Guest guest Posted May 29, 2009 Report Share Posted May 29, 2009 I might be sounding highly ignorant by saying this, but I have certain doubts on the free-will theory. If everybody has free-will and it can be stretched to change our destinys, what about cases like where infants and babies and kids die? (either murdered or death by sickness, accident). they should be also given the right to exercise their free will, right, instead of giving death at the budding age? why do they have to undergo whatever they undergo and some die being abused? why all this? looking at those examples, though highly ignorant in all these aspects, i thought that, our past karma (in this case, previous lives) plays too much important role, to the extent that, whatever tiny percent of free-will we have wont account much to this life, maybe it will surely affect the next lives. and also about blessings and curses (remedies), if everybody wears gemstones etc., and be happy and prosperous forever, why so much pain in the world? is it that easy to erase all our bad past karmas? i dont know. praying to god definitely is good, gives us some peace of mind which will indirectly act on the decisions we take and hence, there might be some good done indirectly. but that's about it. and if we are sincere in our prayers, maybe God/Goddess will one day hear us out and help us. That's about it I guess. Can anyone enlighten me on the above aspect I chose? --- On Thu, 5/28/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr wrote: Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr [vedic astrology] Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) sohamsa , vedic astrology , , Cc: Jyotish_Ganga Thursday, May 28, 2009, 8:35 PM Namaste friends, > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the > amount of freedom the rope allows one. Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are usually quite apt and brilliant. Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will. A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy. While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its surroundings to get what it wants. * * * Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it. A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options. It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and make more things possible. * * * One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different times and in different matters. However, destiny only shows how one (and one's mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight back or just ignore and move on. Destiny places you in different situations. What you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your destiny in a future birth. * * * Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is the sum total of those actions that will come back to you. Each action of yours that impacts other beings and objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an action.) Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as destiny. It does not fix what you do in various situations in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next life. * * * Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the hands of the goat. The scope and options available to free will can be estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny. * * * I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings. When someone's free will works in a predictable way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer fail. Best regards, Narasimha ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote: > > Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> > Re: Re: Horoscope, free will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi) > sohamsa@ .com > Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM > > Namaste! > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the > amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma, > it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases. > Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one > chooses to call it. > > In psychological terms, ones own thought structures are the rope that > ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts us. What a horoscope reveals > in this sense is often the ropes that bind us. The grace of Guru and the > power of sadhana burn away these ropes/sanchita karma. > > Regards, > > Shyam > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote: > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > Dear Srinivasa, > > Let me give my opinion, > > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for free will. Upachaaya means to > > increase or grow. These houses can increase your level of karma. Most > > of the houses are considered bad (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we > > should try to limit our free will for loading our karma baggage. > > > > 3rd House : Kaama or passion related karmas. > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related karmas. > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc. > > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the > > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to > > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative karma. > > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha (7th from 3rd is 9th > > house). > > 11th house worship Shiva > > 6th House worship Vishnu. > > > > Warm Regards > > Sanjay P > > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote: > > > > Om Vishnave Namah > > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu > > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and accurately ascertain how much is the > > destiny/baggage part and the free will part. > > May be this is where modern day astrologers are lagging? > > > > Srinivasa > > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > Namaste, > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but > > > > still...... > > > > Well, free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's destiny. > > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in " Yoga Vaasishtham " that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at you. > > > > Just as a person who spends all his monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will. > > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future. > > > > Best regards, > > Narasimha > > > > > , " gopi_b927 " <gopi_b927@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Narasimha garu, > > > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but > > > > still...... > > > > , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > I will share some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question. > > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from > > > > the mail. > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > For those who are unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is > > > > a little background. > > > > > > > > > > I had predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi > > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political > > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such indications on > > > > the ground. But he did come into politics in the same timeframe. The > > > > initial talk was in 2007, he finally formed a party in 2008 and > > > > elections were in 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a > > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009. > > > > > > > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I upped > > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' s party would do well > > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not specific regarding his level of > > > > success and did not predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I > > > > was honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus, > > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure. > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high profile > > > > political predictions is less than in regular predictions like marriage, > > > > job, childbirth etc in " regular " charts. > > > > > > > > > > In some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and > > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make bad > > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be a human error in > > > > judging various factors. However, that human error seems to be a little > > > > more common in high profile political predictions than in regular > > > > predictions. What could be the reason? > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of astrology > > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will try to think loud and > > > > elaborate what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions committed in previous > > > > lives using one's free will that are to give their reactions in this > > > > life. However, as life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed > > > > in THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in > > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until that > > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in THIS life until now. > > > > Some key actions committed using one's free will in THIS life, > > > > especially at important crossroads in life, should impact the life > > > > events from then onwards. > > > > > > > > > > Many people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a > > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous lives > > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty and free will in this > > > > life has little scope. When the options available for the free will in > > > > this life are limited, there may not be significant actions using free > > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this > > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to predict > > > > events. > > > > > > > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile public > > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more options available for > > > > their free will. With their free will being more free and powerful, the > > > > actions committed by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we > > > > are able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise > > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in this > > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our predictions. > > > > > > > > > > Whether a political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the > > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying > > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to enjoy > > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power and make an accurate > > > > prediction, is the horoscope sufficient always? Could the exercise of > > > > free will in this life until now make a difference in some high profile > > > > charts? > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > I am just thinking loud here. Rather than posing a question and > > > > answering it myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for > > > > themselves.. . > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dear PVR garu, > > > > > > > > > > Namaste. > > > > > > > > > > If you don't mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on > > > > Chiranjeevi failed ? > > > > > > > > > > I am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to > > > > understand if > > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be you ignored some data ? ) > > > > > 2) You still can't understand why it failed and you think that was the > > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago and after coming to know > > > > about you / your lessons I developed strong faith and I thought all the > > > > failures are not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > If it is case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a > > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is > > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be accurate. > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > <deleted> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 29, 2009 Report Share Posted May 29, 2009 Karmaashaya (the desire to do karma) emenates from Klesha, and is to be experienced in present and future lives (Yogasutra,2.12). Klesha is a result of past sins. When sins and virtues are equal, a jiva is born into human specie. But if its karmas are not suffient to make it enjoy human life, it will die in infancy. Death during infancy does not negate the theory of karma. Karma being done is a mix of destiny anf free will. Destiny works in two ways : external circumstances, and one's own samskaaras. Samskaara is etymologically dedrived from sam + kr, and means the totality of past actions which have given rise to horoscope and Karmaashaya. This Karmaashaya moulds oue free will too, hence all our will is not really free. When Klista vrittis of chitta are attenuated by means of kriyaa-yoga (vrata, tapa, & c), then Aklishta vrittis become dominant and increase the range and area of free will. But as long as Klishta vrittis are dominant, we are little more than tools in the hands of destiny. Following one's own nature and instincts blindly and not try to oppose evil instincts leads to lower and lower status in future lives (-Gita). That is why yugas get deteriorated from satayuga to kaliyuga : bad people predominate in kaliyuga. More and more people give up practising real Dharma and live only physical existence, forgetting all about spirituality. For real freedom, one must " swim against the current " ( " vi-tarani " > vaitarani) of circumstances of society as well as one's own samskaara. Its method is kriya-yoga, explained in second chapter of Yogasutra. Unless one's samskaara is changed through rigorous kriyayoga (vratas, tapa, etc), only gems and japa will not change destiny. Gems and japa bring temporary and minor reliefs, they cannot change major events. Generally, people want to cheat gods by means of gems and japa; this insincerity makes gems and japa ineffective. Refusal to reform oneself is a sign of Klishta nature of vrittis, whose only remedy is tapa. As the first line of Aghmarshana sukta (Rgveda-x.191) says, which forms a part of daily sandhyaa-vandana, Rta (moral order) and Satya (anything that " really exixts " , ie, is in " sattaa " ) are born out of Tapa. Tapa generates new Rta and Satya in samskaara, and strengthens old ones. This leads to more room for free will and more intelligence to exersize that free will in proper manner. Although many moksha-kaaraka yogas are described in Jyotisha, no one attains Moksha on account of birth time chart, because birth time chart is a result of past