Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Some thoughts about astrology - 1

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear Sri Prafulla !

You said the right way. Traditionally, astrological readings are done

privately, to the person who wanted it, or at the most, in the

presence of his family members like parents or other well-wishers

whereever appropriate.

 

We should not forget there are 9 planets and 12 houses in every one's

chart; and only half of them are benefic and the other half are

malefic. The benefic ones deliver the good karma results of past

lives and the malefic ones deliver the bad karma results. No one born

on the earth can escape from these 9 planets and 12 houses. Therefore

it is highly ridiculous to point out at others and say 'Your Sani or

Your Mars...'. When I hear comments from people like this, then I

don't know how to estimate the maturity/immaturity level of the

particular astrologer, and when he/she would realize the underlying

principle of astrology. Sani doesn't belong to Bhaskar or Satya or

Prafulla.

 

If an astrologer doesn't recognize these basic-basic principles (I am

not even talking about the core principles of astrology), that person

is unfit as an astrologery. One may argue against my views; I just

welcome those views and ignore them; because truth is truth. ONE WHO

CANNOT UNDERSTNAD THESE SUBTLE BEHAVIORAL REQUIREMENTS IS UNFIT TO BE

AN ASTROLOGER, though he may be well-versed in all the sastras, but

his predictive results will be poor.

 

For us to give predictions, the most necessary thing is that we, as

astrologers, should first be blessed by the PLANETS. If the planets

are not happy with us, our predictions will go wrong. One may argue

for 10 yrs on the Internet groups; but nothing happens. Therefore, as

astrologers it is our PRIME responsibility to seek blessing from the

PLANETS to tell the truth about their dispositions in the charts. Sri

KN Rao says on occassion, that when we achieve that level of

connection with the planets, the planets literally speak to the

astrologer and tell the story about the native. That is true

astrology. Not dependence on books alone. If Sauturn is unhappy with

us, how can he let us see his influence on the charts? Have ever

realized that some very obscure astrologers' predictions would give

stunning results? Because, he would have been so much blessed by the

planets. He who is blessed by the planets is the true astrologer. We

can lay down rules for how to get blessed by the planets.

 

I will continue in next post ...

 

Best regards,

Satya Sai Kolachina

 

 

 

 

, " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish

wrote:

>

> Dear Bharat ji

>

> Many thanks for sharing your opinion.

>

> I am personally not comfortable in any astrologer - writing publicly

> on anyone's chart (unless asked). I could see distinctly - that Shri

> Bhaskar ji asked forum's view only on mercury afflcition and then he

> asked Shri Sateesh to interpret Vimsamsa chart. Any personal

opinion

> could have been posted privately to Bhaskar ji (like you did - which

> was very correct).

>

> Shri Satya's explanation on mars / rahu was in response to the

> unwanted interpretation post of Shri Satessh. My opinion was

> restricted to differentiation of krur/somya and shubha / ashubha;

and

> role of mars / rahu in leo nativity.

>

> Of course - the constellation dispositor will have overriding

effects

> - like many other factors.

>

> regards / Prafulla

>

> , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

> <astrologyhindu@> wrote:

> >

> > Namaste Sri Prafulla and Sri Satya

> >

> > In Sri Bhaskar's case, Rahu and Mars are in Ketu's nakshatra and

thereby

> > connected to the 7th house. Despite the classical Raja yoga that

you

> > mention, it will have a poor effect on the relationships. I have

advised

> > Durga Kavach and Durga Saptshati Japa for him or Sri

> Vishnusahastranama and

> > Ram Raksha Stotra.

> >

> > Moreover, Sun and Mercury are in Rahu's nakshatra which connects

them to

> > Lagna. The lagna is strengthened but Surya remains afflicted. It

is the

> > Mercury that can break the illusion of Rahu. Viveka is the

antidote

> of an

> > illusion. This is the reason the above Japas will help him

immensely.

> >

> > I wouldn't call Rahu as a benefic in his case. The same has been

> expressed

> > directly to him. I did not want to say all this on the list as

> people pounce

> > upon him knowing his weakness to react.

