Graha Drishti - Evaluation - Important Question - Chandrashekhar ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of

longitudes-what is the basis of Graha drishti

2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30

have any connection - span of a Rashi or something.

3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from

Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have special

rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th and

8th etc.What does it imply.

 

Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with

Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga

Chakras.Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based

on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate.

 

I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your opinion

is there in the archives.

 

Respect

Pradeep

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

 

I do not think that graha drishti is only evaluated on the basis of

longitudinal difference. There is another method of looking at different

values of drishtis of graha that is mentioned in classics.

 

I do not think Santanam never considered graha drishtis in D-Charts.

even in his comments on BPHS he explains " I am unable to fully conceive

the logic in aspects in divisional charts " and he goes on to justify

that feeling of inability to conceive the reason behind aspects in

D-charts by saying " for the sage has himself referred to longitudinal

aspectual evaluation in an earlier chapter " . Now reading this it is

clear that Santanam himself did not think that the full, 3/4th and 1/2

results related to similar aspects has anything to do with the

longitudinal aspects.

 

I also seem to remember some member who had interaction with R. Santanam

and who has read some of his articles stating that R. Santanam did

consider aspects in D-charts. So it is not exactly correct to say that

Late Santanam stated that the graha drishtis are impossible in D-charts.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

>

> 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of

> longitudes-what is the basis of Graha drishti

> 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30

> have any connection - span of a Rashi or something.

> 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from

> Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have special

> rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th and

> 8th etc.What does it imply.

>

> Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with

> Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga

> Chakras.Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based

> on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate.

>

> I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your opinion

> is there in the archives.

>

> Respect

> Pradeep

>

>

> ------

>

>

>

> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release 7/24/2007

1:50 PM

>

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Chandrashekhar ji

 

Is longitudinal evaluation done for Graha drhti or Rashi drishi.

How do you find the strength of graha drishti.How is Drik Bala

calculated.

 

Why did Late Santhanam say he cannot fully conceive.Did he mention

Longitude.

 

Wh do outer planets have special rule for finding strength as they

have for bhavas.What is the mathematical reason for jupiter/saturn

and Mars to have special aspects.I am not asking the philosophical

part(because that is subjective).

 

Are you saying whyen sage asks us to evaluate strength based on

longitudes,Graha drishti is not based on longitudes.

 

Why do we have 30 degree ,factors included.

 

Could you read article from Mr.Bose.

 

As i have said what Late Santanam has privately done(whic i do not

personally want to assume) is not under my control.

 

What he has said in BPHS and reading Grah sphuta drishti

kadhanadhyaya for myslef is sufficient.He did write in plain english

why he is unale to fully conceive -Longitude.Which is true .You or

any one else can reads this.

 

Now whether you agree or not is not under my control.

 

I respect your views.

 

Respect

Pradeep

, Chandrashekhar

<chandrashekhar46 wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> I do not think that graha drishti is only evaluated on the basis of

> longitudinal difference. There is another method of looking at

different

> values of drishtis of graha that is mentioned in classics.

>

> I do not think Santanam never considered graha drishtis in D-

Charts.

> even in his comments on BPHS he explains " I am unable to fully

conceive

> the logic in aspects in divisional charts " and he goes on to

justify

> that feeling of inability to conceive the reason behind aspects in

> D-charts by saying " for the sage has himself referred to

longitudinal

> aspectual evaluation in an earlier chapter " . Now reading this it is

> clear that Santanam himself did not think that the full, 3/4th and

1/2

> results related to similar aspects has anything to do with the

> longitudinal aspects.

>

> I also seem to remember some member who had interaction with R.

Santanam

> and who has read some of his articles stating that R. Santanam did

> consider aspects in D-charts. So it is not exactly correct to say

that

> Late Santanam stated that the graha drishtis are impossible in D-

charts.

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >

> > 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of

> > longitudes-what is the basis of Graha drishti

> > 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30

> > have any connection - span of a Rashi or something.

> > 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from

> > Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have

special

> > rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th

and

> > 8th etc.What does it imply.

> >

> > Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with

> > Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga

> > Chakras.Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not

based

> > on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate.

> >

> > I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your

opinion

> > is there in the archives.

> >

> > Respect

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> >

------

> >

> >

> >

> > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release Date:

7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> >

>

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Pradeep,

 

This is my first time back to the jyotish group in several months, and I can

quickly conclude that your aim is not to have a valid discussion with

Chandrashekhar, but to try to evoke a harsh response. It's all quite tiring,

sir. Can we not move on?

