Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fwd: An innocANT question...

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

HinduCalendar , " Avtar Krishen Kaul " <jyotirved

wrote:

 

Shri Hari Malla ji,

Namaskar!

Thank you for posting all this information about the " famous (infamous?) AKK " !

 

Well, I relish it, but at the same time, am handicapped in replying them since I

have been banned by Vedic-astrology, Om_namah_shivaya, hinduism_enviroment etc.

forums. I was hounded by an ancient indian astrology forum that I had to leave

that forum since the posts being moderated, it was just a one way trafiic!

Same was the case with WAVES-VEDIC! It was just one-way-traffic! Extremely

few, if any, of my posts appeared on that forum!

As you must have observed from a recent post from a jyotisha forum, a " Vedic

astrologer " desires that I should be banned by all the forums--even

non-astrology!

" Vedic astrologers " are cowards! They cannot face the facts! They cannot enter

into an argument in an academic fashion! All they will go on repeating endlessly

is that " he is a Muslim, converted to hinduism, to ruin hinduism " .

When Shri Jha complains that AKK is not replying his posts, the Vedic-astrology

forum or other forums where he is cribbing should have had the courage to inform

him that he (Shri Jha) is crying in wilderness since AKK has been banned from

that forum! But " Vedic astrologers " being " followers of asatyam and nothing but

asatyam " , they do not have the courage to do so!

And the " blame game " goes on!

With regards,

A K Kaul

 

 

HinduCalendar , " harimalla@ " <harimalla@> wrote:

>

> , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@> wrote:

>

> Rohini Da,

>

> You are fortunate and farsighted not to run into troubled waters. There is a

big gang aiming its guns at Vedic Astrology. I have no intention to quarrel with

them, but sometimes I am forced to, esp when they start abusing Suryasiddhanta

in spite of their ignorance ofthis difficult text. One should not abuse a text

before understanding it.

>

> -VJ

> ======================= ==

>

>

> ________________________________

> Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@>

>

> Saturday, July 11, 2009 12:07:59 PM

> Re: An innocANT question...

>

>

>

>

>

> Vinay Ji,

>

> I do not know him or ever ran into him.

>

> So, cannot comment!

>

> RR

>

> , Vinay Jha <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote:

> >

> > Rohini Da,

> >

> > Mr AK Kaul is a famous (or infamous) celebrity in astrological

forums, who has almost no knowledge of astrology and claims that the concept of

Rashi should be expelled from Indian astrology, and says such concepts were

imported from Greece. When refuted, he deputes his chelas to abuse and attack

his opponents, instead of arguing.

> >

> > -VJ

> >

> > ============ ======= ==

> >

> >

> > ____________ _________ _________ __

> > Rohiniranjan <jyotish_vani@ ...>

> >

> > Saturday, July 11, 2009 8:01:21 AM

> > Re: An innocANT question...

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Who is Mr. Kaul?

> >

> > I do not know him or read any of his claims, etc.? Does he post on this

forum? Would you kindly quote a few message numbers, if it is not too much

trouble? I hate to waste the time of other members, all of whom I am sure are

very busy.

> >

> > RR

> >

> > , " harimalla@ .. " <harimalla@ ..>

wrote:

> > >

> > > Could it be corrupted by inducting things that were later imported, as

claimed by Mr. Kaul?

> > > Regards

> > > Hari Malla

> > >

> > > , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani@ >

wrote:

> > > >

> > > > We have the Vedas and Puraanas and other scriptures and many others that

I may not even have heard of. Others here must have because I see a lot of

scholars here who are obviously very brilliant, well-read and sincerely serious.

> > > >

> > > > I have not heard of any of these texts as being incomplete or corrupted

over the years.

> > > >

> > > > And yet when we come to Jyotish, its currently available have often been

questioned as to their authenticity. Case in point: Brihat Parashara Hora

Shastra.

> > > >

> > > > Why is this so? Isn't BPHS ancient? Why did it get distorted while other

scriptures were spared?

> > > >

> > > > Rohiniranjan

> > > >

> > >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...