Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 Dear Chandrashekhar ji Though Dashadhyayi, means 10 adhyayas(Chapters),while interpreting the 10 chapters,Acharya explains interlinking shlokas,from the later adhyayas as well as.Moreover he will give us a clue and key on how to interpret those shlokas.Thus the malayalam translation that i am having contains Varahamihira in full.Moreover the translator also quotes -Saravalai-Bhataolpala etc to comapare and drive the point home.Thus it is a valuable book. I will give you you one relevant and concrete example,which as per me should help us in arriving at a conclusion. Dashadhyayi kara is explaining,Chapter 5 (Janmadhyaya) shloka 6 of Varaha hora.''Na LagnaMinduncha Gurur nireekshathe'' -This is about Jaraputhra.Here commentator says - Chandrassya Guru Vargasthithirapi nishidhye - Chandra should not be even in the shadvargas of Guru - Guru is Satwa,Njana Swaroopa and Brahmana Varna swami -So Jarsanthathi should not be predicted. Now our interest -From here Dashadhyayi kara directly refers to to Chapter 21(Please note) - Anishtadhyaya from where you had quoted 2 shlokas.Shloka 5 starting with - ''Asitha Kujayor Vargesthasthe Sithey Tadaveekshithe Parayuvathiga''. (Thatha cha Garggi - and links to Chandra in Guru Vargas for Jarasanthathi) Commentary - ''AthraSita Kujayor Drishtathwe Drashta vyasya thayo: Vargasthithirapyoktha Thatha thrapi chinthaneeyam'' Now the above Asitha Kujayor is the interesting one - Full explanation is - Apart from such a Shukra getting drishti from Kuja/Saturn and placed in the seventh from lagna,its Vargasthithi belonging to those grahas has also to be thought of.Hence to be simple shloka means - Shukra is placed in the 7th from Lagna.It has to be aspected by Saturn and Mars.It is not enough .It has to be situated in the Shadvargas of Saturn or Kuja as well. Now if such an explanation from Dashadhyayi kara is not present - what will contemporary astrologers say!.They will say Vargesthasthe means 7th in six shadvarga Charts and Saturn and Mars should aspect that shukra in six divisional charts!!!. It has been elaborated in numerous shlokas,that Grahamshas are AMSHAKA sambandhas on to a Rashi.Aspect is one kind of relationship.Varga is another.We know where an aspect can happen. Respect Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 Dear Pradeep, First thing first. It is good if Dashaadhyaai commentator has commented on later adhayaayas. So what does he say about the shloka I quoted. has he skipped comment on it? Does he say specifically about shadavargas when he says Vargasthite/ If that be so does he not accept Varaha Mihira " s hora which has horas of only Surya and Chandra and then never could Chandra be in Varga of Guru or Shukra in teargassed of Shani or Kuja? You have not indicated about what the learned commentator say about the shloka that I have given from adhyaaya 19. shloka 4. I think the meaning of the learned Varaha Mihira is very clear. There is no ambiguity here. But if the commentator differs I would like to know his opinion. Again I have given many shlokas that do not talk about rasi amsha sambandha for a yoga to happen. What does the learned commentator say about that? Take care, Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > Though Dashadhyayi, means 10 adhyayas(Chapters),while interpreting > the 10 chapters,Acharya explains interlinking shlokas,from the later > adhyayas as well as.Moreover he will give us a clue and key on how > to interpret those shlokas.Thus the malayalam translation that i am > having contains Varahamihira in full.Moreover the translator also > quotes -Saravalai-Bhataolpala etc to comapare and drive the point > home.Thus it is a valuable book. > > I will give you you one relevant and concrete example,which as per > me should help us in arriving at a conclusion. > > Dashadhyayi kara is explaining,Chapter 5 (Janmadhyaya) shloka 6 of > Varaha hora.''Na LagnaMinduncha Gurur nireekshathe'' -This is about > Jaraputhra.Here commentator says - Chandrassya Guru Vargasthithirapi > nishidhye - Chandra should not be even in the shadvargas of Guru - > Guru is Satwa,Njana Swaroopa and Brahmana Varna swami -So > Jarsanthathi should not be predicted. > > Now our interest -From here Dashadhyayi kara directly refers to to > Chapter 21(Please note) - Anishtadhyaya from where you had quoted 2 > shlokas.Shloka 5 starting with - > > ''Asitha Kujayor Vargesthasthe Sithey Tadaveekshithe Parayuvathiga''. > (Thatha cha Garggi - and links to Chandra in Guru > Vargas for Jarasanthathi) > Commentary - ''AthraSita Kujayor Drishtathwe Drashta vyasya thayo: > Vargasthithirapyoktha Thatha thrapi chinthaneeyam'' > > Now the above Asitha Kujayor is the interesting one - > Full explanation is - Apart from such a Shukra getting drishti from > Kuja/Saturn and placed in the seventh from lagna,its Vargasthithi > belonging to those grahas has also to be thought of.Hence to be > simple shloka means - Shukra is placed in the 7th from Lagna.It has > to be aspected by Saturn and Mars.It is not enough .It has to be > situated in the Shadvargas of Saturn or Kuja as well. > > Now if such an explanation from Dashadhyayi kara is not present - > what will contemporary astrologers say!.They will say Vargesthasthe > means 7th in six shadvarga Charts and Saturn and Mars should aspect > that shukra in six divisional charts!!!. > > It has been elaborated in numerous shlokas,that Grahamshas are > AMSHAKA sambandhas on to a Rashi.Aspect is one kind of > relationship.Varga is another.We know where an aspect can happen. > > Respect > Pradeep > > > ------ > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/832 - Release 6/4/2007 6:43 PM > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.