP ji, Namaskar, Good to hear from you. It's been long since we last talked. Thanks for your kind words of encouragement. I can't agree with you more. I wish too that the LK experts would come forward and not just come forward but share their knowledge with an intention so other eager learners can learn LK analysis & remedial methods. This is the reason I joined this forum. Re: SA, I wouldn't say that its *different* than the vedic jyotish but definately, it has its principles firmly founded on clearly understandable rules. After learning SA, if you would revisit classics like BPHS of Rishi Parashar and other such authors, things would make much more sense. For example, there is a very logical and systematic rule on how to indentify the malefics in the chart. Another example is the difference between malefic planets and weak benefics. All these simple rules have been confused in classical literature and due to that astrologers are unable to follow a fixed structure of horoscope analysis. As a result, vedic jyotish at present cannot be called 'Scientific'. Every astrologer who looks at the chart would come up with their own interpretation of things. SA eliminates these weaknesses and raises vedic jyotish to the level of 'scientific jyotish'. I hope I was able to answer all the aspects of your queries. best wishes, Anshev B. Bhardwejj lalkitab , " priyaa_s_p " <priyaa_s_p> wrote: > ~Dear Anshev ji~ > > I compliment you on your spontaneous service to the needy ppl. > > Wish more experts take out time and discuss problems along with > discussing intricate nuances of lal kitab Astrology vis-a vis other > branches of Astrology. > > I have been a regular visitor of this forum,as a student of astrology > and also seeking redressal of certain problems > . > Though u had mentioned earlier also regarding ur System Approach > method, but can u explain it for me, how its different from other > methods of Astrology, mainly from Vedic. > > ~Regards~ > > Priyaa SP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 23, 2005 Report Share Posted August 23, 2005 ~Dear Anshev ji~ ~Namaskar~ Thanx for a precise reply.I fully agree with u on the point that vedic astrologers tend to get confused at certain calculations, and all of them come to different results on the same horoscope.Do u mean to say that the calculations are made so scientific in SA system and 2 astrologers will reach the same analytical conclusions if they follow this system.If so, its very tempting to learn it.If u can suggest some initial, and simple book for this system,I shall be thankful. I have been reading all the messages and ur remedies. I am again tempted to compliment u on ur selfless services. and I have no doubt about it that ppl who serve the ppl in distress are God's specially appointed ppl. Evertyone can't do it. And everyone doesnt have such expertise also.May God bless u for all ur kind deeds. ~Regards~ Priyaa SP. lalkitab , " Anshev B Bhardwejj " <anshevb> wrote: > Dear Priyaa SP ji, > > Namaskar, > > Good to hear from you. It's been long since we last talked. Thanks > for your kind words of encouragement. > > I can't agree with you more. I wish too that the LK experts would > come forward and not just come forward but share their knowledge > with an intention so other eager learners can learn LK analysis & > remedial methods. This is the reason I joined this forum. > > Re: SA, I wouldn't say that its *different* than the vedic jyotish > but definately, it has its principles firmly founded on clearly > understandable rules. After learning SA, if you would revisit > classics like BPHS of Rishi Parashar and other such authors, things > would make much more sense. > > For example, there is a very logical and systematic rule on how to > indentify the malefics in the chart. Another example is the > difference between malefic planets and weak benefics. All these > simple rules have been confused in classical literature and due to > that astrologers are unable to follow a fixed structure of horoscope > analysis. As a result, vedic jyotish at present cannot be > called 'Scientific'. Every astrologer who looks at the chart would > come up with their own interpretation of things. SA eliminates these > weaknesses and raises vedic jyotish to the level of 'scientific > jyotish'. > > I hope I was able to answer all the aspects of your queries. > > best wishes, > Anshev B. Bhardwejj > > > > > > lalkitab , " priyaa_s_p " <priyaa_s_p> > wrote: > > ~Dear Anshev ji~ > > > > I compliment you on your spontaneous service to the needy ppl. > > > > Wish more experts take out time and discuss problems along with > > discussing intricate nuances of lal kitab Astrology vis-a vis > other > > branches of Astrology. > > > > I have been a regular visitor of this forum,as a student of > astrology > > and also seeking redressal of certain problems > > . > > Though u had mentioned earlier also regarding ur System Approach > > method, but can u explain it for me, how its different from other > > methods of Astrology, mainly from Vedic. > > > > ~Regards~ > > > > Priyaa SP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2005 Report Share Posted August 27, 2005 Namaskar Priya SP ji, Yes, SA is very systematic. There is very little possibility of major difference of opinion amongst those who would practice SA. Of course, the senior practitioners and those with lots of experience would have better insights that the newcomers, but the basic principles would not change. I would say 'Self learning course in Astrology by Prof. V. K. Choudhary ji' would be a good start. best wishes, Anshev B. Bhardwejj lalkitab , " priyaa_s_p " <priyaa_s_p> wrote: > ~Dear Anshev ji~ > > ~Namaskar~ > > Thanx for a precise reply.I fully agree with u on the point that vedic > astrologers tend to get confused at certain calculations, and all of > them come to different results on the same horoscope.Do u mean to say > that the calculations are made so scientific in SA system and 2 > astrologers will reach the same analytical conclusions if they follow > this system.If so, its very tempting to learn it.If u can suggest > some initial, and simple book for this system,I shall be thankful. > > I have been reading all the messages and ur remedies. I am again > tempted to compliment u on ur selfless services. and I have no doubt > about it that ppl who serve the ppl in distress are God's specially > appointed ppl. Evertyone can't do it. And everyone doesnt have such > expertise also.May God bless u for all ur kind deeds. > > ~Regards~ > > Priyaa SP. > > > > > > lalkitab , " Anshev B Bhardwejj " <anshevb> > wrote: > > Dear Priyaa SP ji, > > > > Namaskar, > > > > Good to hear from you. It's been long since we last talked. Thanks > > for your kind words of encouragement. > > > > I can't agree with you more. I wish too that the LK experts would > > come forward and not just come forward but share their knowledge > > with an intention so other eager learners can learn LK analysis & > > remedial methods. This is the reason I joined this forum. > > > > Re: SA, I wouldn't say that its *different* than the vedic jyotish > > but definately, it has its principles firmly founded on clearly > > understandable rules. After learning SA, if you would revisit > > classics like BPHS of Rishi Parashar and other such authors, things > > would make much more sense. > > > > For example, there is a very logical and systematic rule on how to > > indentify the malefics in the chart. Another example is the > > difference between malefic planets and weak benefics. All these > > simple rules have been confused in classical literature and due to > > that astrologers are unable to follow a fixed structure of horoscope > > analysis. As a result, vedic jyotish at present cannot be > > called 'Scientific'. Every astrologer who looks at the chart would > > come up with their own interpretation of things. SA eliminates these > > weaknesses and raises vedic jyotish to the level of 'scientific > > jyotish'. > > > > I hope I was able to answer all the aspects of your queries. > > > > best wishes, > > Anshev B. Bhardwejj > > > > > > > > > > > > lalkitab , " priyaa_s_p " <priyaa_s_p> > > wrote: > > > ~Dear Anshev ji~ > > > > > > I compliment you on your spontaneous service to the needy ppl. > > > > > > Wish more experts take out time and discuss problems along with > > > discussing intricate nuances of lal kitab Astrology vis-a vis > > other > > > branches of Astrology. > > > > > > I have been a regular visitor of this forum,as a student of > > astrology > > > and also seeking redressal of certain problems > > > . > > > Though u had mentioned earlier also regarding ur System Approach > > > method, but can u explain it for me, how its different from other > > > methods of Astrology, mainly from Vedic. > > > > > > ~Regards~ > > > > > > Priyaa SP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.