khanna no 9 sahan= is it so?

[Guest guest]

another vital question; khanna no.1 se khanna no 9 ko jayein ya

makan se bahar niklein; can we still say khanna no 9. is sahan this

way khanna no9 lies outside the makkan kundli.

without finding answer to these questions can we alter the original

book because we havenot understood some concepts; this way varshphal

table will be discarded and so many other vital ingredients. fools

rush in where angels fear to tread.

kulbirbance

, " Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj "

<nirbhar wrote:

>

> Dear Kulbir ji,

> You are right, We first learn the rules apply these rules and see

the

> results. logic will come side by side. I consider our self kids as

> far as the core system of lalkitab is concerned.

> we may try to first complete our command on rules of the system

then

> decide about logics

> Regards

> Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj

> ,

> " kulbirbance " <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> >

> > Nirmal ji; we have 2 options

> > 1. accept makkan kundali as such as varshphal; rashi no ke bolne

> > wale grah etc i.e. we don't know any logic or base which pt

> applied

> > to them, it has not been decoded in any manner. so unless and

> untill

> > someone comes with an explanation as to on what basis this

kundali

> > was made by pt ji we cannot discard it just because we are not

yet

> > to comprehend its logics; accept it as such as varshphal etc;

> > without adulteration of shashtri jyotish.

> > 2. i think prabhakar ji's is right saunth ki dali milne par

aadmi

> > jab pansari ban jata hai to sone ko bhi kasauti par parkhne se

> nahi

> > chookta bhale hi uske pass kasauti na ho aur use koi ose khud hi

> > apni banani pade.

> > 3. enough is enough ; it is simple either explain all the logics

> of

> > this book or accept them as such

> > for a positive approach we can undertake an exercise by

> identifying

> > objects of planets khannawise from left to right as per makkan

> > kundali in our own homes.

> > kulbirbance

> >

> > , " kulbirbance "

> > <kulbirbance@> wrote:

> > >

> > > although it apperas ambigious but is actually correct

> > > according to lalkitab KUNDALI KE KHANA NO. 1 SE CHALKAR AGAR

> > > NAUVAIN KO JAYAIN YA MAKAAN SE BAAHAR KO NIKALAIN TO JIS

TARAF -

> > > DAYAAN (right) HAATH HOGAA- US TARAF MAKAAN KE TAMAAM GRAH JO

> > KHANA

> > > NO. 1 SE 8 TAK HO APNA SABOOT DENGEY, ISI TARAH AGAR 12 NO.

> > KHAANE

> > > SE APNE AAPKO KHANA NO. 9 KI TARAF AATEY HUVE GINE YA MAKAAN

> MAIN

> > > BAAHAR SE AAKAR DAAKHIL HONE LAGAIN TO KHANA NO. 12 SE 12, 11

> 10

> > KE

> > > GHARON KE GRAH --DAAYEN (right) TARAF MAKAAN KE --SABOOT

DENGEY.

> > > at at the face of it appears ambigious because house no 12

> > > represents south east direction i.e. left direction in the

house

> > of

> > > native having east facing house. also at another place shani

12

> ki

> > > andheri kothari is reffered to be on the right side.

> > > BUT IF CAREFULLY READ THESE LINES IT IS CLEAR THAT LEFT AND

> RIGHT

> > > SIDES ARE REFERRED TO BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT AFTER MARKING A

LINE

> > > BETWEEN THE OBSERVERS POSITION AND HOUSE NO. 9.

> > > UNLESS AND UNTILL HOUSE 9 POSITION IS NOT TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT

WE

> > > CANNOT JUST DRAW A STRAIGHT LINE FROM THE HOUSE'S MAIN DOOR IN

> ANY

> > > DIRECTION AND MARK LEFT AND RIGHT SIDES.

> > > kulbirbance

> > >

> >

>