karma, and if past life was fit for moksha then present life would not have resulted. The very fact that present life has been attained means that something is wanting, some sins remain to be washed away. And sins cannot be washed away by doing nothing. In kaliyuga, circumstances are more in favour of sins. Hence, those who keep vigil of inner and outer circumstances and exercize free will judiciously can destroy sins and can thereby increase their freedom gradually, eventually getting the ultimate freedom from bondage to Karmaashaya and to Flesh for perfoming those karmas in next lives. Real free will is attained only after permanent moksha, when both and chitta are got rid of and one's existence is pure consciousness. In a bonded state of Jiva, free will is not really free because Mana (mind) intervenes with its samkalpas according to inertial instincts from Karmaashaya, and these samkalpas of mind are more often than not misunderstood as free will. Real free will (propensity to go against the tide of samskaara as well as of circumstances) is aklishta vritti, which is present only in a minority of humans. As long as Will is a result of samskaara, it is not really free. The only source of " free " will is beyong this Jada (unconscious) chitta, and that is Soul. Soul has power to befool itself by forgetting its separate existence and to think merely according to unconscious mind, but Soul also has power to override chitta and take its own decision : this is the real free will and it is a result of Atma-jnaana. A spiritual Guru is needed for initiation. But as Bhaagavata Purana says, an ignorant shishya prefers an ignorang guru, esp in Kaliyuga. Really enlightened gurus, who live away from pomp and show by renouncing all Maayaa are avoided by media and public, and are even hated by the majority as little more than beggars (but it does not mean all sanyaasis are really enlightened gurus, some of them are cheats). -VJ =================== ========= ________________________________ serenity forever <serenity_forever4 vedic astrology Saturday, May 30, 2009 1:28:45 AM Re: [vedic astrology] Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) I might be sounding highly ignorant by saying this, but I have certain doubts on the free-will theory. If everybody has free-will and it can be stretched to change our destinys, what about cases like where infants and babies and kids die? (either murdered or death by sickness, accident). they should be also given the right to exercise their free will, right, instead of giving death at the budding age? why do they have to undergo whatever they undergo and some die being abused? why all this? looking at those examples, though highly ignorant in all these aspects, i thought that, our past karma (in this case, previous lives) plays too much important role, to the extent that, whatever tiny percent of free-will we have wont account much to this life, maybe it will surely affect the next lives. and also about blessings and curses (remedies), if everybody wears gemstones etc., and be happy and prosperous forever, why so much pain in the world? is it that easy to erase all our bad past karmas? i dont know. praying to god definitely is good, gives us some peace of mind which will indirectly act on the decisions we take and hence, there might be some good done indirectly. but that's about it. and if we are sincere in our prayers, maybe God/Goddess will one day hear us out and help us. That's about it I guess. Can anyone enlighten me on the above aspect I chose? --- On Thu, 5/28/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> wrote: Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net> [vedic astrology] Ramakrishna' s analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) sohamsa@ .com, vedic astrology, @ . com, Cc: Jyotish_Ganga Thursday, May 28, 2009, 8:35 PM Namaste friends, > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the > amount of freedom the rope allows one. Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are usually quite apt and brilliant. Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will. A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy. While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its surroundings to get what it wants. * * * Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it. A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options. It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and make more things possible. * * * One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different times and in different matters. However, destiny only shows how one (and one's mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight back or just ignore and move on. Destiny places you in different situations. What you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your destiny in a future birth. * * * Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is the sum total of those actions that will come back to you. Each action of yours that impacts other beings and objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an action.) Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as destiny. It does not fix what you do in various situations in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next life. * * * Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the hands of the goat. The scope and options available to free will can be estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny. * * * I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings. When someone's free will works in a predictable way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer fail. Best regards, Narasimha ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote: > > Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> > Re: Re: Horoscope, free will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi) > sohamsa@ .com > Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM > > Namaste! > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the > amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma, > it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases. > Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one > chooses to call it. > > In psychological terms, ones own thought structures are the rope that > ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts us. What a horoscope reveals > in this sense is often the ropes that bind us. The grace of Guru and the > power of sadhana burn away these ropes/sanchita karma. > > Regards, > > Shyam > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote: > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > Dear Srinivasa, > > Let me give my opinion, > > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for free will. Upachaaya means to > > increase or grow. These houses can increase your level of karma. Most > > of the houses are considered bad (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we > > should try to limit our free will for loading our karma baggage. > > > > 3rd House : Kaama or passion related karmas. > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related karmas. > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc. > > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the > > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to > > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative karma. > > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha (7th from 3rd is 9th > > house). > > 11th house worship Shiva > > 6th House worship Vishnu. > > > > Warm Regards > > Sanjay P > > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote: > > > > Om Vishnave Namah > > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu > > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and accurately ascertain how much is the > > destiny/baggage part and the free will part. > > May be this is where modern day astrologers are lagging? > > > > Srinivasa > > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > Namaste, > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but > > > > still...... > > > > Well, free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's destiny. > > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in " Yoga Vaasishtham " that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at you. > > > > Just as a person who spends all his monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will. > > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future. > > > > Best regards, > > Narasimha > > > > > , " gopi_b927 " <gopi_b927@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Narasimha garu, > > > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but > > > > still...... > > > > , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > I will share some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question. > > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from > > > > the mail. > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > For those who are unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is > > > > a little background. > > > > > > > > > > I had predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi > > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political > > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such indications on > > > > the ground. But he did come into politics in the same timeframe. The > > > > initial talk was in 2007, he finally formed a party in 2008 and > > > > elections were in 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a > > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009. > > > > > > > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I upped > > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' s party would do well > > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not specific regarding his level of > > > > success and did not predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I > > > > was honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus, > > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure. > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high profile > > > > political predictions is less than in regular predictions like marriage, > > > > job, childbirth etc in " regular " charts. > > > > > > > > > > In some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and > > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make bad > > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be a human error in > > > > judging various factors. However, that human error seems to be a little > > > > more common in high profile political predictions than in regular > > > > predictions. What could be the reason? > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of astrology > > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will try to think loud and > > > > elaborate what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions committed in previous > > > > lives using one's free will that are to give their reactions in this > > > > life. However, as life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed > > > > in THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in > > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until that > > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in THIS life until now. > > > > Some key actions committed using one's free will in THIS life, > > > > especially at important crossroads in life, should impact the life > > > > events from then onwards. > > > > > > > > > > Many people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a > > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous lives > > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty and free will in this > > > > life has little scope. When the options available for the free will in > > > > this life are limited, there may not be significant actions using free > > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this > > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to predict > > > > events. > > > > > > > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile public > > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more options available for > > > > their free will. With their free will being more free and powerful, the > > > > actions committed by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we > > > > are able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise > > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in this > > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our predictions. > > > > > > > > > > Whether a political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the > > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying > > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to enjoy > > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power and make an accurate > > > > prediction, is the horoscope sufficient always? Could the exercise of > > > > free will in this life until now make a difference in some high profile > > > > charts? > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > I am just thinking loud here. Rather than posing a question and > > > > answering it myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for > > > > themselves.. . > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > Dear PVR garu, > > > > > > > > > > Namaste. > > > > > > > > > > If you don't mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on > > > > Chiranjeevi failed ? > > > > > > > > > > I am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to > > > > understand if > > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be you ignored some data ? ) > > > > > 2) You still can't understand why it failed and you think that was the > > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago and after coming to know > > > > about you / your lessons I developed strong faith and I thought all the > > > > failures are not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > If it is case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a > > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is > > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be accurate. > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > > <deleted> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Well said, Mr Michal Dziwulski Ji ! ("we cannot use 'free will' as an excuse for our inability to make accurate predictions consistently.")Here is my message under this thread to another member : <<<Karmaashaya (the desire to do karma) emenates from Klesha, and is to be experienced in present and future lives (Yogasutra,2.12). Klesha is a result of past sins. When sins and virtues are equal, a jiva is born into human specie. But if its