Guest guest Posted June 9, 2009 Report Share Posted June 9, 2009 Dear Chandu, Please note that in the (comprehensive) questionnaire, there is a section that asks for the person's height, weight, skin color, hobbies, and whether born in hospital, home (or elsewhere). This section is followed by questions related to decision-making patterns, personality traits, personal interests and important habits. These physical/personality traits are indicative of certain rashi's (as has been discussed here many times). As we know, for instance, Cancer (a water sign) expresses the 'Kapha' dosha whilst Leo (a fiery sign) expresses the 'Pitta' dosha. Capricorn (an earthy sign) expresses the 'Vata' dosha, and so on...more information on the dosha's is available here http://jyotishvidya.com/prikriti.htm if you're interested. Parashara gives the following in BPHS Ch.4: **5-5 1/2. CLASSIFICATION OF SIGNS: Movable, Fixed, and Dual are the names given to the 12 signs in order. These are again known as malefic and benefic, successively. Similarly these are male and female. Aries, Leo and Sagittarius are bilious. Taurus, Virgo, and Capricorn are windy. Gemini, Libra, and Aquarius are mixed while the rest are phlegmatic.** Note:(bilious=Pitta, windy=Vata, phlegmatic=Kapha) The point is that a person's height/stature reflects physical attributes of the rashi rising at birth; modified, of course, by placement of lagna lord, lagna karaka (Sun) and other influences on lagna, lagna lord etc.. A while back whilst trying to determine lagna of a native whose birthtime was unknown at the time, I decided on Pisces as a tentative lagna, based on physical/personality characteristics (alone). I think it was Krishna who asked whether lagna karaka Sun in Pisces could attribute to these characteristics. As it turned out, after receiving the correct T.O.B., the native did, in fact, have Gemini rising with Sun in Pisces. The lesson here is not to make hasty decisions based on rising sign attributes (only). For rectification many things have to be considered... Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Mrs. Wendy " <jyotishvidya <jyotish-vidya > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:36 AM Re: ascendant con firmation Dear Chandu, Although I realise not everyone has the opportunity to learn from a recognised teacher (or institution), the benefits of personal instruction cannot be measured. Yes, we're fortunate to have the classics, such as BPHS etc, at our fingertips; however formal education from a Guru (or teacher) shines a clear light on texts that may often be misunderstood (or misinterpreted). As most know, I did study Maharishi jyotish under the guidance of recognised (Maharishi) teachers... I mention this and provide the following link in support of the technique for rectification I follow. I do hope you will take the time to read through it. https://forms.netsuite.com/app/site/crm/externalcustrecordpage.nl?compid=ACCT138\ 578 & formid=23 & h=b227e6df8128909daa96 Rectification is a lengthy and time-consuming exercise, no doubt, and I'm satisfied, with my diminished energy level these days, just to come close enough to establish the correct lagna. I'm not saying that I established which lagna was right for Subhash (one event is not enough). I simply wanted to show how this is done, so that anyone interested in trying their hand at it might be encouraged to put in the work. Subhash, I'm sure, would benefit greatly by making some effort himself to verify as many major events in his life as he can. It would be great If others, following this technique, came to the conclusion that Cancer is the correct lagna...I have no preference one way or the other, just trying to show how to go about it in a systematic way. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Mrs. Wendy " <jyotishvidya <jyotish-vidya > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:46 AM Re: ascendant con firmation Dear Chandu, I do have Jataka Parijata (opened in front of me) and am familiar with the slokas you've mentioned...as well as sloka 8 (Adh.1) which deals specifically with the parts of the body represented by each rashi. Also, as I'm sure you've also read, it's further stated (last portion of sloka 56 Adh.1) that " these figures are useful in finding out the relative lengths of the several PARTS OF THE HUMAN BODY " The notes following sloka 76 (Adh.111) make this quite clear: " Remembering that lagna represents the head, the 2nd house (face), the 3rd neck and so on, one can predict whether the several parts of the body are long or short, or disproportional by the length, shortness or otherwise of the signs typifying the particular part of the body, AS WELL AS BY THE PLANETS OCCUPYING THE PARTICULAR RASHI. " ///No where in classical text it is mentioned that birth time rectification can be done through dasas./// The most fundamental tenet of Vedic astrology is the manifestation of karma (events of life) delivered via the dasa system. This basic tenet (i.e. the significations of the planet and the affairs of the house it occupies will manifest during its dasa) is the backbone of prediction! Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " chandu r " <rchandu_98 <jyotish-vidya > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 11:03 PM Re: ascendant con firmation Mrs Wendy and esteemed members of the group, Please referer to 'JATAKA PARIJATA " by V.Subramanya Sastri, ( 2004 edition) vol.I. - chapter I, sloka 56 - page no. 35. and also chapter III , sloka 76 - page no.165. here it is mentioned that the measurement are useful in finding out the relative lengths of the several parts of a human body. For Birth time rectification generally we use events and try to reach a point using dasa and antardasas, No where in classical text it is mentioned that birth time rectification can be done through dasas. for example to find date of marriage - generally 1st bhava, 1st lord , 7th bhava and 7th lords dasas and antar dasas are considered - however marriage can take place in 6,8 or 12 th lords antardasa also. with regards chandu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Dear Mrs. Wendy, //I think it was Krishna who asked whether lagna karaka Sun in Pisces could attribute to these characteristics. As it turned out, after receiving the correct T.O.B., the native did, in fact, have Gemini rising with Sun in Pisces. // Yes, I did comment about the placement of Sun in the case Susan Boyle. I always felt that it is not enough to look at lagna alone to determine the bulk of the physical characteristics of the native. Unfortunately, in astrology things are not so straight forward. Whenever I tried to guess the physical features of a native using lagna alone, I have not got consistent results. I feel that one should look for a combination of Lagna, Chandra lagna and Surya lagna. The contribution of each of these houses will probably be proportional to the strength of that house. Hence, checking the height just using lagna may not yield consistent results. Of course, this is my personal opinion. This is not meant to discourage anyone to go ahead and do research. Regards, Krishna On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote: > > > Dear Chandu, > > Please note that in the (comprehensive) questionnaire, there is a section > that asks for the person's height, weight, skin color, hobbies, and > whether born in hospital, home (or elsewhere). This section is followed > by questions related to decision-making patterns, personality traits, > personal interests and important habits. > > These physical/personality traits are indicative of certain rashi's (as > has been discussed here many times). As we know, for instance, Cancer (a > water sign) expresses the 'Kapha' dosha whilst Leo (a fiery sign) > expresses the 'Pitta' dosha. Capricorn (an earthy sign) expresses the > 'Vata' dosha, and so on...more information on the dosha's is available > here http://jyotishvidya.com/prikriti.htm if you're interested. > > Parashara gives the following in BPHS Ch.4: > > **5-5 1/2. CLASSIFICATION OF SIGNS: > Movable, Fixed, and Dual are the names given to the 12 signs in order. > These are again known as malefic and benefic, successively. Similarly > these are male and female. Aries, Leo and Sagittarius are bilious. > Taurus, Virgo, and Capricorn are windy. Gemini, Libra, and Aquarius are > mixed while the rest are phlegmatic.** > > Note:(bilious=Pitta, windy=Vata, phlegmatic=Kapha) > > The point is that a person's height/stature reflects physical attributes > of the rashi rising at birth; modified, of course, by placement of lagna > lord, lagna karaka (Sun) and other influences on lagna, lagna lord etc.. > > A while back whilst trying to determine lagna of a native whose birthtime > was unknown at the time, I decided on Pisces as a tentative lagna, based > on physical/personality characteristics (alone). I think it was Krishna > who asked whether lagna karaka Sun in Pisces could attribute to these > characteristics. As it turned out, after receiving the correct T.O.B., > the native did, in fact, have Gemini rising with Sun in Pisces. The > lesson here is not to make hasty decisions based on