mahajan ji's davice

[Guest guest]

mahajan ji; aap kale chashme pahan kar dekhenge to kaal hi dikhega.

ab directions ki baat nirmal ji ne samjha di. aapko yeh galatfahmi

kaise hi gayi ki yeh discussion sandook ya badam rakhne rakhwane ke

liye ho rahi hai. hum to kuch swalon ke jawab chate the so mil gaye.

agar aap ne baar padh kar samajh li hai to mere kuch swaal hain

aagya ho to poochon. yeh to mujhe kahna chahiye ki " meri samajh me

ye nahin aa raha ki aap is mail se kya haasil karana chate hain. "

bhanumati ne kunba joda kahin ki eent kahin ka roda.

koi central theme hai aapke is message ka; kisi baat ka sir pakad

liya kissi ka pair aur phir nasihaten de rahe ho.

bhai jaan zara vistaar me likha kijye; aapki baat pale hi nahin

padi. directions ki baat ka yograj ji ke gutke se kya lena dena.

shani ka sandook aur badaam kahan se tapka diye. koi tuk banti hai.

it is requested please read the mail just once before u post it.

kulbirbance

 

, " mts3434 " <mts3434 wrote:

>

> kulbir jee/ kalsi jee/ iqbal jee

> mein yeh dekh ( padh ) rahan hoon ki yahan par sirf galtian dekhi

ja

> rahi hain ki prabhakar sahib ke gutka mein yeh galti , woh galti

> hai, lal kitab ko koi nahi padna nahi chahta, jab ki lk mein saaf

> saaf likha hai ki kitab ko baar baar pado, har baar naya hi

milega.

> agar aap ek baar padoge to issi mein ulajh jayoge, aajkal

direction

> ki baat chal rahi hai, usse kya farak padega , mein nahi

janta.makan

> kundli dekh kar kya aap yahan shani chahiye wahan lohe ka sandook

(

> badam)rakhwa ke kya result logo, batayen. ya aap kya hasil karna

> chahte hain bataye.

>

> mahajan

> , " Iqbal Chand Thakur "

> <thakur.iqbalchand@> wrote:

> >

> > Bhai Kalsi Sahib,

> > Kis chakkar mein pad gaye ho. Lalkitab Padhtey jao sab kuchh

saaf

> hota

> > jayega. Aisi cheezein aapka dhyaan pedhney se door hataayengi,

jo

> nuqsaandeh

> > hai. Jab aap paanchon kitabein ek bar padh logey to sabh giley

> > shikivey door ho jaayenge. Yo sabhi jo ultay fultay swaal khadey

ho

> > rahey hain sabhi kaa jawaab kitaab de degi. baaqi aapki marzi

hai,

> iss

> > chakker mein jitna padogey ulajhatey jaaogey.

> > aapka

> > Iqbal Chand Thakur

> >

> > On 3/30/08, Shivdev Kalsi <shivdev.kalsi@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Nirmal Ji,

> > > It is a universal truth that every being on the earth is

having a

> > > direction. No objects exists without

> > > direction. In Kitab One direction is not given to any khana

> while khana 9 is not given any direction.

> > > Is it not an ambiguity.

> > > Regards

> > > Shiv Dev Kalsi

> > > On 3/27/08, Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj <nirbhar@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Kalsi Ji,

> > > > I dont think any one of the addressees thinks that he is

fully

> mastered

> > > > the Lalkitab. It is a great Book. It is not written by an

> ordinary person.

> > > > I ensure you that each and every point regarding the

lalkitab

> shall

> > > > discussed in detail.

> > > > Please Give your point of view where do you feel that there

is

> ambiguity

> > > > in lalkitab. How do you feel that directions are not defined

> in lalkitab.

> > > > Please try tbe elaborative in the issue.

> > > > Regards

> > > > Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj

> > > >

> > > > On 3/27/08, kulbir bance <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > kalsi ji; this opinion or research cannot be recommended

in

> hurry. at

> > > > > least i will have to check the whole book. commenting upon

> ambiguity in

> > > > > lalkitab is a serious matter and needs a thourough

analysis

> before

> > > > > commenting.

> > > > > i need some time. we have not yet decoded the basis of

> varshphal.

> > > > > don't we admit it as it is because we don't have any

logic.

> do we have any

> > > > > logic as to on what basis and logics pt ji assigned

> directions in a makkan

> > > > > kundli. don't we acept it as such. why do we accept house

> no. 1 as lagna?

> > > > > because it is written as such in the book.

> > > > > we accept darvesh as karkattwa of ketu. why?

> > > > > we accept house no 8 aspects 2 but 2 doesn't aspect 8 why?

> > > > > only sun and moon in house no 9 aspect house no 5.

> > > > > budh in 11 inauspicious till 34 years does shashtri

jyotish

> takes it

> > > > > so, then why do we?

> > > > > ambiguity is a very serious word and puts the whole

> system/book under

> > > > > suspicion.

> > > > > 2+2 are not always 4 in this system because it has a

> philosphy of it

> > > > > own.

> > > > > *but i further ur request by adding that silence will

amount

> to

> > > > > acceptance. therefore senior members should object

expressly

> or their

> > > > > silence will be interpretted as acceptance.*

> > > > > lalkitab is above all personal liasions or differences.

> hence one

> > > > > should give his opinion openly and freely.

> > > > > i shall definitely send in mine once i go through the book

> and consult

> > > > > my gurus of lalkitab.

> > > > > kulbirbance

> > > > >

> > > > > On 3/26/08, Shivdev Kalsi <shivdev.kalsi@> wrote:

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Respected Prabhakar Ji, Bhatia Ji, Nirmal Ji , kulbir ji

> Thakur

> > > > > > Ji, Khattar Ji, Kondal Ji , Shukla Ji and all senior

> members,

> > > > > > This group is claimed to be doing research oriented

studies

> > > > > > lalkitab with the backing of so many others including

all

> of above. Another

> > > > > > group doing discussion in Lalkitab ' Namely " lalkitab

> Discussion group " has

> > > > > > found an ambiguity in lalkitab and claimed that the

> general directions are

> > > > > > different other than makan Kundli. Their invention seems

> to be

> > > > > > genuine.This is a path breaking

> > > > > > research. Hence Your

> > > > > > reccomendation are necessary in this regard as you are

the

> senior most members of this system

> > > > > >

> > > > > > --

> > > > > > Dr. Shiv Dev Kalsi,

> > > > > > Jyotish Rishi (AIFAS)

> > > > > > Consultant (Vedic Astrology)

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > > --

> > > Dr. Shiv Dev Kalsi,

> > > Jyotish Rishi (AIFAS)

> > > Consultant (Vedic Astrology)

> > >

> > >

> >

>