Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Fortune of twins should be the same?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Dear vrkrishnan

 

Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

- Vic

 

 

On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99

wrote:

 

> Dear Mr Vic,

> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

> analysis.

> regards

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya >

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

Dear vrkrishnan,

>

> You write:

>

> ~~~

>

> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

> mother.

>

> ~~~

>

> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

>

> - vic

>

>> vrkrishnan

>>

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>>

>> R.P <rdrugist >

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

>> babies.

>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

>>

>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

>>

>> Thanks

>>

>> RP

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

>>

>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

>>

>> Dear Rakesh,

>>

>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned to

>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

>>

>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give her

>> details again.

>>

>> Best Wishes,

>> Mrs. Wendy

>> http://JyotishVidya .com

>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

>>

>> -

>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

>> <jyotish-vidya>

>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

>>

>> Thanks

>> Rakesh

>>

>> RP

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vic,

Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?).It enables to know about the

native be it his kith and kin and his associates likely to join with him for

promoting his ideals.

But:

Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the way to

approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively about the fate of

the person in progression or other way.The karmic views some how I feel that it

is difficult beyond  a point for us to decipher.(interested to make meaning out

of lagna charts) 

probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will to do things

of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than blind faith in the unknown

destiny.

So:

The saying goes;

till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands  of maother and guided

by her karmas

from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring Nature( in

earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others it is his own way to

grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own features.Not that he can change the

" course " entirely but can understand to know what awaits him?

Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the child

hororscopically but not to say about his future.

This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of past and

future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and present if linked

with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

regards

vrkrishnan

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya >

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear vrkrishnan

 

Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

- Vic

 

On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

wrote:

 

> Dear Mr Vic,

> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

> analysis.

> regards

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

Dear vrkrishnan,

>

> You write:

>

> ~~~

>

> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

> mother.

>

> ~~~

>

> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

>

> - vic

>

>> vrkrishnan

>>

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>>

>> R.P <rdrugist >

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

>> babies.

>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

>>

>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

>>

>> Thanks

>>

>> RP

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

>>

>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

>>

>> Dear Rakesh,

>>

>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned to

>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

>>

>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give her

>> details again.

>>

>> Best Wishes,

>> Mrs. Wendy

>> http://JyotishVidya .com

>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

>>

>> -

>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

>> <jyotish-vidya>

>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

>>

>> Thanks

>> Rakesh

>>

>> RP

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Pranam,

 

So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ? So new born

suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's karma?

I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother is very

religious but child is going thru horoable health and other problems why?

One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his life. His wife

and him totaly devotees but their child went thru tough time so where is Parents

karma here?

 

Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

 

Rick

 

 

RP

 

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 wrote:

 

vattem krishnan <bursar_99

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Vic,

Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to know about the

native be it his kith and kin and his associates likely to join with him for

promoting his ideals.

But:

Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the way to

approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively about the fate of

the person in progression or other way.The karmic views some how I feel that it

is difficult beyond  a point for us to decipher.(intereste d to make meaning out

of lagna charts) 

probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will to do things

of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than blind faith in the unknown

destiny.

So:

The saying goes;

till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands  of maother and guided

by her karmas

from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring Nature( in

earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others it is his own way to

grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own features.Not that he can change the

" course " entirely but can understand to know what awaits him?

Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the child

hororscopically but not to say about his future.

This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of past and

future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and present if linked

with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

regards

vrkrishnan

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

 

Dear vrkrishnan

 

Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

- Vic

 

On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

wrote:

 

> Dear Mr Vic,

> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

> analysis.

> regards

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

Dear vrkrishnan,

>

> You write:

>

> ~~~

>

> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

> mother.

>

> ~~~

>

> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

>

> - vic

>

>> vrkrishnan

>>

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>>

>> R.P <rdrugist >

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

>> babies.

>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

>>

>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

>>

>> Thanks

>>

>> RP

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

>>

>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

>>

>> Dear Rakesh,

>>

>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned to

>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

>>

>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give her

>> details again.

>>

>> Best Wishes,

>> Mrs. Wendy

>> http://JyotishVidya .com

>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

>>

>> -

>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

>> <jyotish-vidya>

>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

>>

>> Thanks

>> Rakesh

>>

>> RP

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear All,

 

I am a firm believer that if any one suffers, it is due to their own karma and

it is nothing to do with anyone else's karma. If one believes karma theory, I

don't say any other option.

 

Regards,

Krishna

 

--- On Fri, 8/8/08, R.P <rdrugist wrote:

R.P <rdrugist

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Friday, 8 August, 2008, 8:28 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pranam,

 

 

 

So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ? So new born

suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's karma?

 

I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother is very

religious but child is going thru horoable health and other problems why?

 

One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his life. His wife

and him totaly devotees but their child went thru tough time so where is Parents

karma here?

 

 

 

Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

 

 

 

Rick

 

 

 

RP

 

 

 

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 > wrote:

 

 

 

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

jyotish-vidya

 

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

 

 

 

Dear Vic,

 

Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to know about the

native be it his kith and kin and his associates likely to join with him for

promoting his ideals.

 

But:

 

Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the way to

approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively about the fate of

the person in progression or other way.The karmic views some how I feel that it

is difficult beyond  a point for us to decipher.(intereste d to make meaning

out of lagna charts) 

 

probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will to do things

of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than blind faith in the unknown

destiny.

 

So:

 

The saying goes;

 

till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands  of maother and

guided by her karmas

 

from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

 

once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring Nature( in

earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others it is his own way to

grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own features.Not that he can change the

" course " entirely but can understand to know what awaits him?

 

Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the child

hororscopically but not to say about his future.

 

This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

 

Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of past and

future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and present if linked

with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

 

regards

 

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

 

 

Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

 

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

 

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

 

 

 

Dear vrkrishnan

 

 

 

Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

 

attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

 

the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

 

able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

 

 

- Vic

 

 

 

On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

wrote:

 

 

 

> Dear Mr Vic,

 

> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

 

> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

 

> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

 

> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

 

> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

 

> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

 

> analysis.

 

> regards

 

> vrkrishnan

 

>

 

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

>

 

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

 

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

 

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Dear vrkrishnan,

 

>

 

> You write:

 

>

 

> ~~~

 

>

 

> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

 

> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

 

> mother.

 

>

 

> ~~~

 

>

 

> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

 

> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

 

>

 

> - vic

 

>

 

>> vrkrishnan

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

 

>>

 

>> R.P <rdrugist >

 

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>> jyotish-vidya

 

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> Pranam Wendiji,

 

>>

 

>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

 

>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

 

>> babies.

