Guest guest Posted October 19, 2007 Report Share Posted October 19, 2007 Why we miss the target – correct date of happening - by most astrologers. In the calculation of VIMSHOTTARI Desa time frame, to tell when the influence of a Planet will operate, it is generally found that the date ‘inferred’ usually slips and the natal feel disappointed on the readings of the Astrologer. We take the year to consist of 12 months of 30 days each in the calculations under the Vimshottari system. Therefore, the year in the calculation of this time frame has 360 days. When we say that the major period of the Sun, for instance, extend over 6 years, we mean that the major period of the Sun runs for 360 X 6 = 2160 days. We know that the average current calendar year has approximately 365.25 days, three consecutive years of 365 days and fourth being 366 years. Inducting this, the major Sun period will have at least one leap year and balance five normal years. Taking this to the calculations of the Sun’s Desa period, it will be at least 365 X 5 + 366 = 2191 days. This will bring to our knowledge that an error of 31 days, if we take the length of the Sun Desa period. The Desa period of the Sun is the shortest. While we deal with other major Desa periods of other Planets, this diference of days will be more. In Mars or Ketu it will be at least 36 days, while in the major period of Venus it will be at least 105 days (and more). Therefore, without converting the 360 day year into calendar year, in spite of our best efforts, mistake in the fixation of time of happening an event though the Vimshottari Desa system is inevitable. Pathi A.V.Pathi, care Dr. Sreenivasan, 5, Heath Road, Nettleham, Lincoln Ln2 2ZX U.K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 19, 2007 Report Share Posted October 19, 2007 Dear Sri Venkatachalapathi ji, You started good thread. Here are my views. I start my views with my own example. At lesast there are about a dozen major events that I can correlate, since I know all events that happened in my life. More over, I have a habit of remembering all the important dates of events in my life. When I analyzed my own horoscope a few years ago, the paramters I used were 365 days/yr method, and the time of birth provided to my by my parents, which they claim to be correct. I attempted to correct my birth time both on higher side and lower side taking a 15 minutes window (+ or - 15 min.) and then started calibrating my horoscope, using Jagannatha Hora (Thanks to Sri PVR, his software is very useful to me most of the time). After a few trials, I figured out that my navamasa lagna changes to the adjacent rasi, and to my surprise, my characteristics fit exactly to the changed navamsa lagna, and not to the original navamsa lagna. I also noticed that my calibration of past events is much closer to the actual dates than before. Then I added the new parameter by changing the days/year to 360. I saw a dramatic change in the dates of events; because we see an average of 5 days/yr difference. This will be substantial diference for any of us, and amounts to a few months of different. I was very satisfied with my approach. Then Finally I started fine-tuning the birth time correction in smaller (delta) variances and came to a stunningly accurate matching of my events, to the extent of 95% or more accuracy. Of course, it is always easy to correct own horoscope or of those of close family members. But for a client, to do this type of calibration takes a lot of time (not a few hours, but atleast a few days at a minimum per every horoscope), and hence practically impossible to do on every horoscope. The other point is, in our own case, we know every event to calibrate, whereas in the case of others, we have to depend on input given by the natives, but no choice. THese are certainly the limitations. Believe me, if you calibrate this way, you can match the events to the Praana dasa level (level 5), which comes as close to the specific day. Having said this, I mention here another observation. In some horoscopes, some planets can be identified with certainty to give certain type of results; in the other type of horoscopes, the same result can be attributed to be given by more than one planet. In the first case, it would be fairely simple to date the events, particularly if we can make wise use of transits of planets also. But in the second case, it would be very difficult to not only date the events, but also to give exact predictions. My own horoscope falls in this category and even some very good astrologers also failed to give even approximate predictions; while one or two astrologers who have added intuition, gave stunning predictions to me, which gave 100% results. Here comes the experience and deep understanding/knowledge of the astrologer along with other good qualities such as sincerity, honesty, and not being greedy etc. Now I am very much convinced to use the 360 day/yr approach. I am not convincing here anyone; people can use their own methods; but I am only sharing my experience. , venkatachala pathi <pathiav wrote: > > Why we miss the target – correct date of happening - by most astrologers. > > In the calculation of VIMSHOTTARI Desa time frame, to tell when the influence of a Planet will operate, it is generally found that the date `inferred' usually slips and the natal feel disappointed on the readings of the Astrologer. > > We take the year to consist of 12 months of 30 days each in the calculations under the Vimshottari system. Therefore, the year in the calculation of this time frame has 360 days. When we say that the major period of the Sun, for instance, extend over 6 years, we mean that the major period of the Sun runs for 360 X 6 = 2160 days. We know that the average current calendar year has approximately 365.25 days, three consecutive years of 365 days and fourth being 366 years. Inducting this, the major Sun period will have at least one leap year and balance five normal years. Taking this to the calculations of the Sun's Desa period, it will be at least 365 X 5 + 366 = 2191 days. > This will bring to our knowledge that an error of 31 days, if we take the length of the Sun Desa period. The Desa period of the Sun is the shortest. While we deal with other major Desa periods of other Planets, this diference of days will be more. > > In Mars or Ketu it will be at least 36 days, while in the major period of Venus it will be at least 105 days (and more). > > Therefore, without converting the 360 day year into calendar year, in spite of our best efforts, mistake in the fixation of time of happening an event though the Vimshottari Desa system is inevitable. > > Pathi > > > A.V.Pathi, > care Dr. Sreenivasan, > 5, Heath Road, > Nettleham, > Lincoln > Ln2 2ZX U.K. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.