Unity in adversity.

[Guest guest]

Dear all,

 

Moderation is never required,if all the honest members

do their work with honesty. If a member abuses someone,

like was done when Raja said wrong about my Parents,

there were 4 who stood for me and 2 who stood for raja.

No harm or wrong in this standing business.

But if those other 2 knew where to stand, then Raja

would never had the guts to continue his torrential

postings done periodically attributed to me and my name.

These 2 members are the ones who allow the Rapists,

a safe haven from the Capital punishment, thus making the

innocents more vulnerable to further attacks.

 

If only these 2 could do their job properly

and honestly, listening to their

voice of conscious, then, many such rajas can be

tackled without moderation, and without

any further dirty exchanges.

 

This misplaced secularism has spoilt the face of

country, and made this a Dharamshala, where

anyone can come in. do what one wishes

and get out. Trying to look good - business,

has been the doom of the Hindus, since the centuries,

when the first invasions effaced India and eroded

our motherland from her treasures. The above 2 and

their likes, can be compared to the traitors,

who have allowed the terrorists passage, and then

given them shelter and roof, to prepare their Bombs

for killing innocent people. We have to become

really Secular (Justice Minded to all with no bias)

and not play the game of secularism, and use this

technique for individual battles , which are formed

in mind, by your own enemies inside you,like jealousy,

and feeling of inadequacy when you see others,

and feel small. If one feels small, then by siding

with the Big Bad Guys,one does not transform into

big, but this can happen only by making your own

image Big, in Your own eyes, and act accordingly.

 

Bhaskar.

 

 

 

 

, " atma_gnan " <atma_gnan wrote:

>

> Praneshji

>

> I am happy to hear that you have tracked my message history here - that

> must have taken some time. But don't you think that time would have

> been better spent learning some Jyotish?

>

> Your point is valued, but I have mentioned on several occasions that my

> experiances in condeming inapproporate behaviour have convinced me that

> moral policing achives nothing but extend the issue (just as it has

> here once again) rather then resolve any dispute.I am simply advising

> others to adopt such an approach, which seems like the most mature and

> responsible thing to do in the absence of active moderation.

>

> However, if you take pleasure from making sideline comments on disputes

> thats your perogative which are of course entitled to.

>

> Take care.

>

>

>

> , " pranesh_joshi2003 "

> <pranesh_joshi2003@> wrote:

> >

> > , " atma_gnan " <atma_gnan@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Prafullaji

> > >

> > > My humble request once again to yuo to quit moral policing,

> >

> > Ho ho ho, look who's preaching about moral policing! Your first post

> > here (I shall give you the reference number if you want) was all about

> > just that, remember?

> >

> > Posturing hypocrite, with a posturing pseudonym.

> >

> > PJ

> >

>