 

>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

 

>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

 

>>

 

>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

 

>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

 

>>

 

>> Thanks

 

>>

 

>> RP

 

>>

 

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

 

>>

 

>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

 

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>> jyotish-vidya

 

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

 

>>

 

>> Dear Rakesh,

 

>>

 

>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned to

 

>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

 

>>

 

>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give her

 

>> details again.

 

>>

 

>> Best Wishes,

 

>> Mrs. Wendy

 

>> http://JyotishVidya .com

 

>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

 

>>

 

>> -

 

>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

 

>> <jyotish-vidya>

 

>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

 

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>>

 

>> Pranam Wendiji,

 

>>

 

>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

 

>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

 

>>

 

>> Thanks

 

>> Rakesh

 

>>

 

>> RP

 

>>

 

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Pranam Krishnaji,

 

Yes I m agree with u too. You and Your Karma comes with u.

 

Thanks

Rick

 

 

RP

 

--- On Fri, 8/8/08, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998 wrote:

 

Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Friday, August 8, 2008, 10:08 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear All,

 

I am a firm believer that if any one suffers, it is due to their own karma and

it is nothing to do with anyone else's karma. If one believes karma theory, I

don't say any other option.

 

Regards,

Krishna

 

--- On Fri, 8/8/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

R.P <rdrugist >

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Friday, 8 August, 2008, 8:28 PM

 

Pranam,

 

 

 

So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ? So new born

suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's karma?

 

I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother is very

religious but child is going thru horoable health and other problems why?

 

One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his life. His wife

and him totaly devotees but their child went thru tough time so where is Parents

karma here?

 

Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

 

 

 

Rick

 

RP

 

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 > wrote:

 

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

jyotish-vidya

 

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

 

Dear Vic,

 

Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to know about the

native be it his kith and kin and his associates likely to join with him for

promoting his ideals.

 

But:

 

Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the way to

approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively about the fate of

the person in progression or other way.The karmic views some how I feel that it

is difficult beyond  a point for us to decipher.(intereste d to make meaning out

of lagna charts) 

 

probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will to do things

of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than blind faith in the unknown

destiny.

 

So:

 

The saying goes;

 

till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands  of maother and guided

by her karmas

 

from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

 

once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring Nature( in

earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others it is his own way to

grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own features.Not that he can change the

" course " entirely but can understand to know what awaits him?

 

Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the child

hororscopically but not to say about his future.

 

This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

 

Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of past and

future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and present if linked

with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

 

regards

 

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

 

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

 

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

 

Dear vrkrishnan

 

Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

 

attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

 

the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

 

able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

- Vic

 

On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

wrote:

 

> Dear Mr Vic,

 

> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

 

> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

 

> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

 

> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

 

> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

 

> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

 

> analysis.

 

> regards

 

> vrkrishnan

 

>

 

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

>

 

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

 

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

 

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Dear vrkrishnan,

 

>

 

> You write:

 

>

 

> ~~~

 

>

 

> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

 

> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

 

> mother.

 

>

 

> ~~~

 

>

 

> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

 

> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

 

>

 

> - vic

 

>

 

>> vrkrishnan

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

 

>>

 

>> R.P <rdrugist >

 

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>> jyotish-vidya

 

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>>

 

>> Pranam Wendiji,

 

>>

 

>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

 

>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

 

>> babies.

 

>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

 

>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

 

>>

 

>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

 

>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

 

>>

 

>> Thanks

 

>>

 

>> RP

 

>>

 

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

 

>>

 

>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

 

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>> jyotish-vidya

 

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

 

>>

 

>> Dear Rakesh,

 

>>

 

>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned to

 

>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

 

>>

 

>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give her

 

>> details again.

 

>>

 

>> Best Wishes,

 

>> Mrs. Wendy

 

>> http://JyotishVidya .com

 

>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

 

>>

 

>> -

 

>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

 

>> <jyotish-vidya>

 

>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

 

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>>

 

>> Pranam Wendiji,

 

>>

 

>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

 

>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

 

>>

 

>> Thanks

 

>> Rakesh

 

>>

 

>> RP

 

>>

 

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Sir,

Probably we are into analysing the horoscopes of twins and opined that natal

charts give holistic view of destiny of the native.

In case of Infants,study of horoscopes normally taken up after they attain some

age around 12th.Till that time the conventions/beliefs considered have been

told.Even iam not convinced about such things.

ultimately for all sufferings(at any stage?) one has to hold himself

responsible.Every where we can pass on ........but not in case of sufferings.

Pranams

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Fri, 8/8/08, R.P <rdrugist wrote:

 

R.P <rdrugist

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Friday, August 8, 2008, 10:58 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pranam,

 

So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ? So new born

suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's karma?

I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother is very

religious but child is going thru horoable health and other problems why?

One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his life. His wife

and him totaly devotees but their child went thru tough time so where is Parents

karma here?

 

Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

 

Rick

 

RP

 

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 > wrote:

 

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

 

Dear Vic,

Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to know about the

native be it his kith and kin and his associates likely to join with him for

promoting his ideals.

But:

Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the way to

approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively about the fate of

the person in progression or other way.The karmic views some how I feel that it

is difficult beyond  a point for us to decipher.(intereste d to make meaning out

of lagna charts) 

probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will to do things

of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than blind faith in the unknown

destiny.

So:

The saying goes;

till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands  of maother and guided

by her karmas

from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring Nature( in

earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others it is his own way to

grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own features.Not that he can change the

" course " entirely but can understand to know what awaits him?

Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the child

hororscopically but not to say about his future.

This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of past and

future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and present if linked

with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

regards

vrkrishnan

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

 

Dear vrkrishnan

 

Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

- Vic

 

On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

wrote:

 

> Dear Mr Vic,

> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

> analysis.

> regards

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

Dear vrkrishnan,

>

> You write:

>

> ~~~

>

> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

> mother.

>

> ~~~

>

> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

>

> - vic

>

>> vrkrishnan

>>

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>>

>> R.P <rdrugist >

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

>> babies.

>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

>>

>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

>>

>> Thanks

>>

>> RP

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

>>

>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

>>

>> Dear Rakesh,

>>

>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned to

>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

>>

>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give her

>> details again.

>>

>> Best Wishes,

>> Mrs. Wendy

>> http://JyotishVidya .com

>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

>>

>> -

>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

>> <jyotish-vidya>

>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

>>

>> Thanks

>> Rakesh

>>

>> RP

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

RP

 

--- On Fri, 8/8/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 wrote:

 

vattem krishnan <bursar_99

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Friday, August 8, 2008, 11:11 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sir,

Probably we are into analysing the horoscopes of twins and opined that natal

charts give holistic view of destiny of the native.