rising sign > attributes (only). For rectification many things have to be considered... > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ > > - > " Mrs. Wendy " <jyotishvidya <jyotishvidya%40bigpond.com>> > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:36 AM > Re: ascendant con firmation > > Dear Chandu, > > Although I realise not everyone has the opportunity to learn from a > recognised teacher (or institution), the benefits of personal instruction > cannot be measured. Yes, we're fortunate to have the classics, such as > BPHS etc, at our fingertips; however formal education from a Guru (or > teacher) shines a clear light on texts that may often be misunderstood > (or misinterpreted). As most know, I did study Maharishi jyotish under > the guidance of recognised (Maharishi) teachers... > > I mention this and provide the following link in support of the technique > for rectification I follow. I do hope you will take the time to read > through it. > > > https://forms.netsuite.com/app/site/crm/externalcustrecordpage.nl?compid=ACCT138\ 578 & formid=23 & h=b227e6df8128909daa96 > > Rectification is a lengthy and time-consuming exercise, no doubt, and I'm > satisfied, with my diminished energy level these days, just to come close > enough to establish the correct lagna. > > I'm not saying that I established which lagna was right for Subhash (one > event is not enough). I simply wanted to show how this is done, so that > anyone interested in trying their hand at it might be encouraged to put > in the work. Subhash, I'm sure, would benefit greatly by making some > effort himself to verify as many major events in his life as he can. > > It would be great If others, following this technique, came to the > conclusion that Cancer is the correct lagna...I have no preference one > way or the other, just trying to show how to go about it in a systematic > way. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ > > - > " Mrs. Wendy " <jyotishvidya <jyotishvidya%40bigpond.com>> > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 12:46 AM > Re: ascendant con firmation > > Dear Chandu, > > I do have Jataka Parijata (opened in front of me) and am familiar with > the slokas you've mentioned...as well as sloka 8 (Adh.1) which deals > specifically with the parts of the body represented by each rashi. Also, > as I'm sure you've also read, it's further stated (last portion of sloka > 56 Adh.1) that " these figures are useful in finding out the relative > lengths of the several PARTS OF THE HUMAN BODY " > > The notes following sloka 76 (Adh.111) make this quite clear: > " Remembering that lagna represents the head, the 2nd house (face), the > 3rd neck and so on, one can predict whether the several parts of the body > are long or short, or disproportional by the length, shortness or > otherwise of the signs typifying the particular part of the body, AS WELL > AS BY THE PLANETS OCCUPYING THE PARTICULAR RASHI. " > > ///No where in classical text it is mentioned that birth time > rectification can be done through dasas./// > > The most fundamental tenet of Vedic astrology is the manifestation of > karma (events of life) delivered via the dasa system. This basic tenet > (i.e. the significations of the planet and the affairs of the house it > occupies will manifest during its dasa) is the backbone of prediction! > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ > > - > " chandu r " <rchandu_98 <rchandu_98%40.co.uk>> > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > Tuesday, June 09, 2009 11:03 PM > Re: ascendant con firmation > > Mrs Wendy and esteemed members of the group, > > Please referer to 'JATAKA PARIJATA " by V.Subramanya Sastri, ( 2004 > edition) vol.I. > > - chapter I, sloka 56 - page no. 35. and also chapter III , sloka 76 - > page no.165. here it is mentioned that the measurement are useful in > finding out the relative lengths of the several parts of a human body. > > For Birth time rectification generally we use events and try to reach a > point using dasa and antardasas, > > No where in classical text it is mentioned that birth time rectification > can be done through dasas. > > for example to find date of marriage - generally 1st bhava, 1st lord , > 7th bhava and 7th lords > > dasas and antar dasas are considered - however marriage can take place in > 6,8 or 12 th lords > > antardasa also. > > with regards > > chandu > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Dear Krishna, ///I always felt that it is not enough to look at lagna alone to determine the bulk of the physical characteristics of the