karmas are not suffient to make it enjoy human life, it will die in infancy. Death during infancy does not negate the theory of karma. Karma being done is a mix of destiny anf free will. Destiny works in two ways : external circumstances, and one's own samskaaras. Samskaara is etymologically dedrived from sam + kr, and means the totality of past actions which have given rise to horoscope and Karmaashaya. This Karmaashaya moulds oue free will too, hence all our will is not really free. When Klista vrittis of chitta are attenuated by means of kriyaa-yoga (vrata, tapa, & c), then Aklishta vrittis become dominant and increase the range and area of free will. But as long as Klishta vrittis are dominant, we are little more than tools in the hands of destiny.Following one's own nature and instincts blindly and not try to oppose evil instincts leads to lower and lower status in future lives (-Gita). That is why yugas get deteriorated from satayuga to kaliyuga : bad people predominate in kaliyuga. More and more people give up practising real Dharma and live only physical existence, forgetting all about spirituality. For real freedom, one must "swim against the current" ("vi-tarani" > vaitarani) of circumstances of society as well as one's own samskaara. Its method is kriya-yoga, explained in second chapter of Yogasutra. Unless one's samskaara is changed through rigorous kriyayoga (vratas, tapa, etc), only gems and japa will not change destiny. Gems and japa bring temporary and minor reliefs, they cannot change major events. Generally, people want to cheat gods by means of gems and japa; this insincerity makes gems and japa ineffective. Refusal to reform oneself is a sign of Klishta nature of vrittis, whose only remedy is tapa. As the first line of Aghmarshana sukta (Rgveda-x.191) says, which forms a part of daily sandhyaa-vandana, Rta (moral order) and Satya (anything that "really exixts" , ie, is in "sattaa") are born out of Tapa. Tapa generates new Rta and Satya in samskaara, and strengthens old ones. This leads to more room for free will and more intelligence to exersize that free will in proper manner. Although many moksha-kaaraka yogas are described in Jyotisha, no one attains Moksha on account of birth time chart, because birth time chart is a result of past karma, and if past life was fit for moksha then present life would not have resulted. The very fact that present life has been attained means that something is wanting, some sins remain to be washed away. And sins cannot be washed away by doing nothing. In kaliyuga, circumstances are more in favour of sins. Hence, those who keep vigil of inner and outer circumstances and exercize free will judiciously can destroy sins and can thereby increase their freedom gradually, eventually getting the ultimate freedom from bondage to Karmaashaya and to Flesh for perfoming those karmas in next lives. Real free will is attained only after permanent moksha, when both and chitta are got rid of and one's existence is pure consciousness. In a bonded state of Jiva, free will is not really free because Mana (mind) intervenes with its samkalpas according to inertial instincts from Karmaashaya, and these samkalpas of mind are more often than not misunderstood as free will. Real free will (propensity to go against the tide of samskaara as well as of circumstances) is aklishta vritti, which is present only in a minority of humans. As long as Will is a result of samskaara, it is not really free. The only source of "free" will is beyong this Jada (unconscious) chitta, and that is Soul. Soul has power to befool itself by forgetting its separate existence and to think merely according to unconscious mind, but Soul also has power to override chitta and take its own decision : this is the real free will and it is a result of Atma-jnaana. A spiritual Guru is needed for initiation. But as Bhaagavata Purana says, an ignorant shishya prefers an ignorang guru, esp in Kaliyuga. Really enlightened gurus, who live away from pomp and show by renouncing all Maayaa are avoided by media and public, and are even hated by the majority as little more than beggars (but it does not mean all sanyaasis are really enlightened gurus, some of them are cheats).>>>Michal Dziwulski <nearmichalsohamsa Sent: Saturday, May 30, 2009 4:16:13 AMRe: Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) Hare Rama Krsna ||Dear Narasimha,I see you are in a philosophical mood:)In my observations and studies I have found that people generally are largely predetermined. When you witness incredible chart analysis by a gifted astrologer there is little choice but to have this view. Though a person may think, feel, and act as if they are making choices in their life, this view may be completely compromised by an astrologer describing exactly where they are, what they have been doing, and how they got there. If someone can do this with a few symbols nicely arranged on a piece of paper then it really questions the idea of 'free will'.The analogy of the goat having 'free will' within the range of its tether is really saying that given the huge size of the world the goat is extremely restricted. And so are we. If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. This being so, we cannot use 'free will' as an excuse for our inability to make accurate predictions consistently.Warm regards,MichalNarasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net>sohamsa@ .com; vedic astrology; ; Cc: Jyotish_GangaFriday, 29 May, 2009 3:35:00 PM Ramakrishna' s analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) Namaste friends, > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the> amount of freedom the rope allows one. Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are usually quite apt and brilliant. Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will. A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy. While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its surroundings to get what it wants. * * * Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it. A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options. It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and make more things possible. * * * One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different times and in different matters. However, destiny only shows how one (and one's mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight back or just ignore and move on. Destiny places you in different situations. What you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your destiny in a future birth. * * * Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is the sum total of those actions that will come back to you. Each action of yours that impacts other beings and objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an action.) Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as destiny. It does not fix what you do in various situations in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next life. * * * Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the hands of the goat. The scope and options available to free will can be estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny. * * * I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings. When someone's free will works in a predictable way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer fail. Best regards,Narasimha------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homamDo Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpanaSpirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdomFree Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.orgSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote:> > Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...>> Re: Re: Horoscope, free will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi)> sohamsa@ .com> Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM> > Namaste!> > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the> amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma,> it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases.> Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one> chooses to call it.> > In psychological terms, ones own thought structures are the rope that> ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts us. What a horoscope reveals> in this sense is often the ropes that bind us. The grace of Guru and the> power of sadhana burn away these ropes/sanchita karma.> > Regards,> > Shyam> > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote:> > > > || Om Gurave Namah ||> > Dear Srinivasa,> > Let me give my opinion,> > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for free will. Upachaaya means to> > increase or grow. These houses can increase your level of karma. Most> > of the houses are considered bad (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we> > should try to limit our free will for loading our karma baggage.> > > > 3rd House : Kaama or passion related karmas. > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related karmas. > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc.> > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the> > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to> > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative karma.> > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha (7th from 3rd is 9th> > house).> > 11th house worship Shiva> > 6th House worship Vishnu.> > > > Warm Regards> > Sanjay P> > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote:> >> > Om Vishnave Namah> > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu> > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and accurately ascertain how much is the> > destiny/baggage part and the free will part.> > May be this is where modern day astrologers are lagging?> > > > Srinivasa> > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote:> > Namaste,> > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but> > > > still......> > > > Well, free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's destiny.> > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in "Yoga Vaasishtham" that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at you.> > > > Just as a person who spends all his monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will.> > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future.> > > > Best regards,> > Narasimha> > > > > , "gopi_b927" <gopi_b927@> wrote:> > > > > > > > Narasimha garu,> > > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but> > > > still......> > > > , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@>> > > > wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Namaste,> > > > >> > > > > I will share some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question.> > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from> > > > the mail.> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > For those who are unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is> > > > a little background.> > > > >> > > > > I had predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi> > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political> > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such indications on> > > > the ground. But he did come into politics in the same timeframe. The> > > > initial talk was in 2007, he finally formed a party in 2008 and> > > > elections were in 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a> > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009.> > > > >> > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I upped> > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' s party would do well> > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not specific regarding his level of> > > > success and did not predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I> > > > was honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus,> > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure.> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high profile> > > > political predictions is less than in regular predictions like marriage,> > > > job, childbirth etc in "regular" charts.> > > > >> > > > > In some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and> > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make bad> > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be a human error in> > > > judging various factors. However, that human error seems to be a little> > > > more common in high profile political predictions than in regular> > > > predictions. What could be the reason?> > > > >> > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of astrology> > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will try to think loud and> > > > elaborate what I mean.> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions committed in previous> > > > lives using one's free will that are to give their reactions in this> > > > life. However, as life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed> > > > in THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in> > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until that> > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in THIS life until now.> > > > Some key actions committed using one's free will in THIS life,> > > > especially at important crossroads in life, should impact the life> > > > events from then onwards.> > > > >> > > > > Many people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a> > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous lives> > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty and free will in this> > > > life has little scope. When the options available for the free will in> > > > this life are limited, there may not be significant actions using free> > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this> > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to predict> > > > events.> > > > >> > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile public> > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more options available for> > > > their free will. With their free will being more free and powerful, the> > > > actions committed by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we> > > > are able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise> > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in this> > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our predictions.> > > > >> > > > > Whether a political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the> > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying> > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to enjoy> > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power and make an accurate> > > > prediction, is the horoscope sufficient always? Could the exercise of> > > > free will in this life until now make a difference in some high profile> > > > charts?> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > I am just thinking loud here. Rather than posing a question and> > > > answering it myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for> > > > themselves.. .> > > > >> > > > > Best regards,> > > > > Narasimha> > > > >> > > > > -> > > > > Dear PVR garu,> > > > >> > > > > Namaste.> > > > >> > > > > If you don't mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on> > > > Chiranjeevi failed ?> > > > >> > > > > I am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to> > > > understand if> > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be you ignored some data ? )> > > > > 2) You still can't understand why it failed and you think that was the> > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge.> > > > >> > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago and after coming to know> > > > about you / your lessons I developed strong faith and I thought all the> > > > failures are not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack> > > > of knowledge.> > > > >> > > > > If it is case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a> > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is> > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be accurate.> > > > >> > > > > Best Regards,> > > > > <deleted> Reading this email at work? Make a change with Xtra Jobs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Dear Prasad and other members,Thanks for the wonderful post. Now the question ( often raised) is about the expected results of our efforts, whether the results are commisurate with our efforts or not? Whether the magnitude of the expected results are reduced/ multiplied, in an unexplained way? While some of efforts are 'effortless' for us, someothers seem unchangeable (like early to rise from bed!). Can we say that, the conflict mentioned by H.H could be better handled at favourable times as determined by the study of astrology? Also, can we not reverse the question and say, is there only free-will, and no stopping it? Can we sum up free-will as of the devine spark within us, while vasanas (which lead our actions) are an attribute of our mind? H.H. did clearly articulate the path to moksha, by controliing bad vasanas by the excercise of our free-will. H.H did mention about shastras, though not specifically about Jyotishya (vedanga); so it is easy to assume that Jyotishya has a role to play in guiding us. Lots of questions, is there anyone to answer them?Thanks and regardsvishwanathamOn Sat, May 30, 2009 at 1:14 AM, vvootla <vvootla wrote: Dear Members,Here is another article by the late His Holiness Shri Chandrashekhara Bharati of Shringeri Shankara Mutt on the Riddle of Fate and Free Will Regards,-Prasadsohamsa , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote:>> Namaste friends, > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the> > amount of freedom the rope allows one. > > Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are usually quite apt and brilliant.> > Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will. > > A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy. > > While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its surroundings to get what it wants. > > * * *> > Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me extend Ramakrishna's analogy to explain it. > > A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options. > > It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and make more things possible. > > * * *> > One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different times and in different matters. > > However, destiny only shows how one (and one's mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight back or just ignore and move on. > > Destiny places you in different situations. What you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your destiny in a future birth. > > * * *> > Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is the sum total of those actions that will come back to you. > > Each action of yours that impacts other beings and objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an action.) > > Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as destiny.> > It does not fix what you do in various situations in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next life. > > * * *> > Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the hands of the goat. > > The scope and options available to free will can be estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny. > > * * *> > I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings. > > When someone's free will works in a predictable way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer fail. > > Best regards,> Narasimha> > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana> Spirituality: > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net> Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org> > > > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa shyam.srivatsa@ wrote: > > > > Shyam V. Srivatsa shyam.srivatsa@> > Re: Re: Horoscope, free will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi)> > sohamsa > > Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM> > > > Namaste!> > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the > > amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma,> > it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases.> > Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one > > chooses to call it.> > > > In psychological terms, ones own thought structures are the rope that> > ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts us. What a horoscope reveals> > in this sense is often the ropes that bind us. The grace of Guru and the > > power of sadhana burn away these ropes/sanchita karma.> > > > Regards,> > > > Shyam> > > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote: > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah ||> > > Dear Srinivasa,> > > Let me give my opinion,> > > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for free will. Upachaaya means to > > > increase or grow. These houses can increase your level of karma. Most> > > of the houses are considered bad (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we> > > should try to limit our free will for loading our karma baggage. > > > > > > 3rd House : Kaama or passion related karmas. > > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related karmas. > > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc.> > > > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the > > > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to> > > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative karma.> > > > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha (7th from 3rd is 9th > > > house).> > > 11th house worship Shiva> > > 6th House worship Vishnu.> > > > > > Warm Regards> > > Sanjay P> > > > sohamsa , Srinivasa Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote: > > >> > > Om Vishnave Namah> > > > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu> > > > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and accurately ascertain how much is the > > > destiny/baggage part and the free will part.> > > May be this is where modern day astrologers are lagging?> > > > > > Srinivasa> > > > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > Namaste,> > > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but> > > > > still......> > > > > > Well, free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's destiny. > > > > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in " Yoga Vaasishtham " that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at you. > > > > > > Just as a person who spends all his monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will. > > > > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future. > > > > > > Best regards,> > > Narasimha> > > > > > > , " gopi_b927 " <gopi_b927@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > Narasimha garu,> > > > > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but> > > > > still......> > > > > , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr@> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > >> > > > > > I will share some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question. > > > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from> > > > > the mail.> > > > > >> > > > > > * * *> > > > > > > > > > > > For those who are unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is> > > > > a little background.> > > > > >> > > > > > I had predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi > > > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political> > > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such indications on> > > > > the ground. But he did come into politics in the same timeframe. The > > > > > initial talk was in 2007, he finally formed a party in 2008 and> > > > > elections were in 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a> > > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009. > > > > > >> > > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I upped> > > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' s party would do well > > > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not specific regarding his level of> > > > > success and did not predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I> > > > > was honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus, > > > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure.> > > > > >> > > > > > * * *> > > > > >> > > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high profile > > > > > political predictions is less than in regular predictions like marriage,> > > > > job, childbirth etc in " regular " charts.> > > > > >> > > > > > In some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and > > > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make bad> > > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be a human error in> > > > > judging various factors. However, that human error seems to be a little > > > > > more common in high profile political predictions than in regular> > > > > predictions. What could be the reason?> > > > > >> > > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of astrology > > > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will try to think loud and> > > > > elaborate what I mean.> > > > > >> > > > > > * * * > > > > > >> > > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions committed in previous> > > > > lives using one's free will that are to give their reactions in this > > > > > life. However, as life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed> > > > > in THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in> > > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until that > > > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in THIS life until now.> > > > > Some key actions committed using one's free will in THIS life,> > > > > especially at important crossroads in life, should impact the life > > > > > events from then onwards.> > > > > >> > > > > > Many people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a> > > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous lives > > > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty and free will in this> > > > > life has little scope. When the options available for the free will in> > > > > this life are limited, there may not be significant actions using free > > > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this> > > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to predict> > > > > events. > > > > > >> > > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile public> > > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more options available for > > > > > their free will. With their free will being more free and powerful, the> > > > > actions committed by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we> > > > > are able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise > > > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in this> > > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our predictions.> > > > > > > > > > > > Whether a political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the> > > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying> > > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to enjoy > > > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power and make an accurate> > > > > prediction, is the horoscope sufficient always? Could the exercise of> > > > > free will in this life until now make a difference in some high profile > > > > > charts?> > > > > >> > > > > > * * *> > > > > >> > > > > > I am just thinking loud here. Rather than posing a question and > > > > > answering it myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for> > > > > themselves.. .> > > > > >> > > > > > Best regards,> > > > > > Narasimha > > > > > >> > > > > > -> > > > > > Dear PVR garu,> > > > > >> > > > > > Namaste.> > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on> > > > > Chiranjeevi failed ?> > > > > >> > > > > > I am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to > > > > > understand if> > > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be you ignored some data ? )> > > > > > 2) You still can't understand why it failed and you think that was the > > > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge.> > > > > >> > > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago and after coming to know> > > > > about you / your lessons I developed strong faith and I thought all the > > > > > failures are not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack> > > > > of knowledge.> > > > > >> > > > > > If it is case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a > > > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is> > > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be accurate.