In case of Infants,study of horoscopes normally taken up after they attain some

age around 12th.Till that time the conventions/ beliefs considered have been

told.Even iam not convinced about such things.

ultimately for all sufferings(at any stage?) one has to hold himself

responsible. Every where we can pass on ........but not in case of sufferings.

Pranams

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Fri, 8/8/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

 

R.P <rdrugist >

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Friday, August 8, 2008, 10:58 AM

 

Pranam,

 

So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ? So new born

suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's karma?

I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother is very

religious but child is going thru horoable health and other problems why?

One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his life. His wife

and him totaly devotees but their child went thru tough time so where is Parents

karma here?

 

Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

 

Rick

 

RP

 

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 > wrote:

 

vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

 

Dear Vic,

Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to know about the

native be it his kith and kin and his associates likely to join with him for

promoting his ideals.

But:

Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the way to

approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively about the fate of

the person in progression or other way.The karmic views some how I feel that it

is difficult beyond  a point for us to decipher.(intereste d to make meaning out

of lagna charts) 

probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will to do things

of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than blind faith in the unknown

destiny.

So:

The saying goes;

till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands  of maother and guided

by her karmas

from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring Nature( in

earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others it is his own way to

grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own features.Not that he can change the

" course " entirely but can understand to know what awaits him?

Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the child

hororscopically but not to say about his future.

This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of past and

future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and present if linked

with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

regards

vrkrishnan

--- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

 

Dear vrkrishnan

 

Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

- Vic

 

On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

wrote:

 

> Dear Mr Vic,

> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

> analysis.

> regards

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

Dear vrkrishnan,

>

> You write:

>

> ~~~

>

> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

> mother.

>

> ~~~

>

> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

>

> - vic

>

>> vrkrishnan

>>

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>>

>> R.P <rdrugist >

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

>> babies.

>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

>>

>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

>>

>> Thanks

>>

>> RP

>>

>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

>>

>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

>>

>> Dear Rakesh,

>>

>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned to

>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

>>

>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give her

>> details again.

>>

>> Best Wishes,

>> Mrs. Wendy

>> http://JyotishVidya .com

>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

>>

>> -

>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

>> <jyotish-vidya>

>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>>

>> Pranam Wendiji,

>>

>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

>>

>> Thanks

>> Rakesh

>>

>> RP

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

All:

 

I agree a Krishna murti. If the mothers chart indicates something

about the child the childs chart must also show it. That is my

opinion, at least.

 

- Vic

 

 

On Aug 8, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998

> wrote:

 

> Dear All,

>

> I am a firm believer that if any one suffers, it is due to their own

> karma and it is nothing to do with anyone else's karma. If one

> believes karma theory, I don't say any other option.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> --- On Fri, 8/8/08, R.P <rdrugist wrote:

> R.P <rdrugist

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> jyotish-vidya

> Friday, 8 August, 2008, 8:28 PM

>

>

>

>

>

Pranam,

>

>

>

> So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ?

> So new born suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's karma?

>

> I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother

> is very religious but child is going thru horoable health and other

> problems why?

>

> One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his

> life. His wife and him totaly devotees but their child went thru

> tough time so where is Parents karma here?

>

>

>

> Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

>

>

>

> Rick

>

>

>

> RP

>

>

>

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 > wrote:

>

>

>

> vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

>

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

> jyotish-vidya

>

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

>

>

>

> Dear Vic,

>

> Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to

> know about the native be it his kith and kin and his associates

> likely to join with him for promoting his ideals.

>

> But:

>

> Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the

> way to approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively

> about the fate of the person in progression or other way.The karmic

> views some how I feel that it is difficult beyond a point for us to

> decipher.(intereste d to make meaning out of lagna charts)

>

> probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will

> to do things of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than

> blind faith in the unknown destiny.

>

> So:

>

> The saying goes;

>

> till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands of

> maother and guided by her karmas

>

> from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

>

> once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring

> Nature( in earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others

> it is his own way to grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own

> features.Not that he can change the " course " entirely but can

> understand to know what awaits him?

>

> Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the

> child hororscopically but not to say about his future.

>

> This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

>

> Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of

> past and future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and

> present if linked with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

>

> regards

>

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

>

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

>

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

>

>

>

> Dear vrkrishnan

>

>

>

> Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

>

> attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

>

> the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

>

> able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

>

>

>

> - Vic

>

>

>

> On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

>

> wrote:

>

>

>

>> Dear Mr Vic,

>

>> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

>

>> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

>

>> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

>

>> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

>

>> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

>

>> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

>

>> analysis.

>

>> regards

>

>> vrkrishnan

>

>>

>

>> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

>>

>

>> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

>

>> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Dear vrkrishnan,

>

>>

>

>> You write:

>

>>

>

>> ~~~

>

>>

>

>> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

>

>> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

>

>> mother.

>

>>

>

>> ~~~

>

>>

>

>> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

>

>> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

>

>>

>

>> - vic

>

>>

>

>>> vrkrishnan

>

>>>

>

>>>

>

>>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>

>>>

>

>>> R.P <rdrugist >

>

>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>> jyotish-vidya

>

>>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

>

>>>

>

>>>

>

>>>

>

>>>

>

>>>

>

>>>

>

>>> Pranam Wendiji,

>

>>>

>

>>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

>

>>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

>

>>> babies.

>

>>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

>

>>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

>

>>>

>

>>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

>

>>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

>

>>>

>

>>> Thanks

>

>>>

>

>>> RP

>

>>>

>

>>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

>

>>>

>

>>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>

>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>> jyotish-vidya

>

>>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

>

>>>

>

>>> Dear Rakesh,

>

>>>

>

>>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned

>>> to

>

>>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

>

>>>

>

>>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give

>>> her

>

>>> details again.

>

>>>

>

>>> Best Wishes,

>

>>> Mrs. Wendy

>

>>> http://JyotishVidya .com

>

>>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

>

>>>

>

>>> -

>

>>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

>

>>> <jyotish-vidya>

>

>>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

>

>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>>

>

>>> Pranam Wendiji,

>

>>>

>

>>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

>

>>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

>

>>>

>

>>> Thanks

>

>>> Rakesh

>

>>>

>

>>> RP

>

>>>

>

>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear Vic,

 

You are perfectly correct. Some people are of the opinion that a new born baby

or a newly wedded bride bring luck/bad luck to the family. However, even if

their horoscope indicates such an event, it is not they are causing it, their

horoscope indicates that they would be joining such a family. For example, if an

infant's chart indicates early death of father, it means that the infant is

destined to grow up with out father. And, such an infant would be born to an

individual who would have short span of life himself. Hence, our relatives chart

can only be used as a thermometer and no more. A thermometer only shows fever

(if there is any) and does not cause it!

