Albert Einstein - birth data

~~~~~~~~~

January 18, 2010

Dear Balaji,

Since the birth time given is LMT, you need not worry about DST.

Regards,

Krishna

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji

> wrote:

>

> Can somebody please help me with Einstein's birth data?

>

> http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Einstein,_Albert gives it as 14 March

> 1879 at 11:30 in Ulm (48n24, 10e00).

>

> Usually, I use http://www.nlogn.com/cgi-bin/latLongLookup to find the time

> zone, but this only supports years after 1890.

>

> I need the DST (if any) and the timezone. I used no DST and 1 East and got

> the right rasi chart but the wrong navamsa as compared to data given by

> Frawley (astrology of seers) and Dr Raman (notable horoscopes).

>

> Could somebody please help me out with the timezone and DST, please?

>

> Also, please mention the Lagna you are getting so that I can verify. I use

> some old trusted DOS SW that needs this data to be entered manually. :-)

>

> ~~~~~~~~~

> Balaji Narasimhan

> Author & Editor

> ~~~~~~~~~

>

January 18, 2010

Dear Balaji,

The data I have is:

Albert Einstein

14 Mar 1879 (11:30 AM)

Ulma, Baden-Wurttemberg

Germany (08E01; 48N44)

Lagna: Gemini 19:27:39

There was no D.S.T. in effect at that time.

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

============================

Balaji Narasimhan

Monday, 18 January 2010 10:05 PM

jyotish-vidya

Albert Einstein - birth data

Can somebody please help me with Einstein's birth data?

http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Einstein,_Albert gives it as 14 March 1879

at 11:30 in Ulm (48n24, 10e00).

Usually, I use http://www.nlogn.com/cgi-bin/latLongLookup to find the time zone,

but this only supports years after 1890.

I need the DST (if any) and the timezone. I used no DST and 1 East and got the

right rasi chart but the wrong navamsa as compared to data given by Frawley

(astrology of seers) and Dr Raman (notable horoscopes).

Could somebody please help me out with the timezone and DST, please?

Also, please mention the Lagna you are getting so that I can verify. I use some

old trusted DOS SW that needs this data to be entered manually. :-)

~~~~~~~~~

Balaji Narasimhan

Author & Editor

~~~~~~~~~

=================================

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

database 4784 (20100118) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

January 18, 2010

Dear Balaji,

For the time you provided I get the following:

Universal Time (GMT) 10:50 hours

Sideral Time 22:56:44

Time Zone 00:40:00

Lahiri Ayanamsa 22:11

Lagna Gemini 19:28:20

Moon in Scorpio 22:21:5

Sun in Pisces 01:20:1

Krishna Paksha Saptami

If you are entering the birth data manually feed the GMT and keep the

values as Time Zone 0:0 and DST value 0

This is the simple way for the moments before 2000 AD.

Regards, C.S. Ravindramani

January 18, 2010

Whoops!!

Thanks to Ravindramani's post for alerting me to the time zone (which I forgot

to give). According to my software the time zone is -00:03:36

_________________________

Dear Balaji,

The data I have is:

Albert Einstein

14 Mar 1879 (11:30 AM)

Ulma, Baden-Wurttemberg

Germany (08E01; 48N44)

Lagna: Gemini 19:27:39

There was no D.S.T. in effect at that time.

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

============================

Balaji Narasimhan

Monday, 18 January 2010 10:05 PM

jyotish-vidya

Albert Einstein - birth data

Can somebody please help me with Einstein's birth data?

http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Einstein,_Albert gives it as 14 March 1879

at 11:30 in Ulm (48n24, 10e00).

Usually, I use http://www.nlogn.com/cgi-bin/latLongLookup to find the time zone,

but this only supports years after 1890.

I need the DST (if any) and the timezone. I used no DST and 1 East and got the

right rasi chart but the wrong navamsa as compared to data given by Frawley

(astrology of seers) and Dr Raman (notable horoscopes).

Could somebody please help me out with the timezone and DST, please?

Also, please mention the Lagna you are getting so that I can verify. I use some

old trusted DOS SW that needs this data to be entered manually. :-)