> > > > > > > > > > > > Best Regards,> > > > > > <deleted>> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Dear Michal, > If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are > usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we > can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. Yes, the world is vast. But the space that matters to the goat is small and the goat's maneuvres within that small space are quite important - they decide how much the goat is able to accomplish and how happy it is. See the example below of river and bucket of water. In that example, goat's choice decides whether its thirst is quenched or not. Similarly, an ordinary person's free will works within a limited space. There may be millions of things that are out of reach for an ordinary person. But, the maneuvres made within the limited space of possibilities can have a considerable impact on that person's life. * * * Assuming that life and one's actions are predetermined based on horoscope, we are effectively saying that actions in one of the previous lives (which determined the current horoscope) are determining all actions in this life, hence the next life's horoscope, hence all actions in next life, hence the horoscope in the life after that one, and so on. This line of thinking implies that choices made in one particular life predetermine a sequence of lives. What a proposition! * * * BTW, Prasad, thanks for an awesome link. Seekers of knowledge who are genuinely interested in this topic (the play of destiny and free will) should find this article quite insightful. I bow to the wisdom of Swami Chandrashekhara Bharati, who is clearly a knower of Brahman. > http://www.advaita-vedanta.org/articles/The_Riddle_of_Fate_and_Free.htm Best regards, Narasimha Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana Spirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org sohamsa , Michal Dziwulski <nearmichal wrote: > > Hare Rama Krsna || > > Dear Narasimha, > > I see you are in a philosophical mood:) > > In my observations and studies I have found that people generally are largely predetermined. When you witness incredible chart analysis by a gifted astrologer there is little choice but to have this view. Though a person may think, feel, and act as if they are making choices in their life, this view may be completely compromised by an astrologer describing exactly where they are, what they have been doing, and how they got there. If someone can do this with a few symbols nicely arranged on a piece of paper then it really questions the idea of 'free will'. > > The analogy of the goat having 'free will' within the range of its tether is really saying that given the huge size of the world the goat is extremely restricted. And so are we. If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. This being so, we cannot use 'free will' as an excuse for our inability to make accurate predictions consistently. > > Warm regards, > Michal > > ________________________________ > Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr > sohamsa ; vedic astrology ; ; > Cc: Jyotish_Ganga > Friday, 29 May, 2009 3:35:00 PM > Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) > > Namaste friends, > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results > of past actions to be like > > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free > will is restricted to the > > amount of freedom the rope allows > one. > > Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest > of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are > usually quite apt and brilliant. > > Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past > actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat > goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will. > > A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and > despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle > continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that > it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of > water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. > It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy. > > While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth > (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the > surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the > actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its > surroundings to get what it wants. > > * > * * > > Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's > actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify > destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me > extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it. > > A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one > direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it > was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life > may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options. > > It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may > get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. > Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and > make more things possible. > * > * * > > One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. > One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's > destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction > for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw > obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by > millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different > times and in different matters. > > However, destiny only shows how one (and one's > mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself > in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can > still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed > based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may > feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. > But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight > back or just ignore and move on. > > Destiny places you in different situations. What > you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some > cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, > it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may > not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your > destiny in a future birth. > > * > * * > > Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit > word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of > tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is > the sum total of those actions that will come back to you. > > Each action of yours that impacts other beings and > objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here > please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel > towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also > impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an > action.) > > Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, > committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which > are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as > destiny. > > It does not fix what you do in various situations > in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at > important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they > shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, > or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next > life. > > * > * * > > Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show > acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the > frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the > rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope > and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the > hands of the goat. > > The scope and options available to free will can be > estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable > based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been > used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has > an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. > The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny. > > * > * * > > I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the > original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics > in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone > is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has > a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a > prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low > probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using > astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology > worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying > that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings. > > When someone's free will works in a predictable > way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life > situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is > easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free > will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the > actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer > fail. > > Best > regards, > Narasimha > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > Do > a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > Do > Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > Free > Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > Free > Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > Sri > Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > > > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote: > > > > Shyam V. Srivatsa > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> > > Re: Re: Horoscope, free > will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi) > > sohamsa@ .com > > Date: > Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM > > > > Namaste! > > > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like > > > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the > > > amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma, > > > it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases. > > > Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one > > > chooses to call it. > > > > In psychological terms, ones own thought > structures are the rope that > > ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts > us. What a horoscope reveals > > in this sense is often the ropes that bind > us. The grace of Guru and the > > power of sadhana burn away these > ropes/sanchita karma. > > > > Regards, > > > > Shyam > > > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote: > > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > Dear Srinivasa, > > > > Let me give my opinion, > > > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for > free will. Upachaaya means to > > > increase or grow. These houses can > increase your level of karma. Most > > > of the houses are considered bad > (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we > > > should try to limit our free > will for loading our karma baggage. > > > > > > 3rd House : Kaama > or passion related karmas. > > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related > karmas. > > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc. > > > > > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the > > > > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to > > > > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative > karma. > > > > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha > (7th from 3rd is 9th > > > house). > > > 11th house worship > Shiva > > > 6th House worship Vishnu. > > > > > > Warm > Regards > > > Sanjay P > > > > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa > Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote: > > > > > > Om Vishnave > Namah > > > > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu > > > > > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and > accurately ascertain how much is the > > > destiny/baggage part and the > free will part. > > > May be this is where modern day astrologers are > lagging? > > > > > > Srinivasa > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > how do we know that free > will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > > be an > asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > but > > > > > still...... > > > > > > Well, > free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no > destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's > destiny. > > > > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in " Yoga > Vaasishtham " that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is > your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will > catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This > destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at > you. > > > > > > Just as a person who spends all his > monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in > the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be > faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. > Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will. > > > > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may > vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that > free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future. > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Narasimha > > > > > > > , " gopi_b927 " > <gopi_b927@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Narasimha garu, > > > > > > > > > > how do we know > that free will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > but > > > > > still...... > > > > > --- In > , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > I will share > some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question. > > > > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from > > > > > > the mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > For those who are > unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is > > > > > a > little background. > > > > > > > > > > > > I had > predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi > > > > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political > > > > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such > indications on > > > > > the ground. But he did come into politics > in the same timeframe. The > > > > > initial talk was in 2007, he > finally formed a party in 2008 and > > > > > elections were in > 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a > > > > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I > upped > > > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' > s party would do well > > > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not > specific regarding his level of > > > > > success and did not > predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I > > > > > was > honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus, > > > > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high > profile > > > > > political predictions is less than in regular > predictions like marriage, > > > > > job, childbirth etc in > " regular " charts. > > > > > > > > > > > > In > some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and > > > > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make > bad > > > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be > a human error in > > > > > judging various factors. However, that > human error seems to be a little > > > > > more common in high > profile political predictions than in regular > > > > > > predictions. What could be the reason? > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of > astrology > > > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will > try to think loud and > > > > > elaborate what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions > committed in previous > > > > > lives using one's free will that > are to give their reactions in this > > > > > life. However, as > life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed > > > > > in > THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in > > > > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until > that > > > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in > THIS life until now. > > > > > Some key actions committed using > one's free will in THIS life, > > > > > especially at important > crossroads in life, should impact the life > > > > > events from > then onwards. > > > > > > > > > > > > Many > people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a > > > > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous > lives > > > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty > and free will in this > > > > > life has little scope. When the > options available for the free will in > > > > > this life are > limited, there may not be significant actions using free > > > > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this > > > > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to > predict > > > > > events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile > public > > > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more > options available for > > > > > their free will. With their free > will being more free and powerful, the > > > > > actions committed > by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we > > > > > are > able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise > > > > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in > this > > > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our > predictions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether a > political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the > > > > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying > > > > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to > enjoy > > > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power > and make an accurate > > > > > prediction, is the horoscope > sufficient always? Could the exercise of > > > > > free will in > this life until now make a difference in some high profile > > > > > > charts? > > > > > > > > > > > > * * > * > > > > > > > > > > > > I am just thinking > loud here. Rather than posing a question and > > > > > answering it > myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for > > > > > > themselves.. . > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > regards, > > > > > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > Dear PVR garu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste. > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't > mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on > > > > > > Chiranjeevi failed ? > > > > > > > > > > > > I > am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to > > > > > > understand if > > > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be > you ignored some data ? ) > > > > > > 2) You still can't > understand why it failed and you think that was the > > > > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago > and after coming to know > > > > > about you / your lessons I > developed strong faith and I thought all the > > > > > failures are > not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack > > > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > If it is > case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a > > > > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is > > > > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be > accurate. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > Regards, > > > > > > > <deleted> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 || Oum Namah Shivaya Namomkaareshwaraaya|| Dear learned astrologers, While I do not claim any grasp either on astrology or theology, I am somewhat interested in spirituality. Needless to say, the concept of free will interests and intrigues me at teh same time. I somehow find the notion of predestination rather unpalatable. If it were so, why were we made to live as humans and not as goats? The Ramakrishna's analogy cited by Sri Narasimha can be further "stretched" thus. What if the goat, in its attempt to explore the woods, keeps pulling at the rope and the rope elongates with time. It was the goat's karma that bettered its chances. And what if the goat is really adamant/ resolved and keeps pulling at the rope and one day, after the goat having shed significant sweat and blood, the rope breaks and the goat is free to roam in the woods. Harder karmas leading to sweeter results. The goat was tied because of her past karmas and its present karmas liberated it. It is not my attempt to play down on either of you gentlemen's superior knowledge. Therefore, you are requested to take it in the right perspective. Regards, Dhiraj --- On Sat, 30/5/09, Michal Dziwulski <nearmichal wrote: Michal Dziwulski <nearmichalRe: Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..)sohamsa Date: Saturday, 30 May, 2009, 6:46 AM Hare Rama Krsna ||Dear Narasimha,I see you are in a philosophical mood:)In my observations and studies I have found that people generally are largely predetermined. When you witness incredible chart analysis by a gifted astrologer there is little choice but to have this view. Though a person may think, feel, and act as if they are making choices in their life, this view may be completely compromised by an astrologer describing exactly where they are, what they have been doing, and how they got there. If someone can do this with a few symbols nicely arranged on a piece of paper then it really questions the idea of 'free will'.The analogy of the goat having 'free will' within the range of its tether is really saying that given the huge size of the world the goat is extremely restricted. And so are we. If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. This being so, we cannot use 'free will' as an excuse for our inability to make accurate predictions consistently.Warm regards,Michal Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr (AT) charter (DOT) net>sohamsa@ .com; vedic astrology; ; Cc: Jyotish_GangaFriday, 29 May, 2009 3:35:00 PM Ramakrishna' s analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) Namaste friends, > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the> amount of freedom the rope allows one. Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are usually quite apt and brilliant. Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will. A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy. While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its surroundings to get what it wants. * * * Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it. A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options. It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and make more things possible. * * * One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different times and in different matters. However, destiny only shows how one (and one's mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight back or just ignore and move on. Destiny places you in different situations. What you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your destiny in a future birth. * * * Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is the sum total of those actions that will come back to you. Each action of yours that impacts other beings and objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an action.) Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as destiny. It does not fix what you do in various situations in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next life. * * * Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the hands of the goat. The scope and options available to free will can be estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny. * * * I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings. When someone's free will works in a predictable way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer fail. Best regards,Narasimha------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homamDo Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpanaSpirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdomFree Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.orgSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote:> > Shyam V. Srivatsa <shyam.srivatsa@ ...>> Re: Re: Horoscope, free will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi)> sohamsa@ .com> Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM> > Namaste!> > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the> amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma,> it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases.> Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one> chooses to call it.> > In psychological terms, ones own thought structures are the rope that> ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts us. What a horoscope reveals> in this sense is often the ropes that bind us. The grace of Guru and the> power of sadhana burn away these ropes/sanchita karma.> > Regards,> > Shyam> > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote:> > > > || Om Gurave Namah ||> > Dear Srinivasa,> > Let me give my opinion,> > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for free will. Upachaaya means to> > increase or grow. These houses can increase your level of karma. Most> > of the houses are considered bad (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we> > should try to limit our free will for loading our karma baggage.> > > > 3rd House : Kaama or passion related karmas. > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related karmas. > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc.> > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the> > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to> > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative karma.> > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha (7th from 3rd is 9th> > house).> > 11th house worship Shiva> > 6th House worship Vishnu.> > > > Warm Regards> > Sanjay P> > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote:> >> > Om Vishnave Namah> > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu> > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and accurately ascertain how much is the> > destiny/baggage part and the free will part.> > May be this is where modern day astrologers are lagging?> > > > Srinivasa> > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote:> > Namaste,> > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but> > > > still......> > > > Well, free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's destiny.> > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in "Yoga Vaasishtham" that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at you.> > > > Just as a person who spends all his monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will.> > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future.> > > > Best regards,> > Narasimha> > > > > , "gopi_b927" <gopi_b927@> wrote:> > > > > > > > Narasimha garu,> > > > > > > > how do we know that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree but> > > > still......> > > > , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@>> > > > wrote:> > > > >> > > > > Namaste,> > > > >> > > > > I will share some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question.> > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from> > > > the mail.> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > For those who are unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is> > > > a little background.> > > > >> > > > > I had predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi> > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political> > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such indications on> > > > the ground. But he did come into politics in the same timeframe. The> > > > initial talk was in 2007, he finally formed a party in 2008 and> > > > elections were in 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a> > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009.> > > > >> > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I upped> > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' s party would do well> > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not specific regarding his level of> > > > success and did not predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I> > > > was honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus,> > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure.> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high profile> > > > political predictions is less than in regular predictions like marriage,> > > > job, childbirth etc in "regular" charts.> > > > >> > > > > In some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and> > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make bad> > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be a human error in> > > > judging various factors. However, that human error seems to be a little> > > > more common in high profile political predictions than in regular> > > > predictions. What could be the reason?> > > > >> > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of astrology> > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will try to think loud and> > > > elaborate what I mean.> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions committed in previous> > > > lives using one's free will that are to give their reactions in this> > > > life. However, as life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed> > > > in THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in> > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until that> > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in THIS life until now.> > > > Some key actions committed using one's free will in THIS life,> > > > especially at important crossroads in life, should impact the life> > > > events from then onwards.