> >

> > If you see there are some good combinations in his chart and

> certainly, I

> > wouldn't call his Mercury Afflicted.

> >

> > Thanks and Regards

> > Bharat

> >

> >

> >

> > On 7/14/07, Prafulla Gang <jyotish@> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Shri Satya ji,

> > >

> > > If I may add:

> > > Sage Parashar (and classics) has defined planets into two

groups:

> > > a. krur and somya planets (what we call natural benefic and

malefic

> > > planets) for example - weak moon / sun / mars / shani / rahu /

ketu

> > > etc as krur planets; guru, strong moon, venus etc (mercury

gives as

> > > per its association). Many classics are silent on Ketu as krur

planet.

> > >

> > > b. shubh / ashubh planets (what we call as functional malefic

and

> > > benefic) - and it is based upon respective lagna. Sage Parashar

has

> > > not defined rahu / ketu as ashubha or shubha for any specific

lagna -

> > > but has linked that to its placement in kona / trikona with

another

> > > yoga graha as shubha.

> > >

> > > IMO - the krur planet primarily means to deliver through krur

ways (so

> > > karmic effects have some negative issues) - but for worldly

results

> > > (what we always refer in our day to day astrology or say modern

use of

> > > astrology) - we look at functional " results " .

> > >

> > > For Leo lagna - mars is yoga graha and rahu / ketu if

associated with

> > > mars in kendra / trikona will give yogakarka results. Any p-

lanet -

> > > when hailed as yoga karka - may still not be outright positive

in all

> > > spheres - but it has role for the houses / associations for

specific

> > > lagna (And also the relative placement from each bhava ) - so

planet

> > > has multiple results. Even somya planet like guru / venus can

harm

> > > (ashubha) or a krur planet can be shubha.

> > >

> > > Now any planet's natural or functional status for a lagna is

again

> > > not a conclusive factor - but there are overriding /

complimenting

> > > factors - like its avastha, its dispositor's strength, its

shadbala,

> > > its participation in yoga, its ashtakvarga, planets associated

with it

> > > through aspects / conj, D charts positions and so on..

> > >

> > > In addition - Rahu / ketu works per their rasi dispositors - as

those

> > > rasi dispositors work as Karmic Controlling Planet.

> > >

> > > Generally speaking - rahu in simha / dhanu and mesha rashi gives

> > > excellent results (subject to other factors); for leo and karka

lagna

> > > - mars association with rahu / ketu makes rahu and ketu as yoga

karka.

> > > Mars placed in its best friend Sun's sign is an excellent

placement

> > > for leo native.

> > >

> > > Mars, rahu, ketu remains krur planet - irrespective of their

> > > functional role; and so are saturn for tula native. But their

> > > functional " results " for their house occupation and lordship are

> > > considered shubha.

> > >

> > > perhaps - krur and somya are nature of planets or one can say

approach

> > > of the planet - in terms of " means " of its role. Functional

results

> > > are end outcome. In this discusion - we were discussing - the

> > > functional results of mars and rahu !!

> > >

> > > regards / Prafulla

> > >

> > > <%

40>,

> > > " Satya Sai Kolachina "

> > >

> > > <skolachi@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Anna,

> > > >

> > > > The way discussions are going on in this forum, I am not

feeling

> > > > encouraged to share my views/experiences in this forum. I

have been

> > > > noticing day-by-day the number of people maintaining balance

is

> > > > reducing, and people start targetting on others on a personal

basis,

> > > > which is not an acceptable quality for an astrologer; those

who are

> > > > supposed to guide others, are expected to behave balanced; I

know we

> > > > are all humans; but still I insist on exercising balance,

without

> > > > which there is no point in astrology discussion; because the

divine

> > > > blessing will not be there for such discussion.

> > > >

> > > > However, since I mentioned this point, I will give my

clarification

> > > > here.

> > > >

> > > > There are only six lagnas as I mentioned in my earlier mail,

which

> > > > have perfect yoga karaka. First of all what is a yoga karaka?

> One who

> > > > is the lord of kona and kendra with resepct to lagna. THe same

> can be

> > > > analyzed from Chandra lagna and Surya lagna also, but I am

not going

> > > > to deviate into that direction at this time.