~~~~~~~~~

Balaji Narasimhan

Author & Editor

~~~~~~~~~

=================================

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

database 4784 (20100118) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

January 19, 2010

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

There are more than one Ulms in Germany. According to Astrodatbank, the

correct Ulm has the longitude 10E00. Hence, the correct time zone is 0:40.

Regards,

Krishna

On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 7:00 AM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote:

>

> Whoops!!

>

> Thanks to Ravindramani's post for alerting me to the time zone (which I

> forgot to give). According to my software the time zone is -00:03:36

> _________________________

>

> Dear Balaji,

>

> The data I have is:

>

> Albert Einstein

> 14 Mar 1879 (11:30 AM)

> Ulma, Baden-Wurttemberg

> Germany (08E01; 48N44)

> Lagna: Gemini 19:27:39

>

> There was no D.S.T. in effect at that time.

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

>

> ============================

>

> Balaji Narasimhan

> Monday, 18 January 2010 10:05 PM

> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>

> Albert Einstein - birth data

>

> Can somebody please help me with Einstein's birth data?

>

> http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Einstein,_Albert gives it as 14 March

> 1879 at 11:30 in Ulm (48n24, 10e00).

>

> Usually, I use http://www.nlogn.com/cgi-bin/latLongLookup to find the time

> zone, but this only supports years after 1890.

>

> I need the DST (if any) and the timezone. I used no DST and 1 East and got

> the right rasi chart but the wrong navamsa as compared to data given by

> Frawley (astrology of seers) and Dr Raman (notable horoscopes).

>

> Could somebody please help me out with the timezone and DST, please?

>

> Also, please mention the Lagna you are getting so that I can verify. I use

> some old trusted DOS SW that needs this data to be entered manually. :-)

>

> ~~~~~~~~~

> Balaji Narasimhan

> Author & Editor

> ~~~~~~~~~

>

> =================================

>

> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

> database 4784 (20100118) __________

>

> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

>

> http://www.eset.com

>

January 19, 2010

Respected Shri Balaji Narasimhan,

I am student of Jyotish. I have set of books giving particulars of Indian &

international personalities. These books also gives same details of Germany

as mentioned by you.

Regards

Anil Bhoot

09819028111

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji

> wrote:

>

> Can somebody please help me with Einstein's birth data?

>

> http://www.astro.com/astro-databank/Einstein,_Albert gives it as 14 March

> 1879 at 11:30 in Ulm (48n24, 10e00).

>

> Usually, I use http://www.nlogn.com/cgi-bin/latLongLookup to find the time

> zone, but this only supports years after 1890.

>

> I need the DST (if any) and the timezone. I used no DST and 1 East and got

> the right rasi chart but the wrong navamsa as compared to data given by

> Frawley (astrology of seers) and Dr Raman (notable horoscopes).

>

> Could somebody please help me out with the timezone and DST, please?

>

> Also, please mention the Lagna you are getting so that I can verify. I use

> some old trusted DOS SW that needs this data to be entered manually. :-)

>

> ~~~~~~~~~

> Balaji Narasimhan

> Author & Editor

> ~~~~~~~~~

>

--

Thanks & Regards,

ANIL BHOOT

9819028111

January 19, 2010

Wendy ji, Ravindramani ji and Krishnamurthy ji,

Thanks for all the inputs.

I have finally settled on

14 March 1879 at 11:30 AM LMT (10:50 AM GMT) in Ulm (48n24, 10e00), no DST, TZ

0:40 East.

With two different software packages, I'm getting Mithuna 19:28 and 19:29

respectively.

Thanks, all of you! :-)

