Bhava Chalith - Vinay Ji

[Guest guest]

Dear Vinay ji

 

In one of your articles, you have mentioned about Bhava chalitha.

 

1) You have mentioned that aspects,friendship ucha neecha etc are

judged from ''rashi chart'' while phala is judged from Chalitha chart.

 

2) You have mentioned that ''In both Rashi-chakra and Bhaava-chalita,

lagna is always placed at the centre of first mansion. But in Raashi-

chakra, successive mansions are computed by merely adding 30 degrees

to the lagna, whereas in the bhaava-chalita bhaavas are reckoned

independently''.

 

Moreover you said - ''The entire house of Lagna is approximately 30

degrees (plus or minus few degrees), half of it remains below the

horizon''.

 

For instance if Lagna is 27 degree pisces then can you please explain

how is Lagna placed at the CENTRE of first mansion in Rashi Chakra?.

And how is half of it below horizon.

 

3) You have mentioned that all rashis are not 30 degrees(elliptic)

and hence chalitha chart is important. However in the same article or

another article you are speaking high about ''varga chakras'' which

are based on 30 degrees. In your view if this 30 degree delineation

is approximate then how do you support vargas and consider them as so

important? Don't you feel self-contradiction here ? Also in your view

don't you think we have to draw bhava chalith for these ''varga

kundalees'' as well ?Are we in a loop ?

 

 

I can see that at certain places you talk logic and in total

contradiction and illogical at other places while talking about the

same.

 

As i am not interested in a debate on '' Varga charts'' and new

theories let us keep it aside. I can see that you have copied and

borrowed some of these theories from contemporary scholars which is

purely your choice.

 

However please be consistent in your logic.

 

Dieties are the inner dwellers in a Kshethra. Physical manifestation

of a graha can be seen with sensory organs while the essence or the

atma of the graha has to be felt using inner instruments. But you are

creating new theories and talking about two suns and trying to draw

an invisible sun with the help of software? Vinay ji are they two

suns or different talas of the same sun ?

 

I can see that you are fortunate to access valauble knowlegde. But

please don't re-create the same errors by mixing non-logic with

paramparic knowledge. Please don't draw the kundali of Shri Krishna.

 

There could be different ways of expressing rosha- can be more polite

as compared to Chandra ji - in some one's views. However after seeing

all these , Kaliyuga, Dashamsha Chakra of ShriKrishana etc , if one

remains silent, is one doing justice to oneself ?

 

Thanks

Pradeep