native. Unfortunately, in astrology things are not so straight forward. Whenever I tried to guess the physical features of a native using lagna alone, I have not got consistent results./// Sometimes there can be a particular feature in a chart that draws one intuitively to the correct lagna. But, as we know, this can be inconsistent so there's often no choice but to roll up our sleeves and put in the hard work. Some years ago my interest was sparked to take a look at Patsy Cline's chart. I had the date and place of birth but no time. I felt strongly that her physical characteristics and personality were very much akin to Taurus and found confirmation of this as soon as I looked at the chart. She had lagnesh Venus in 3rd in mutual aspect with 10th lord Saturn (dispositor of Rahu) whilst lagnesh Venus' dispositor (Moon) occupied 8th house in mutual aspect with 12th/7th lord Mars. I was quite sure this was the right chart. Patsy, we know, died tragically in a plane crash on 5 Mar 1963. She also had a near fatal car accident on 14 Jun 1961. She was running mahadasa of Moon from 1956 until her death in 1963. I set a tentative time of 22:20 and some time later (a year or more, I think) I came across a copy of her birth certificate on a fan site, the time given was 23:05, giving Taurus lagna with lagnesh Venus' dispositor (Moon) in 8th etc.. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58 <jyotish-vidya > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:37 PM Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu Dear Mrs. Wendy, //I think it was Krishna who asked whether lagna karaka Sun in Pisces could attribute to these characteristics. As it turned out, after receiving the correct T.O.B., the native did, in fact, have Gemini rising with Sun in Pisces. // Yes, I did comment about the placement of Sun in the case Susan Boyle. I always felt that it is not enough to look at lagna alone to determine the bulk of the physical characteristics of the native. Unfortunately, in astrology things are not so straight forward. Whenever I tried to guess the physical features of a native using lagna alone, I have not got consistent results. I feel that one should look for a combination of Lagna, Chandra lagna and Surya lagna. The contribution of each of these houses will probably be proportional to the strength of that house. Hence, checking the height just using lagna may not yield consistent results. Of course, this is my personal opinion. This is not meant to discourage anyone to go ahead and do research. Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Dear Mrs. Wendy, Yes, for an experienced astrologer, it might work in some cases pretty well. I am not denying that possibility. In the particular case you are talking about, could you please tell me the relative strengths of lagna lord, Sun and Moon? We could probably start observing this and then could see a pattern emerging. The following is my observation in the case of Susan Boyle: 1. Of LL(Mercury), Sun and Moon, Sun has the highest Shadbala, and Mercury has the lowest. 2. Moon's Dispositor Mercury has the lowest shadbala of all planets 3. Sun is moving closer to its exaltation point while Mercury and Moon are moving towads their debilitation point 4. Sun and Moon have the same dispositors in Rasi as well as in Navamsha. 5. Sun's dispositor Jupiter has well crossed the deep debilitation point and has started moving towards his exaltation point and hence can not be considered debiltated. Putting these points together we could conclude that Sun the strongest of the three. And, I guess that is the reason for Surya lagna determines the physical characteristics of the native. Her looks also remind of an old freind of mine who says that his Sun sign is Pisces. I don't have his birth details though. Regards, Krishna Regards, Krishna On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > ///I always felt that it is not enough to look at lagna alone to > determine the bulk of the physical characteristics of the native. > Unfortunately, in astrology things are not so straight forward. Whenever > I tried to guess the physical features of a native using lagna alone, I > have not got consistent results./// > > Sometimes there can be a particular feature in a chart that draws one > intuitively to the correct lagna. But, as we know, this can be > inconsistent so there's often no choice but to roll up our sleeves and > put in the hard work. > > Some years ago my interest was sparked to take a look at Patsy > Cline's chart. I had the date and place of birth but no time. I felt > strongly that her