Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Respected senior members of the group Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 it says " magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " I think it should be 11 years because suraj mayaad is 22 years and its nisf is 11 years On page#903 line#8 it says " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " Regards Gaurav Sharma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Dear Gaurav Ji, Please check the reference. These texts dont exist at the referred lines. Also give the chapter heading to locate it easily regards Nirmal , " gaurav sharma " <sandybablu wrote: > > Respected senior members of the group > > Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 it says > > " magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " > > I think it should be 11 years because suraj mayaad is 22 years and its nisf is 11 years > > On page#903 line#8 it says > " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > Regards > Gaurav Sharma > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Dear Nirmal Ji Its in topic " chand madadgaar masalae " Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 " uska dost budh beshak uske saath hai-magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " On page#903 line#8 it says " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " I think reference is correct Nirmal Ji Regards Gaurav Sharma , " Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj " <nirbhar wrote: > > Dear Gaurav Ji, > Please check the reference. These texts dont exist at the referred lines. > Also give the chapter heading to locate it easily > regards > Nirmal > , " gaurav sharma " <sandybablu@> wrote: > > > > Respected senior members of the group > > > > Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 it says > > > > " magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " > > > > I think it should be 11 years because suraj mayaad is 22 years and its nisf is 11 years > > > > On page#903 line#8 it says > > " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > Regards > > Gaurav Sharma > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Dear Gaurav Ji,It is not on Page 901 it is existing on page 951. I feel you are reading original texts in urdu. number 5 in urdu sometimes read by newbie as 0. // Lal Kitab 1952 Page#951 line#6 " uska dost budh beshak uske saath hai-magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " //Budh always remains silent with sun for half of its age,not the age of Sun. Figure 17 is correct which is half of Budh's Arsa of 34 years. If I am not wrong,you may read it as " weh apne dost sooraj ke saath apne nisf arsa taq yaani 17 saal chup..... " //On page#953 line#8 it says " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " //Yes i agree it should like this. RegardsNirmal On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM, gaurav sharma <sandybablu wrote: Dear Nirmal Ji Its in topic " chand madadgaar masalae " Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 " uska dost budh beshak uske saath hai-magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " On page#903 line#8 it says " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " I think reference is correct Nirmal Ji Regards Gaurav Sharma , " Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj " <nirbhar wrote: > > Dear Gaurav Ji, > Please check the reference. These texts dont exist at the referred lines. > Also give the chapter heading to locate it easily > regards > Nirmal > , " gaurav sharma " <sandybablu@> wrote: > > > > Respected senior members of the group > > > > Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 it says > > > > " magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " > > > > I think it should be 11 years because suraj mayaad is 22 years and its nisf is 11 years > > > > On page#903 line#8 it says > > " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > Regards > > Gaurav Sharma > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 14, 2009 Report Share Posted June 14, 2009 Dear Nirmalji My bad, you are absolutely right. It is page number 951 I misread it as 901. I am still learning urdu. Thanks for correcting me. Regards, Gaurav Sharma - -- In , Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj <nirbhar wrote: > > Dear Gaurav Ji, > It is not on Page 901 it is existing on page 951. I feel you are reading > original texts in urdu. number 5 in urdu sometimes read by newbie as 0. > > // Lal Kitab 1952 Page#951 line#6 > > " uska dost budh beshak uske saath hai-magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf > aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " // > Budh always remains silent with sun for half of its age,not the age of Sun. > Figure 17 is correct which is half of Budh's Arsa of 34 years. If I am not > wrong,you may read it as " weh apne dost sooraj ke saath apne nisf arsa taq > yaani 17 saal chup..... " > > //On page#953 line#8 it says > > " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " // > Yes i agree it should like this. > Regards > Nirmal > > > On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 9:48 PM, gaurav sharma <sandybablu wrote: > > > > > > > Dear Nirmal Ji > > > > Its in topic " chand madadgaar masalae " > > > > Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 > > > > " uska dost budh beshak uske saath hai-magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf > > aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " > > > > On page#903 line#8 it says > > > > " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > I think reference is correct Nirmal Ji > > > > Regards > > Gaurav Sharma > > > > <%40>, > > " Nirmal Kumar Bhardwaj " <nirbhar@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Gaurav Ji, > > > Please check the reference. These texts dont exist at the referred lines. > > > Also give the chapter heading to locate it easily > > > regards > > > Nirmal > > > <%40>, > > " gaurav sharma " <sandybablu@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Respected senior members of the group > > > > > > > > Lal Kitab 1952 Page#901 line#6 it says > > > > > > > > " magar weh aapnae dost suraj kee nisf aarsa tak yaani 17 saal chup hai " > > > > > > > > > > I think it should be 11 years because suraj mayaad is 22 years and its > > nisf is 11 years > > > > > > > > On page#903 line#8 it says > > > > " yeh greh sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > > > > > I think it should be " yeh ghar sanichhar va mangal badh ka hai " > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > Gaurav Sharma > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.