Chandrashekhar ji on Akshavedamsha and Shashtiamsha in 2004

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

Dear Sirs,

 

If I may express myself, I tend to agree with Freedom. Vargas could

not be looked at in isolation. Otherwise Parashara would not have

said that .All general indications could be seen from Akshavedamsha

and Shastiamsha.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

 

Chandrashekhar ji

 

You are saying Vargas cannot be seen in isolation and you cannot see

all aspects from akshavedamsha and shashtiamsha,if not seen together

with rashi chakra.Ofcourse i agree that charts are mentioned by you

(varga).But how about the ''not in isolation''.Didnt you question me

on this point a few days back.

 

How did you change.What influence was on you.?

 

I pray that i get my Chandrashekhar ji back.

 

Respect

Pradeep

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

 

I do not understand the reason for your digging out out of context

messages. Have I ever said in all the voluminous communication that we

have had that D-Charts should be seen in isolation? Could you point me

to such a quote in my post?

 

By the way, the post by me is also talking of looking at all the

indications from Akshavedamsha and Shashtyamsha, and since you quote the

message to support whatever argument you are trying to present, it is

obvious that you agree with the content of the message and have now

changed your stand that theses have only to relate to rasis and not

otherwise. may I know why?

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

>

> Dear Sirs,

>

> If I may express myself, I tend to agree with Freedom. Vargas could

> not be looked at in isolation. Otherwise Parashara would not have

> said that .All general indications could be seen from Akshavedamsha

> and Shastiamsha.

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> Chandrashekhar ji

>

> You are saying Vargas cannot be seen in isolation and you cannot see

> all aspects from akshavedamsha and shashtiamsha,if not seen together

> with rashi chakra.Ofcourse i agree that charts are mentioned by you

> (varga).But how about the ''not in isolation''.Didnt you question me

> on this point a few days back.

>

> How did you change.What influence was on you.?

>

> I pray that i get my Chandrashekhar ji back.

>

> Respect

> Pradeep

>

>

> ------

>

>

>

> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release 7/24/2007

1:50 PM

>

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

As you do not agree ,i will concentrate on the main thread.

Now all the indications from akshavedamsha is not my

understanding,for all matters one can look at akshavedamsha.It means

in general,the akshavedamsha of any graha can be seen.

 

Respect

Pradeep

 

, Chandrashekhar

<chandrashekhar46 wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> I do not understand the reason for your digging out out of context

> messages. Have I ever said in all the voluminous communication that

we

> have had that D-Charts should be seen in isolation? Could you point

me

> to such a quote in my post?

>

> By the way, the post by me is also talking of looking at all the

> indications from Akshavedamsha and Shashtyamsha, and since you

quote the

> message to support whatever argument you are trying to present, it

is

> obvious that you agree with the content of the message and have now

> changed your stand that theses have only to relate to rasis and not

> otherwise. may I know why?

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >

> > Dear Sirs,

> >

> > If I may express myself, I tend to agree with Freedom. Vargas

could

> > not be looked at in isolation. Otherwise Parashara would not have

> > said that .All general indications could be seen from

Akshavedamsha

> > and Shastiamsha.

> >

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > Chandrashekhar ji

> >

> > You are saying Vargas cannot be seen in isolation and you cannot

see

> > all aspects from akshavedamsha and shashtiamsha,if not seen

together

> > with rashi chakra.Ofcourse i agree that charts are mentioned by

you

> > (varga).But how about the ''not in isolation''.Didnt you question

me

> > on this point a few days back.

> >

> > How did you change.What influence was on you.?

> >

> > I pray that i get my Chandrashekhar ji back.

> >

> > Respect

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> >

------

> >

> >

> >

> > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date:

7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> >

>

>

>