What is actually meaning of equalising ?

[Guest guest]

Please explain,

 

1) A policeman beating a pickpocket,when

he was caught pickpocketing.Did he more than

equalise ? Should the policeman keep quiet,

for the pickpocket to start doing this again ?

 

2) In Iran 2 days back, a man was stoned to

death for adultery. That is the law there.

Maybe harsh for us in India. But

was it more than equalising ?

 

How can we sensibly, treat both the police

and the pickpocket at par, just because he beat

the pickpocket and more than equalised ?

 

How can we treat the Law of Iran and the adultery

committer, both on Par, just because he was stoned

to death ?

 

In both cases, justice was dispensed with.

And we cannot treat both the parties as alike.

Only on provocation, or on committing

of a wrong act, was the re-action put forth.

 

Therefore let us be sensible,

and not preach, unnecessarily, just

to look good and saintly in public

image. When the same things

happen with the wrong police force here,

then we shall see what preaching is practised,

and how they behave.

 

What is hapenning to this world ? Why does

injustice be not curbed the way it should

be . It cannot be curbed by Pravachan. No rapist

can be allowed to go free after pravachan,otherwise

he will rape again. We have already seen many cases

in India, where the traitors who had indulged in

terrorism, planting bombs, were let scot free,

for want of witneeses and proof. History is Proof,

that they returned to bomb innocents again.

 

Let us put a full stop, to this

Ironic and moronic talks of moral policing

to the victim, instead of the criminal.

 

regards,

Bhaskar.

[Guest guest]

, " Bhaskar " <bhaskar_jyotish

wrote:

>

> Please explain,

>

> 1) A policeman beating a pickpocket,when

> he was caught pickpocketing.Did he more than

> equalise ? Should the policeman keep quiet,

> for the pickpocket to start doing this again ?

>

> 2) In Iran 2 days back, a man was stoned to

> death for adultery. That is the law there.

> Maybe harsh for us in India. But

> was it more than equalising ?

>

> How can we sensibly, treat both the police

> and the pickpocket at par, just because he beat

> the pickpocket and more than equalised ?

>

> How can we treat the Law of Iran and the adultery

> committer, both on Par, just because he was stoned

> to death ?

>

> In both cases, justice was dispensed with.

> And we cannot treat both the parties as alike.

> Only on provocation, or on committing

> of a wrong act, was the re-action put forth.

>

> Therefore let us be sensible,

> and not preach, unnecessarily, just

> to look good and saintly in public

> image. When the same things

> happen with the wrong police force here,

> then we shall see what preaching is practised,

> and how they behave.

>

> What is hapenning to this world ? Why does

> injustice be not curbed the way it should

> be . It cannot be curbed by Pravachan. No rapist

> can be allowed to go free after pravachan,otherwise

> he will rape again. We have already seen many cases

> in India, where the traitors who had indulged in

> terrorism, planting bombs, were let scot free,

> for want of witneeses and proof. History is Proof,

> that they returned to bomb innocents again.

>

> Let us put a full stop, to this

> Ironic and moronic talks of moral policing

> to the victim, instead of the criminal.

>

> regards,

> Bhaskar.

>

Well you a rite ,we in kali yuga must practice some different law,not

like this in another yugas.

Sory if my english is not 100% correct.