~~~~~~~~~

Balaji Narasimhan

Author & Editor

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1921/einstein-bio.html

~~~~~~~~~

January 20, 2010

Dear Krishna,

There certainly may be more than one Ulm in Germany, however the Ulm in Baden-

Wurttemberg is given officially as his place of birth on the " Nobelprize.org "

website.

This is the chart I've worked with for quite some years now.

I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany as the

place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to use (apart

from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?

Checking in Doris Chase Doane's " Time Changes in the World " it's a little

difficult (for me at the moment) to decipher the time zone for the year 1879. As

best as I can make out (a little thick-headed at the moment) it's telling me

that, to 1892 Wurttemberg observed the local mean time of Stuttgart (9E11) which

gives (I think?) a time zone of -00:36:44...

But, obviously I'm wrong somewhere as PL gives the time zone as -00:33:36

It's been many years since I've had to do any calculations at all and I'm

certainly feeling more than a little thick-headed at this stage. Perhaps someone

can help me out here by finding the correct time zone for 1879.

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1921/einstein-bio.html

============================

Krishnamurthy Seetharama

Tuesday, 19 January 2010 4:06 PM

jyotish-vidya

Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

There are more than one Ulms in Germany. According to Astrodatbank, the

correct Ulm has the longitude 10E00. Hence, the correct time zone is 0:40.

Regards,

Krishna

============================

January 20, 2010

PS: Looking at this website http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ulm it would seem that

this could be the one and only Ulm in Germany?

===============================

Dear Krishna,

There certainly may be more than one Ulm in Germany, however the Ulm in Baden-

Wurttemberg is given officially as his place of birth on the " Nobelprize.org "

website.

This is the chart I've worked with for quite some years now.

I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany as the

place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to use (apart

from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?

Checking in Doris Chase Doane's " Time Changes in the World " it's a little

difficult (for me at the moment) to decipher the time zone for the year 1879. As

best as I can make out (a little thick-headed at the moment) it's telling me

that, to 1892 Wurttemberg observed the local mean time of Stuttgart (9E11) which

gives (I think?) a time zone of -00:36:44...

But, obviously I'm wrong somewhere as PL gives the time zone as -00:33:36

It's been many years since I've had to do any calculations at all and I'm

certainly feeling more than a little thick-headed at this stage. Perhaps someone

can help me out here by finding the correct time zone for 1879.

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

============================

Krishnamurthy Seetharama

Tuesday, 19 January 2010 4:06 PM

jyotish-vidya

Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

There are more than one Ulms in Germany. According to Astrodatbank, the

correct Ulm has the longitude 10E00. Hence, the correct time zone is 0:40.

Regards,

Krishna

============================

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

database 4788 (20100120) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

*http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=1008*

January 20, 2010

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

//I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany

as the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to

use (apart from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?//

The following website gives the coordinates for Ulm, Baden-Württemberg,

Germany, and the longitude is 10E00

*

Regards,

Krishna

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote:

>

> Dear Krishna,

>

> There certainly may be more than one Ulm in Germany, however the Ulm in

> Baden- Wurttemberg is given officially as his place of birth on the

> " Nobelprize.org " website.

> http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1921/einstein-bio.html

> This is the chart I've worked with for quite some years now.

>

> I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany as

> the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to

> use (apart from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?

>

> Checking in Doris Chase Doane's " Time Changes in the World " it's a little

> difficult (for me at the moment) to decipher the time zone for the year

> 1879. As best as I can make out (a little thick-headed at the moment) it's

> telling me that, to 1892 Wurttemberg observed the local mean time of

> Stuttgart (9E11) which gives (I think?) a time zone of -00:36:44...

>

> But, obviously I'm wrong somewhere as PL gives the time zone as -00:33:36

> It's been many years since I've had to do any calculations at all and I'm

> certainly feeling more than a little thick-headed at this stage. Perhaps

> someone can help me out here by finding the correct time zone for 1879.

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

> *http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=1008*

>

> ============================

>

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama

> Tuesday, 19 January 2010 4:06 PM

> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>

> Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

>

> Dear Mrs. Wendy,

>

> There are more than one Ulms in Germany. According to Astrodatbank, the

> correct Ulm has the longitude 10E00. Hence, the correct time zone is 0:40.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> ============================

>

January 20, 2010

Dear Sirs,

Ulm (FRG) 48N24 & 10E00

On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama <

kmurthys58 wrote:

> Dear Mrs. Wendy,

>

> //I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany

> as the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm

> to

> use (apart from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?//

>

> The following website gives the coordinates for Ulm, Baden-Württemberg,

> Germany, and the longitude is 10E00

> *

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidya

> >wrote:

>

> >

> > Dear Krishna,

> >

> > There certainly may be more than one Ulm in Germany, however the Ulm in

> > Baden- Wurttemberg is given officially as his place of birth on the

> > " Nobelprize.org " website.

> >

> http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates//1921/einstein-bio.html

> > This is the chart I've worked with for quite some years now.

> >

> > I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany

> as

> > the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to

> > use (apart from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?

> >

> > Checking in Doris Chase Doane's " Time Changes in the World " it's a little

> > difficult (for me at the moment) to decipher the time zone for the year

> > 1879. As best as I can make out (a little thick-headed at the moment)

> it's

> > telling me that, to 1892 Wurttemberg observed the local mean time of

> > Stuttgart (9E11) which gives (I think?) a time zone of -00:36:44...

> >

> > But, obviously I'm wrong somewhere as PL gives the time zone as -00:33:36

> > It's been many years since I've had to do any calculations at all and I'm

> > certainly feeling more than a little thick-headed at this stage. Perhaps

> > someone can help me out here by finding the correct time zone for 1879.

> >

> > Best Wishes,

> > Mrs. Wendy

> > http://JyotishVidya.com

> >

> > ============================

> >

> > Krishnamurthy Seetharama

> > Tuesday, 19 January 2010 4:06 PM

> > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>

> > Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

> >

> > Dear Mrs. Wendy,

> >

> > There are more than one Ulms in Germany. According to Astrodatbank, the

> > correct Ulm has the longitude 10E00. Hence, the correct time zone is

> 0:40.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> >

> > ============================

> >

January 20, 2010

Wendy ji,

///I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany as

the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to use

(apart from the coordinates) ...so it leaves me wondering?///

Frawley (Astrology of seers) uses 48N30 and 10E00 (without mentioning place). He

gets Mituna (21:02) as Lagna. Ayanamsa: 20:42

Raman (Notable Horoscopes) uses 48N24 and 10E00 (again, without mentioning

place) and gets lagna as Mituna (21:47). Ayanamsa: 20:43

My Ayanamsa is 22:10:27 (Lahiri) as verified by two old DOS SW packages. Both

packages give 19-28 and 19-29 Mithuna as Lagna.

I don't think that there is much confusion over place--Astrodatabank's figures

for Ulm are I thing quite good. The only problem was with TZ, but I think that

0:40 East is good. I think that my ayanamsa beng Lahiri, it disagrees with

charts created by Frawley and Raman.

