Guest guest Posted June 11, 2007 Report Share Posted June 11, 2007 Dear Chandrashekhar ji I feel after reading the previous mails I feel we have a clue on how amshas are always read as amshaka rashi sambsndhas.We also know where and how Drishties are seen. Now regarding dwadashamsha/Rashi. ''Yat Proktam Parathi rashi Veekshana Pahalam Tat dwadashamshe smritham''.How Veekshana Phalams(aspectual results) are mentioned for Chandras placement in individual rashis,results due to aspect are the same when chandra is having dwadshamsha in those Rashis. 1)CHANDRA is aspected by various planets What is the result of this aspect when chandra is placed in 12 rashis What is the result of this aspect when chandra is having dwadashamsha in these 12 rashis. Aspect is one relationship.Varga is another.Both are derived and evaluated in Rashi chakra,which is a set of 12 Rashis and their Vargas. Also I do not understand how will a scholar like Bhatolpala say '' aspects of planets in drekkana chart and Hora chart are mentioned'' when the sanskrit shloka does not contain it. ''Tadgatha -Sthryamshe -Tatpathibhi'' -Chandra is having some Drekkana.Its Pathi (Lord) as well -As per the shloka Aspect from Chandra drekkanadhitpathi is good for Chandra.Where is Drekkana chart and aspect coming.Also aspect from planets situated in Chandra Hora is good. ''Suhrud Bhavana gairva Veekshitha'' -Aspects from planets placed in the friendly rashis of chandra is also good.This also proves that all are seen from Rashi chakra.I do not see how,you are saying aspects are mentioned in ''such charts'' - when there is no chart mentioned. Respect Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 12, 2007 Report Share Posted June 12, 2007 Dear Pradeep, I have given the shloka and its interpretation by Bhattotpala, which is further commented upon by Sitaram Jha who was the emeritus professor of astrology at Kashi Sanskrit Vishwa Vidyaalaya. Now if you think both of them do not know Sanskrit grammar of the time of Varaha Mihira and Bhattotpala, I am helpless. Of course it is quite possible that the opinion of Dashaadhyaayi commentator about the level of knowledge was deficient. About the reference to places from navamsha affecting the nature and fortune of a jataka I could give umpteen shlokas from Karakamsha Adhyaaya of BPHS and also Jaimini, but as you have already decided that there can not be any relation between any of the grahas occupying different Vargas, in a Varga chart, after all that is what the drishties, occupation or relative position in Vargas represent in Varga charts it may not be a fruitful exercise. Take care, Chandrashekhar. vijayadas_pradeep wrote: > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji > > I feel after reading the previous mails I feel we have a clue on how > amshas are always read as amshaka rashi sambsndhas.We also know > where and how Drishties are seen. > Now regarding dwadashamsha/Rashi. > > ''Yat Proktam Parathi rashi Veekshana Pahalam Tat dwadashamshe > smritham''.How Veekshana Phalams(aspectual results) are mentioned > for Chandras placement in individual rashis,results due to aspect > are the same when chandra is having dwadshamsha in those Rashis. > > 1)CHANDRA is aspected by various planets > What is the result of this aspect when chandra is placed in 12 > rashis What is the result of this aspect when chandra is having > dwadashamsha in these 12 rashis. > > Aspect is one relationship.Varga is another.Both are derived and > evaluated in Rashi chakra,which is a set of 12 Rashis and their > Vargas. > > Also I do not understand how will a scholar like Bhatolpala say '' > aspects of planets in drekkana chart and Hora chart are mentioned'' > when the sanskrit shloka does not contain it. > > ''Tadgatha -Sthryamshe -Tatpathibhi'' -Chandra is having some > Drekkana.Its Pathi (Lord) as well -As per the shloka Aspect from > Chandra drekkanadhitpathi is good for Chandra.Where is Drekkana > chart and aspect coming.Also aspect from planets situated in Chandra > Hora is good. > > ''Suhrud Bhavana gairva Veekshitha'' -Aspects from planets placed in > the friendly rashis of chandra is also good.This also proves that > all are seen from Rashi chakra.I do not see how,you are saying > aspects are mentioned in ''such charts'' - when there is no chart > mentioned. > > Respect > Pradeep > > > ------ > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 269.8.9/832 - Release 6/4/2007 6:43 PM > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.