 

Regards,

Krishna

 

--- On Sat, 9/8/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

" Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya >

Saturday, 9 August, 2008, 12:43 AM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All:

 

 

 

I agree a Krishna murti. If the mothers chart indicates something

 

about the child the childs chart must also show it. That is my

 

opinion, at least.

 

 

 

- Vic

 

 

 

On Aug 8, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998@

 

> wrote:

 

 

 

> Dear All,

 

>

 

> I am a firm believer that if any one suffers, it is due to their own

 

> karma and it is nothing to do with anyone else's karma. If one

 

> believes karma theory, I don't say any other option.

 

>

 

> Regards,

 

> Krishna

 

>

 

> --- On Fri, 8/8/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

 

> R.P <rdrugist >

 

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

> jyotish-vidya

 

> Friday, 8 August, 2008, 8:28 PM

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Pranam,

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ?

 

> So new born suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's karma?

 

>

 

> I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother

 

> is very religious but child is going thru horoable health and other

 

> problems why?

 

>

 

> One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his

 

> life. His wife and him totaly devotees but their child went thru

 

> tough time so where is Parents karma here?

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Rick

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> RP

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 > wrote:

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

>

 

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>

 

> jyotish-vidya

 

>

 

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Dear Vic,

 

>

 

> Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to

 

> know about the native be it his kith and kin and his associates

 

> likely to join with him for promoting his ideals.

 

>

 

> But:

 

>

 

> Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the

 

> way to approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively

 

> about the fate of the person in progression or other way.The karmic

 

> views some how I feel that it is difficult beyond a point for us to

 

> decipher.(intereste d to make meaning out of lagna charts)

 

>

 

> probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will

 

> to do things of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than

 

> blind faith in the unknown destiny.

 

>

 

> So:

 

>

 

> The saying goes;

 

>

 

> till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands of

 

> maother and guided by her karmas

 

>

 

> from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

 

>

 

> once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring

 

> Nature( in earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others

 

> it is his own way to grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own

 

> features.Not that he can change the " course " entirely but can

 

> understand to know what awaits him?

 

>

 

> Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the

 

> child hororscopically but not to say about his future.

 

>

 

> This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

 

>

 

> Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of

 

> past and future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and

 

> present if linked with the parents may lead to a better understanding.

 

>

 

> regards

 

>

 

> vrkrishnan

 

>

 

> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

 

>

 

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>

 

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

 

>

 

> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Dear vrkrishnan

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

 

>

 

> attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage for

 

>

 

> the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

 

>

 

> able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> - Vic

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

 

>

 

> wrote:

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>> Dear Mr Vic,

 

>

 

>> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

 

>

 

>> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around 12th.

 

>

 

>> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

 

>

 

>> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

 

>

 

>> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

 

>

 

>> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

 

>

 

>> analysis.

 

>

 

>> regards

 

>

 

>> vrkrishnan

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

 

>

 

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>

 

>> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

 

>

 

>> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> Dear vrkrishnan,

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> You write:

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> ~~~

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

 

>

 

>> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope of

 

>

 

>> mother.

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> ~~~

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

 

>

 

>> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>> - vic

 

>

 

>>

 

>

 

>>> vrkrishnan

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> R.P <rdrugist >

 

>

 

>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>

 

>>> jyotish-vidya

 

>

 

>>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Pranam Wendiji,

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

 

>

 

>>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue of

 

>

 

>>> babies.

 

>

 

>>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

 

>

 

>>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

 

>

 

>>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Thanks

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> RP

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com> wrote:

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

 

>

 

>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>

 

>>> jyotish-vidya

 

>

 

>>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Dear Rakesh,

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned

 

>>> to

 

>

 

>>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give

 

>>> her

 

>

 

>>> details again.

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Best Wishes,

 

>

 

>>> Mrs. Wendy

 

>

 

>>> http://JyotishVidya .com

 

>

 

>>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> -

 

>

 

>>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

 

>

 

>>> <jyotish-vidya>

 

>

 

>>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

 

>

 

>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Pranam Wendiji,

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

 

>

 

>>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> Thanks

 

>

 

>>> Rakesh

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>> RP

 

>

 

>>>

 

>

 

>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Well said, Krishna Ji.

- Vic

 

On Aug 8, 2008, at 8:51 PM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

 

> Dear Vic,

>

> You are perfectly correct. Some people are of the opinion that a new

> born baby or a newly wedded bride bring luck/bad luck to the family.

> However, even if their horoscope indicates such an event, it is not

> they are causing it, their horoscope indicates that they would be

> joining such a family. For example, if an infant's chart indicates

> early death of father, it means that the infant is destined to grow

> up with out father. And, such an infant would be born to an

> individual who would have short span of life himself. Hence, our

> relatives chart can only be used as a thermometer and no more. A

> thermometer only shows fever (if there is any) and does not cause it!

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> --- On Sat, 9/8/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

> Vic D <vicdicara

> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya >

> Saturday, 9 August, 2008, 12:43 AM

>

>

>

>

>

All:

>

>

>

> I agree a Krishna murti. If the mothers chart indicates something

>

> about the child the childs chart must also show it. That is my

>

> opinion, at least.

>

>

>

> - Vic

>

>

>

> On Aug 8, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <krishna_1998@

>

>

>> wrote:

>

>

>

>> Dear All,

>

>>

>

>> I am a firm believer that if any one suffers, it is due to their own

>

>> karma and it is nothing to do with anyone else's karma. If one

>

>> believes karma theory, I don't say any other option.

>

>>

>

>> Regards,

>

>> Krishna

>

>>

>

>> --- On Fri, 8/8/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>

>> R.P <rdrugist >

>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>> jyotish-vidya

>

>> Friday, 8 August, 2008, 8:28 PM

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Pranam,

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> So let me ask u if new born till 5yrs old deped on mother's karma ?

>

>> So new born suffering from cancer or deadly discease then who's

>> karma?

>

>>

>

>> I can give u many example of mother in our Hindu History then mother

>

>> is very religious but child is going thru horoable health and other

>

>> problems why?

>

>>

>

>> One example of Narshih Mehta u know the enitre storey about his

>

>> life. His wife and him totaly devotees but their child went thru

>

>> tough time so where is Parents karma here?

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Please excuse me if I said something wrong.

