Will Parasara reveal the Real Truth in his BPHS

[Guest guest]

Om Datta Guru

 

Dear Prafulla Bhai & Sushmita,

 

Someone wrote that Robert Koch was hardly crucified, how come that

person never wrote about the Racist Remark on me. Someone called me

having learnt astrology from a Christian Missionary (we all know the

bad name of them in india). What hurt me most is

 

1) Why attack someones religion

 

2) The fact is i follow hinduism

 

3) The moderator Mr.Sreenadh did nothing, infact defended him saying

that what wrong did he say inspite of Bharat & Prafulla coming to my

defense though before that I had existed from the list. I did not feel

that bad at Sreenadh since I know he is a young kid on the block.

 

4) The question here is not Sreenadh, but the fault lies with us, we

entertain such people who do not follow what Parasara said, we put them

on pedestals, we maintain silence and adharma arises I guess, only

Bhrigu Samhita answers how Karmas of our associates effect us and that

too in which period, no other classic explains that. We allow them to

hide behind the back of Parasara to suit their arguments & any kid can

do that, what about following what Parasara said.

 

 

v 1-4. Maharishi Parasara said. O Brahmin! I have described to you the

Jyotish Shastra, as narrated by Lord Brahma to the Sage Narada and by

Narada to Shaunaka and other Sages, from whom I received the knowledge

of this Shastra. I have narrated the same Jyotish Shastra, which I

learnt from them. Do not impart the knowledge of this Shastra to one,

who is insignificative, slanders, or calumniates others, nor to one, who

is not intelligent, is wicked and unknown to you. Teach this supreme

Vedanga Jyotish Shastra only to one, who is gentle and amiable, devoted,

truthful, brilliant and well known to you.

Knowing this would Sage Parasara reveal the Real Astrology for people

like us, no he would not is what I feel.

 

What needs to be highlighted is

 

* Gentle & Amiable

* Truthful

* Well known to you

* Devoted

 

 

1) None of these qualities are found in argumentative, one man upship,

so called wanna be Gurus or scholars.

2) I notice everybody wants to Teach astrology to everyone but nobody

wants to Predict

3) How about allowing someone to preach astrology here on lists after

he has demonstrated his predictive ability over a 20 chart blind test. I

bet my life all these theories will disappear then of these so called

astro teachers & parampara experts.

 

Everybody has an opinion or barks here and some do that with anonymous

names. I fail to understand why.

 

In olden days young students would not open their mouth and talk

anything without thinking, nowadays everybody here wants to talk and be

heard and wants his name on the web lists. This is the problem of the

net.

 

 

 

 

best wishes

Sunil John

Mumbai

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Hi Sunil John,

 

DO you remember me? I am Satya; we used to have good debates sometime

ago.

 

I am reading your posts; really good messages you are writing;

particularly what sages had said or not said.

 

Bottom line is; if we do not make amsa charts we miserably fail to

discover the astrological differences between charts with same Rasi

placement of planets including lagna. You brought in good points.

 

Best regards,

Satya S Kolachina

 

, " jjnet2000_in "

<jjnet2000_in wrote:

>

> Om Datta Guru

>

> Dear Prafulla Bhai & Sushmita,

>

> Someone wrote that Robert Koch was hardly crucified, how come that

> person never wrote about the Racist Remark on me. Someone called me

> having learnt astrology from a Christian Missionary (we all know

the

> bad name of them in india). What hurt me most is

>

> 1) Why attack someones religion

>

> 2) The fact is i follow hinduism

>

> 3) The moderator Mr.Sreenadh did nothing, infact defended him saying

> that what wrong did he say inspite of Bharat & Prafulla coming to my

> defense though before that I had existed from the list. I did not

feel

> that bad at Sreenadh since I know he is a young kid on the block.

>

> 4) The question here is not Sreenadh, but the fault lies with us, we

> entertain such people who do not follow what Parasara said, we put

them

> on pedestals, we maintain silence and adharma arises I guess, only

> Bhrigu Samhita answers how Karmas of our associates effect us and

that

> too in which period, no other classic explains that. We allow them

to

> hide behind the back of Parasara to suit their arguments & any kid

can

> do that, what about following what Parasara said.