~~~~~~~~~

Balaji Narasimhan

Author & Editor

~~~~~~~~~

January 21, 2010

Dear Balaji, Krishna and All,

Many thanks for your contribution on this issue...your efforts are certainly

appreciated!

I've just checked the atlas in PL7 (which I should have done in the beginning,

but better late than never I guess). It turns out that there are 4 listings for

Ulm (in the state of Baden-Wurttemberg?) Given below are the coordinates and

time zones.

Ulm 08E01 48N44 -00:32:04

Ulm 08E03 48N34 -00:32:12

Ulm 08E18 50N35 -00:33:12

Ulm 10E00 48N24 -00:40:00

The chart I've been using (calculated on previous version of PL) with 08E01,

48N44 gives the time zone as -00:33:36. Obviously (in this newest version) the

time zone has been modified/upgraded to -00:32:04

I've re-cast the chart with the same coordinates and the upgraded TZ to get

lagna at 19:46:36 Gemini.

Using 10E00, 48N24 -00:40:00 gives lagna at 19:28:14 Gemini

I suppose, if anyone's interested in confirming major events with operating

dasas, the correct location could be arrived at.

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

=========================

Balaji Narasimhan

Thursday, 21 January 2010 12:40 PM

jyotish-vidya

Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

Wendy ji,

///I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany as

the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to use

(apart from the coordinates) ...so it leaves me wondering?///

Frawley (Astrology of seers) uses 48N30 and 10E00 (without mentioning place). He

gets Mituna (21:02) as Lagna. Ayanamsa: 20:42

Raman (Notable Horoscopes) uses 48N24 and 10E00 (again, without mentioning

place) and gets lagna as Mituna (21:47). Ayanamsa: 20:43

My Ayanamsa is 22:10:27 (Lahiri) as verified by two old DOS SW packages. Both

packages give 19-28 and 19-29 Mithuna as Lagna.

I don't think that there is much confusion over place--Astrodatabank's figures

for Ulm are I thing quite good. The only problem was with TZ, but I think that

0:40 East is good. I think that my ayanamsa beng Lahiri, it disagrees with

charts created by Frawley and Raman.