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Rick

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> RP

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 > wrote:

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

>

>>

>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>

>

>> jyotish-vidya

>

>>

>

>> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 11:09 PM

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Dear Vic,

>

>>

>

>> Any One's chart is a holistic plan of Almighty(?). It enables to

>

>> know about the native be it his kith and kin and his associates

>

>> likely to join with him for promoting his ideals.

>

>>

>

>> But:

>

>>

>

>> Iam not clear why a very thin lines(beyond one'e logic) come in the

>

>> way to approach in a more determined way to know more conclusively

>

>> about the fate of the person in progression or other way.The karmic

>

>> views some how I feel that it is difficult beyond a point for us to

>

>> decipher.(intereste d to make meaning out of lagna charts)

>

>>

>

>> probably we may yet times there is lot of scope by way of free will

>

>> to do things of our choice and rationalise our actions rather than

>

>> blind faith in the unknown destiny.

>

>>

>

>> So:

>

>>

>

>> The saying goes;

>

>>

>

>> till the age of five child's fate/destiny is in the hands of

>

>> maother and guided by her karmas

>

>>

>

>> from fifth to ten year the child grows out of the karmas of father.

>

>>

>

>> once he gets in to the attire of his own by way of his exploring

>

>> Nature( in earlier day probably " jannevi for a brahmin and for others

>

>> it is his own way to grow) and tries to learn to shape up his own

>

>> features.Not that he can change the " course " entirely but can

>

>> understand to know what awaits him?

>

>>

>

>> Normally,I may just draw a chart to christen(suggestion only) the

>

>> child hororscopically but not to say about his future.

>

>>

>

>> This is what we used to get from the great gurus of ICAS.

>

>>

>

>> Childs horoscope no doubt independently shall focus on his karmas of

>

>> past and future but their conclusive impact on a tiny tot's past and

>

>> present if linked with the parents may lead to a better

>> understanding.

>

>>

>

>> regards

>

>>

>

>> vrkrishnan

>

>>

>

>> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

>

>>

>

>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>

>

>> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

>

>>

>

>> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 5:39 PM

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Dear vrkrishnan

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> Very interesting. So in very young age many occurances could be

>

>>

>

>> attributable to the parents karma? Since this is a formative stage

>> for

>

>>

>

>> the rest of the life wouldn't this mean that we would not really be

>

>>

>

>> able to read anyones chary without also rearing their parents?

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> - Vic

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> On Aug 7, 2008, at 12:25 PM, vattem krishnan <bursar_99 >

>

>>

>

>> wrote:

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>> Dear Mr Vic,

>

>>

>

>>> Some how on this point Iam bit feable as from the beginning i try to

>

>>

>

>>> avoid deep study of an infants chart till he attains say around

>>> 12th.

>

>>

>

>>> I also some times has conviction feel it is mother's karmas in that

>

>>

>

>>> stage affects child and sufferings occur.

>

>>

>

>>> May be Iam wrong but open to correction as iam also not very

>

>>

>

>>> convinced as past karmas of native could also be arrived by closer

>

>>

>

>>> analysis.

>

>>

>

>>> regards

>

>>

>

>>> vrkrishnan

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> --- On Thu, 8/7/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

>

>>

>

>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>

>

>>> " Jyotish Vidya " <jyotish-vidya>

>

>>

>

>>> Thursday, August 7, 2008, 10:14 AM

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> Dear vrkrishnan,

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> You write:

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> ~~~

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> But the main issue that why these twins ahve different courses of

>

>>

>

>>> life(born at same time) would need to be figured out from horscope

>>> of

>

>>

>

>>> mother.

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> ~~~

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> So, to what extent do u propose that an individuals karma cannot me

>

>>

>

>>> known without reference to the karma of the mother?

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>> - vic

>

>>

>

>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> vrkrishnan

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, R.P <rdrugist > wrote:

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> R.P <rdrugist >

>

>>

>

>>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>

>

>>>> jyotish-vidya

>

>>

>

>>>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 12:45 PM

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Pranam Wendiji,

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Yes U are correct, Originally we came up on 08/08/08 in the early

>

>>

>

>>>> morning but Dr. donot want to wait that long bcoz of health issue

>>>> of

>

>>

>

>>>> babies.

>

>>

>

>>>> so with Health issue and best possible chart which I came with

>

>>

>

>>>> discussing with Vicji on July 21st around 1.30pm.

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> My wife dob: December 1st 1973 at 12.15pm ,ahmedabad,India

>

>>

>

>>>> MY dob: March 6th 1972, 8.05AM , ahmedabad India.

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Thanks

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> RP

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> --- On Wed, 8/6/08, Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>>>> wrote:

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Wendy Vasicek <jyotishvidya@ bigpond.com>

>

>>

>

>>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>

>

>>>> jyotish-vidya

>

>>

>

>>>> Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 11:21 AM

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Dear Rakesh,

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> If I remember correctly you had advised us that the doctor planned

>

>>>> to

>

>>

>

>>>> deliver your twins by c-section during the 1st week of August??

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Also I can't seem to locate your wife's horoscope... can you give

>

>>>> her

>

>>

>

>>>> details again.

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Best Wishes,

>

>>

>

>>>> Mrs. Wendy

>

>>

>

>>>> http://JyotishVidya .com

>

>>

>

>>>> ____________ _________ _________ _______

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> -

>

>>

>

>>>> " R.P " <rdrugist >

>

>>

>

>>>> <jyotish-vidya>

>

>>

>

>>>> Wednesday, August 06, 2008 10:58 PM

>

>>

>

>>>> Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Pranam Wendiji,

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Shiv (Male) July 21st,2008 at 1.31PM , Houston, Texas, USA

>

>>

>

>>>> Soni (female) JUly 21st 2008, 1.32PM Houston, TX, USA

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> Thanks

>

>>

>

>>>> Rakesh

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>> RP

>

>>

>

>>>>

>

>>

>

>>>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Members,

 

I know few learned astrologers { Sri L.R. Chawdari} of yester years, who

used to see children from a Male chart, for the child is though born to

a mother, but the seed comes from male. This is one school of thought

and they have their basis in some interpretations of ancient texts.

 

With regards,

 

Sreeram_Srinivas

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not married at

that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and a girl. As of now we

only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at my chart the 5th house is neither

occupied nor aspected by any planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look

at the divisional charts for predicting progeny ?

I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

Aug 2nd 1974

5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

Bangalore, India

 

Regards,

Jai

 

 

 

sreeram srinivas <sreeram64

jyotish-vidya

Monday, August 11, 2008 5:15:20 AM

Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

 

 

Dear Members,

 

I know few learned astrologers { Sri L.R. Chawdari} of yester years, who

used to see children from a Male chart, for the child is though born to

a mother, but the seed comes from male. This is one school of thought

and they have their basis in some interpretations of ancient texts.