>

>

> v 1-4. Maharishi Parasara said. O Brahmin! I have described to you

the

> Jyotish Shastra, as narrated by Lord Brahma to the Sage Narada and

by

> Narada to Shaunaka and other Sages, from whom I received the

knowledge

> of this Shastra. I have narrated the same Jyotish Shastra, which I

> learnt from them. Do not impart the knowledge of this Shastra to

one,

> who is insignificative, slanders, or calumniates others, nor to

one, who

> is not intelligent, is wicked and unknown to you. Teach this supreme

> Vedanga Jyotish Shastra only to one, who is gentle and amiable,

devoted,

> truthful, brilliant and well known to you.

> Knowing this would Sage Parasara reveal the Real Astrology for

people

> like us, no he would not is what I feel.

>

> What needs to be highlighted is

>

> * Gentle & Amiable

> * Truthful

> * Well known to you

> * Devoted

>

>

> 1) None of these qualities are found in argumentative, one man

upship,

> so called wanna be Gurus or scholars.

> 2) I notice everybody wants to Teach astrology to everyone but

nobody

> wants to Predict

> 3) How about allowing someone to preach astrology here on lists

after

> he has demonstrated his predictive ability over a 20 chart blind

test. I

> bet my life all these theories will disappear then of these so

called

> astro teachers & parampara experts.

>

> Everybody has an opinion or barks here and some do that with

anonymous

> names. I fail to understand why.

>

> In olden days young students would not open their mouth and talk

> anything without thinking, nowadays everybody here wants to talk

and be

> heard and wants his name on the web lists. This is the problem of

the

> net.

>

>

>

>

> best wishes

> Sunil John

> Mumbai

>

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Sunil John,

 

 

>

> Dear Prafulla Bhai & Sushmita,

>

> Someone wrote that Robert Koch was hardly crucified, how come that

> person never wrote about the Racist Remark on me. Someone called me

> having learnt astrology from a Christian Missionary (we all know the

> bad name of them in india). What hurt me most is

 

 

 

>

> 1) Why attack someones religion

>

> 2) The fact is i follow hinduism

>

> 3) The moderator Mr.Sreenadh did nothing, infact defended him saying

> that what wrong did he say inspite of Bharat & Prafulla coming to my

> defense though before that I had existed from the list. I did not feel

> that bad at Sreenadh since I know he is a young kid on the block.

 

 

[Prafulla] - well, it is member's choice to ignore the snobbish approach, and

Robert Koch was certainly put to discomfort in very harsh / questionable manner.

This is already there in that forum and let members make their opinion.

 

yes - there were rasicst remarks against you sometime back, and may be (like for

few in history in the name of blasphemy - all is applaudable) it is way of life

for few.

 

And beyond doubt, these were sad incidents - full of malice.

 

 

Many thanks for sharing parashar's pre qualificaton norms for an astrologer.

 

regards / Prafulla

[Guest guest]

Om Datta Guru

 

Dear Satya Sai,

I came on the list after many months I guess so it took me time to

recognise u, I apologise, but now I remember u very well.

 

Thanks for ur kind mail. I can see that you maintain the spirit of open

mind.

 

Sorry for short mail brother but it seems in 2 days there are 50 mails,

replying to them is going to be cumbersome

 

best wishes to u

 

Sunil John

Mumbai

 

 

 

, " Satya Sai Kolachina "

<skolachi wrote:

>

> Hi Sunil John,

>

> DO you remember me? I am Satya; we used to have good debates sometime

> ago.

>

> I am reading your posts; really good messages you are writing;

> particularly what sages had said or not said.

>

> Bottom line is; if we do not make amsa charts we miserably fail to

> discover the astrological differences between charts with same Rasi

> placement of planets including lagna. You brought in good points.