physical characteristics and personality were very > much akin to Taurus and found confirmation of this as soon as I looked at > the chart. > > She had lagnesh Venus in 3rd in mutual aspect with 10th lord Saturn > (dispositor of Rahu) whilst lagnesh Venus' dispositor (Moon) occupied 8th > house in mutual aspect with 12th/7th lord Mars. I was quite sure this was > the right chart. > > Patsy, we know, died tragically in a plane crash on 5 Mar 1963. She also > had a near fatal car accident on 14 Jun 1961. She was running mahadasa > of Moon from 1956 until her death in 1963. > > I set a tentative time of 22:20 and some time later (a year or more, I > think) I came across a copy of her birth certificate on a fan site, the > time given was 23:05, giving Taurus lagna with lagnesh Venus' dispositor > (Moon) in 8th etc.. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com <http://jyotishvidya.com/> > ___ > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58<kmurthys58%40gmail.com> > > > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:37 PM > Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu > > Dear Mrs. Wendy, > > //I think it was Krishna who asked whether lagna karaka Sun in Pisces > could > attribute to these characteristics. As it turned out, after receiving the > correct T.O.B., the native did, in fact, have Gemini rising with Sun in > Pisces. // > > Yes, I did comment about the placement of Sun in the case Susan Boyle. I > always felt that it is not enough to look at lagna alone to determine the > bulk of the physical characteristics of the native. Unfortunately, in > astrology things are not so straight forward. Whenever I tried to guess > the > physical features of a native using lagna alone, I have not got > consistent > results. I feel that one should look for a combination of Lagna, Chandra > lagna and Surya lagna. The contribution of each of these houses will > probably be proportional to the strength of that house. > > Hence, checking the height just using lagna may not yield consistent > results. Of course, this is my personal opinion. This is not meant to > discourage anyone to go ahead and do research. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 10, 2009 Report Share Posted June 10, 2009 Dear Krishna, ///In the particular case you are talking about, could you please tell me the relative strengths of lagna lord, Sun and Moon?/// Lagnesh Venus is strongest, Sun and Moon are weak with Sun the weakest of all. Following are the details if you wish to look at the chart yourself. Patsy Cline 8 Sep 1932 (23:05) Winchester, Virginia Regarding Susan Boyle: ///1. Of LL(Mercury), Sun and Moon, Sun has the highest Shadbala, and Mercury has the lowest./// As per my software, Moon has the highest shadbala? ///5. Sun's dispositor Jupiter has well crossed the deep debilitation point and has started moving towards his exaltation point and hence can not be considered debiltated./// A planet occupying sign of debilitation is still considered debilitated regardless of degree. It's simply a matter of intensity, the closer it is to debilitation degree (or exaltation for that matter) the more intense the effect. In Susan's chart, Jupiter has 3 neechabhanga points. Saturn, conjunct Jupiter, is final dispositor for all planets. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58 <jyotish-vidya > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:21 PM Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu Dear Mrs. Wendy, Yes, for an experienced astrologer, it might work in some cases pretty well. I am not denying that possibility. In the particular case you are talking about, could you please tell me the relative strengths of lagna lord, Sun and Moon? We could probably start observing this and then could see a pattern emerging. The following is my observation in the case of Susan Boyle: 1. Of LL(Mercury), Sun and Moon, Sun has the highest Shadbala, and Mercury has the lowest. 2. Moon's Dispositor Mercury has the lowest shadbala of all planets 3. Sun is moving closer to its exaltation point while Mercury and Moon are moving towads their debilitation point 4. Sun and Moon have the same dispositors in Rasi as well as in Navamsha. 5. Sun's dispositor Jupiter has well crossed the deep debilitation point and has started moving towards his exaltation point and hence can not be considered debiltated. Putting these points together we could conclude that Sun the strongest of the three. And, I guess that is the reason for Surya lagna determines the physical characteristics of the native. Her looks also remind of an old freind of mine who says that his Sun sign is Pisces. I don't have his birth details though. Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2009 Report Share Posted June 11, 2009 Dear Mrs. Wedny, Thanks for the birth details. My observation is: 1. Sun is fully eclipsed by Ketu. Occupies own sign in Rasi. OK Shadbala 2. Venus is debilitated in Navamsha, has a weak dispositor in Rasi. Shadbala is very good, in Bitter Enemy's sign in Rasi 3. Lowest Shadbala, in enemy's sign in Rasi Are you saying that the Sun is the weakest because it is fully eclipsed by Ketu? I feel that Moon is the weakest and it is a close contest between Venus and Sun. Probably this lady had a good combination of features of Taurus and Leo. Regards, Krishna On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > ///In the particular case you are talking about, could you please tell me > the > relative strengths of lagna lord, Sun and Moon?/// > > Lagnesh Venus is strongest, Sun and Moon are weak with Sun the weakest of > all. Following are the details if you wish to look at the chart yourself. > > Patsy Cline > 8 Sep 1932 (23:05) > Winchester, Virginia > > Regarding Susan Boyle: > > > ///1. Of LL(Mercury), Sun and Moon, Sun has the highest Shadbala, and > Mercury > has the lowest./// > > As per my software, Moon has the highest shadbala? > > ///5. Sun's dispositor Jupiter has well crossed the deep debilitation > point and > has started moving towards his exaltation point and hence can not be > considered debiltated./// > > A planet occupying sign of debilitation is still considered debilitated > regardless of degree. It's simply a matter of intensity, the closer it is > to debilitation degree (or exaltation for that matter) the more intense > the effect. In Susan's chart, Jupiter has 3 neechabhanga points. Saturn, > conjunct Jupiter, is final dispositor for all planets. > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58<kmurthys58%40gmail.com> > > > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > Wednesday, June 10, 2009 11:21 PM > Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu > > Dear Mrs. Wendy, > > Yes, for an experienced astrologer, it might work in some cases pretty > well. > I am not denying that possibility. > > In the particular case you are talking about, could you please tell me > the > relative strengths of lagna lord, Sun and Moon? We could probably start > observing this and then could see a pattern emerging. > > The following is my observation in the case of Susan Boyle: > > 1. Of LL(Mercury), Sun and Moon, Sun has the highest Shadbala, and > Mercury > has the lowest. > 2. Moon's Dispositor Mercury has the lowest shadbala of all planets > 3. Sun is moving closer to its exaltation point while Mercury and Moon > are > moving towads their debilitation point > 4. Sun and Moon have the same dispositors in Rasi as well as in Navamsha. > 5. Sun's dispositor Jupiter has well crossed the deep debilitation point > and > has started moving towards his exaltation point and hence can not be > considered debiltated. > > Putting these points together we could conclude that Sun the strongest of > the three. And, I guess that is the reason for Surya lagna determines the > physical characteristics of the native. > > Her looks also remind of an old freind of mine who says that his Sun sign > is > Pisces. I don't have his birth details though. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2009 Report Share Posted June 11, 2009 Dear Krishna, I was citing strength as per shadbala... Sun - 0.90 Moon - 1.00 Venus - 1.65 Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58 <jyotish-vidya > Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:16 PM Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu Dear Mrs. Wedny, Thanks for the birth details. My observation is: 1. Sun is fully eclipsed by Ketu. Occupies own sign in Rasi. OK Shadbala 2. Venus is debilitated in Navamsha, has a weak dispositor in Rasi. Shadbala is very good, in Bitter Enemy's sign in Rasi 3. Lowest Shadbala, in enemy's sign in Rasi Are you saying that the Sun is the weakest because it is fully eclipsed by Ketu? I feel that Moon is the weakest and it is a close contest between Venus and Sun. Probably this lady had a good combination of features of Taurus and Leo. Regards, Krishna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2009 Report Share Posted June 11, 2009 Dear Mrs. Wendy, That is interesting, my s/w JHora gives the following shadbala: Sun - 1.15 Moon - 0.97 Venus - 1.56 This is another issue with different s/w programs. Regards, Krishna