Guest guest Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 Hare Krsna Namaste to you all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight meeting on 22-04-2007. The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two parts with necessary and sufficient conditions. The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it should be connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have been 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he had already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue. And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected it. I request the learned members to throw a light on this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight meetings, of course of little use. I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes Thank you one and all Pavan Kumar. FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA RANI Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 24, 2007 Report Share Posted April 24, 2007 --- pavan kumar <pavankumargvp wrote: > Hare Krsna > > > Namaste to you all. Here is a question thrown by a > senior member of Hyderabad K.P.Astrologers > association in the recently held fortnight meeting > on 22-04-2007. > > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages > has two parts with necessary and sufficient > conditions. > > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL > should signify either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the > first condition that it should be connected to Mer > or Jup with a dual sign. > > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it > should have been 2nd CSL that is to be considered. > And he further told that he had already spoken to > Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue. > And he said that it was a printing mistake. I > strongly objected it. > > I request the learned members to throw > a light on this regard as we have many such issues > in our fortnight meetings, of course of little use. > > I feel regret for, if > any, tying mistakes > > Thank you one and all > Pavan Kumar. > > >dear sir with due permission i regret to say that sons of our guru ji had done little for the KP but the commercial angel is more in them and due to this the whole of KP students r having lot of problem , i will request the learned gurujan to keep the spirit of kp high vinay sayal > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 Dear Vinay, In my humble experience,of more than 35 yrs, I have tested and confirmed K.P. rules : that the VIIth cusp,its s/l and ss/l their nature, position and occupancy of star,sub and sub-sub accurately describe more than one marriage, etc... the Vth cusp s/l indicates love-affairs and getting pleasure out of it...the VIIIth s/l denotes sexual pleasure and functioning of genital organs,the XIth cusp s/l, fulfillment of desire etc... Further, the IInd stands for "prapthi", and as said above, the XIth for fulfillment of desire... However,K.P. rules apply fully,ONLY when the Birth Chart or Horary Chart is cast meticulously correct...and only the VIIth cusp stands for marriage... The above is my considered opinion...formed,over the years... With best wishes, L.Y.Rao. VINAY SAYAL <astrosleuthus Sent: Tuesday, 24 April, 2007 11:42:30 PMRe: Re: Plurality of marraiges --- pavan kumar <pavankumargvp@ .co. in> wrote:> Hare Krsna> > > Namaste to you all. Here is a question thrown by a> senior member of Hyderabad K.P.Astrologers> association in the recently held fortnight meeting> on 22-04-2007.> > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages> has two parts with necessary and sufficient> conditions.> > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL> should signify either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the> first condition that it should be connected to Mer> or Jup with a dual sign.> > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it> should have been 2nd CSL that is to be considered. > And he further told that he had already spoken to> Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue.> And he said that it was a printing mistake. I> strongly objected it.> > I request the learned members to throw> a light on this regard as we have many such issues> in our fortnight meetings, of course of little use.> > I feel regret for, if> any, tying mistakes> > Thank you one and all> Pavan Kumar.> > >dear sirwith due permission i regret to say that sons of ourguru ji had done little for the KP but the commercialangel is more in them and due to this the whole of KPstudents r having lot of problem , i will request thelearned gurujan to keep the spirit of kp highvinay sayal> > > > > > ____________ _________ _________ _________ _________ __ http://mail. SHOUT IT OUT! Tell everyone, from anywhere, that you're online on Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 Dear Pavan Kumar In my understanding, the 2nd Cusp is considered when one is considering a 2nd marriage. pavan kumar <pavankumargvp wrote: Hare Krsna Namaste to you all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight meeting on 22-04-2007. The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two parts with necessary and sufficient conditions. The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it should be connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have been 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he had already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue. And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected it. I request the learned members to throw a light on this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight meetings, of course of little use. I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes Thank you one and all Pavan