> > > >

> > > > For Sukra lagnas Tula and Vrishabha Sani is the yoga karaka,

for

> Sani

> > > > lagnas Makara and Kumbha Sukra is the yoga karaka, and for

Karkataka

> > > > and Simha Kuja/Mangal is the yoga karaka. For other lagnas, a

> > > > Konadhipathi is simultaneously the owner of a malefic house

and

> hence

> > > > is not a PERFECT yogakarka, in the sense that it loses its

partial

> > > > beneficence and aquires partial maleficence. For example for

Mithuna

> > > > lagna, Sukra is 5th and 12th lord, not granted a full

yogakaraka

> > > > status, and Sani is 8th and 9th lord not granted a fully yoga

karaka

> > > > status; only the lagna lord is the yoga karaka in this case.

> > > >

> > > > Now, coming to Rahu or Kethu association with yoga karaka, it

is

> true

> > > > that when Rahu or Kethu gets associated with the Yoga Karaka

planet,

> > > > then the particular node will take the responsibility of

delivering

> > > > the yoga karaka results in its dasa/antardasa; in addition,

the

> > > > maleficence of the node is greatly reduced; only those who

test this

> > > > principle on several charts can confidently say this; sole

> dependence

> > > > on books/theory does not give confidence to say so.

> > > >

> > > > No doubt, Rahu and kethu have maleficence that they shower;

but that

> > > > maleficence is changed to beneficence to a large extent when

> they are

> > > > associated with yoga karaka planet. I have practically seen

> > > > horoscopes and the respective individuals, in both cases,

where the

> > > > nodes give malefic results or extreme benefic results. I would

> > > > honestly and earnestly request members not to jump to

conclusions

> > > > based on the fact that they are nodes. When they become

benefic,

> they

> > > > shower extreme benefic results. Not having a proper

understanding on

> > > > the nodes will lead us to make terrrible mistakes in

predictions.

> > > >

> > > > Sri KN Rao says that the Rahu-Kethu axis in any horoscope

plays a

> > > > very important role and conveys several hidden messages to the

> > > > astrologers. I would therefore add, that every astrologer

should pay

> > > > proper attention to this Rahu Kethu axis; and all of us do

have this

> > > > axis covering some area of our life; no exception.

> > > >

> > > > Best regards,

> > > > Satya Sai Kolachina

> > > >

> > > >

> <%40>,

> > > 108ar <bona_mente@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > Dear Satya,

> > > > >

> > > > > I am very intrigued by your post, would you please direct

me to

> > > > the article you are refferring to? For ex. rayaYoga pl. for

Ta Lagna

> > > > is Sa- does any contact between Rahu and Saturn become

> > > > positive /conj.,square or trine/? I've learnt that Rahu/Mars

and

> > > > Rahu/Sa bring Sarpa yoga, of sort. Mars trine Rahu as well,

for Cn

> > > > Lagna. In mutual kendra as well.

> > > > >

> > > > > Best wishes,

> > > > > Anna

> > > > >

> > > > > SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote:

> > > > > Satyaji,

> > > > >

> > > > > Rahu in kedra with kona lord becomes a rajayoga. There

> > > > > is no doubt about it. But rahu is a malefic. The term

> > > > > malefic is in its truest sense a planets that affect

> > > > > health and longevity. So rahu in kendra with kona lord

> > > > > is a rajayoga but rajayoga does not mean it would be

> > > > > great in all areas of life. Thas the subtle

> > > > > difference. Rahu and mangal in a house will harm the

> > > > > living indications of that house. So lets say malefics

> > > > > and rajayoga planets are in 4th house it may give the

> > > > > native good properties but will affect the mother in

> > > > > adverse way. Thats the point I am making here.

> > > > >

> > > > > I am not making fun of anyone's horoscope, in fact I

> > > > > have no interest whatsoever in the said natives

> > > > > horoscope. He is chiding everyone and sundry time and

> > > > > again and such childish and immature behavior has been

> > > > > going on for long and its best nipped in the bud.