 

With regards,

 

Sreeram_Srinivas

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jai,

 

Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

more than the occupants of the 5th.

 

Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

 

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

 

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

 

> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

> charts for predicting progeny ?

> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

> Aug 2nd 1974

> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

> Bangalore, India

>

> Regards,

> Jai

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sir,

is it not we look into 5th from lagna,moon and sun and find which is strongest

and also find placement of lords there in.Aspect of putra karaka is most

important also .Basic sare celatly bought out in the recent issue of

Astrological issue.Special edition revealing inticacies of putra bahava.

 

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Mon, 8/11/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Monday, August 11, 2008, 3:56 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jai,

 

Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

more than the occupants of the 5th.

 

Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

 

> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

> charts for predicting progeny ?

> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

> Aug 2nd 1974

> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

> Bangalore, India

>

> Regards,

> Jai

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Jai, and vrKrishnan,

 

Specifics aside, this question can be answered generically so the

knowledge can be applied to any house or any topic. If you want to

know about a subject you must determine a few things:

 

1. What planet(s) pertains to the subject

2. What house(s) pertain to the subject

3. What divisional chart(s) pertain to the subject

 

So for children, for example.

 

1. Jupiter

 

2. 5th House (which includes it's ruler, dispositor and aspectors and

occupants - you may judge " bhavat bhavam " as well... that is: the 5th

from the moon and perhaps other occurrences of 5ths).

 

3. 7th Divisional (placement of the Lord of the 5th house of the birth

chart, as well as placement in the birth chart of the ruler of the 7th

Divisional's ascendant).

 

This is the basic idea of how you determine what factors are of

essential import in determining an astrological reading on a specific

focus.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

 

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 6:10 PM, vattem krishnan wrote:

 

> Sir,

> is it not we look into 5th from lagna,moon and sun and find which is

> strongest and also find placement of lords there in.Aspect of putra

> karaka is most important also .Basic sare celatly bought out in the

> recent issue of Astrological issue.Special edition revealing

> inticacies of putra bahava.

>

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Mon, 8/11/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara

> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> jyotish-vidya

> Monday, August 11, 2008, 3:56 PM

Jai,

>

> Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

> birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

> more than the occupants of the 5th.

>

> Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

> divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

> birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

> On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>

>> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

>> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

>> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

>> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

>> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

>> charts for predicting progeny ?

>> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

>> Aug 2nd 1974

>> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

>> Bangalore, India

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jai

>>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vic,

we also get involved in collateral issues such as to look into male chart or

according importance to kshetra sphuta of female also.female horoscopy,some how

has a defienete course in nature,yet with only supportive role in the human

cycle.In the judgement of putra bahava, charts of parents are considered as

equally important.ofcourse we may for the present may not delve in to karmic

aspects,though it is the core issue of human beings progression in life

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Mon, 8/11/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Monday, August 11, 2008, 9:20 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Jai, and vrKrishnan,

 

Specifics aside, this question can be answered generically so the

knowledge can be applied to any house or any topic. If you want to

know about a subject you must determine a few things:

 

1. What planet(s) pertains to the subject

2. What house(s) pertain to the subject

3. What divisional chart(s) pertain to the subject

 

So for children, for example.

 

1. Jupiter

 

2. 5th House (which includes it's ruler, dispositor and aspectors and

occupants - you may judge " bhavat bhavam " as well... that is: the 5th

from the moon and perhaps other occurrences of 5ths).

 

3. 7th Divisional (placement of the Lord of the 5th house of the birth

chart, as well as placement in the birth chart of the ruler of the 7th

Divisional's ascendant).

 

This is the basic idea of how you determine what factors are of

essential import in determining an astrological reading on a specific

focus.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 6:10 PM, vattem krishnan wrote:

 

> Sir,

> is it not we look into 5th from lagna,moon and sun and find which is

> strongest and also find placement of lords there in.Aspect of putra

> karaka is most important also .Basic sare celatly bought out in the

> recent issue of Astrological issue.Special edition revealing

> inticacies of putra bahava.

>

> vrkrishnan

>

> --- On Mon, 8/11/08, Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com> wrote:

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

> jyotish-vidya

> Monday, August 11, 2008, 3:56 PM

Jai,

>

> Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

> birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

> more than the occupants of the 5th.

>

> Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

> divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

> birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

> On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>

>> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

>> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

>> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

>> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

>> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

>> charts for predicting progeny ?

>> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

>> Aug 2nd 1974

>> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

>> Bangalore, India

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jai

>>

>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Krishnan,

 

> In the judgement of putra bahava, charts of parents are considered

> as equally important.ofcourse we may for the present may not delve

> in to karmic aspects,though it is the core issue of human beings

> progression in life

 

So by " Putra Bhava " you are referring not specifically to the 5th

House, but to the " Nature of the Child " ? And thus you are saying that

to determine the nature of the child one must consider the nature of

the parents, Correct?

 

I agree with you on psychological terms, but not on astrological

grounds.

 

Here is an example:

 

My mother's chart shows that religion is the greatest enemy of her

son. Indeed this is how SHE perceives me. Due to religion I renounced

my relationship with my dear-most mother for almost a decade and lived

a mendicant's life, during which time my mother suffered horribly.

However, my chart shows that religion is my greatest companion and

blessing.

 

What you can see from my mother's chart is HER EXPERIENCE of her son

(or her mother or her father, etc). But you cannot actually see the

karma of her son, (mother, father, etc.) per se. In the horoscope of

her son, conversely you will see HIS EXPERIENCE of his mother - but

not her actual karma.

 

Thus if a mother's chart indicates miscarriage it is not SHE who kills

the child. Did Ganga Mayi kill her seven children, or was that THEIR

OWN BUSINESS??? No, if a mother's chart indicates that one of the

children will die, IT WILL NOT HAPPEN to any child whose chart does

not show it. And if none of her children's chart show it, ever, then

you should understand that she has escaped misery by the causeless

grace of Bhagavan. Or, that a similar EMOTIONAL form of the experience

may manifest on the astral level.

 

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vic,

Lord of 5th (Mesha ) is Mangal. He is placed in 9th from Lagna in Leo. Mangal

does not have any company in that house. Mangal is aspected by retro Jupiter who

himself is in 3rd ( by 7th aspect ). Thats all I can read.

 

Regards,

Jai

 

 

 

 

Vic D <vicdicara

jyotish-vidya

Monday, August 11, 2008 2:56:33 PM

Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

 

Jai,

 

Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

more than the occupants of the 5th.

