Suriya veedhi / zodiaic / Rasi charka ?? TO Rafalji .

[Guest guest]

Namaste,

Guru Gendarzji,

 

Your answers are confusing; do you mean to say Rasi Chackra / Surya veedhi is

360 degrees and they are divided into 12 Rasis of 30 degrees each. Please give

your tentative supportive advices.

I am confident that your good advices would make young students mouth shut.

The other Astrologers in the group also requested to enlighten the above

subject.

 

 

Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme wrote: *hare

rama krsna*

 

Dear Karunakaram,

 

I advise You latest Sanjayji lecture about third chapter of BPHS. There

You can read about Nakshatras which are mentioned before listening the

Rasis. We have the starting point - Chitra Star and we divide the cirlce

on 12 Rasis - this is the basis of fixed zodiac. Then we draw equal

Rasis and they give nature to the bhavas.

 

Regards,

Rafal Gendarz - SJC Guru

email: rafal

www.rohinaa.com

(+48) 503 44 18 18

 

KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM napisa?(a):

>

>

> Namaste,

> Guru Gendarzji,

>

> Is the bhu-chakra based on Nakshatra's, divided into 12 EQUAL parts of

> Rasis?

>

>

> Rafal Gendarz <starsuponme@ wp.pl <starsuponme%40wp.pl>> wrote:

> *hraum namah adityaya*

>

> Dear Karunakaram,

>

> Basics are in Parasara..the bhu-chakra (zodiac is bad name..as no every

> sign represents animal) is based on Nakshatra's (chitra paksa ayanamsa),

> this divided on 12 parts (moon and surya meets 12 times in year giving

> dwadasa adityas) gives space for rasi and consequently bhava. Point on

> the horizon must set the first house called Lagna, Udaya.

>

> That was the question, or?

>

> Regards,

> Rafal Gendarz

> Sri Jagannath Center Guru

> email: rafal (AT) rohinaa (DOT) com <rafal%40rohinaa.com>

> Jyotish pages: www.rohinaa. com

>

> KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM napisa?(a):

> >

> > Namaste,

> > Guru Gendarzji,

> >

> > Suriya veedhi / zodiaic / Rasi charka are one and the same. They

> > divided into TWELVE equal segments called Meesha,

> > Rishabha.... ......... Meena rasis.

> > How to prove the above theory? Any uppaayaa to prove the above fully

> > or partly would be much appreciated (new born horn challenges me).

> >

> >

> >

> > ------------ --------- --------- ---

> > Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on

> > TV.

> >

> >