Guest guest Posted July 25, 2007 Report Share Posted July 25, 2007 Dear Respected members As the previous mail from Mr.Kuttikkatt Bose a senior gentleman was long,i am highlighting the relevant portions as excerpts.It also proves that not only for me and a few others but also gentlemen from an elder generation had similar concerns.Kindly go through them. ''When a planet is transplanted from its rasi position in a birth chart(where in fact it is there in real time) to another Zodiac House in an amsa chart, this planet looses its longitudinal identity which characterized it in the birth chart''. ''Parasara's justification for the creation of the varga charts is based on his postulate that planets which have the common lordship over a rasi, for example Mars over Mesha(Aries) and Vrischika (Scorpio) are not necessarily the supreme rulers of the various amsas (fractions) within the thirty degree span of the same rasis. Thus, while Mars rules the whole of Mesha in general, Mars has some added rulership-right on the first Navamsha of Mesha(0-3°20') compared to the rest of 8 Navamshas of Mesha.'' ''The starting point of the math for evaluation of drikbala function is the longitude of planets. Is it not clear that the drikbala is aspectual strength? If there is no longitudinal identity,and consequently no angular relationship can be attributed between planets in an amsa chart, does it not make aspect and aspectual strength a foregone conclusion in amsa charts? '' Regds Pradeep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.