~~~~~~~~~

Balaji Narasimhan

Author & Editor

*http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=1008*

~~~~~~~~~

=========================

Krishnamurthy Seetharama

Wednesday, 20 January 2010 5:55 PM

jyotish-vidya

Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

//I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany

as the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to

use (apart from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?//

The following website gives the coordinates for Ulm, Baden-Württemberg,

Germany, and the longitude is 10E00

Regards,

Krishna

========================

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

database 4793 (20100121) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

January 21, 2010

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

//The chart I've been using (calculated on previous version of PL) with

08E01, 48N44 gives the time zone as -00:33:36//

This statement looks puzzling to me because the time zone (LMT based cases)

depends on the longitude of the place and nothing else. Hence, for a

longitude of 8E01, a time zone of 0:33:36 looks incorrect.

For each degree change in longitude, the time difference would be exactly 4

minutes (or one hour for every 15 degrees). In the case under discussion, if

the longitude is 8E01, the corresponding time difference from GMT or the

time zone would be 8:01 multiplied by 4 which is 32:04. Similarly, for

longitude 10E00, the time zone would be 10:00 multiplied by 4, and that

would be 0:40:00 and so on.

Regards,

Krishna

On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote:

>

> Dear Balaji, Krishna and All,

>

> Many thanks for your contribution on this issue...your efforts are

> certainly appreciated!

>

> I've just checked the atlas in PL7 (which I should have done in the

> beginning, but better late than never I guess). It turns out that there are

> 4 listings for Ulm (in the state of Baden-Wurttemberg?) Given below are the

> coordinates and time zones.

>

> Ulm 08E01 48N44 -00:32:04

> Ulm 08E03 48N34 -00:32:12

> Ulm 08E18 50N35 -00:33:12

> Ulm 10E00 48N24 -00:40:00

>

> The chart I've been using (calculated on previous version of PL) with

> 08E01, 48N44 gives the time zone as -00:33:36. Obviously (in this newest

> version) the time zone has been modified/upgraded to -00:32:04

>

> I've re-cast the chart with the same coordinates and the upgraded TZ to get

> lagna at 19:46:36 Gemini.

>

> Using 10E00, 48N24 -00:40:00 gives lagna at 19:28:14 Gemini

>

> I suppose, if anyone's interested in confirming major events with operating

> dasas, the correct location could be arrived at.

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

>

> =========================

>

> Balaji Narasimhan

> Thursday, 21 January 2010 12:40 PM

>

> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>

> Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

>

> Wendy ji,

>

> ///I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany

> as the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm to

> use (apart from the coordinates) ...so it leaves me wondering?///

>

> Frawley (Astrology of seers) uses 48N30 and 10E00 (without mentioning

> place). He gets Mituna (21:02) as Lagna. Ayanamsa: 20:42

>

> Raman (Notable Horoscopes) uses 48N24 and 10E00 (again, without mentioning

> place) and gets lagna as Mituna (21:47). Ayanamsa: 20:43

>

> My Ayanamsa is 22:10:27 (Lahiri) as verified by two old DOS SW packages.

> Both packages give 19-28 and 19-29 Mithuna as Lagna.

>

> I don't think that there is much confusion over place--Astrodatabank's

> figures for Ulm are I thing quite good. The only problem was with TZ, but I

> think that 0:40 East is good. I think that my ayanamsa beng Lahiri, it

> disagrees with charts created by Frawley and Raman.

>

> ~~~~~~~~~

> Balaji Narasimhan

> Author & Editor

> *http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/city.html?n=1008*

> ~~~~~~~~~

>

> =========================

>

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama

> Wednesday, 20 January 2010 5:55 PM

>

> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>

> Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

>

> Dear Mrs. Wendy,

>

> //I've looked at the Astrodatabank listing and they only give Ulm, Germany

> as the place of birth... there is no mention of just where (or which) Ulm

> to

> use (apart from the coordinates)...so it leaves me wondering?//

>

> The following website gives the coordinates for Ulm, Baden-Württemberg,

> Germany, and the longitude is 10E00

>

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> ========================

>

> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

> database 4793 (20100121) __________

>

> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

>

> http://www.eset.com

>

January 21, 2010

Dear Krishna,

///This statement looks puzzling to me because the time zone (LMT based cases)

depends on the longitude of the place and nothing else. Hence, for a

longitude of 8E01, a time zone of 0:33:36 looks incorrect.///

Which is (obviously) why the earlier entry (PL) was corrected to -00:32:04 in

the upgraded Atlas (in latest version of PL7).

08:00 degrees = 32mins; 00:01 degrees = 04seconds.

So for 08:01 degrees longitude we get -00:32:04 time zone.

This is precisely what my new software (PL7) gives. Obviously was an error in

the older version which has since been rectified...do you agree with this?

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

============================

Krishnamurthy Seetharama

Friday, 22 January 2010 12:12 AM

