Guest guest Posted April 27, 2007 Report Share Posted April 27, 2007 jaideep ji......... thank u for ur response , actually u know megstar amitabh ji has saturn in cancer in his 4th house retro.......and his lagna is " kumbha " and regarding ups and downs at th age of 36 , i think u are talking aboout that " coolie " incident .........i can also explain , that that was just because of an unfavourable antardasha details arranged according to " my research on saturn and amitabh " i will post later on ...... vikas .......... In vedic astrology , jaideep mukherji <anmol400 wrote: > > Hi Everyone > > Have saturn in 10th house retrograde in cancer sign so > my saturn is weak though iam libra asc...but amitabh > ji the celebrity has faced tough times also and when > he was 36 he has shine so saturn has shown him bad > times also... > --- astro_tellerkerala > <astro_tellerkerala wrote: > > > > > om krishna guru > > > > dear vikas , > > > > Can u post the data and Please post your > > reserch or cronologiacal > > order of events ,as it may help others to study or > > judge the result of a > > chart. > > > > But did u find why saturn irrespective of vakra > > has given good > > results ,we r eager to know your findings . > > > > Let us start a healthy discussion and i hope all > > gurus and seniors and > > other student s will contribute to the thread . > > > > Also please ,if possible ,disclose how far we can > > rely the data which > > u hav . > > > > regds sunil nair. > > > > http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/ > > <http://www.indiamart.com/Vedic Astrology/> > > > > for naadi readings > > < > > > > om shreem mahalaxmai namah. > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > " vikas_asthana009 " > > <vikas_asthana009@> wrote: > > > > > > ~JAI BALAJI MAHARAJ~ > > > > > > gaurav ji , > > > i didnt jump to conclusion , what i wrote or > > posted was just a small > > > segment of the total thesis i have > > > i was just answering the question of our fellow > > astrologer who was > > > not very sure of saturn and related influences on > > amitabh > > > bachchan ...................... > > > > > > as far as correct birth data is concerned , i can > > assure u , its > > > 200% correct , coz i havent taken this data , from > > any source on > > > internet , i have personal relations ...and thus > > data is absolutely > > > correct.... > > > thank u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " Gaurav > > Ghosh " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gaurav.ghosh@ wrote: > > > > > > > > ||Jai Ramakrishna|| > > > > Vikas, > > > > Read Amitabh's chart thoroughly (I dont know > > which data you are > > > > using as in the world of internet, there are > > many speculative Data > > > > of Celebrities.) If you have the correct chart, > > then see why > > > Amitabh > > > > had a good time in Saturn Mahadas, when the > > planet is Retro, > > > without > > > > any beneficial aspect or in 6th house frm D-10 > > Lagna. > > > > See the Antardasa trends, their position in D-10 > > chart, also see > > > the > > > > Nakshatra Lord of Saturn & its position. > > Consider Saturn's > > > position > > > > in D-9 as well. DONT JUMP INTO CONCLUSIONS! > > SOMEONE HAVING ALREADY > > > > STRONG SATURN & WEARING 1000 NEELAM WILL NOT DO > > ANYTHING GOOD!! > > > > Thanq, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > " vikas_asthana009 " > > > > <vikas_asthana009@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > my dear frend , whosoever has posted the > > material written > > > > > underneath " that amitabh was over shadowed by > > rajesh khanna " > > > > > > > > > > i too agree that there was a time , when > > amitabh was > > > overshadowed > > > > > by then superstar rajesh khanna , but at that > > time , amitabh was > > > > > through ,his guru mahadasha with rahu's antar > > whch lasted in > > > > > 1973 ......... > > > > > > > > > > as long as amitabh had GURU MD WITH RAHU ANTAR > > , he was subsied > > > by > > > > > rajesh khanna but since 1973 ..... whn MD OF > > SATURN STARTED IN > > > > 1973 > > > > > he became unstoppable ,,,, with release of > > ZANJIR , IN 1973 , > > > AND > > > > > LATER THE ULTIMATE BLOCKBUSTER > > " SHOLAY " .......... > > > > > AND THEN CAME A SERIES OF IT , ....including > > ,KAALIYA , > > > > > MR.NATWARLAL , NAMAK-HARAM, DON ETC TO NAME A > > FEW,,,,, > > > > > > > > > > HIS SATURN IS UNDOUBTEDLY STRONG ....HE IS > > ALSO WEARING TWO BLUE > > > > > SAPPHIRE TOGETHER IN HIS MIDDLE FINGER > > .....GIVING HIM A > > > > TREMENDOUS > > > > > BOOST................. > > > > > SO PLS THERE IS NO POINT OF DISCUSSING , THAT > > AMITABH DIDNT HAD > > > > GUD > > > > > SATURN , OR FAVOURABLE GIFTS FROM SATURN , > > > > > MOREOVER HIS ASCENDANT IS ALSO " KUMBHA " , SO .I > > HOPE U UNDERSTAND > > > > THE > > > > > REST, > > > > > AND AS FAR AS HIS CORRECT HOROSCOPE IS > > CONCERNED , PLS DONT > > > WORRY, > > > > > i have exact data's of almost all celebrities, > > ....... > > > > > hope to have a warm discussion. > > > > > vikas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , > > " Rohiniranjan " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <rohini_ranjan@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > But did Amitabh not gain the superstar state > > rather quickly, > > > > > despite > > > > > > initially being somewhat overshadowed by the > > superstar Rajesh > > > > > Khanna > > > > > > of those times? The smouldering intensity > > that > === message truncated === > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.