Chandrashekhar ji on Graha Drishti in Varga charts

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

You have always held the view that,graha drishti as a rule cannot be

seen in varga charts.This is very true.You had an additional view that

it can be considered in certain cases,if sage mentions so.(i humly

disagre with this view - as there is no differential rule).

 

But today you have a totally new view.To defend your understanding -you

are agreeing to planetary aspects as a rule in Varga charts.

 

I have already requested to you to kindly give 2 reasons -

1)Why is this change in opinion

2)What made you initially think that grahadrishtis are not possible in

varga arrangements.

 

You were true,but how did you change?

 

Respect

Pradeep

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

 

Either I am not able to convey what I mean in English or you choose not

to understand what I am saying. Have you not read the position that I

have taken again and again in my posts as to my personal opinion

vis-a-vis the texts?

 

I too have a question for you. Why now you agree that everything can be

seen from Akshavedamsha and shashtyamsha (charts) as is apparent from

you quoting my old mail in support of whatever you were trying to imply.

 

I remember you saying that no chart other than rasi chart can be drawn

or words to that effect.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

>

> You have always held the view that,graha drishti as a rule cannot be

> seen in varga charts.This is very true.You had an additional view that

> it can be considered in certain cases,if sage mentions so.(i humly

> disagre with this view - as there is no differential rule).

>

> But today you have a totally new view.To defend your understanding -you

> are agreeing to planetary aspects as a rule in Varga charts.

>

> I have already requested to you to kindly give 2 reasons -

> 1)Why is this change in opinion

> 2)What made you initially think that grahadrishtis are not possible in

> varga arrangements.

>

> You were true,but how did you change?

>

> Respect

> Pradeep

>

>

> ------

>

>

>

> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release 7/24/2007

1:50 PM

>

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Candrashekhar ji

 

Even if you check the discussions happened in 2003,i had mentioned

that,you can write vargas on piece of paper or draw as a chart.Then

someody told me it is a Yantra etc.

 

Thus pls dont say i have said so.My point is it is not a chart.It

means you cannot have the rules as in rashi chakra.

 

Respect

Pradeep

 

, Chandrashekhar

<chandrashekhar46 wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> Either I am not able to convey what I mean in English or you choose

not

> to understand what I am saying. Have you not read the position that

I

> have taken again and again in my posts as to my personal opinion

> vis-a-vis the texts?

>

> I too have a question for you. Why now you agree that everything

can be

> seen from Akshavedamsha and shashtyamsha (charts) as is apparent

from

> you quoting my old mail in support of whatever you were trying to

imply.

>

> I remember you saying that no chart other than rasi chart can be

drawn

> or words to that effect.

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >

> > You have always held the view that,graha drishti as a rule cannot

be

> > seen in varga charts.This is very true.You had an additional view

that

> > it can be considered in certain cases,if sage mentions so.(i humly

> > disagre with this view - as there is no differential rule).

> >

> > But today you have a totally new view.To defend your

understanding -you

> > are agreeing to planetary aspects as a rule in Varga charts.

> >

> > I have already requested to you to kindly give 2 reasons -

> > 1)Why is this change in opinion

> > 2)What made you initially think that grahadrishtis are not

possible in

> > varga arrangements.

> >

> > You were true,but how did you change?

> >

> > Respect

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> >

------

> >

> >

> >

> > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date:

7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

 

If some one told you that drawing a chart of Vargas is a yantra, that

does not necessarily make it right. Anyway your point has been that it

is not a chart implying that it can not be drawn as a chart. And that is

in recent stream of discussions if memory serves me right. I had also

given examples of Parashara himself recommending drawing of Bhava, Hora,

Ghati lagna based charts , to which you did not reply. So there is no

question that I am saying something that you have not said.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Candrashekhar ji

>

> Even if you check the discussions happened in 2003,i had mentioned

> that,you can write vargas on piece of paper or draw as a chart.Then

> someody told me it is a Yantra etc.

>

> Thus pls dont say i have said so.My point is it is not a chart.It

> means you cannot have the rules as in rashi chakra.

>

> Respect

> Pradeep

>

>

> <%40>, Chandrashekhar

> <chandrashekhar46 wrote:

> >

> > Dear Pradeep,

> >

> > Either I am not able to convey what I mean in English or you choose

> not

> > to understand what I am saying. Have you not read the position that

> I

> > have taken again and again in my posts as to my personal opinion

> > vis-a-vis the texts?

> >

> > I too have a question for you. Why now you agree that everything

> can be

> > seen from Akshavedamsha and shashtyamsha (charts) as is apparent

> from

> > you quoting my old mail in support of whatever you were trying to

> imply.

> >

> > I remember you saying that no chart other than rasi chart can be

> drawn

> > or words to that effect.

> >

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> > vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> > >

> > > You have always held the view that,graha drishti as a rule cannot

> be

> > > seen in varga charts.This is very true.You had an additional view

> that

> > > it can be considered in certain cases,if sage mentions so.(i humly

> > > disagre with this view - as there is no differential rule).

> > >

> > > But today you have a totally new view.To defend your

> understanding -you

> > > are agreeing to planetary aspects as a rule in Varga charts.

> > >

> > > I have already requested to you to kindly give 2 reasons -

> > > 1)Why is this change in opinion

> > > 2)What made you initially think that grahadrishtis are not

> possible in

> > > varga arrangements.

> > >

> > > You were true,but how did you change?

> > >

> > > Respect

> > > Pradeep

> > >

> > >

> > > -------------------------

> ------

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date:

> 7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> > >

> >

> >

> >