Purpose of debate

[Guest guest]

Dear Prafulla ji,Satya ji etc

 

I am again making the purpose of this debate clear.

There is no point in bringing names of Raoji or KAS here.This debate is

not about whether they use or not.If you are debating for that,what is

the necessity?Everyone knows.

 

This debate is to study BPHS.Anyone who can translate Graha drishti and

Evalauation of it from BPHS in a different way from what Late Santhanam

did can provide the translation.

 

As long as we do not have any such translation- your mails carry no

substance w.r to the concerned debate.

 

Regds

Pradeep

[Guest guest]

Oh No..I thought debate is on:

 

a. if D chakra exists

b. If there can be houses, combinations, aspects in D chakra

 

Why not referring each of those theories / People, who have very

successfully used.

 

I asked a simple question - Did those people misled (or misleading)

the jyotish community by their wrong understanding of varga chakra.

The answer can be simple yes or no. You need not come with political

answer. If you have conviction, then please say so that - they are /

were all wrong and they misled !!

 

regards / Prafulla

 

, " vijayadas_pradeep "

<vijayadas_pradeep wrote:

>

> Dear Prafulla ji,Satya ji etc

>

> I am again making the purpose of this debate clear.

> There is no point in bringing names of Raoji or KAS here.This debate is

> not about whether they use or not.If you are debating for that,what is

> the necessity?Everyone knows.

>

> This debate is to study BPHS.Anyone who can translate Graha drishti and

> Evalauation of it from BPHS in a different way from what Late Santhanam

> did can provide the translation.

>

> As long as we do not have any such translation- your mails carry no

> substance w.r to the concerned debate.

>

> Regds

> Pradeep

>