 

Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

 

> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

> charts for predicting progeny ?

> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

> Aug 2nd 1974

> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

> Bangalore, India

>

> Regards,

> Jai

>

>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Jai,

 

Well, I am EXTREMELY busy at the moment. But on the basis of what you

said, the lord of the 5th house (children) is in the fortunate 9th

house aspected by the significator of children, Jupiter. That does

seem to be good for children doesn't it?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

 

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Jai Dixit wrote:

 

> Dear Vic,

> Lord of 5th (Mesha ) is Mangal. He is placed in 9th from Lagna in

> Leo. Mangal does not have any company in that house. Mangal is

> aspected by retro Jupiter who himself is in 3rd ( by 7th aspect ).

> Thats all I can read.

>

> Regards,

> Jai

>

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara

> jyotish-vidya

> Monday, August 11, 2008 2:56:33 PM

> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>

> Jai,

>

> Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

> birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

> more than the occupants of the 5th.

>

> Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

> divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

> birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

> On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>

>> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

>> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

>> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

>> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

>> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

>> charts for predicting progeny ?

>> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

>> Aug 2nd 1974

>> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

>> Bangalore, India

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jai

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vic,

Oh1 it is really great of you to put those astrological consideration in a very

impressive and poignant way.Also in a very short time you have expressed and

analysed issues.

I  will be trying to understand these aspects very closely further  in the 

manner you have explained.

Thanx

vrkrishnan

 

--- On Mon, 8/11/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

 

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Monday, August 11, 2008, 10:22 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Krishnan,

 

> In the judgement of putra bahava, charts of parents are considered

> as equally important.ofcourse we may for the present may not delve

> in to karmic aspects,though it is the core issue of human beings

> progression in life

 

So by " Putra Bhava " you are referring not specifically to the 5th

House, but to the " Nature of the Child " ? And thus you are saying that

to determine the nature of the child one must consider the nature of

the parents, Correct?

 

I agree with you on psychological terms, but not on astrological

grounds.

 

Here is an example:

 

My mother's chart shows that religion is the greatest enemy of her

son. Indeed this is how SHE perceives me. Due to religion I renounced

my relationship with my dear-most mother for almost a decade and lived

a mendicant's life, during which time my mother suffered horribly.

However, my chart shows that religion is my greatest companion and

blessing.

 

What you can see from my mother's chart is HER EXPERIENCE of her son

(or her mother or her father, etc). But you cannot actually see the

karma of her son, (mother, father, etc.) per se. In the horoscope of

her son, conversely you will see HIS EXPERIENCE of his mother - but

not her actual karma.

 

Thus if a mother's chart indicates miscarriage it is not SHE who kills

the child. Did Ganga Mayi kill her seven children, or was that THEIR

OWN BUSINESS??? No, if a mother's chart indicates that one of the

children will die, IT WILL NOT HAPPEN to any child whose chart does

not show it. And if none of her children's chart show it, ever, then

you should understand that she has escaped misery by the causeless

grace of Bhagavan. Or, that a similar EMOTIONAL form of the experience

may manifest on the astral level.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your quick response Vic.I was looking at 5th house very differently

than you saw. Please help me understand when you get a chance.

5th Lord Mangal a natural malefic is in 9th. Also note that Shani Maharaj

another great malefic sitting in the 7th house who happens to be lords of 2nd

and 3rd is aspecting 9th ( by 3rd aspect ). So the only saving grace is Guru

aspecting 9th house ( Simha ) owned by his friend Surya and occupied by another

friend Mangal ? Is Mangal *bad*  for the house he occupies and aspects ?

Thanks and regards,

Jai

 

 

 

Vic D <vicdicara

jyotish-vidya

Monday, August 11, 2008 9:32:28 PM

Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

 

 

Dear Jai,

 

Well, I am EXTREMELY busy at the moment. But on the basis of what you

said, the lord of the 5th house (children) is in the fortunate 9th

house aspected by the significator of children, Jupiter. That does

seem to be good for children doesn't it?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicast rologer.net

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Jai Dixit wrote:

 

> Dear Vic,

> Lord of 5th (Mesha ) is Mangal. He is placed in 9th from Lagna in

> Leo. Mangal does not have any company in that house. Mangal is

> aspected by retro Jupiter who himself is in 3rd ( by 7th aspect ).

> Thats all I can read.

>

> Regards,

> Jai

>

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> jyotish-vidya

> Monday, August 11, 2008 2:56:33 PM

> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>

> Jai,

>

> Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

> birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

> more than the occupants of the 5th.

>

> Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

> divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

> birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

> On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>

>> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

>> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

>> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

>> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

>> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

>> charts for predicting progeny ?

>> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

>> Aug 2nd 1974

>> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

>> Bangalore, India

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jai

>>

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Jai,

 

Very Very busy, but here are some thoughts:

 

You must be Sagittarius Rising. So Mars owns the 5th and 12th. The 5th

will more strongly color his nature. " Malefic " is an interesting word.

It is not that malefic planets are " bad " they are just rough. But a

planet would not be bad towards the houses it owns under any

circumstance.

 

So Mars is the owner of the 5th and occupies the 9th. First look up

that Lordship yoga in Brihat Parashara Hora Shastra (available in the

library on www.jyotish-vidya.com).

 

Next consider that the owner of the 5th is aspected by the owner of

the chart, ascendant lord Jupiter, who naturally signifies children

and is highly soft and gentle. So your 5th house is blessed in so many

ways.

 

Shani-ji / Saturn can cause some difficulties to the marriage by

detatchment, distance and coldness. As for his influence on the 5th

Lord, Mars, take note of their degrees. How close are they by degree?

 

> Is Mangal *bad* for the house he occupies and aspects ?

 

That is overly simplistic. It is far too general. If Mars owns the 5th

and is placed in a trine like the 9th then his placement amplifies the

strength of the 5th house greatly.

 

If additionally he gets the aspect of the natural representative of

the 5th House, Jupiter, then his 5th house is even further strengthened.

 

IMO, the astrologer you visited 4 years ago was moving in this line of

thought towards his prediction.

 

Mars brings energy to the house he occupies and aspects. Its up to you

as the astrologer to see in which ways the energy can be frustrated

and lead to argument, strife and violence - and which ways the energy

can be attuned and lead to enterprise, adventure and achievement.

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS

 

Besides even if Mars in the 9th is bad... it is bad for the

significance of the 9th house, the 5th house still flourishes.

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Jai Dixit wrote:

 

> Thanks for your quick response Vic.I was looking at 5th house very

> differently than you saw. Please help me understand when you get a

> chance.

