Guest guest Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Dear friends, All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in the Navamsa too? I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. Three examples: 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on the 24th, I got a job interview. 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to work there. Three questions: 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in Navamsa chart, right? Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in Navamsa in transit? __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Dear Shri Balaji, I am rather new in the field & doesnot get much of time for reading even though I have purchased lots of books. I also learned preparation of Sarvatobhadra Chakra wherein 108 Navmansh has specific names which also denotes result given by these Navmansh. We have been taught that results of planets are based on specific Navmansh in which they are transiting. We were never been told to consider aspects in Navmansh Chart. Divisional charts were not taught to us in detail, only how they are prepared is been told i.e. maths part/preparation part. I really look forward for lots of response to this mail providing new & more informations. It is infact good for students like me to learn from questions posed by experienced scholars like you peoples. I really enjoy reading mails. With Regards Anil Bhoot 981908111 On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji > wrote: > > > Dear friends, > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in the > Navamsa too? > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. > > Three examples: > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on the > 24th, I got a job interview. > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa in > Dhanur, I got the offer letter. > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD lord > Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but here, > with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the wrong > way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! :-) I > tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to work > there. > > Three questions: > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask this > because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in > Navamsa chart, right? > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in > Navamsa in transit? > __________________ > Balaji Narasimhan > Author & Editor > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! > http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > > -- Thanks & Regards, ANIL BHOOT 9819028111 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 12, 2010 Report Share Posted April 12, 2010 Dear Anil, ///We have been taught that results of planets are based on specific Navmansh in which they are transiting./// As the Vargas are simple divisions of Natal chart, I cannot see how we can possibly apply current transits to them? Best Wishes Mrs.Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com =================== BPHS Ch.1 Only good will follow the teaching of this science to the students who are peacefully disposed, who honor the preceptors (and elders), who speak only truth and who are God-fearing. Woeful for ever doubtlessly will it be to impart knowledge of this science to an unwilling student, to a heterodox, and to a crafty person. =================== ----------------- " Anil Bhoot " <anilbhoot Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:32 AM <jyotish-vidya > Re: Navamsa transits Dear Shri Balaji, I am rather new in the field & doesnot get much of time for reading even though I have purchased lots of books. I also learned preparation of Sarvatobhadra Chakra wherein 108 Navmansh has specific names which also denotes result given by these Navmansh. We have been taught that results of planets are based on specific Navmansh in which they are transiting. We were never been told to consider aspects in Navmansh Chart. Divisional charts were not taught to us in detail, only how they are prepared is been told i.e. maths part/preparation part. I really look forward for lots of response to this mail providing new & more informations. It is infact good for students like me to learn from questions posed by experienced scholars like you peoples. I really enjoy reading mails. With Regards Anil Bhoot 981908111 On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji > wrote: > > > Dear friends, > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in the > Navamsa too? > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. > > Three examples: > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on the > 24th, I got a job interview. > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa > in > Dhanur, I got the offer letter. > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD > lord > Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but here, > with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the wrong > way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! :-) I > tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to work > there. > > Three questions: > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask > this > because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in > Navamsa chart, right? > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in > Navamsa in transit? > __________________ > Balaji Narasimhan > Author & Editor > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 Dear Bala Ji Please give your birth data. Are you saying transit of planets in the Navamsha chart with its current[then] degrees or their navamsha positions as per their degrees ? For example- Jupiter is now transiting in Aquarious but in Navaamsha it is in Taurus. Yes,transit is seen in the Navamsha chart too and it is used as an independent chart as well by some astrologers. Jyotish is such a vast and ocean like divine science that it becomes endless and that is why it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an ocean! Regards Om jyotish-vidya , Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji wrote: > > Dear friends, > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in the Navamsa too? > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. > > Three examples: > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on the 24th, I got a job interview. > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to work there. > > Three questions: > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in Navamsa chart, right? > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in Navamsa in transit? > __________________ > Balaji Narasimhan > Author & Editor > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 Dear Om ji, //... it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an ocean!