> > > > >> > > > > Many people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a> > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous lives> > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty and free will in this> > > > life has little scope. When the options available for the free will in> > > > this life are limited, there may not be significant actions using free> > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this> > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to predict> > > > events.> > > > >> > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile public> > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more options available for> > > > their free will. With their free will being more free and powerful, the> > > > actions committed by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we> > > > are able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise> > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in this> > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our predictions.> > > > >> > > > > Whether a political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the> > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying> > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to enjoy> > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power and make an accurate> > > > prediction, is the horoscope sufficient always? Could the exercise of> > > > free will in this life until now make a difference in some high profile> > > > charts?> > > > >> > > > > * * *> > > > >> > > > > I am just thinking loud here. Rather than posing a question and> > > > answering it myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for> > > > themselves.. .> > > > >> > > > > Best regards,> > > > > Narasimha> > > > >> > > > > -> > > > > Dear PVR garu,> > > > >> > > > > Namaste.> > > > >> > > > > If you don't mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on> > > > Chiranjeevi failed ?> > > > >> > > > > I am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to> > > > understand if> > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be you ignored some data ? )> > > > > 2) You still can't understand why it failed and you think that was the> > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge.> > > > >> > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago and after coming to know> > > > about you / your lessons I developed strong faith and I thought all the> > > > failures are not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack> > > > of knowledge.> > > > >> > > > > If it is case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a> > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is> > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be accurate.> > > > >> > > > > Best Regards,> > > > > <deleted>Reading this email at work? Make a change with Xtra Jobs Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with India Travel Click here! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Dear Michal, > If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are > usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we > can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. Yes, the world is vast. But the space that matters to the goat is small and the goat's maneuvres within that small space are quite important - they decide how much the goat is able to accomplish and how happy it is. See the example below of river and bucket of water. In that example, goat's choice decides whether its thirst is quenched or not. Similarly, an ordinary person's free will works within a limited space. There may be millions of things that are out of reach for an ordinary person. But, the maneuvres made within the limited space of possibilities can have a considerable impact on that person's life. * * * Assuming that life and one's actions are predetermined based on horoscope, we are effectively saying that actions in one of the previous lives (which determined the current horoscope) are determining all actions in this life, hence the next life's horoscope, hence all actions in next life, hence the horoscope in the life after that one, and so on. This line of thinking implies that choices made in one particular life predetermine a sequence of lives. What a proposition! * * * BTW, Prasad, thanks for an awesome link. Seekers of knowledge who are genuinely interested in this topic (the play of destiny and free will) should find this article quite insightful. I bow to the wisdom of Swami Chandrashekhara Bharati, who is clearly a knower of Brahman. > http://www.advaita-vedanta.org/articles/The_Riddle_of_Fate_and_Free.htm Best regards,NarasimhaDo a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homamDo Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpanaSpirituality: Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.orgSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org sohamsa , Michal Dziwulski <nearmichal wrote:>> Hare Rama Krsna ||> > Dear Narasimha,> > I see you are in a philosophical mood:)> > In my observations and studies I have found that people generally are largely predetermined. When you witness incredible chart analysis by a gifted astrologer there is little choice but to have this view. Though a person may think, feel, and act as if they are making choices in their life, this view may be completely compromised by an astrologer describing exactly where they are, what they have been doing, and how they got there. If someone can do this with a few symbols nicely arranged on a piece of paper then it really questions the idea of 'free will'.> > The analogy of the goat having 'free will' within the range of its tether is really saying that given the huge size of the world the goat is extremely restricted. And so are we. If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. This being so, we cannot use 'free will' as an excuse for our inability to make accurate predictions consistently.> > Warm regards,> Michal> > ________________________________> Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr> sohamsa ; vedic astrology ; ; > Cc: Jyotish_Ganga > Friday, 29 May, 2009 3:35:00 PM> Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..)> > Namaste friends,> > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results > of past actions to be like> > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free > will is restricted to the> > amount of freedom the rope allows > one.> > Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest > of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are > usually quite apt and brilliant.> > Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past > actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat > goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will.> > A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and > despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle > continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that > it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of > water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. > It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy.> > While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth > (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the > surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the > actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its > surroundings to get what it wants.> > * > * *> > Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's > actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify > destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me > extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it.> > A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one > direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it > was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life > may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options.> > It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may > get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. > Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and > make more things possible.> * > * *> > One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. > One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's > destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction > for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw > obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by > millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different > times and in different matters.> > However, destiny only shows how one (and one's > mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself > in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can > still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed > based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may > feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. > But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight > back or just ignore and move on.> > Destiny places you in different situations. What > you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some > cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, > it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may > not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your > destiny in a future birth.> > * > * *> > Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit > word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of > tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is > the sum total of those actions that will come back to you.> > Each action of yours that impacts other beings and > objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here > please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel > towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also > impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an > action.)> > Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, > committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which > are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as > destiny.> > It does not fix what you do in various situations > in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at > important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they > shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, > or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next > life.> > * > * *> > Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show > acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the > frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the > rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope > and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the > hands of the goat.> > The scope and options available to free will can be > estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable > based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been > used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has > an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. > The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny.> > * > * *> > I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the > original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics > in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone > is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has > a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a > prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low > probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using > astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology > worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying > that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings.> > When someone's free will works in a predictable > way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life > situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is > easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free > will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the > actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer > fail.> > Best > regards,> Narasimha> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------> Do > a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam> Do > Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana> Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom> Free > Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net> Free > Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org> Sri > Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > > > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote:> > > > Shyam V. Srivatsa > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...>> > Re: Re: Horoscope, free > will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi)> > sohamsa@ .com> > > Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM> > > > Namaste!> > > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> > > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the> > > amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma,> > > it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases.> > > Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one> > > chooses to call it.> > > > In psychological terms, ones own thought > structures are the rope that> > ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts > us. What a horoscope reveals> > in this sense is often the ropes that bind > us. The grace of Guru and the> > power of sadhana burn away these > ropes/sanchita karma.> > > > Regards,> > > > Shyam> > > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote:> > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah ||> > > Dear Srinivasa,> > > > Let me give my opinion,> > > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for > free will. Upachaaya means to> > > increase or grow. These houses can > increase your level of karma. Most> > > of the houses are considered bad > (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we> > > should try to limit our free > will for loading our karma baggage.> > > > > > 3rd House : Kaama > or passion related karmas. > > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related > karmas. > > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc.> > > > > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the> > > > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to> > > > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative > karma.> > > > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha > (7th from 3rd is 9th> > > house).> > > 11th house worship > Shiva> > > 6th House worship Vishnu.