Most Important question - Chandrashekhar ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

Kindly answer the following.

 

You have said you have not changed your views.It means aspects as a

rule in general is not possible in varga chakras.

If so ,how do you explain Lagna shadvargake shloka.As per your

explanation in any of the shadvarga chakras,any single planet can

aspect lagna from its position.One among Mars ,Jupiter and Saturn can

aspect in 3 ways in any varga chart and so on in 6 charts.Other planets

too can aspect lagna ,even though they are not longitudinally so as per

you.It means you have to accept graha drishti as a rule.How do you deal

this.

 

Hope you have understood the concern.

 

Respect

Pradeep

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

 

I have never said aspects are not possible in Vargas. I have said that I

do not use them as a general practice, unless specified in some specific

yogas by the sages.

 

I have given the translation of the shloka and it is very clear I think.

why should only graha drishti be assumed? Has rasi drishti not been

explained by Parashara? I have not seen him saying that it should not be

used, in any of the editions of BPHS I have with me. Perhaps you are

better informed from some other edition of BPHS. Could you therefore

indicate where he says that and in which edition?

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

 

vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

>

> Kindly answer the following.

>

> You have said you have not changed your views.It means aspects as a

> rule in general is not possible in varga chakras.

> If so ,how do you explain Lagna shadvargake shloka.As per your

> explanation in any of the shadvarga chakras,any single planet can

> aspect lagna from its position.One among Mars ,Jupiter and Saturn can

> aspect in 3 ways in any varga chart and so on in 6 charts.Other planets

> too can aspect lagna ,even though they are not longitudinally so as per

> you.It means you have to accept graha drishti as a rule.How do you deal

> this.

>

> Hope you have understood the concern.

>

> Respect

> Pradeep

>

>

> ------

>

>

>

> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release 7/24/2007

1:50 PM

>

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

Ok agree.Could you pls tell me why you do not use them asa general

practise.What is the reason.

 

No one is disagreeing aspects between rashis.This shloka is about

grha drishti.So i will wait for your answer.Why are you not using

aspects as a general practise.Any specific reason.

 

I can also check the archives to see your previous opinion.

 

Respect

Pradeep

, Chandrashekhar

<chandrashekhar46 wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> I have never said aspects are not possible in Vargas. I have said

that I

> do not use them as a general practice, unless specified in some

specific

> yogas by the sages.

>

> I have given the translation of the shloka and it is very clear I

think.

> why should only graha drishti be assumed? Has rasi drishti not been

> explained by Parashara? I have not seen him saying that it should

not be

> used, in any of the editions of BPHS I have with me. Perhaps you

are

> better informed from some other edition of BPHS. Could you

therefore

> indicate where he says that and in which edition?

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

>

> vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >

> > Kindly answer the following.

> >

> > You have said you have not changed your views.It means aspects as

a

> > rule in general is not possible in varga chakras.

> > If so ,how do you explain Lagna shadvargake shloka.As per your

> > explanation in any of the shadvarga chakras,any single planet can

> > aspect lagna from its position.One among Mars ,Jupiter and Saturn

can

> > aspect in 3 ways in any varga chart and so on in 6 charts.Other

planets

> > too can aspect lagna ,even though they are not longitudinally so

as per

> > you.It means you have to accept graha drishti as a rule.How do

you deal

> > this.

> >

> > Hope you have understood the concern.

> >

> > Respect

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> >

------

> >

> >

> >

> > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date:

7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

 

Too much space is already utilized on the list in explaining whether one

should use graha drishti or not and then the discussion has gone off

tangent. If I now state why I do not use them as a general use, I am

sure more discussions that lead nowhere and out of context references

would appear. More words that I never used would be attributed to me and

more expletives used. So I would rather not tell why I do not use them

as a general practice.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

>

> Ok agree.Could you pls tell me why you do not use them asa general

> practise.What is the reason.

>

> No one is disagreeing aspects between rashis.This shloka is about

> grha drishti.So i will wait for your answer.Why are you not using

> aspects as a general practise.Any specific reason.

>

> I can also check the archives to see your previous opinion.