// I think 'Samudra' means ocean and Samudrik means 'body features and features in general'. That is why palmistry is called as 'Hasta Samudrik Shastra' meaning knowledge of features of hand. Regards, Krishna On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Om <astrops2122 wrote: > > > > Dear Bala Ji > > Please give your birth data. > > Are you saying transit of planets in the Navamsha chart with its > current[then] degrees or their navamsha positions as per their degrees ? > > For example- Jupiter is now transiting in Aquarious but in Navaamsha it > is in Taurus. > > Yes,transit is seen in the Navamsha chart too and it is used as an > independent chart as well by some astrologers. > > Jyotish is such a vast and ocean like divine science that it becomes > endless and that is why it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an > ocean! > > Regards > > Om > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>, > Balaji Narasimhan > > <sherlockbalaji wrote: > > > > Dear friends, > > > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in > the Navamsa too? > > > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. > > > > Three examples: > > > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on > the 24th, I got a job interview. > > > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in > Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. > > > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD > lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. > > > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but > here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. > > > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the > wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! > :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to > work there. > > > > Three questions: > > > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? > > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask > this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. > > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in > Navamsa chart, right? > > > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in > Navamsa in transit? > > __________________ > > Balaji Narasimhan > > Author & Editor > > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > > > > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! > http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 Dear Balaji, ///2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter./// DASA: ME-SA-RA TRANSIT: ME (Sag)-SA (Vir)-RA (Sag) DASHAMSHA: ME (Sco) - SA (Can) - RA (Gem) Note dasa lord Mercury occupying sign of Scorpio in D10. In Rashi, Scorpio manifests as 6th house of employment whilst 6th lord Mars is conjunct P/D lord Rahu in sign of Sagittarius. Both Mercury and Rahu were transiting Mars/Rahu in Sagittarius. Mars was transiting Moon in sign of Cancer... Bhukti lord Saturn occupies sign of Cancer in D10. In Rashi, 2nd house is occupied by swakshetra Moon in mutual aspect with 10th lord Jupiter. Moon was transiting 10th house in mutual aspect with transit Saturn. This is how we see the transits (in Rashi) related to varga placements. Transits themselves are not applied to (so-called) divisional " charts " . They're not independent, stand alone " charts " as some would have. Best Wishes Mrs.Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com =================== BPHS Ch.1 Only good will follow the teaching of this science to the students who are peacefully disposed, who honor the preceptors (and elders), who speak only truth and who are God-fearing. Woeful for ever doubtlessly will it be to impart knowledge of this science to an unwilling student, to a heterodox, and to a crafty person. =================== Balaji Narasimhan Monday, April 12, 2010 8:31 PM jyotish-vidya Navamsa transits Dear friends, All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in the Navamsa too? I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. Three examples: 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on the 24th, I got a job interview. 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to work there. Three questions: 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in Navamsa chart, right? Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in Navamsa in transit? __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 PS: As an example (of the use of divisionals) I've included the following from Brihat Jataka Ch.10 (including the notes). I should also add that the sage is referring to avocation here...an activity, hobby, or passion outside our main occupation/career. Whether this was a wrong translation or not I cannot tell? **A person gets wealth from his father, mother, enemy, friend, brother, wife or servant according as the planet which occupies the 10th house from the Lagna or from the Moon is the Sun, or the Moon, or Mars or Mercury, or Jupiter or Venus or Saturn respectively (a). The avocation of a person will be that stated for the planets (b) which might be the lords of the Navamsas occupied by the lords of the 10th houses from Lagna, the Moon and the Sun. NOTES (a) He will get wealth in the manner stated in the Text in the Dasa period of the planet, according to Garga. If the 10th house from the ascendant and the 10th house from the Moon be both occupied by planets, a person will acquire wealth from both sources ; and if several planets occupy the 10th house, there will be several sources of wealth. (8) Vide Stanzas 2 and 3. © Suppose, sign Cancer is the Lagna ; the 10th house from Cancer is Aries ; the lord of Aries is Mars ; suppose, Mars to occupy the Navamsa of Sagittari ; the lord of Sagittari is Jupiter and the avocation stated for Jupiter (vide 3rd Stanza), will be the avocation of a person in the Dasa period of Jupiter, according to Garga.