>

> Best regards,

> Satya S Kolachina

>

> , " jjnet2000_in "

> jjnet2000_in@ wrote:

> >

> > Om Datta Guru

> >

> > Dear Prafulla Bhai & Sushmita,

> >

> > Someone wrote that Robert Koch was hardly crucified, how come that

> > person never wrote about the Racist Remark on me. Someone called me

> > having learnt astrology from a Christian Missionary (we all know

> the

> > bad name of them in india). What hurt me most is

> >

> > 1) Why attack someones religion

> >

> > 2) The fact is i follow hinduism

> >

> > 3) The moderator Mr.Sreenadh did nothing, infact defended him saying

> > that what wrong did he say inspite of Bharat & Prafulla coming to my

> > defense though before that I had existed from the list. I did not

> feel

> > that bad at Sreenadh since I know he is a young kid on the block.

> >

> > 4) The question here is not Sreenadh, but the fault lies with us, we

> > entertain such people who do not follow what Parasara said, we put

> them

> > on pedestals, we maintain silence and adharma arises I guess, only

> > Bhrigu Samhita answers how Karmas of our associates effect us and

> that

> > too in which period, no other classic explains that. We allow them

> to

> > hide behind the back of Parasara to suit their arguments & any kid

> can

> > do that, what about following what Parasara said.

> >

> >

> > v 1-4. Maharishi Parasara said. O Brahmin! I have described to you

> the

> > Jyotish Shastra, as narrated by Lord Brahma to the Sage Narada and

> by

> > Narada to Shaunaka and other Sages, from whom I received the

> knowledge

> > of this Shastra. I have narrated the same Jyotish Shastra, which I

> > learnt from them. Do not impart the knowledge of this Shastra to

> one,

> > who is insignificative, slanders, or calumniates others, nor to

> one, who

> > is not intelligent, is wicked and unknown to you. Teach this supreme

> > Vedanga Jyotish Shastra only to one, who is gentle and amiable,

> devoted,

> > truthful, brilliant and well known to you.

> > Knowing this would Sage Parasara reveal the Real Astrology for

> people

> > like us, no he would not is what I feel.

> >

> > What needs to be highlighted is

> >

> > * Gentle & Amiable

> > * Truthful

> > * Well known to you

> > * Devoted

> >

> >

> > 1) None of these qualities are found in argumentative, one man

> upship,

> > so called wanna be Gurus or scholars.

> > 2) I notice everybody wants to Teach astrology to everyone but

> nobody

> > wants to Predict

> > 3) How about allowing someone to preach astrology here on lists

> after

> > he has demonstrated his predictive ability over a 20 chart blind

> test. I

> > bet my life all these theories will disappear then of these so

> called

> > astro teachers & parampara experts.

> >

> > Everybody has an opinion or barks here and some do that with

> anonymous

> > names. I fail to understand why.

> >

> > In olden days young students would not open their mouth and talk

> > anything without thinking, nowadays everybody here wants to talk

> and be

> > heard and wants his name on the web lists. This is the problem of

> the

> > net.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > best wishes

> > Sunil John

> > Mumbai

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

OM Datta Guru

 

Dear Prafulla Bhai

Thanks for ur mail. Noted ur good points

I even forgot the name of the person who made that racist comment to

be honest

 

best wishes

SJ

 

 

, Prafulla Gang <jyotish wrote:

>

> Dear Sunil John,

>

>

> >

> > Dear Prafulla Bhai & Sushmita,

> >

> > Someone wrote that Robert Koch was hardly crucified, how come that

> > person never wrote about the Racist Remark on me. Someone called me

> > having learnt astrology from a Christian Missionary (we all know

the

> > bad name of them in india). What hurt me most is

>

>

>

> >

> > 1) Why attack someones religion

> >

> > 2) The fact is i follow hinduism

> >

> > 3) The moderator Mr.Sreenadh did nothing, infact defended him saying

> > that what wrong did he say inspite of Bharat & Prafulla coming to my

> > defense though before that I had existed from the list. I did not

feel

> > that bad at Sreenadh since I know he is a young kid on the block.

>

>

> [Prafulla] - well, it is member's choice to ignore the snobbish

approach, and Robert Koch was certainly put to discomfort in very harsh

/ questionable manner. This is already there in that forum and let

members make their opinion.

>

> yes - there were rasicst remarks against you sometime back, and may be

(like for few in history in the name of blasphemy - all is applaudable)

it is way of life for few.

>

> And beyond doubt, these were sad incidents - full of malice.

>

>

> Many thanks for sharing parashar's pre qualificaton norms for an

astrologer.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>