> > > > > Besides arguments( Not debates) and agitation what has

> > > > > this individual done on the list. Go back into

> > > > > archives and check. Its just a nuisance. No one is

> > > > > asking him to waste his time and he should refrain

> > > > > from wasting others time as well.

> > > > >

> > > > > Satish

> > > > >

> > > > > --- Satya Sai Kolachina <skolachi@> wrote:

> > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Sri Satish,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > I would suggest you read Sri KN Rao's articles about

> > > > > > when Rahu

> > > > > > becomes benefic. When Rahu and Ketu associate with

> > > > > > the Yoga Karaka

> > > > > > for a lagna, and that is also in a Kendra or Kona,

> > > > > > then it becomes

> > > > > > full benefic and bestows benefic results. I would

> > > > > > request you please

> > > > > > not make fun of others' horoscopes, as a wise

> > > > > > astrologer.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Dear Sri Bhaskar,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > You are making here an unnecessary attempt. Please

> > > > > > consider my wise

> > > > > > advise and leave these arguments. Please do not

> > > > > > waste your energy to

> > > > > > teach them astrology.

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Best regards to both of you,

> > > > > >

> > > > > > Satya Sai Kolachina

> > > > > >

> > > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > ________

> > > > > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative

> > > > vehicles. Visit the Auto Green Center.

> > > > > http://autos./green_center/

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.

> > > > >

> > > > >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Satya ji

 

I must take privilege in reading such wonderful thoughts and am looking forward

to next part of your post.

 

The " blessing of Planet " part of the mail is real pointer - where internet

jyotish literally fails.

 

regards / Prafulla Gang

http://www.prafulla.net

 

Diplomacy - n. the patriotic act of lying for one's country / community.

************************************************

 

 

>

> skolachi

> Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:57:52 -0000

>

> Some thoughts about astrology - 1

>

> Dear Sri Prafulla !

> You said the right way. Traditionally, astrological readings are done

> privately, to the person who wanted it, or at the most, in the

> presence of his family members like parents or other well-wishers

> whereever appropriate.

>

> We should not forget there are 9 planets and 12 houses in every one's

> chart; and only half of them are benefic and the other half are

> malefic. The benefic ones deliver the good karma results of past

> lives and the malefic ones deliver the bad karma results. No one born

> on the earth can escape from these 9 planets and 12 houses. Therefore

> it is highly ridiculous to point out at others and say 'Your Sani or

> Your Mars...'. When I hear comments from people like this, then I

> don't know how to estimate the maturity/immaturity level of the

> particular astrologer, and when he/she would realize the underlying

> principle of astrology. Sani doesn't belong to Bhaskar or Satya or

> Prafulla.

>

> If an astrologer doesn't recognize these basic-basic principles (I am

> not even talking about the core principles of astrology), that person

> is unfit as an astrologery. One may argue against my views; I just

> welcome those views and ignore them; because truth is truth. ONE WHO

> CANNOT UNDERSTNAD THESE SUBTLE BEHAVIORAL REQUIREMENTS IS UNFIT TO BE

> AN ASTROLOGER, though he may be well-versed in all the sastras, but

> his predictive results will be poor.

>

> For us to give predictions, the most necessary thing is that we, as

> astrologers, should first be blessed by the PLANETS. If the planets

> are not happy with us, our predictions will go wrong. One may argue

> for 10 yrs on the Internet groups; but nothing happens. Therefore, as

> astrologers it is our PRIME responsibility to seek blessing from the

> PLANETS to tell the truth about their dispositions in the charts. Sri

> KN Rao says on occassion, that when we achieve that level of

> connection with the planets, the planets literally speak to the

> astrologer and tell the story about the native. That is true

> astrology. Not dependence on books alone. If Sauturn is unhappy with

> us, how can he let us see his influence on the charts? Have ever

> realized that some very obscure astrologers' predictions would give

> stunning results? Because, he would have been so much blessed by the

> planets. He who is blessed by the planets is the true astrologer. We

> can lay down rules for how to get blessed by the planets.

>

> I will continue in next post ...