* Note the sage refers to the house in Rashi but refers simply to the lord of the navamsha. There is no suggestion of houses in navamsha. PS: This (pdf) copy of Brihat Jataka just happens to be on my desktop, hence the example given here. No time at the moment to look for other examples, I'm afraid. But this, I believe, is confirmation of what I've been saying. Of course we (always) have to refer back to the position/strength (in Rashi) of the above mentioned planets before coming to any conclusion. _ Mrs.Wendy Tuesday, April 13, 2010 2:37 PM jyotish-vidya Re: Navamsa transits Dear Balaji, ///2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter./// DASA: ME-SA-RA TRANSIT: ME (Sag)-SA (Vir)-RA (Sag) DASHAMSHA: ME (Sco) - SA (Can) - RA (Gem) Note dasa lord Mercury occupying sign of Scorpio in D10. In Rashi, Scorpio manifests as 6th house of employment whilst 6th lord Mars is conjunct P/D lord Rahu in sign of Sagittarius. Both Mercury and Rahu were transiting Mars/Rahu in Sagittarius. Mars was transiting Moon in sign of Cancer... Bhukti lord Saturn occupies sign of Cancer in D10. In Rashi, 2nd house is occupied by swakshetra Moon in mutual aspect with 10th lord Jupiter. Moon was transiting 10th house in mutual aspect with transit Saturn. This is how we see the transits (in Rashi) related to varga placements. Transits themselves are not applied to (so-called) divisional " charts " . They're not independent, stand alone " charts " as some would have. Best Wishes Mrs.Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com =================== BPHS Ch.1 Only good will follow the teaching of this science to the students who are peacefully disposed, who honor the preceptors (and elders), who speak only truth and who are God-fearing. Woeful for ever doubtlessly will it be to impart knowledge of this science to an unwilling student, to a heterodox, and to a crafty person. =================== Balaji Narasimhan Monday, April 12, 2010 8:31 PM jyotish-vidya Navamsa transits Dear friends, All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in the Navamsa too? I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. Three examples: 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on the 24th, I got a job interview. 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to work there. Three questions: 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in Navamsa chart, right? Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in Navamsa in transit? __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 Dear Krishna Ji, 'Samudra' is noun while 'Samudrik' is adjective which means : related to samudra/of samudra/matereals from samudra/and of course predictive part of astrology including palmistry and body parts' signs/scars/shapes/warts etc. But by calling astrology as samudrik the sages wanted to tell us the vastness of this sience like that of an ocean. The deeper we go the costlier we get. The more we explore the more we get ! Regards Om jyotish-vidya , Krishnamurthy Seetharama <kmurthys58 wrote: > > Dear Om ji, > > //... it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an ocean!// > > I think 'Samudra' means ocean and Samudrik means 'body features and features > in general'. That is why palmistry is called as 'Hasta Samudrik Shastra' > meaning knowledge of features of hand. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Om astrops2122 wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Bala Ji > > > > Please give your birth data. > > > > Are you saying transit of planets in the Navamsha chart with its > > current[then] degrees or their navamsha positions as per their degrees ? > > > > For example- Jupiter is now transiting in Aquarious but in Navaamsha it > > is in Taurus. > > > > Yes,transit is seen in the Navamsha chart too and it is used as an > > independent chart as well by some astrologers. > > > > Jyotish is such a vast and ocean like divine science that it becomes > > endless and that is why it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an > > ocean! > > > > Regards > > > > Om > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>, > > Balaji Narasimhan > > > > sherlockbalaji@ wrote: > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied in > > the Navamsa too? > > > > > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in Astrology. > > > > > > Three examples: > > > > > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in Navamsa; on > > the 24th, I got a job interview. > > > > > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in > > Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. > > > > > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a temple; PD > > lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. > > > > > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it seems > > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but > > here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. > > > > > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the > > wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish now! > > :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem to > > work there. > > > > > > Three questions: > > > > > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? > > > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I ask > > this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. > > > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted in > > Navamsa chart, right? > > > > > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords in > > Navamsa in transit? > > > __________________ > > > Balaji Narasimhan > > > Author & Editor > > > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > > > > > > > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! > > http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 Dear Om ji, For what you are saying 'Saamudraa' could be the right word. But, 'Saamudrikaa' comprises of two parts - fiirst is 'Saa' meaning WITH and 'mudrikaa' meaning IMPRINT. Regards, Krishna On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Om <astrops2122 wrote: > > > > Dear Krishna Ji, > > 'Samudra' is noun while 'Samudrik' is adjective which means : related to > samudra/of samudra/matereals from samudra/and of course predictive part > of astrology including palmistry and body parts' > signs/scars/shapes/warts etc. > > But by calling astrology as samudrik the sages wanted to tell us the > vastness of this sience like that of an ocean. > > The deeper we go the costlier we get. > > The more we explore the more we get ! > > Regards > > Om > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>, > Krishnamurthy Seetharama > > <kmurthys58 wrote: > > > > Dear Om ji, > > > > //... it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an ocean!// > > > > I think 'Samudra' means ocean and Samudrik means 'body features and > features > > in general'. That is why palmistry is called as 'Hasta Samudrik > Shastra' > > meaning knowledge of features of hand. > > > > Regards, > > Krishna > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Om astrops2122 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Bala Ji > > > > > > Please give your birth data. > > > > > > Are you saying transit of planets in the Navamsha chart with its > > > current[then] degrees or their navamsha positions as per their > degrees ? > > > > > > For example- Jupiter is now transiting in Aquarious but in Navaamsha > it > > > is in Taurus. > > > > > > Yes,transit is seen in the Navamsha chart too and it is used as an > > > independent chart as well by some astrologers. > > > > > > Jyotish is such a vast and ocean like divine science that it becomes > > > endless and that is why it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an > > > ocean! > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > Om > > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40> > <jyotish-vidya%40>, > > > > Balaji Narasimhan > > > > > > sherlockbalaji@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear friends, > > > > > > > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied > in > > > the Navamsa too? > > > > > > > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in > Astrology. > > > > > > > > Three examples: > > > > > > > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in > Navamsa; on > > > the 24th, I got a job interview. > > > > > > > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in > > > Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. > > > > > > > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a > temple; PD > > > lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. > > > > > > > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it > seems > > > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but > > > here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. > > > > > > > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the > > > wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish > now! > > > :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem > to > > > work there. > > > > > > > > Three questions: > > > > > > > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? > > > > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I > ask > > > this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. > > > > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted > in > > > Navamsa chart, right? > > > > > > > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords > in > > > Navamsa in transit? > > > > __________________ > > > > Balaji Narasimhan > > > > Author & Editor > > > > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! > > > http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 13, 2010 Report Share Posted April 13, 2010 PS: There is also a meaning for " Saamudrikaa " that is related to ocean meaning - 'Born of ocean'. But, that is not relevant here. Regards, Krishna On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama < kmurthys58 wrote: > Dear Om ji, > > For what you are saying 'Saamudraa' could be the right word. But, > 'Saamudrikaa' comprises of two parts - fiirst is 'Saa' meaning WITH and > 'mudrikaa' meaning IMPRINT. > > Regards, > Krishna > > > > On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Om <astrops2122 wrote: > >> >> >> >> Dear Krishna Ji, >> >> 'Samudra' is noun while 'Samudrik' is adjective which means : related to >> samudra/of samudra/matereals from samudra/and of course predictive part >> of astrology including palmistry and body parts' >> signs/scars/shapes/warts etc. >> >> But by calling astrology as samudrik the sages wanted to tell us the >> vastness of this sience like that of an ocean. >> >> The deeper we go the costlier we get. >> >> The more we explore the more we get ! >> >> Regards >> >> Om >> >> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>, >> Krishnamurthy Seetharama >> >> <kmurthys58 wrote: >> > >> > Dear Om ji, >> > >> > //... it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an ocean!// >> > >> > I think 'Samudra' means ocean and Samudrik means 'body features and >> features >> > in general'. That is why palmistry is called as 'Hasta Samudrik >> Shastra' >> > meaning knowledge of features of hand. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Krishna >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Om astrops2122 wrote: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Dear Bala Ji >> > > >> > > Please give your birth data. >> > > >> > > Are you saying transit of planets in the Navamsha chart with its >> > > current[then] degrees or their navamsha positions as per their >> degrees ? >> > > >> > > For example- Jupiter is now transiting in Aquarious but in Navaamsha >> it >> > > is in Taurus. >> > > >> > > Yes,transit is seen in the Navamsha chart too and it is used as an >> > > independent chart as well by some astrologers. >> > > >> > > Jyotish is such a vast and ocean like divine science that it becomes >> > > endless and that is why it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an >> > > ocean! >> > > >> > > Regards >> > > >> > > Om >> > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40> >> <jyotish-vidya%40>, >> >> > > Balaji Narasimhan >> > > >> > > sherlockbalaji@ wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Dear friends, >> > > > >> > > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied >> in >> > > the Navamsa too? >> > > > >> > > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in >> Astrology. >> > > > >> > > > Three examples: >> > > > >> > > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in >> Navamsa; on >> > > the 24th, I got a job interview. >> > > > >> > > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in >> > > Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. >> > > > >> > > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a >> temple; PD >> > > lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. >> > > > >> > > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it >> seems >> > > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but >> > > here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. >> > > > >> > > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the >> > > wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish >> now! >> > > :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem >> to >> > > work there. >> > > > >> > > > Three questions: >> > > > >> > > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? >> > > > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I >> ask >> > > this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. >> > > > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted >> in >> > > Navamsa chart, right? >> > > > >> > > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords >> in >> > > Navamsa in transit? >> > > > __________________ >> > > > Balaji Narasimhan >> > > > Author & Editor >> > > > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! >> > > http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 samudrrika shatra ,,,by samudra muni On Tue Apr 13th, 2010 11:38 PM EDT Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote: >PS: There is also a meaning for " Saamudrikaa " that is related to ocean >meaning - 'Born of ocean'. But, that is not relevant here. > >Regards, >Krishna > > >On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama < >kmurthys58 wrote: > >> Dear Om ji, >> >> For what you are saying 'Saamudraa' could be the right word. But, >> 'Saamudrikaa' comprises of two parts - fiirst is 'Saa' meaning WITH and >> 'mudrikaa' meaning IMPRINT. >> >> Regards, >> Krishna >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Om <astrops2122 wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Krishna Ji, >>> >>> 'Samudra' is noun while 'Samudrik' is adjective which means : related to >>> samudra/of samudra/matereals from samudra/and of course predictive part >>> of astrology including palmistry and body parts' >>> signs/scars/shapes/warts etc. >>> >>> But by calling astrology as samudrik the sages wanted to tell us the >>> vastness of this sience like that of an ocean. >>> >>> The deeper we go the costlier we get. >>> >>> The more we explore the more we get ! >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Om >>> >>> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>, >>> Krishnamurthy Seetharama >>> >>> <kmurthys58 wrote: >>> > >>> > Dear Om ji, >>> > >>> > //... it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an ocean!// >>> > >>> > I think 'Samudra' means ocean and Samudrik means 'body features and >>> features >>> > in general'. That is why palmistry is called as 'Hasta Samudrik >>> Shastra' >>> > meaning knowledge of features of hand. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > Krishna >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Om astrops2122 wrote: >>> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > Dear Bala Ji >>> > > >>> > > Please give your birth data. >>> > > >>> > > Are you saying transit of planets in the Navamsha chart with its >>> > > current[then] degrees or their navamsha positions as per their >>> degrees ? >>> > > >>> > > For example- Jupiter is now transiting in Aquarious but in Navaamsha >>> it >>> > > is in Taurus. >>> > > >>> > > Yes,transit is seen in the Navamsha chart too and it is used as an >>> > > independent chart as well by some astrologers. >>> > > >>> > > Jyotish is such a vast and ocean like divine science that it becomes >>> > > endless and that is why it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an >>> > > ocean! >>> > > >>> > > Regards >>> > > >>> > > Om >>> > > jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40> >>> <jyotish-vidya%40>, >>> >>> > > Balaji Narasimhan >>> > > >>> > > sherlockbalaji@ wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > Dear friends, >>> > > > >>> > > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied >>> in >>> > > the Navamsa too? >>> > > > >>> > > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in >>> Astrology. >>> > > > >>> > > > Three examples: >>> > > > >>> > > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in >>> Navamsa; on >>> > > the 24th, I got a job interview. >>> > > > >>> > > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in >>> > > Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. >>> > > > >>> > > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a >>> temple; PD >>> > > lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. >>> > > > >>> > > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it >>> seems >>> > > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but >>> > > here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. >>> > > > >>> > > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the >>> > > wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish >>> now! >>> > > :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem >>> to >>> > > work