Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Vic ji - regarding Sukra

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Vic ji,

 

///For a Leo lagna Venus owns the 10th and 3rd Houses (right? i'm tired). As

such her presence in the 1st Indicats that the person is highly career oriented

and may have a strong connection to younger sibling(s) and that they likely have

strong will to live and are somewhat adventurous.///

 

This is very appropriately written--also, since the third is the house of

initiative, the native could take a lot of effort to further his career.

However, one danger is that Sukra becomes malefic because of ownership of a

kendra and a trishadya. Also, Moolatrikona falls in trishadya, so is not the

danger heightened? Also, the 3rd rules kama, and desire could push the native to

do strange things to propel his career...

 

~~~~~~~~~

Balaji Narasimhan

Author & Editor

http://www.balaji.ind.in/

~~~~~~~~~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Balaji,

 

(With a name like Balaji I suddenly find myself remembering Annakut!)

 

Yor mention that Sukra " becomes a malefic " . I know that is widely

accepted language. But I propose a change. I shall stop using the

terms " functional benefic " or " functional malefic " or any permutation

like " becoming a malefic " because I feel it is counter-intuitive and

ruins a clear understanding.

 

In the case of Leo, Venus is a benefic (period). Since she owns the

3rd house with her root (Mooltr.) there, she can do strange things as

well - but this is NOT her acting as venus, but acting as the 3rd

House lord.

 

It's merely a change in semantics, but I believe it will go a long way

to clearing up a lot of misunderstanding and cloudy thinking in the

current culture of jyotish.

 

I like what you have written. The 3rd House has some darkness to it

because it is connected with such primal forces (the very will to

live). If there is a fault in the 3rd House it becomes glaring and

quite problematic because it causes a fundamental fault in the

person's will and daily inspiration.

 

 

 

~ Vic DiCara

 

www.vicdicara.com

www.vedicastrologer.net

 

 

 

 

 

On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Balaji Narasimhan wrote:

 

> Vic ji,

>

> ///For a Leo lagna Venus owns the 10th and 3rd Houses (right? i'm

> tired). As such her presence in the 1st Indicats that the person is

> highly career oriented and may have a strong connection to younger

> sibling(s) and that they likely have strong will to live and are

> somewhat adventurous.///

>

> This is very appropriately written--also, since the third is the

> house of initiative, the native could take a lot of effort to

> further his career. However, one danger is that Sukra becomes

> malefic because of ownership of a kendra and a trishadya. Also,

> Moolatrikona falls in trishadya, so is not the danger heightened?

> Also, the 3rd rules kama, and desire could push the native to do

> strange things to propel his career...

>

> ~~~~~~~~~

> Balaji Narasimhan

> Author & Editor

> http://www.balaji.ind.in/

> ~~~~~~~~~

>

>

>

>

> ---

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Vic,

 

You said:

 

" ...In the case of Leo, Venus is a benefic (period). "

 

Is this what you wanted to say? or did you intend to say:

 

" ...For any rising, Venus is a benefic (period). "

 

Regards,

Krishna

 

--- On Tue, 11/11/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

Vic D <vicdicara

Re: Vic ji - regarding Sukra

jyotish-vidya

Tuesday, 11 November, 2008, 6:52 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Balaji,

 

 

 

(With a name like Balaji I suddenly find myself remembering Annakut!)

 

 

 

Yor mention that Sukra " becomes a malefic " . I know that is widely

 

accepted language. But I propose a change. I shall stop using the

 

terms " functional benefic " or " functional malefic " or any permutation

 

like " becoming a malefic " because I feel it is counter-intuitive and

 

ruins a clear understanding.

 

 

 

In the case of Leo, Venus is a benefic (period). Since she owns the

 

3rd house with her root (Mooltr.) there, she can do strange things as

 

well - but this is NOT her acting as venus, but acting as the 3rd

 

House lord.

 

 

 

It's merely a change in semantics, but I believe it will go a long way

 

to clearing up a lot of misunderstanding and cloudy thinking in the

 

current culture of jyotish.

 

 

 

I like what you have written. The 3rd House has some darkness to it

 

because it is connected with such primal forces (the very will to

 

live). If there is a fault in the 3rd House it becomes glaring and

 

quite problematic because it causes a fundamental fault in the

 

person's will and daily inspiration.