> 5th Lord Mangal a natural malefic is in 9th. Also note that Shani

> Maharaj another great malefic sitting in the 7th house who happens

> to be lords of 2nd and 3rd is aspecting 9th ( by 3rd aspect ). So

> the only saving grace is Guru aspecting 9th house ( Simha ) owned by

> his friend Surya and occupied by another friend Mangal ? Is Mangal

> *bad* for the house he occupies and aspects ?

> Thanks and regards,

> Jai

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara

> jyotish-vidya

> Monday, August 11, 2008 9:32:28 PM

> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>

> Dear Jai,

>

> Well, I am EXTREMELY busy at the moment. But on the basis of what you

> said, the lord of the 5th house (children) is in the fortunate 9th

> house aspected by the significator of children, Jupiter. That does

> seem to be good for children doesn't it?

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

> On Aug 11, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>

>> Dear Vic,

>> Lord of 5th (Mesha ) is Mangal. He is placed in 9th from Lagna in

>> Leo. Mangal does not have any company in that house. Mangal is

>> aspected by retro Jupiter who himself is in 3rd ( by 7th aspect ).

>> Thats all I can read.

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jai

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Monday, August 11, 2008 2:56:33 PM

>> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>>

>>

>> Jai,

>>

>> Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

>> birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

>> more than the occupants of the 5th.

>>

>> Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

>> divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

>> birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

>>

>> Yours,

>> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

>> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>>

>> On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>>

>>> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

>>> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

>>> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

>>> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

>>> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

>>> charts for predicting progeny ?

>>> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

>>> Aug 2nd 1974

>>> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

>>> Bangalore, India

>>>

>>> Regards,

>>> Jai

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mr Jai

 

To know about progeny we have to calculate Beeja Sphuta and kshetra Sphuta in

addition to Santana Thithi. The fifth house, the fifth lord also play a role in

predicting progeny.

 

savithri

 

--- On Tue, 8/12/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

jyotish-vidya

Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 1:10 AM

 

PS

 

Besides even if Mars in the 9th is bad... it is bad for the

significance of the 9th house, the 5th house still flourishes.

 

On Aug 11, 2008, at 8:56 PM, Jai Dixit wrote:

 

> Thanks for your quick response Vic.I was looking at 5th house very

> differently than you saw. Please help me understand when you get a

> chance.

> 5th Lord Mangal a natural malefic is in 9th. Also note that Shani

> Maharaj another great malefic sitting in the 7th house who happens

> to be lords of 2nd and 3rd is aspecting 9th ( by 3rd aspect ). So

> the only saving grace is Guru aspecting 9th house ( Simha ) owned by

> his friend Surya and occupied by another friend Mangal ? Is Mangal

> *bad* for the house he occupies and aspects ?

> Thanks and regards,

> Jai

>

>

>

> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

> jyotish-vidya

> Monday, August 11, 2008 9:32:28 PM

> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>

>

> Dear Jai,

>

> Well, I am EXTREMELY busy at the moment. But on the basis of what you

> said, the lord of the 5th house (children) is in the fortunate 9th

> house aspected by the significator of children, Jupiter. That does

> seem to be good for children doesn't it?

>

> Yours,

> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>

> On Aug 11, 2008, at 7:28 PM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>

>> Dear Vic,

>> Lord of 5th (Mesha ) is Mangal. He is placed in 9th from Lagna in

>> Leo. Mangal does not have any company in that house. Mangal is

>> aspected by retro Jupiter who himself is in 3rd ( by 7th aspect ).

>> Thats all I can read.

>>

>> Regards,

>> Jai

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Vic D <vicdicara (AT) gmail (DOT) com>

>> jyotish-vidya

>> Monday, August 11, 2008 2:56:33 PM

>> Re: Re: Fortune of twins should be the same?

>>

>>

>> Jai,

>>

>> Who is the lord of your 5th House? Where is he or she placed in your

>> birthchart and who aspects / conjoins him or her? This will tell you

>> more than the occupants of the 5th.

>>

>> Additionally look at the position of this planet in the childrens'

>> divisional (the number escapes me at the moment) and look for the

>> birthchart placement of the ascendant ruler of that divisional.

>>

>> Yours,

>> Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

>> http://www.vedicast rologer.net

>>

>> On Aug 11, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Jai Dixit wrote:

>>

>>> When I had consulted an astrologer in India 4 years ago ( I was not

>>> married at that time ) he had predicted that I will father a boy and

>>> a girl. As of now we only have a 9 month baby girl . When I look at

>>> my chart the 5th house is neither occupied nor aspected by any

>>> planet. How do we interpret this ? Should we look at the divisional

>>> charts for predicting progeny ?

>>> I'm still a neophyte. So please don't mind my basic/silly questions.

>>> Aug 2nd 1974

>>> 5:00 PM Indian Standard Time

>>> Bangalore, India

>>>

>>> Regards,

>>> Jai

>>>

>

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Savithri,

 

> To know about progeny we have to calculate Beeja Sphuta and kshetra

> Sphuta in addition to Santana Thithi. The fifth house, the fifth

> lord also play a role in predicting progeny.

 

Seed, egg, and timing... these are techniques developed by Mantreshwar

to determine fertility, or really, to counter infertility.

 

The idea is simple, and almost gynecological. The seed (beeja) or

sperm must be able to bear fruit, the egg (kshetra, or womb) from the

ovary must be able to bear fruit, and the time (tithi) must be

appropriate in the ovulation cycle. With these there, we can have

successful conceptions

 

You get the position of Beeja Sphuta by adding the man's longitudes of

Sun, Venus and Jupiter. Check the sign that this sum falls into in

both the birth chart and the ninth division. Female signs are fertile,

male signs are infertile. Two female signs is excellent. Male and

female is mediocre. Two male signs is bad for the fertility of the

sperm.

 

You get the position of the Kshetra Sphuta by adding the woman's

longitudes of Jupiter, Moon and Mars. Follow the same rules as above

for determining her fertility.

 

Now, for the tithi... multiply the longitude of the sun by 5. do the

same for the longitude of the moon. Then subtract the suns multiplied

longitude from the moon's. Convert this number into a sign, degree and

minute. Divide that by twelve and add one. The number that you have is

the day number of best conception on the lunar calendar. 2 = the

second day of the lunar cycle, etc. numbers greater than 15 represent

the waxing fortnight. Remainders greater than 6 fall in the second

portion of the tithi.

 

To be honest I have a fair share of skepticism about this technique.

Has anyone actually used it? What have been the results?

 

Yours,

Vic DiCara / Vraja Kishor

http://www.vedicastrologer.net

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...