there. >>> > > > >>> > > > Three questions: >>> > > > >>> > > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? >>> > > > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I >>> ask >>> > > this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. >>> > > > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted >>> in >>> > > Navamsa chart, right? >>> > > > >>> > > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords >>> in >>> > > Navamsa in transit? >>> > > > __________________ >>> > > > Balaji Narasimhan >>> > > > Author & Editor >>> > > > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! >>> > > http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Dear ones, all of you are correct and there may be some more corrects as well since both astrology and sanskrit are so vast....... Love and regards, gopi. jyotish-vidya , narendra soni <narendra100ni wrote: > > samudrrika shatra ,,,by samudra muni > > On Tue Apr 13th, 2010 11:38 PM EDT Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote: > > >PS: There is also a meaning for " Saamudrikaa " that is related to ocean > >meaning - 'Born of ocean'. But, that is not relevant here. > > > >Regards, > >Krishna > > > > > >On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Krishnamurthy Seetharama < > >kmurthys58 wrote: > > > >> Dear Om ji, > >> > >> For what you are saying 'Saamudraa' could be the right word. But, > >> 'Saamudrikaa' comprises of two parts - fiirst is 'Saa' meaning WITH and > >> 'mudrikaa' meaning IMPRINT. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Krishna > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 7:46 AM, Om astrops2122 wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Dear Krishna Ji, > >>> > >>> 'Samudra' is noun while 'Samudrik' is adjective which means : related to > >>> samudra/of samudra/matereals from samudra/and of course predictive part > >>> of astrology including palmistry and body parts' > >>> signs/scars/shapes/warts etc. > >>> > >>> But by calling astrology as samudrik the sages wanted to tell us the > >>> vastness of this sience like that of an ocean. > >>> > >>> The deeper we go the costlier we get. > >>> > >>> The more we explore the more we get ! > >>> > >>> Regards > >>> > >>> Om > >>> > >>> jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40>, > >>> Krishnamurthy Seetharama > >>> > >>> kmurthys58@ wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Dear Om ji, > >>> > > >>> > //... it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an ocean!// > >>> > > >>> > I think 'Samudra' means ocean and Samudrik means 'body features and > >>> features > >>> > in general'. That is why palmistry is called as 'Hasta Samudrik > >>> Shastra' > >>> > meaning knowledge of features of hand. > >>> > > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Krishna > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Om astrops2122@ wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > Dear Bala Ji > >>> > > > >>> > > Please give your birth data. > >>> > > > >>> > > Are you saying transit of planets in the Navamsha chart with its > >>> > > current[then] degrees or their navamsha positions as per their > >>> degrees ? > >>> > > > >>> > > For example- Jupiter is now transiting in Aquarious but in Navaamsha > >>> it > >>> > > is in Taurus. > >>> > > > >>> > > Yes,transit is seen in the Navamsha chart too and it is used as an > >>> > > independent chart as well by some astrologers. > >>> > > > >>> > > Jyotish is such a vast and ocean like divine science that it becomes > >>> > > endless and that is why it is said 'Samudrik Shastra' ,that is, an > >>> > > ocean! > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards > >>> > > > >>> > > Om > >>> > > --- In jyotish-vidya <jyotish-vidya%40> > >>> <jyotish-vidya%40>, > >>> > >>> > > Balaji Narasimhan > >>> > > > >>> > > sherlockbalaji@ wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Dear friends, > >>> > > > > >>> > > > All of us have studied transits in Rasi, but can they be studied > >>> in > >>> > > the Navamsa too? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I thought about this after reading CS Patel's Navamsa in > >>> Astrology. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Three examples: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > 1. On 23/Dec/2009, MD lord Budha conjoined PD lord Rahu in > >>> Navamsa; on > >>> > > the 24th, I got a job interview. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > 2. On 21/Jan/2010, when 10th lord Guru conjoined PD lord Rahu in > >>> > > Navamsa in Dhanur, I got the offer letter. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > 3. On 11/Apr/2010, a thorn pierced my foot when I visited a > >>> temple; PD > >>> > > lord Guru was in 12th in Navamsa. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > I don't know if this is permitted in Parasara's system, but it > >>> seems > >>> > > interesting. Of course, we always look at the transit Nakshatra, but > >>> > > here, with Navamsa, it is the transit Nakshatra pada. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Of course, three summers do not a swallow make (oops! got that the > >>> > > wrong way around; hope I'm not making the same mistake with Jyotish > >>> now! > >>> > > :-) I tried looking at the D-81 (Nava Navamsa) but this doesn't seem > >>> to > >>> > > work there. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Three questions: > >>> > > > > >>> > > > 1. Do transits make sense in charts other than Rasi? > >>> > > > 2. If so, should we look at only Navamsa or other divisions too? I > >>> ask > >>> > > this because Rasi Tulya is applied only to Navamsa. > >>> > > > 3. Can we consider aspects? I think that aspects are not permitted > >>> in > >>> > > Navamsa chart, right? > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Overall, Is it generally good to look at status of MD/AD/PD lords > >>> in > >>> > > Navamsa in transit? > >>> > > > __________________ > >>> > > > Balaji Narasimhan > >>> > > > Author & Editor > >>> > > > http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > Your Mail works best with the New Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! > >>> > > http://downloads./in/internetexplorer/ > >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Dear friends, Thanks a lot for giving me your inputs on Navamsa transits. [Wendy ji] ///Transits themselves are not applied to (so-called) divisional " charts " . They're not independent, stand alone " charts " as some would have./// Point taken! :-) BTW, CS Patel takes Navamsa points and applies transits based upon them on the Rasi chart. Eg: He has Kataka Lagna, with Lagnadipathi occupying Makara Navamsa, whose trines are Vrishaba and Kanya. When Guru was transiting Kanya (in Rasi), he says he was blessed with a child. [Om ji] ///Please give your birth data./// 14 March 1973, 2:14 PM, Mumbai/Bombay; Lagna:28-Mithuna-17 [Anil ji] ///It is infact good for students like me to learn from questions posed by experienced scholars like you peoples. I really enjoy reading mails./// Trust me, I'm not an expert. I read some books, and when I'm confused by what I read, I seek help from people like Wendy ji. __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Messenger. Download Now! http://messenger./download.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 14, 2010 Report Share Posted April 14, 2010 Dear Balaji, ///BTW, CS Patel takes Navamsa points and applies transits based upon them on the Rasi chart./// Unfortunately I've not read any of his works, but will try to obtain the book you refer to as soon as finances permit. I have done a quick web search and came across the following. http://www.scribd.com/doc/22848626/C-S-Patel On page 240 I read: **Meaning that when the lord of the ascendant is positioned in the Navamsa chart in the 8th house with ref to the ascendant of the Rasi chart... etc..** So here again we see he's saying that the 8th house (in this instance) is specified with reference to Rasi. This is in agreement with what I've been saying. Reading on he gives the chart of Mahatma Gandhi as an example, making it quite clear that he was referring to 8th house in reference to Rashi. But, of course, I cannot come to any conclusion regarding his application of Navamsa without a thorough study of his work...hope to do so soon. Best Wishes Mrs.Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com =================== BPHS Ch.1 Only good will follow the teaching of this science to the students who are peacefully disposed, who honor the preceptors (and elders), who speak only truth and who are God-fearing. Woeful for ever doubtlessly will it be to impart knowledge of this science to an unwilling student, to a heterodox, and to a crafty person. =================== Balaji Narasimhan Wednesday, April 14, 2010 3:20 PM jyotish-vidya Re: Navamsa transits Dear friends, Thanks a lot for giving me your inputs on Navamsa transits. [Wendy ji] ///Transits themselves are not applied to (so-called) divisional " charts " . They're not independent, stand alone " charts " as some would have./// Point taken! :-) BTW, CS Patel takes Navamsa points and applies transits based upon them on the Rasi chart. Eg: He has Kataka Lagna, with Lagnadipathi occupying Makara Navamsa, whose trines are Vrishaba and Kanya. When Guru was transiting Kanya (in Rasi), he says he was blessed with a child. [Om ji] ///Please give your birth data./// 14 March 1973, 2:14 PM, Mumbai/Bombay; Lagna:28-Mithuna-17 [Anil ji] ///It is infact good for students like me to learn from questions posed by experienced scholars like you peoples. I really enjoy reading mails./// Trust me, I'm not an expert. I read some books, and when I'm confused by what I read, I seek help from people like Wendy ji. __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 Wendy ji, ///Unfortunately I've not read any of his works, but will try to obtain the book you refer to as soon as finances permit./// Good! :-) Much of the Jyotish I have learnt is from sources approved by you. If you can read it and share your findings, it will be most useful. ///On page 240 I read: **Meaning that when the lord of the ascendant is positioned in the Navamsa chart in the 8th house with ref to the ascendant of the Rasi chart... etc..**/// CS Patel has given some interesting data. For example, he says that a graha in the 8th from itself in Navamsa as compared to Rasi is in ashtamamsa and causes problems. Eg: Guru in Dhanur in Rasi and Kataka in Navamsa will cause problems though uccha in Navamsa because Kataka is the 8th from Dhanur. He has usually taken transits from Rasi, with Navamsa supplying points to note. Maybe, since I have Vargotamma Lagna, I got confused and found the same to be true from Navamsa too! Ah, well...we live and learn...good judgement, as they say, comes from experience, but experience typically comes from bad judgement! :-) __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Messenger. Download Now! http://messenger./download.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 Dear Balaji, I have ordered the book but mail from the US can be quite slow, so don't know how long I'll have to wait...a couple of weeks perhaps? Best Wishes Mrs.Wendy http://JyotishVidya.com =================== BPHS Ch.1 Only good will follow the teaching of this science to the students who are peacefully disposed, who honor the preceptors (and elders), who speak only truth and who are God-fearing. Woeful for ever doubtlessly will it be to impart knowledge of this science to an unwilling student, to a heterodox, and to a crafty person. =================== Balaji Narasimhan Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:52 PM jyotish-vidya Re: Navamsa transits Wendy ji, ///Unfortunately I've not read any of his works, but will try to obtain the book you refer to as soon as finances permit./// Good! :-) Much of the Jyotish I have learnt is from sources approved by you. If you can read it and share your findings, it will be most useful. ///On page 240 I read: **Meaning that when the lord of the ascendant is positioned in the Navamsa chart in the 8th house with ref to the ascendant of the Rasi chart... etc..