jyotish-vidya

Re: Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

//The chart I've been using (calculated on previous version of PL) with

08E01, 48N44 gives the time zone as -00:33:36//

This statement looks puzzling to me because the time zone (LMT based cases)

depends on the longitude of the place and nothing else. Hence, for a

longitude of 8E01, a time zone of 0:33:36 looks incorrect.

For each degree change in longitude, the time difference would be exactly 4

minutes (or one hour for every 15 degrees). In the case under discussion, if

the longitude is 8E01, the corresponding time difference from GMT or the

time zone would be 8:01 multiplied by 4 which is 32:04. Similarly, for

longitude 10E00, the time zone would be 10:00 multiplied by 4, and that

would be 0:40:00 and so on.

Regards,

Krishna

==============================

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

database 4795 (20100121) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

January 21, 2010

PS: Which coordinates are correct for his place of birth? Honestly I don't have

a clue...only research into his operating dasas, confirming or negating known

events can bring more clarity.

Dear Krishna,

///This statement looks puzzling to me because the time zone (LMT based cases)

depends on the longitude of the place and nothing else. Hence, for a

longitude of 8E01, a time zone of 0:33:36 looks incorrect.///

Which is (obviously) why the earlier entry (PL) was corrected to -00:32:04 in

the upgraded Atlas (in latest version of PL7).

08:00 degrees = 32mins; 00:01 degrees = 04seconds.

So for 08:01 degrees longitude we get -00:32:04 time zone.

This is precisely what my new software (PL7) gives. Obviously was an error in

the older version which has since been rectified...do you agree with this?

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

============================

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

database 4795 (20100121) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.travelpost.com/EU/Germany/Baden-Wrttemberg/Ulm/3027127

January 22, 2010

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

It was hard to believe that such a simple calculation was buggy in a product

having gone through 6 major revisions! Anyway, now we have the right stuff.

As we know the birth place of Einstein has a world famous cathedral (tallest

church of earlier times), I tried searching for web pages connecting the

cathedral and longitude of the place. I found that the following tourist log

that connects the cathedral and the longitude of the city. It is 10E00.

Hence, it appears to me that what is given in Astrodatabank is correct.

Now, we could focus on the dates and events in Einstein's life.

Regards,

Krishna

On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Mrs. Wendy <jyotishvidyawrote:

>

> PS: Which coordinates are correct for his place of birth? Honestly I don't

> have a clue...only research into his operating dasas, confirming or negating

> known events can bring more clarity.

>

> Dear Krishna,

>

> ///This statement looks puzzling to me because the time zone (LMT based

> cases)

> depends on the longitude of the place and nothing else. Hence, for a

> longitude of 8E01, a time zone of 0:33:36 looks incorrect.///

>

> Which is (obviously) why the earlier entry (PL) was corrected to -00:32:04

> in the upgraded Atlas (in latest version of PL7).

>

> 08:00 degrees = 32mins; 00:01 degrees = 04seconds.

> So for 08:01 degrees longitude we get -00:32:04 time zone.

>

> This is precisely what my new software (PL7) gives. Obviously was an error

> in the older version which has since been rectified...do you agree with

> this?

>

> Best Wishes,

> Mrs. Wendy

>

> ============================

>

> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

> database 4795 (20100121) __________

>

> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

>

> http://www.eset.com

>

January 24, 2010

Dear Krishna,

///It was hard to believe that such a simple calculation was buggy in a product

having gone through 6 major revisions!///

I agree! Actually I hardly entertained the thought that PL could be wrong...I've

put my trust in its reliability for so long, it just wasn't something I thought

of, until I checked the (updated) Atlas. But there you go, we live and learn.

I will have a look for some significant events in A.E.'s life (after weekend

rest) and see how closely the dasas coincide with the event dates.

If you (or anyone) have some events/dates, it would save (me) a lot of time if

you could post them.

Best Wishes,

Mrs. Wendy

http://www.travelpost.com/EU/Germany/Baden-Wrttemberg/Ulm/3027127

===========================

Krishnamurthy Seetharama

Friday, 22 January 2010 5:04 PM

jyotish-vidya

Re: Re: Albert Einstein - birth data

Dear Mrs. Wendy,

It was hard to believe that such a simple calculation was buggy in a product

having gone through 6 major revisions! Anyway, now we have the right stuff.

As we know the birth place of Einstein has a world famous cathedral (tallest

church of earlier times), I tried searching for web pages connecting the

cathedral and longitude of the place. I found that the following tourist log

that connects the cathedral and the longitude of the city. It is 10E00.

Hence, it appears to me that what is given in Astrodatabank is correct.

Now, we could focus on the dates and events in Einstein's life.

Regards,

Krishna

===========================

__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature

database 4800 (20100123) __________

The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.