>

> Best regards,

> Satya Sai Kolachina

>

>

>

>

> , " Prafulla Gang " <jyotish

> wrote:

>>

>> Dear Bharat ji

>>

>> Many thanks for sharing your opinion.

>>

>> I am personally not comfortable in any astrologer - writing publicly

>> on anyone's chart (unless asked). I could see distinctly - that Shri

>> Bhaskar ji asked forum's view only on mercury afflcition and then he

>> asked Shri Sateesh to interpret Vimsamsa chart. Any personal

> opinion

>> could have been posted privately to Bhaskar ji (like you did - which

>> was very correct).

>>

>> Shri Satya's explanation on mars / rahu was in response to the

>> unwanted interpretation post of Shri Satessh. My opinion was

>> restricted to differentiation of krur/somya and shubha / ashubha;

> and

>> role of mars / rahu in leo nativity.

>>

>> Of course - the constellation dispositor will have overriding

> effects

>> - like many other factors.

>>

>> regards / Prafulla

>>

>> , " Bharat - Hindu Astrology "

>> <astrologyhindu@> wrote:

>>>

>>> Namaste Sri Prafulla and Sri Satya

>>>

>>> In Sri Bhaskar's case, Rahu and Mars are in Ketu's nakshatra and

> thereby

>>> connected to the 7th house. Despite the classical Raja yoga that

> you

>>> mention, it will have a poor effect on the relationships. I have

> advised

>>> Durga Kavach and Durga Saptshati Japa for him or Sri

>> Vishnusahastranama and

>>> Ram Raksha Stotra.

>>>

>>> Moreover, Sun and Mercury are in Rahu's nakshatra which connects

> them to

>>> Lagna. The lagna is strengthened but Surya remains afflicted. It

> is the

>>> Mercury that can break the illusion of Rahu. Viveka is the

> antidote

>> of an

>>> illusion. This is the reason the above Japas will help him

> immensely.

>>>

>>> I wouldn't call Rahu as a benefic in his case. The same has been

>> expressed

>>> directly to him. I did not want to say all this on the list as

>> people pounce

>>> upon him knowing his weakness to react.

>>>

>>> If you see there are some good combinations in his chart and

>> certainly, I

>>> wouldn't call his Mercury Afflicted.

>>>

>>> Thanks and Regards

>>> Bharat

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> On 7/14/07, Prafulla Gang <jyotish@> wrote:

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Dear Shri Satya ji,

>>>>

>>>> If I may add:

>>>> Sage Parashar (and classics) has defined planets into two

> groups:

>>>> a. krur and somya planets (what we call natural benefic and

> malefic

>>>> planets) for example - weak moon / sun / mars / shani / rahu /

> ketu

>>>> etc as krur planets; guru, strong moon, venus etc (mercury

> gives as

>>>> per its association). Many classics are silent on Ketu as krur

> planet.

>>>>

>>>> b. shubh / ashubh planets (what we call as functional malefic

> and

>>>> benefic) - and it is based upon respective lagna. Sage Parashar

> has

>>>> not defined rahu / ketu as ashubha or shubha for any specific

> lagna -

>>>> but has linked that to its placement in kona / trikona with

> another

>>>> yoga graha as shubha.

>>>>

>>>> IMO - the krur planet primarily means to deliver through krur

> ways (so

>>>> karmic effects have some negative issues) - but for worldly

> results

>>>> (what we always refer in our day to day astrology or say modern

> use of

>>>> astrology) - we look at functional " results " .

>>>>

>>>> For Leo lagna - mars is yoga graha and rahu / ketu if

> associated with

>>>> mars in kendra / trikona will give yogakarka results. Any p-

> lanet -

>>>> when hailed as yoga karka - may still not be outright positive

> in all

>>>> spheres - but it has role for the houses / associations for

> specific

>>>> lagna (And also the relative placement from each bhava ) - so

> planet

>>>> has multiple results. Even somya planet like guru / venus can

> harm

>>>> (ashubha) or a krur planet can be shubha.