**/// CS Patel has given some interesting data. For example, he says that a graha in the 8th from itself in Navamsa as compared to Rasi is in ashtamamsa and causes problems. Eg: Guru in Dhanur in Rasi and Kataka in Navamsa will cause problems though uccha in Navamsa because Kataka is the 8th from Dhanur. He has usually taken transits from Rasi, with Navamsa supplying points to note. Maybe, since I have Vargotamma Lagna, I got confused and found the same to be true from Navamsa too! Ah, well...we live and learn...good judgement, as they say, comes from experience, but experience typically comes from bad judgement! :-) __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 15, 2010 Report Share Posted April 15, 2010 " Mrs.Wendy " <jyotishvidya wrote: >Dear Balaji, > >I have ordered the book but mail from the US can be quite slow, so don't know how long I'll have to wait...a couple of weeks perhaps? > >Best Wishes >Mrs.Wendy >http://JyotishVidya.com > >=================== >BPHS Ch.1 >Only good will follow the teaching of this >science to the students who are peacefully >disposed, who honor the preceptors >(and elders), who speak only truth and who >are God-fearing. Woeful for ever doubtlessly >will it be to impart knowledge of this science >to an unwilling student, to a heterodox, and >to a crafty person. >=================== > > > >Balaji Narasimhan >Thursday, April 15, 2010 2:52 PM >jyotish-vidya > Re: Navamsa transits > > > >Wendy ji, > >///Unfortunately I've not read any of his works, but will try to obtain the book you refer to as soon as finances permit./// > >Good! :-) > >Much of the Jyotish I have learnt is from sources approved by you. If you can read it and share your findings, it will be most useful. > >///On page 240 I read: **Meaning that when the lord of the ascendant is positioned in the Navamsa chart in the 8th house with ref to the ascendant of the Rasi chart... etc..**/// > >CS Patel has given some interesting data. For example, he says that a graha in the 8th from itself in Navamsa as compared to Rasi is in ashtamamsa and causes problems. > >Eg: Guru in Dhanur in Rasi and Kataka in Navamsa will cause problems though uccha in Navamsa because Kataka is the 8th from Dhanur. > >He has usually taken transits from Rasi, with Navamsa supplying points to note. Maybe, since I have Vargotamma Lagna, I got confused and found the same to be true from Navamsa too! > >Ah, well...we live and learn...good judgement, as they say, comes from experience, but experience typically comes from bad judgement! :-) >__________________ >Balaji Narasimhan >Author & Editor >http://www.balaji.ind.in/ > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 16, 2010 Report Share Posted April 16, 2010 Dear Mr Balaji  Let me share my views on " Navamsa in Astrology " by Mr CS Patel. It is an wonderful book written after much research.  The Pushkara Navamsa concept is well described.  There is a chapter on Dispositors wherein he states " A native born in Cancer asc. with Venus occupying Dhanu Navamsa in Mesha sign will have much wealth and be happy during the period of conjunction in transit of Jupiter and Mars "  He goes on to state that Transits of slow moving planets such as Sani,Guru Rahu and Ketu thro the 64th navamsa or its trines have to be considered for delineation purposes. He has also delt extensively the 64th navamsa.  In short the book is worth reading and a must for the library of Astrology lovers.  regards savithri --- On Thu, 15/4/10, Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji wrote: Balaji Narasimhan <sherlockbalaji Re: Navamsa transits jyotish-vidya Thursday, 15 April, 2010, 1:52 AM  Wendy ji, ///Unfortunately I've not read any of his works, but will try to obtain the book you refer to as soon as finances permit./// Good! :-) Much of the Jyotish I have learnt is from sources approved by you. If you can read it and share your findings, it will be most useful. ///On page 240 I read: **Meaning that when the lord of the ascendant is positioned in the Navamsa chart in the 8th house with ref to the ascendant of the Rasi chart... etc..**/// CS Patel has given some interesting data. For example, he says that a graha in the 8th from itself in Navamsa as compared to Rasi is in ashtamamsa and causes problems. Eg: Guru in Dhanur in Rasi and Kataka in Navamsa will cause problems though uccha in Navamsa because Kataka is the 8th from Dhanur. He has usually taken transits from Rasi, with Navamsa supplying points to note. Maybe, since I have Vargotamma Lagna, I got confused and found the same to be true from Navamsa too! Ah, well...we live and learn...good judgement, as they say, comes from experience, but experience typically comes from bad judgement! :-) ____________ ______ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji. ind.in/ Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Messenger. Download Now! http://messenger. / download. php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted April 17, 2010 Report Share Posted April 17, 2010 Savithri ji, ///Let me share my views on " Navamsa in Astrology " by Mr CS Patel. It is an wonderful book written after much research./// I agree. Shri Patel should be congratulated on his research capabilities. But the fact that it is based upon Nadis seems to bestow upon it two flaws: 1. The book touches more upon transits rather than upon dasas and buktis, which are very personal to an individual. 2. There seems to be a general belief throughout the book that the transit of Guru produces good, while the transit of Sani produces evil. That is, the book looks at natural malefics and benefics, not functional ones, and this is something that people who have studied Parasara cannot agree with. But these issues apart, it is a great book. One should read it to understand the navamsa--the most important chart *after* the Rasi chart--but use it perhaps with dasas and buktis as opposed to just transits. __________________ Balaji Narasimhan Author & Editor http://www.balaji.ind.in/ Send free SMS to your Friends on Mobile from your Messenger. Download Now! http://messenger./download.php Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.