On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > I was citing strength as per shadbala... > > Sun - 0.90 > Moon - 1.00 > Venus - 1.65 > > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ > > - > " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58<kmurthys58%40gmail.com> > > > <jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>> > Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:16 PM > Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu > > Dear Mrs. Wedny, > > Thanks for the birth details. > > My observation is: > > 1. Sun is fully eclipsed by Ketu. Occupies own sign in Rasi. OK Shadbala > 2. Venus is debilitated in Navamsha, has a weak dispositor in Rasi. > Shadbala > is very good, in Bitter Enemy's sign in Rasi > 3. Lowest Shadbala, in enemy's sign in Rasi > > Are you saying that the Sun is the weakest because it is fully eclipsed > by > Ketu? > > I feel that Moon is the weakest and it is a close contest between Venus > and > Sun. Probably this lady had a good combination of features of Taurus and > Leo. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 11, 2009 Report Share Posted June 11, 2009 Dear Krishna, I have confidence in the accuracy of PL7...have to or I wouldn't be able to work with it. However there are occasions when the software does seem to suffer a little glitch...more to do with my computer though, I think. A while back I was having some problems with the atlas not finding some places in India, but after a good cleanup it seemed to come right. Perhaps other members could check their software to confirm. BTW we are talking about Patsy Cline's chart, aren't we? Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58 <jyotish-vidya > Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:43 PM Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu Dear Mrs. Wendy, That is interesting, my s/w JHora gives the following shadbala: Sun - 1.15 Moon - 0.97 Venus - 1.56 This is another issue with different s/w programs. Regards, Krishna On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > I was citing strength as per shadbala... > > Sun - 0.90 > Moon - 1.00 > Venus - 1.65 > > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Dear Mrs. Wendy,Sorry I could not contribute on this thread further as I was preoccupied with some urgent work.Regards,KrishnaOn Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidya wrote: Dear Krishna, I have confidence in the accuracy of PL7...have to or I wouldn't be able to work with it. However there are occasions when the software does seem to suffer a little glitch...more to do with my computer though, I think. A while back I was having some problems with the atlas not finding some places in India, but after a good cleanup it seemed to come right. Perhaps other members could check their software to confirm. BTW we are talking about Patsy Cline's chart, aren't we? Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58 <jyotish-vidya > Thursday, June 11, 2009 1:43 PM Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu Dear Mrs. Wendy, That is interesting, my s/w JHora gives the following shadbala: Sun - 1.15 Moon - 0.97 Venus - 1.56 This is another issue with different s/w programs. Regards, Krishna On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > I was citing strength as per shadbala... > > Sun - 0.90 > Moon - 1.00 > Venus - 1.65 > > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 13, 2009 Report Share Posted June 13, 2009 Dear Krishna, No problem at all :-) I hope your pilgrimage goes well and look forward to hearing from you when you get back. Best Wishes, Mrs. Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com ___ - " Krishnamurthy Seetharama " <kmurthys58 <jyotish-vidya > Saturday, June 13, 2009 10:59 PM Re: Ascendant confirmation: Chandu Dear Mrs. Wendy, Sorry I could not contribute on this thread further as I was preoccupied with some urgent work. Regards, Krishna On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote: > > > Dear Krishna, > > I have confidence in the accuracy of PL7...have to or I wouldn't be > able > to work with it. However there are occasions when the software does > seem > to suffer a little glitch...more to do with my computer though, I > think. > A while back I was having some problems with the atlas not finding some > places in India, but after a good cleanup it seemed to come right. > > Perhaps other members could check their software to confirm. > > BTW we are talking about Patsy Cline's chart, aren't we? > > > Best Wishes, > Mrs. Wendy > http://JyotishVidya.com > ___ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.