 

 

 

~ Vic DiCara

 

 

 

www.vicdicara. com

 

www.vedicastrologer .net

 

 

 

On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Balaji Narasimhan wrote:

 

 

 

> Vic ji,

 

>

 

> ///For a Leo lagna Venus owns the 10th and 3rd Houses (right? i'm

 

> tired). As such her presence in the 1st Indicats that the person is

 

> highly career oriented and may have a strong connection to younger

 

> sibling(s) and that they likely have strong will to live and are

 

> somewhat adventurous. ///

 

>

 

> This is very appropriately written--also, since the third is the

 

> house of initiative, the native could take a lot of effort to

 

> further his career. However, one danger is that Sukra becomes

 

> malefic because of ownership of a kendra and a trishadya. Also,

 

> Moolatrikona falls in trishadya, so is not the danger heightened?

 

> Also, the 3rd rules kama, and desire could push the native to do

 

> strange things to propel his career...

 

>

 

> ~~~~~~~~~

 

> Balaji Narasimhan

 

> Author & Editor

 

> http://www.balaji. ind.in/

 

> ~~~~~~~~~

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

>

 

> ------------ --------- --------- ------

 

>

 

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Krishna,

 

THANKS! Yes!!!! =)

 

~ Vic DiCara

 

www.vicdicara.com

www.vedicastrologer.net

 

 

 

 

 

On Nov 11, 2008, at 6:36 AM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

 

> Dear Vic,

>

> You said:

>

> " ...In the case of Leo, Venus is a benefic (period). "

>

> Is this what you wanted to say? or did you intend to say:

>

> " ...For any rising, Venus is a benefic (period). "

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> --- On Tue, 11/11/08, Vic D <vicdicara wrote:

> Vic D <vicdicara

> Re: Vic ji - regarding Sukra

> jyotish-vidya

> Tuesday, 11 November, 2008, 6:52 PM

>

>

>

>

>

Dear Balaji,

>

>

>

> (With a name like Balaji I suddenly find myself remembering Annakut!)

>

>

>

> Yor mention that Sukra " becomes a malefic " . I know that is widely

>

> accepted language. But I propose a change. I shall stop using the

>

> terms " functional benefic " or " functional malefic " or any permutation

>

> like " becoming a malefic " because I feel it is counter-intuitive and

>

> ruins a clear understanding.

>

>

>

> In the case of Leo, Venus is a benefic (period). Since she owns the

>

> 3rd house with her root (Mooltr.) there, she can do strange things as

>

> well - but this is NOT her acting as venus, but acting as the 3rd

>

> House lord.

>

>

>

> It's merely a change in semantics, but I believe it will go a long way

>

> to clearing up a lot of misunderstanding and cloudy thinking in the

>

> current culture of jyotish.

>

>

>

> I like what you have written. The 3rd House has some darkness to it

>

> because it is connected with such primal forces (the very will to

>

> live). If there is a fault in the 3rd House it becomes glaring and

>

> quite problematic because it causes a fundamental fault in the

>

> person's will and daily inspiration.

>

>

>

> ~ Vic DiCara

>

>

>

> www.vicdicara. com

>

> www.vedicastrologer .net

>

>

>

> On Nov 11, 2008, at 12:25 AM, Balaji Narasimhan wrote:

>

>

>

>> Vic ji,

>

>>

>

>> ///For a Leo lagna Venus owns the 10th and 3rd Houses (right? i'm

>

>> tired). As such her presence in the 1st Indicats that the person is

>

>> highly career oriented and may have a strong connection to younger

>

>> sibling(s) and that they likely have strong will to live and are

>

>> somewhat adventurous. ///

>

>>

>

>> This is very appropriately written--also, since the third is the

>

>> house of initiative, the native could take a lot of effort to

>

>> further his career. However, one danger is that Sukra becomes

>

>> malefic because of ownership of a kendra and a trishadya. Also,

>

>> Moolatrikona falls in trishadya, so is not the danger heightened?

>

>> Also, the 3rd rules kama, and desire could push the native to do

>

>> strange things to propel his career...

>

>>

>

>> ~~~~~~~~~

>

>> Balaji Narasimhan

>

>> Author & Editor

>

>> http://www.balaji. ind.in/

>

>> ~~~~~~~~~

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>>

>

>> ------------ --------- --------- ------

>

>>

>

>>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...