>>>>

>>>> Now any planet's natural or functional status for a lagna is

> again

>>>> not a conclusive factor - but there are overriding /

> complimenting

>>>> factors - like its avastha, its dispositor's strength, its

> shadbala,

>>>> its participation in yoga, its ashtakvarga, planets associated

> with it

>>>> through aspects / conj, D charts positions and so on..

>>>>

>>>> In addition - Rahu / ketu works per their rasi dispositors - as

> those

>>>> rasi dispositors work as Karmic Controlling Planet.

>>>>

>>>> Generally speaking - rahu in simha / dhanu and mesha rashi gives

>>>> excellent results (subject to other factors); for leo and karka

> lagna

>>>> - mars association with rahu / ketu makes rahu and ketu as yoga

> karka.

>>>> Mars placed in its best friend Sun's sign is an excellent

> placement

>>>> for leo native.

>>>>

>>>> Mars, rahu, ketu remains krur planet - irrespective of their

>>>> functional role; and so are saturn for tula native. But their

>>>> functional " results " for their house occupation and lordship are

>>>> considered shubha.

>>>>

>>>> perhaps - krur and somya are nature of planets or one can say

> approach

>>>> of the planet - in terms of " means " of its role. Functional

> results

>>>> are end outcome. In this discusion - we were discussing - the

>>>> functional results of mars and rahu !!

>>>>

>>>> regards / Prafulla

>>>>

>>>> <%

> 40>,

>>>> " Satya Sai Kolachina "

>>>>

>>>> <skolachi@> wrote:

>>>>>

>>>>> Dear Anna,

>>>>>

>>>>> The way discussions are going on in this forum, I am not

> feeling

>>>>> encouraged to share my views/experiences in this forum. I

> have been

>>>>> noticing day-by-day the number of people maintaining balance

> is

>>>>> reducing, and people start targetting on others on a personal

> basis,

>>>>> which is not an acceptable quality for an astrologer; those

> who are

>>>>> supposed to guide others, are expected to behave balanced; I

> know we

>>>>> are all humans; but still I insist on exercising balance,

> without

>>>>> which there is no point in astrology discussion; because the

> divine

>>>>> blessing will not be there for such discussion.

>>>>>

>>>>> However, since I mentioned this point, I will give my

> clarification

>>>>> here.

>>>>>

>>>>> There are only six lagnas as I mentioned in my earlier mail,

> which

>>>>> have perfect yoga karaka. First of all what is a yoga karaka?

>> One who

>>>>> is the lord of kona and kendra with resepct to lagna. THe same

>> can be

>>>>> analyzed from Chandra lagna and Surya lagna also, but I am

> not going

>>>>> to deviate into that direction at this time.

>>>>>

>>>>> For Sukra lagnas Tula and Vrishabha Sani is the yoga karaka,

> for

>> Sani

>>>>> lagnas Makara and Kumbha Sukra is the yoga karaka, and for

> Karkataka

>>>>> and Simha Kuja/Mangal is the yoga karaka. For other lagnas, a

>>>>> Konadhipathi is simultaneously the owner of a malefic house

> and

>> hence

>>>>> is not a PERFECT yogakarka, in the sense that it loses its

> partial

>>>>> beneficence and aquires partial maleficence. For example for

> Mithuna

>>>>> lagna, Sukra is 5th and 12th lord, not granted a full

> yogakaraka

>>>>> status, and Sani is 8th and 9th lord not granted a fully yoga

> karaka

>>>>> status; only the lagna lord is the yoga karaka in this case.

>>>>>

>>>>> Now, coming to Rahu or Kethu association with yoga karaka, it

> is

>> true

>>>>> that when Rahu or Kethu gets associated with the Yoga Karaka

> planet,

>>>>> then the particular node will take the responsibility of

> delivering

>>>>> the yoga karaka results in its dasa/antardasa; in addition,

> the

>>>>> maleficence of the node is greatly reduced; only those who

> test this

>>>>> principle on several charts can confidently say this; sole

>> dependence

>>>>> on books/theory does not give confidence to say so.