 

 

Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46 wrote:

Dear Pradeep,

 

I do not think that graha drishti is only evaluated on the basis of

longitudinal difference. There is another method of looking at different

values of drishtis of graha that is mentioned in classics.

 

I do not think Santanam never considered graha drishtis in D-Charts.

even in his comments on BPHS he explains " I am unable to fully conceive

the logic in aspects in divisional charts " and he goes on to justify

that feeling of inability to conceive the reason behind aspects in

D-charts by saying " for the sage has himself referred to longitudinal

aspectual evaluation in an earlier chapter " . Now reading this it is

clear that Santanam himself did not think that the full, 3/4th and 1/2

results related to similar aspects has anything to do with the

longitudinal aspects.

 

I also seem to remember some member who had interaction with R. Santanam

and who has read some of his articles stating that R. Santanam did

consider aspects in D-charts. So it is not exactly correct to say that

Late Santanam stated that the graha drishtis are impossible in D-charts.

 

Chandrashekhar.

 

vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Chandrashekhar ji

>

> 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of

> longitudes-what is the basis of Graha drishti

> 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this 30

> have any connection - span of a Rashi or something.

> 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from

> Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have special

> rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and 9th,4th and

> 8th etc.What does it imply.

>

> Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree with

> Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga

> Chakras.Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not based

> on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate.

>

> I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your opinion

> is there in the archives.

>

> Respect

> Pradeep

>

>

> -------------------------

>

>

>

> Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release 7/24/2007

1:50 PM

>

 

[Guest guest]

Dear Sir

 

Me too feels so.Inspite of sphuta drishti rules we are not reaching

anywhere.Thanks fo your dvise.After couple ofmails i ill start my

paper work.

 

Thanks for the valid advise.

 

Regds

Pradeep , Jay Richardson

<gojrr wrote:

>

> Dear Pradeep,

>

> This is my first time back to the jyotish group in several

months, and I can quickly conclude that your aim is not to have a

valid discussion with Chandrashekhar, but to try to evoke a harsh

response. It's all quite tiring, sir. Can we not move on?

>

>

> Chandrashekhar <chandrashekhar46

wrote: Dear Pradeep,

>

> I do not think that graha drishti is only evaluated on the basis

of

> longitudinal difference. There is another method of looking at

different

> values of drishtis of graha that is mentioned in classics.

>

> I do not think Santanam never considered graha drishtis in D-

Charts.

> even in his comments on BPHS he explains " I am unable to fully

conceive

> the logic in aspects in divisional charts " and he goes on to

justify

> that feeling of inability to conceive the reason behind aspects

in

> D-charts by saying " for the sage has himself referred to

longitudinal

> aspectual evaluation in an earlier chapter " . Now reading this it

is

> clear that Santanam himself did not think that the full, 3/4th

and 1/2

> results related to similar aspects has anything to do with the

> longitudinal aspects.

>

> I also seem to remember some member who had interaction with R.

Santanam

> and who has read some of his articles stating that R. Santanam

did

> consider aspects in D-charts. So it is not exactly correct to say

that

> Late Santanam stated that the graha drishtis are impossible in D-

charts.

>

> Chandrashekhar.

>

> vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

> >

> > Dear Chandrashekhar ji

> >

> > 1)As strength of Graha drishti is evaluated on the basis of

> > longitudes-what is the basis of Graha drishti

> > 2)Do we have a factor of 30 degrees applied somewhere.Does this

30

> > have any connection - span of a Rashi or something.

> > 3)While evaluating strength of graha drishti from

> > Jupiter /Saturn /Mars why do we need special rules?Do we have

special

> > rules for these planets at any other place.Namely 5th and

9th,4th and

> > 8th etc.What does it imply.

> >

> > Without ourselves debating unnecessarily,can us please agree

with

> > Late Santhanam on why Graha drishti is impossible in Varga

> > Chakras.Can i ever think,that you will say graha drishti is not

based

> > on longitudinal distances,just for the sake of this debate.

> >

> > I honestly think you will not change your opinion here.Your

opinion

> > is there in the archives.

> >

> > Respect

> > Pradeep

> >

> >

> > -------------------------

> >

> >

> >

> > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.17/915 - Release

7/24/2007 1:50 PM

> >

>

>