Kumar. FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA RANI Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Good Luck Raichur A R Bombay Tel 2506 2609 Do not use anant_1608 @ I have closed that account Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check out new cars at Autos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 25, 2007 Report Share Posted April 25, 2007 Pranams to everybody. Regarding the plurality of marriages,i have my own opinion.In kp system of astrology, more than one marriage can be predicted when the 7th cuspal sublord or the star lord have any connection with mercury and jupiter with 11th bhava and occupy a dual sign except the house Virgo.But even in traditional astrology also, it said that, in a horoscope,how many number of planets along with the ruler of 7th house, have connection with the 11th house, that much number of marriage will take place to the owner of that horoscope. It is called Kalathra Dosha. Thank you Raichur-a-r <raichurar wrote: Dear Pavan Kumar In my understanding, the 2nd Cusp is considered when one is considering a 2nd marriage. pavan kumar <pavankumargvp (AT) (DOT) co.in> wrote: Hare Krsna Namaste to you all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight meeting on 22-04-2007. The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two parts with necessary and sufficient conditions. The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it should be connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have been 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he had already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue. And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected it. I request the learned members to throw a light on this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight meetings, of course of little use. I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes Thank you one and all Pavan Kumar. FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA RANI Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger Good Luck Raichur A R Bombay Tel 2506 2609 Do not use anant_1608 @ I have closed that account Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?Check out new cars at Autos. Vidhyaganapathi SHOUT IT OUT! Tell everyone, from anywhere, that you're online on Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Dear Pavan Kumar, Both of you are correct; one is referring KSK Rule One and another KSK Rule Two as mentioned in the uploaded file: KSK RULES FOR SECOND MARRIAGE. Regards, tw , pavan kumar <pavankumargvp wrote: > > Hare Krsna > > Namaste to you all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight meeting on 22-04-2007. > > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two parts with necessary and sufficient conditions. > > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it should be connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. > > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have been 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he had already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue. And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected it. > > I request the learned members to throw a light on this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight meetings, of course of little use. > > I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes > > Thank you one and all > Pavan Kumar. > > > > > FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA RANI > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 26, 2007 Report Share Posted April 26, 2007 Respected Tin Win ji, My heartfelt thanks to you for beautifully summarizing the extant rules of multimarriage that is found in the KP literature, including the recent research findings of Kanak ji. I am sure any new researcher in multimarriage rules in KP can now go a step forward with these rules to start with. Regards, Andrewtw853 <tw853 wrote: Dear Pavan Kumar,Both of you are correct; one is referring KSK Rule One and another KSK Rule Two as mentioned in the uploaded file: KSK RULES FOR SECOND MARRIAGE.Regards,tw , pavan kumar <pavankumargvp wrote:>> Hare Krsna> > Namaste to you all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight meeting on 22-04-2007.> > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two parts with necessary and sufficient conditions.> > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it should be connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign.> > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have been 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he had already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue. And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected it.> > I request the learned members to throw a light on this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight meetings, of course of little use.> > I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes> > Thank you one and all> Pavan Kumar.> > > > > > > > > > > > FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA RANI> > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger> Prof. Andrew Dutta Faculty Member The ICFAI Business School, Survey Number 156/157, Dontanapally Village, Shankerpally Mandal, R.R. District. Andhra Pradesh 501 203. India Telephone (Direct): 0-0-92470 21036 Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check out new cars at Autos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 Dear Andrew ji, Thank you for the kind words. As you're aware, it's just a reference for serious KP learners like myself. Regards, tw , andrew dutta <andrewinfinitum wrote: > > Respected Tin Win ji, > My heartfelt thanks to you for beautifully summarizing the extant rules of multimarriage that is found in the KP literature, including the recent research findings of Kanak ji. > > I am sure any new researcher in multimarriage rules in KP can now go a step forward with these rules to start with. > > > Regards, > > Andrew > > tw853 <tw853 wrote: > Dear Pavan Kumar, > > Both of you are correct; one is referring KSK Rule One and another > KSK Rule Two as mentioned in the uploaded file: KSK RULES FOR SECOND > MARRIAGE. > > Regards, > > tw > > , pavan kumar <pavankumargvp@> > wrote: > > > > Hare Krsna > > > > Namaste to you > all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad > K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight meeting on > 22-04-2007. > > > > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two parts > with necessary and sufficient conditions. > > > > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify > either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it should be > connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. > > > > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have been > 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he had > already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this issue. > And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected it. > > > > I request the learned members to throw a light on > this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight meetings, of > course of little use. > > > > I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes > > > > Thank you one and all > > Pavan Kumar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA RANI > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > Prof. Andrew Dutta > Faculty Member > The ICFAI Business School, > Survey Number 156/157, > Dontanapally Village, Shankerpally Mandal, > R.R. District. Andhra Pradesh 501 203. India > Telephone (Direct): 0-0-92470 21036 > Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > Check outnew cars at Autos. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 Dear TW, An erudite compilation of the subject,plurality of marriages. Thank you for putting such vital info in Files section. Regards, Satish , " tw853 " <tw853 wrote: > > Dear Andrew ji, > > Thank you for the kind words. > > As you're aware, it's just a reference for serious KP learners like > myself. > > Regards, > > tw > > > , andrew dutta > <andrewinfinitum@> wrote: > > > > Respected Tin Win ji, > > My heartfelt thanks to you for beautifully summarizing the > extant rules of multimarriage that is found in the KP literature, > including the recent research findings of Kanak ji. > > > > I am sure any new researcher in multimarriage rules in KP can > now go a step forward with these rules to start with. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Andrew > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote: > > Dear Pavan Kumar, > > > > Both of you are correct; one is referring KSK Rule One and another > > KSK Rule Two as mentioned in the uploaded file: KSK RULES FOR > SECOND > > MARRIAGE. > > > > Regards, > > > > tw > > > > , pavan kumar <pavankumargvp@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Hare Krsna > > > > > > Namaste to you > > all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad > > K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight meeting > on > > 22-04-2007. > > > > > > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two parts > > with necessary and sufficient conditions. > > > > > > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify > > either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it should > be > > connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. > > > > > > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have been > > 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he had > > already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this > issue. > > And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected it. > > > > > > I request the learned members to throw a light on > > this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight meetings, > of > > course of little use. > > > > > > I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes > > > > > > Thank you one and all > > > Pavan Kumar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA RANI > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Prof. Andrew Dutta > > Faculty Member > > The ICFAI Business School, > > Survey Number 156/157, > > Dontanapally Village, Shankerpally Mandal, > > R.R. District. Andhra Pradesh 501 203. India > > Telephone (Direct): 0-0-92470 21036 > > Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2007 Report Share Posted April 30, 2007 Dear Satish, Thank you for the kind words and I still owe you to upload the updated Punarphoo information in the Files section. Regards, tw , " R Satish " <rsatish1942 wrote: > > > Dear TW, > > An erudite compilation of the subject,plurality of > marriages. > > Thank you for putting such vital info in Files section. > > Regards, > > Satish > > > > > , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > Dear Andrew ji, > > > > Thank you for the kind words. > > > > As you're aware, it's just a reference for serious KP learners > like > > myself. > > > > Regards, > > > > tw > > > > > > , andrew dutta > > <andrewinfinitum@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected Tin Win ji, > > > My heartfelt thanks to you for beautifully summarizing the > > extant rules of multimarriage that is found in the KP literature, > > including the recent research findings of Kanak ji. > > > > > > I am sure any new researcher in multimarriage rules in KP can > > now go a step forward with these rules to start with. > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote: > > > Dear Pavan Kumar, > > > > > > Both of you are correct; one is referring KSK Rule One and > another > > > KSK Rule Two as mentioned in the uploaded file: KSK RULES FOR > > SECOND > > > MARRIAGE. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > tw > > > > > > , pavan kumar <pavankumargvp@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hare Krsna > > > > > > > > Namaste to you > > > all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad > > > K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight > meeting > > on > > > 22-04-2007. > > > > > > > > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two > parts > > > with necessary and sufficient conditions. > > > > > > > > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify > > > either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it > should > > be > > > connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. > > > > > > > > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have > been > > > 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he > had > > > already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this > > issue. > > > And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly objected > it. > > > > > > > > I request the learned members to throw a light on > > > this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight > meetings, > > of > > > course of little use. > > > > > > > > I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes > > > > > > > > Thank you one and all > > > > Pavan Kumar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA > RANI > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on Messenger > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Prof. Andrew Dutta > > > Faculty Member > > > The ICFAI Business School, > > > Survey Number 156/157, > > > Dontanapally Village, Shankerpally Mandal, > > > R.R. District. Andhra Pradesh 501 203. India > > > Telephone (Direct): 0-0-92470 21036 > > > Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 30, 2007 Report Share Posted April 30, 2007 Dear TW, Your info is always clear,unambiguous,and replete with references. To collate such info takes effort & time.Hence do please take your own time.You will be doing us a favour. Regards, Satish , " tw853 " <tw853 wrote: > > Dear Satish, > > Thank you for the kind words and I still owe you to upload the > updated Punarphoo information in the Files section. > > Regards, > > tw > > > > , " R Satish " <rsatish1942@> > wrote: > > > > > > Dear TW, > > > > An erudite compilation of the subject,plurality of > > marriages. > > > > Thank you for putting such vital info in Files section. > > > > Regards, > > > > Satish > > > > > > > > > > , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Andrew ji, > > > > > > Thank you for the kind words. > > > > > > As you're aware, it's just a reference for serious KP learners > > like > > > myself. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > > > , andrew dutta > > > <andrewinfinitum@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected Tin Win ji, > > > > My heartfelt thanks to you for beautifully summarizing the > > > extant rules of multimarriage that is found in the KP > literature, > > > including the recent research findings of Kanak ji. > > > > > > > > I am sure any new researcher in multimarriage rules in KP > can > > > now go a step forward with these rules to start with. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > tw853 <tw853@> wrote: > > > > Dear Pavan Kumar, > > > > > > > > Both of you are correct; one is referring KSK Rule One and > > another > > > > KSK Rule Two as mentioned in the uploaded file: KSK RULES FOR > > > SECOND > > > > MARRIAGE. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > tw > > > > > > > > , pavan kumar > <pavankumargvp@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hare Krsna > > > > > > > > > > Namaste to you > > > > all. Here is a question thrown by a senior member of Hyderabad > > > > K.P.Astrologers association in the recently held fortnight > > meeting > > > on > > > > 22-04-2007. > > > > > > > > > > The Standard rule of Sri KSK on multiple marriages has two > > parts > > > > with necessary and sufficient conditions. > > > > > > > > > > The Sufficient condition is that the 7th CSL should signify > > > > either of 2nd or 7th or 11th + the first condition that it > > should > > > be > > > > connected to Mer or Jup with a dual sign. > > > > > > > > > > But what he says is that instead of 7th CSL, it should have > > been > > > > 2nd CSL that is to be considered. And he further told that he > > had > > > > already spoken to Mr. Subramanian, Son of Sri KSK, about this > > > issue. > > > > And he said that it was a printing mistake. I strongly > objected > > it. > > > > > > > > > > I request the learned members to throw a light on > > > > this regard as we have many such issues in our fortnight > > meetings, > > > of > > > > course of little use. > > > > > > > > > > I feel regret for, if any, tying mistakes > > > > > > > > > > Thank you one and all > > > > > Pavan Kumar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FOR HIS GRACE WHO IS SHAMPOOING THE LOTUS FEET OF SRI RADHA > > RANI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Check out what you're missing if you're not on > Messenger > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Prof. Andrew Dutta > > > > Faculty Member > > > > The ICFAI Business School, > > > > Survey Number 156/157, > > > > Dontanapally Village, Shankerpally Mandal, > > > > R.R. District. Andhra Pradesh 501 203. India > > > > Telephone (Direct): 0-0-92470 21036 > > > > Cell: 0-0-98666 20483 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible " new car " smell? > > > > Check outnew cars at Autos. > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.