Date of Birth of Bhagwan Ram!

[Guest guest]

Dear freidns,

Jai Shri Ram!

<So Mr.

Krishen admits that he has not understood the ramifications. I hope he will

understand it after pondering over the same for more time.>

This is yet

another funny twist to his own statement by Shri Bhattacharjya himself

since his original question was, " It seems Mr. Krishen did not read

my earlier mail explaining the ramifications of projecting Lord Rama as

God in the Balakanda, either by Valmiki himself or subsequently by another

sage. "

Can there be

any Hindu who does not know that Bhagwan Ram is a divine incarnation of Vishnu

and Valmiki Maharshi also has depicted Him like that in Balakanda and

Uttarakanda? If some " vedic astrologer " does not believe

Bhagwan Ram to be an Incarnation of Vishnu, that is his fault! But why

should he present Maharshi Valmiki as the villain of the peace who would not

like Bhagwan Ram to be presented as a divine Incarnations? it is

therefore actually for Shri Bhattacharjya to understand the ramifications

of his own statement/stand of denying the status of a divine Incarnation to

Bhagwan Ram!

< Secondly

he is lying when he says that I agreed to the date December 3, 7323 BCE as Lord

Rama's birth. I said that Dr. Vartak gave a ballpark figure around 7323 BCE

from the precessional data and a historian would be satisfied

with that. One may question the exact date given by Dr. Vartak but

should not question the ballpark figure given from the precessional data.>

Yet another

confusing statement from Shri Bhattacharjya! When did Bhagwan Ram

Incarnate according to him, if not on December 4, 7323 BCE? What type of

agreement does he have with the “ballpark” figure of Dr. Vartak

then, since Dr. Vartak claims that Shri Ram Incarnated on that date but Shri

Bhattacharjya says He did not incarnate on that date exactly!

<Mr. Krishen

is talking about millions of years. Has he gone out of mind?>

On the one

hand, Shri Bhattacharjya wants everybody to believe in the gospel truth of the

Surya Sidahnta, since that is an aarsha work of astronomy according to him.

And if it is the same Surya Sidhanta, that talks of Treta Yuga, when Bhagwan

Ram incarnated, having occurred millions of years back, it means that Maya the

mlechha had gone out of mind actually! Naturally, Shri Bhattacharjya will

have to decide whether to believe in Maya the mlechha or not!

Secondly, if

the Valmiki Ramayana itself says that Bhagwan Ram was destined to rule for

eleven thousand years and He did actually rule for eleven thousand years, how

could He have incarnated in 7323 BCE as per the same Valmiki Ramayana?  And the

Valmiki Ramayana also says that He incarnated in Treta Yuga.  When did that

yuga start according to Shri Bhattacharjya and how and why?

<Let Mr.

Krishen spell out what according to him is the date of Lord Rama even if it is

a ballpark figure. If he has no idea what could be Lord Rama's date then let

keep his mouth shut.>

Mr.

Bhatacharjya has no faith in the Valmiki Ramayana, since that claims that

Bhagwan Ram was a divine incarnation whereas Mr. Bhattacharjya does not believe

in that! Mr. Bhattacharjya has no faith in the Surya Sidhanta since that

claims that Treta Yuga did actually take place millions of years back! He

has faith only in " Vedic astrology " , obviously! As such, he

should " do some nashta-jataka prashna " himself and try to establish

the date of birth of Bhagwan Ram himself, instead of asking others to do that

job for him. If he cannot do that job himself, in spite of being a

“Vedic astrologer”then " let him keep his mouth shut " .

Jai Shri Ram!

A K Kaul

 

,

Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya

wrote:

>

Re: [VRI] Fwd: [ind. & West.

Astrology] Fw: Re: Dating of Ramayana Period

 

Dear friends,

 

So Mr. Krishen admits that he has not understood the ramifications. I hope he

will understand it after pondering over the same for more time. Let him not be

impatient.

 

Secondly he is lying when he says that I agreed to the date December 3, 7323

BCE

as Lord Rama's birth. I said that Dr. Vartak gave a ballpark figure around 7323

BCE from the precessional data and a historian would be satisfied

withÂ

that. One may question the exact date given by Dr. Vartak but should not

question the ballpark figure given from the precessional data. Mr. Krishen is

talking about millions of years. Has he gone out of mind?

 

Let Mr. Krishen spell out what according to him is the date of Lord Rama even

if

it is a ballpark figure. If he has no idea what could be Lord Rama's date then

let keep his mouth shut.

 

Regards,

 

Sunil K. Bhattacharjya

 

 

 

--- On Fri, 11/6/09, Krishen <jyotirved

wrote:

 

Krishen <jyotirved

[VRI] Fwd: [ind. & West. Astrology] Fw:

Re:

Dating of Ramayana Period

vedic_research_institute

Friday, November 6, 2009, 12:20 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Â

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear friends,

 

Jai Shri Ram!

 

<It seems Mr. Krishen did not read my earlier mail explaining the

 

ramifications of projecting Lord Rama as God in the Balakanda, either by

 

Valmiki himself or.subsequently by another sage.>

 

 

 

My simple question was---and still is----that if Bhagwan Ram was

 

destined to rule for eleven thousand years as per 97th mantra of the

 

very first sarga of Balakanda and if He did rule for eleven thousand

 

years as per shlokas 12 to 14 of almost the last sarga i.e. 104 of

 

Uttarakanda i.e. the last Kanda of the Valmiki Ramayana itself, how

 

could Bhagwan Ram have incarnated on December 4, 7323 BCE, as per Dr.

 

Vartak, with whom Shri Bhattacharjya also agrees.

 

 

 

Shri Bhattacharjya must certainly ponder on the " ramifications " of

his

 

self-contradictory statements, since it means that we are still living

 

in Rama Rajya and Kali yuga is still away by millions of years according

 

to Messrs Vartak and Bhattacharjya!

 

Jai Shri Ram!

 

A K Kaul

 

vedic_research_ institute, Sunil Bhattacharjya

 

<sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote:

 

>

 

> Dear friends,