>

> Respect

> Pradeep

>

> <%40>, Chandrashekhar

> <chandrashekhar46 wrote:

> >

> > Dear Pradeep,

> >

> > I have never said aspects are not possible in Vargas. I have said

> that I

> > do not use them as a general practice, unless specified in some

> specific

> > yogas by the sages.

> >

> > I have given the translation of the shloka and it is very clear I

> think.

> > why should only graha drishti be assumed? Has rasi drishti not been

> > explained by Parashara? I have not seen him saying that it should

> not be

> > used, in any of the editions of BPHS I have with me. Perhaps you

> are

> > better informed from some other edition of BPHS. Could you

> therefore

> > indicate where he says that and in which edition?

> >

> > Chandrashekhar.

> >

> >

> > vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> > >

> > > Kindly answer the following.

> > >

> > > You have said you have not changed your views.It means aspects as

> a

> > > rule in general is not possible in varga chakras.

> > > If so ,how do you explain Lagna shadvargake shloka.As per your

> > > explanation in any of the shadvarga chakras,any single planet can

> > > aspect lagna from its position.One among Mars ,Jupiter and Saturn

> can

> > > aspect in 3 ways in any varga chart and so on in 6 charts.Other

> planets

> > > too can aspect lagna ,even though they are not longitudinally so

> as per

> > > you.It means you have to accept graha drishti as a rule.How do

> you deal

> > > this.

> > >

> > > Hope you have understood the concern.

> > >

> > > Respect

> > > Pradeep

> > >

> > >

> > > -------------------------

> ------

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date:

> 7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> > >

> >

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

I cannot force you.But your logic on why you do not use it as a

genral practise is very important for this debate.The longitudinal

point is what i have in mind.

 

But i cannot force you.It is upto you.No problem.

 

Respect

Pradeep

 

, Chandrashekhar

<chandrashekhar46 wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> Too much space is already utilized on the list in explaining

whether one

> should use graha drishti or not and then the discussion has gone

off

> tangent. If I now state why I do not use them as a general use, I

am

> sure more discussions that lead nowhere and out of context

references

> would appear. More words that I never used would be attributed to

me and

> more expletives used. So I would rather not tell why I do not use

them

> as a general practice.

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >

> > Ok agree.Could you pls tell me why you do not use them asa

general

> > practise.What is the reason.

> >

> > No one is disagreeing aspects between rashis.This shloka is about

> > grha drishti.So i will wait for your answer.Why are you not using

> > aspects as a general practise.Any specific reason.

> >

> > I can also check the archives to see your previous opinion.

> >

> > Respect

> > Pradeep

> >

> > <%40>, Chandrashekhar

> > <chandrashekhar46@> wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Pradeep,

> > >

> > > I have never said aspects are not possible in Vargas. I have

said

> > that I

> > > do not use them as a general practice, unless specified in some

> > specific

> > > yogas by the sages.

> > >

> > > I have given the translation of the shloka and it is very

clear I

> > think.

> > > why should only graha drishti be assumed? Has rasi drishti not

been

> > > explained by Parashara? I have not seen him saying that it

should

> > not be

> > > used, in any of the editions of BPHS I have with me. Perhaps

you

> > are

> > > better informed from some other edition of BPHS. Could you

> > therefore

> > > indicate where he says that and in which edition?

> > >

> > > Chandrashekhar.

> > >

> > >

> > > vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> > > >

> > > > Kindly answer the following.

> > > >

> > > > You have said you have not changed your views.It means

aspects as

> > a

> > > > rule in general is not possible in varga chakras.

> > > > If so ,how do you explain Lagna shadvargake shloka.As per

your

> > > > explanation in any of the shadvarga chakras,any single

planet can

> > > > aspect lagna from its position.One among Mars ,Jupiter and

Saturn

> > can

> > > > aspect in 3 ways in any varga chart and so on in 6

charts.Other

> > planets

> > > > too can aspect lagna ,even though they are not

longitudinally so

> > as per

> > > > you.It means you have to accept graha drishti as a rule.How

do

> > you deal

> > > > this.

> > > >

> > > > Hope you have understood the concern.

> > > >

> > > > Respect

> > > > Pradeep

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > -------------------------

> > ------

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release

Date:

> > 7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> > > >

> > >

> > >

> > >