[akandabaratam] FW: Ancient arithmatics and numbers recorded in Purans and Ramayan

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir, I hope that the modern Astronomy is noted by you refer to  the Helio         centric Astronomical theories and that  I too accept with you that the Indians theories of Astronomy can not be compared with the Helio's Theories because of  the Indians theories of Astronomy or of Cosmology are derived from the Earth centered Theories!

The Ancient Indians derived the Fixed and the integrated form of the 27 Nakshtras Which forms the Cosmos and therby they have arrived the positions of all the planets between the Nakshtras and to the Earth in the Cosmos in which the Earth is found to be positioned at the center of the Cosmos. Based upon these they have calculated the 8 kinds of movements of the Planets with reference and parallel to the Fixed and the integrated form of the 27 Nakshtras in their positions and detailed the formations of eclipses in the cosmos from time-to time based upon their detailed calender system. For more informations kindly log on www.swamycosmology.wordpress.com

Thank You,R.Swaminthan

On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 1:23 PM, <jyotirved wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

jyotirveda

[jyotirved]

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 9:42

PM

'Dr Bhudia Kutch Science

Foundation'

Cc: 'AKGHOSH'; 'aash_rum';

'amalava'; 'akkulshrestha100'; 'Ashit GUHA';

'annamraju_2000'; 'balachandra_rao';

'bharathgyan'; 'BIMAL BUCH'; 'bntiwari56'; 'charitarth

vyas'; 'Dr Ayenger'; 'Dr. Alok Tripathi'; 'Dr. Rajiv Nigam';

'drbhudia'; 'hv_tiwary'; 'kanu166';

'knjoshipura'; 'lalit pandey'; 'mivaishnav';

'prabodhsharma1'; 'Ramji Lachhani'; 'ramram2you'; 'ryadubir';

'raykalyan'; 'rcmehrotra'; 'Valji Mepani';

'tuli.hazra'; 'VASANT DAVE'; 'vedakavi';

'vedastudy'; 'vikasupadhyay'

RE: Ancient arithmatics

and numbers recorded in Purans and Ramayan

 

 

Dear Sir,

Jai Shri Ram!

Thank you for your mail!

Actually you have raised more questions

than answered any of them!  Some of these are:

 

All

the yuga calculations made by you are based on the Surya Siddhanta by Maya

the mlechha since we do not have any records of the duration of yugas

prior to that siddhanta!

Aryabhatta’s

duration of yuga is much different from that of the Surya Siddhanta! 

Why? 

The

Surya Siddhanta is not an indigenous astronomical work but of Greek

origin, wherein Maya the mleccha concocted the story that the fundamental

planetary arguments were revealed to him by none other than Surya

Bhagwan!  And like quite a few other “Vedic astrologers”,

you too have fallen hook, line and sinker into Maya’s trap!

You

are saying that Bhagwan Ram Incarnated millions of years back in Treta

Yuga, whereas Maya the mleccha claims that he was around in Satya

Yuga!  Obviously, Bhagwan Ram Incarnated much after Maya the

mlechha!  That means that if Bhagwan Ram had really incarnated in Treta

Yuga and if someone had really prepared His horoscope, it would have been

on the basis of the Surya Siddhanta since there was no other astronomical

 work available then!

However.,

as per the Surya Siddhanta calculations as well, it is impossible that

anybody can be born when it is Navmi tithi and Punarvasu nakshatra with

the Moon in Karkata and the Sun in Mesha.  Similarly, birth under

such a planetary combination is impossible as per modern astronomy.

It

is thus clear that you have no faith in the Surya Siddhanta yourself, but

still want others to believe in the yuga duration of that very work and

want Bhagwan Ram to have incarnated in the Treta Yuga of Maya the

mlechha!  As such, don’t you think that you are simply making a

fool of everybody by making such tall claims?

 

Regarding the real Vedic calendar, there

is a lot of discussion going on in

hinducalendar

 

forum.  If you so desire, you may

please join the same.

Jai Shri Ram!

A K Kaul

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dr Bhudia Kutch

Science Foundation [kutchsciencefoundation]

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:28

PM

AKGHOSH; aash_rum;

amalava; akkulshrestha100; Ashit GUHA;

annamraju_2000; balachandra_rao;

bharathgyan; BIMAL BUCH; bntiwari56; charitarth vyas;

Dr Ayenger; Dr. Alok Tripathi; Dr. Rajiv Nigam; drbhudia;

hv_tiwary; jyotirved; kanu166; knjoshipura;

lalit pandey; mivaishnav; prabodhsharma1; Ramji Lachhani;

ramram2you; ryadubir; raykalyan;

rcmehrotra; Valji Mepani; tuli.hazra; VASANT DAVE;

vedakavi; vedastudy; vikasupadhyay

FW:Ancient arithmatics

and numbers recorded in Purans and Ramayan

 

 

kutchsciencefoundation

 

Dear friends of Mythologies, geology, paleontology, , science, Maths and

Astronomy

 

I AM PLEASED that so many people are studying RAMAYAN and giving

their personal opinions, BUT every thing is like a " TUNDE: TUNDE: MATI:

BHINHA: " Every one says they gone through all of these RAMAYAN events and

calculated all events of astronomical phenomenon’s, But have they really

calculated? or just copying all incorrect data believing that all data

available is correct.

 

If they are following Ramayana correctly and claiming they have got

all correct then why they IGNORE reality of Shrimad BHAGAVAT PURANS -

denouncing the writer of BHAGVATAM and following RAMAYAN ? 

 

see the mathematics of SMALLEST COMMON MULTIPLES of the COMMOM man

and understand the events of mathematical series and prime numbers

 

DOES fossil formation occurs in 10000 years time?

 

Is planetarium data is correct from recorded readings at that time

or derived by mathematical predictions only