>>>>>

>>>>> No doubt, Rahu and kethu have maleficence that they shower;

> but that

>>>>> maleficence is changed to beneficence to a large extent when

>> they are

>>>>> associated with yoga karaka planet. I have practically seen

>>>>> horoscopes and the respective individuals, in both cases,

> where the

>>>>> nodes give malefic results or extreme benefic results. I would

>>>>> honestly and earnestly request members not to jump to

> conclusions

>>>>> based on the fact that they are nodes. When they become

> benefic,

>> they

>>>>> shower extreme benefic results. Not having a proper

> understanding on

>>>>> the nodes will lead us to make terrrible mistakes in

> predictions.

>>>>>

>>>>> Sri KN Rao says that the Rahu-Kethu axis in any horoscope

> plays a

>>>>> very important role and conveys several hidden messages to the

>>>>> astrologers. I would therefore add, that every astrologer

> should pay

>>>>> proper attention to this Rahu Kethu axis; and all of us do

> have this

>>>>> axis covering some area of our life; no exception.

>>>>>

>>>>> Best regards,

>>>>> Satya Sai Kolachina

>>>>>

>>>>>

>> <%40>,

>>>> 108ar <bona_mente@> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Dear Satya,

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I am very intrigued by your post, would you please direct

> me to

>>>>> the article you are refferring to? For ex. rayaYoga pl. for

> Ta Lagna

>>>>> is Sa- does any contact between Rahu and Saturn become

>>>>> positive /conj.,square or trine/? I've learnt that Rahu/Mars

> and

>>>>> Rahu/Sa bring Sarpa yoga, of sort. Mars trine Rahu as well,

> for Cn

>>>>> Lagna. In mutual kendra as well.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Best wishes,

>>>>>> Anna

>>>>>>

>>>>>> SPK <aquaris_rising@> wrote:

>>>>>> Satyaji,

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Rahu in kedra with kona lord becomes a rajayoga. There

>>>>>> is no doubt about it. But rahu is a malefic. The term

>>>>>> malefic is in its truest sense a planets that affect

>>>>>> health and longevity. So rahu in kendra with kona lord

>>>>>> is a rajayoga but rajayoga does not mean it would be

>>>>>> great in all areas of life. Thas the subtle

>>>>>> difference. Rahu and mangal in a house will harm the

>>>>>> living indications of that house. So lets say malefics

>>>>>> and rajayoga planets are in 4th house it may give the

>>>>>> native good properties but will affect the mother in

>>>>>> adverse way. Thats the point I am making here.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> I am not making fun of anyone's horoscope, in fact I

>>>>>> have no interest whatsoever in the said natives

>>>>>> horoscope. He is chiding everyone and sundry time and

>>>>>> again and such childish and immature behavior has been

>>>>>> going on for long and its best nipped in the bud.

>>>>>> Besides arguments( Not debates) and agitation what has

>>>>>> this individual done on the list. Go back into

>>>>>> archives and check. Its just a nuisance. No one is

>>>>>> asking him to waste his time and he should refrain

>>>>>> from wasting others time as well.

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Satish

>>>>>>

>>>>>> --- Satya Sai Kolachina <skolachi@> wrote:

>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Dear Sri Satish,

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> I would suggest you read Sri KN Rao's articles about

>>>>>>> when Rahu

>>>>>>> becomes benefic. When Rahu and Ketu associate with

>>>>>>> the Yoga Karaka

>>>>>>> for a lagna, and that is also in a Kendra or Kona,

>>>>>>> then it becomes

>>>>>>> full benefic and bestows benefic results. I would

>>>>>>> request you please

>>>>>>> not make fun of others' horoscopes, as a wise

>>>>>>> astrologer.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Dear Sri Bhaskar,

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> You are making here an unnecessary attempt. Please

>>>>>>> consider my wise

>>>>>>> advise and leave these arguments. Please do not

>>>>>>> waste your energy to

>>>>>>> teach them astrology.

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Best regards to both of you,

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>> Satya Sai Kolachina

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> ________

>>>>>> Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative

>>>>> vehicles. Visit the Auto Green Center.

>>>>>> http://autos./green_center/

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

>>>>>> Pinpoint customers who are looking for what you sell.

>>>>>>

>>>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...