Guest guest Posted October 12, 2009 Report Share Posted October 12, 2009 akandabaratam , " Krishen " <jyotirved wrote: Shri Ramachandran Swaminathan ji, Shri Ramachandraya namah! <THE ANCIENT INDIANS DERIVED THEIR ASTRONOMICAL THEORIES AND THE ASTROLOGICAL THEORIES BASED UPON THE GEO-CENTRIC CONCEPTS.> " Geocentric " was not only an Indian but a sort of universal concept till the advent of Copernicus! Though Aryabhata had tried to voice a heliocentric concept in around sixth century AD, he was abused left and right by none other than Brahmagupta in such words as " moorkho va pihacho va " . <THE BASIC FORCE TO THE MOVEMENTS OF THE PLANETS ARE RECEIVED ONLY FROM THE INTEGRATED AND FIXED 27 STELLAR CONSTELLATIONS WHICH FORMS OUR GEO-CENTERED COSMOS.> Constellations is actually a Greek term and the so called astrological Rashis Aries, Taurus etc. are namesakes of the same. Indian Rashis like Mesha, Vrisha etc. are Sanskrit equivalents of the Greek constellaitons Aries, Taurus etc.. There are twelvle " constellatons " in use in astrology. And not twenty-seven. If by constellations you mean " nakshatras " , you have to prove that they are responsible for the movements of the planets, and that also geocentric! Shri Ramabhadraya namah! A K Kaul akandabaratam , ramachandran swaminathan mannaiswami@ wrote: > > HELLO SIRS, > I am very surprised to note form the e-mail > contents that a new from of idea has been created that the Vedic moon > and the sub planet to the earth moon are different and the previous > one is an imaginary and the sub-planet to the earth moon is the > original! > I hope this is because of the basic concept of the > Astronomical theories of the present which is based on the Helios > system in which the sun is treated at the center and all the other > planets are revolving the Sun in an elliptical orbits. BUT WHERE AS > THE ANCIENT INDIANS DERIVED THEIR ASTRONOMICAL THEORIES AND THE > ASTROLOGICAL THEORIES BASED UPON THE GEO-CENTRIC CONCEPTS. UNLESS WE > UNDERSTAND THE BASIC CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS THEN ONLY > WE CAN COME INTO A FINAL CONCLUSION. IT IS FOUND THAT THE ANCIENT > INDIANS GEO-CENTRIC COSMOLOGICAL THEORIES ARE WITHIN THE FRAME NATURAL > LAWS OF PHYSICS. THE BASIC FORCE TO THE MOVEMENTS OF THE PLANETS ARE > RECEIVED ONLY FROM THE INTEGRATED AND FIXED 27 STELLAR CONSTELLATIONS > WHICH FORMS OUR GEO-CENTERED COSMOS. For more details kindly log on > www.indiancosmology.com (or)www.swamycosmology.wordpress.com > (or)http://sites.google.com/site/geocentriccosmos > OR please e-mail to mannaiswami@ > With regards, > R.SWAMINATHAN > > On 10/10/09, jyotirved jyotirved@ wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Balasubramanian-ji, > > > > Jai Shri Ram! > > > > Many thanks for the mail in various forums appending the so called > > Navagraha.ved in pdf format. > > > --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2009 Report Share Posted October 13, 2009 akandabaratam , " Krishen " <jyotirved wrote: Shri Ramachandran Swaminathan ji, Shri Ramachandraya namah! <THE ANCIENT INDIANS DERIVED THEIR ASTRONOMICAL THEORIES AND THE ASTROLOGICAL THEORIES BASED UPON THE GEO-CENTRIC CONCEPTS.> " Geocentric " was not only an Indian but a sort of universal concept till the advent of Copernicus! Though Aryabhata had tried to voice a heliocentric concept in around sixth century AD, he was abused left and right by none other than Brahmagupta in such words as " moorkho va pihacho va " . <THE BASIC FORCE TO THE MOVEMENTS OF THE PLANETS ARE RECEIVED ONLY FROM THE INTEGRATED AND FIXED 27 STELLAR CONSTELLATIONS WHICH FORMS OUR GEO-CENTERED COSMOS.> Constellations is actually a Greek term and the so called astrological Rashis Aries, Taurus etc. are namesakes of the same. Indian Rashis like Mesha, Vrisha etc. are Sanskrit equivalents of the Greek constellaitons Aries, Taurus etc.. There are twelvle " constellatons " in use in astrology. And not twenty-seven. If by constellations you mean " nakshatras " , you have to prove that they are responsible for the movements of the planets, and that also geocentric! Shri Ramabhadraya namah! A K Kaul akandabaratam , ramachandran swaminathan mannaiswami@ wrote: > > HELLO SIRS, > I am very surprised to note form the e-mail > contents that a new from of idea has been created that the Vedic moon > and the sub planet to the earth moon are different and the previous > one is an imaginary and the sub-planet to the earth moon is the > original! > I hope this is because of the basic concept of the > Astronomical theories of the present which is based on the Helios > system in which the sun is treated at the center and all the other > planets are revolving the Sun in an elliptical orbits. BUT WHERE AS > THE ANCIENT INDIANS DERIVED THEIR ASTRONOMICAL THEORIES AND THE > ASTROLOGICAL THEORIES BASED UPON THE GEO-CENTRIC CONCEPTS. UNLESS WE > UNDERSTAND THE BASIC CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN THE TWO SYSTEMS THEN ONLY > WE CAN COME INTO A FINAL CONCLUSION. IT IS FOUND THAT THE ANCIENT > INDIANS GEO-CENTRIC COSMOLOGICAL THEORIES ARE WITHIN THE FRAME NATURAL > LAWS OF PHYSICS. THE BASIC FORCE TO THE MOVEMENTS OF THE PLANETS ARE > RECEIVED ONLY FROM THE INTEGRATED AND FIXED 27 STELLAR CONSTELLATIONS > WHICH FORMS OUR GEO-CENTERED COSMOS. For more details kindly log on > www.indiancosmology.com (or)www.swamycosmology.wordpress.com > (or)http://sites.google.com/site/geocentriccosmos > OR please e-mail to mannaiswami@ > With regards, > R.SWAMINATHAN > > On 10/10/09, jyotirved jyotirved@ wrote: > > > > > > Dear Shri Balasubramanian-ji, > > > > Jai Shri Ram! > > > > Many thanks for the mail in various forums appending the so called > > Navagraha.ved in pdf format. > > > --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.