> > > > > > Warm > Regards> > > Sanjay P> > > > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa > Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote:> > >> > > Om Vishnave > Namah> > > > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu> > > > > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and > accurately ascertain how much is the> > > destiny/baggage part and the > free will part.> > > May be this is where modern day astrologers are > lagging?> > > > > > Srinivasa> > > > > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote:> > > > Namaste,> > > > > > > > how do we know that free > will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > > be an > asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > but> > > > > still......> > > > > > Well, > free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no > destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's > destiny.> > > > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in "Yoga > Vaasishtham" that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is > your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will > catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This > destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at > you.> > > > > > Just as a person who spends all his > monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in > the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be > faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. > Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will.> > > > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may > vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that > free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future.> > > > > > > Best regards,> > > Narasimha> > > > > > > , "gopi_b927" > <gopi_b927@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > Narasimha garu,> > > > > > > > > > how do we know > that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > but> > > > > still......> > > > > > , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > >> > > > > > I will share > some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question.> > > > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from> > > > > > the mail.> > > > > >> > > > > > > * * *> > > > > >> > > > > > For those who are > unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is> > > > > a > little background.> > > > > >> > > > > > I had > predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi> > > > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political> > > > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such > indications on> > > > > the ground. But he did come into politics > in the same timeframe. The> > > > > initial talk was in 2007, he > finally formed a party in 2008 and> > > > > elections were in > 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a> > > > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009.> > > > > >> > > > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I > upped> > > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' > s party would do well> > > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not > specific regarding his level of> > > > > success and did not > predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I> > > > > was > honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus,> > > > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure.> > > > > > >> > > > > > * * *> > > > > >> > > > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high > profile> > > > > political predictions is less than in regular > predictions like marriage,> > > > > job, childbirth etc in > "regular" charts.> > > > > >> > > > > > In > some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and> > > > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make > bad> > > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be > a human error in> > > > > judging various factors. However, that > human error seems to be a little> > > > > more common in high > profile political predictions than in regular> > > > > > predictions. What could be the reason?> > > > > >> > > > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of > astrology> > > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will > try to think loud and> > > > > elaborate what I mean.> > > > > > >> > > > > > * * *> > > > > > >> > > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions > committed in previous> > > > > lives using one's free will that > are to give their reactions in this> > > > > life. However, as > life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed> > > > > in > THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in> > > > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until > that> > > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in > THIS life until now.> > > > > Some key actions committed using > one's free will in THIS life,> > > > > especially at important > crossroads in life, should impact the life> > > > > events from > then onwards.> > > > > >> > > > > > Many > people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a> > > > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous > lives> > > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty > and free will in this> > > > > life has little scope. When the > options available for the free will in> > > > > this life are > limited, there may not be significant actions using free> > > > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this> > > > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to > predict> > > > > events.> > > > > >> > > > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile > public> > > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more > options available for> > > > > their free will. With their free > will being more free and powerful, the> > > > > actions committed > by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we> > > > > are > able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise> > > > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in > this> > > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our > predictions.> > > > > >> > > > > > Whether a > political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the> > > > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying> > > > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to > enjoy> > > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power > and make an accurate> > > > > prediction, is the horoscope > sufficient always? Could the exercise of> > > > > free will in > this life until now make a difference in some high profile> > > > > > charts?> > > > > >> > > > > > * * > *> > > > > >> > > > > > I am just thinking > loud here. Rather than posing a question and> > > > > answering it > myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for> > > > > > themselves.. .> > > > > >> > > > > > Best > regards,> > > > > > Narasimha> > > > > > >> > > > > > -> > > > > > > Dear PVR garu,> > > > > >> > > > > > > Namaste.> > > > > >> > > > > > If you don't > mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on> > > > > > Chiranjeevi failed ?> > > > > >> > > > > > I > am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to> > > > > > understand if> > > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be > you ignored some data ? )> > > > > > 2) You still can't > understand why it failed and you think that was the> > > > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge.> > > > > > >> > > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago > and after coming to know> > > > > about you / your lessons I > developed strong faith and I thought all the> > > > > failures are > not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack> > > > > > of knowledge.> > > > > >> > > > > > If it is > case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a> > > > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is> > > > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be > accurate.> > > > > >> > > > > > Best > Regards,> > > > > > > <deleted> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 30, 2009 Report Share Posted May 30, 2009 Hare Rama Krsna ||Dear Narasimha,We are largely predetermined ie. tied to a short rope pegged to the ground.That we can take a step to the right or two steps to the left is but a small trifle. You may call that freedom, but it is really nothing in comparison to the bondage of the tether.To know that you are bound is the first step to becoming free.Sincerely,MichalNarasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvrsohamsa ; vedic astrology ; ; Sent: Sunday, 31 May, 2009 6:32:33 AM Re: Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) Dear Michal, > If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are > usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we > can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. Yes, the world is vast. But the space that matters to the goat is small and the goat's maneuvres within that small space are quite important - they decide how much the goat is able to accomplish and how happy it is. See the example below of river and bucket of water. In that example, goat's choice decides whether its thirst is quenched or not. Similarly, an ordinary person's free will works within a limited space. There may be millions of things that are out of reach for an ordinary person. But, the maneuvres made within the limited space of possibilities can have a considerable impact on that person's life. * * * Assuming that life and one's actions are predetermined based on horoscope, we are effectively saying that actions in one of the previous lives (which determined the current horoscope) are determining all actions in this life, hence the next life's horoscope, hence all actions in next life, hence the horoscope in the life after that one, and so on. This line of thinking implies that choices made in one particular life predetermine a sequence of lives. What a proposition! * * * BTW, Prasad, thanks for an awesome link. Seekers of knowledge who are genuinely interested in this topic (the play of destiny and free will) should find this article quite insightful. I bow to the wisdom of Swami Chandrashekhara Bharati, who is clearly a knower of Brahman. > http://www.advaita- vedanta.org/ articles/ The_Riddle_ of_Fate_and_ Free.htm Best regards,Narasimha------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homamDo Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpanaSpirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdomFree Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. netFree Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.orgSri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- sohamsa@ .com, Michal Dziwulski <nearmichal@. ..> wrote:>> Hare Rama Krsna ||> > Dear Narasimha,> > I see you are in a philosophical mood:)> > In my observations and studies I have found that people generally are largely predetermined. When you witness incredible chart analysis by a gifted astrologer there is little choice but to have this view. Though a person may think, feel, and act as if they are making choices in their life, this view may be completely compromised by an astrologer describing exactly where they are, what they have been doing, and how they got there. If someone can do this with a few symbols nicely arranged on a piece of paper then it really questions the idea of 'free will'.> > The analogy of the goat having 'free will' within the range of its tether is really saying that given the huge size of the world the goat is extremely restricted. And so are we. If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. This being so, we cannot use 'free will' as an excuse for our inability to make accurate predictions consistently.> > Warm regards,> Michal> > ____________ _________ _________ __> Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr> sohamsa@ .com; vedic astrology; ; > Cc: Jyotish_Ganga> Friday, 29 May, 2009 3:35:00 PM> Ramakrishna' s analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..)> > Namaste friends,> > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results > of past actions to be like> > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free > will is restricted to the> > amount of freedom the rope allows > one.> > Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest > of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are > usually quite apt and brilliant.> > Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past > actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat > goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will.> > A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and > despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle > continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that > it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of > water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. > It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy.> > While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth > (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the > surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the > actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its > surroundings to get what it wants.> > * > * *> > Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's > actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify > destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me > extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it.> > A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one > direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it > was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life > may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options.> > It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may > get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. > Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and > make more things possible.> * > * *> > One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. > One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's > destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction > for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw > obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by > millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different > times and in different matters.> > However, destiny only shows how one (and one's > mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself > in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can > still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed > based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may > feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. > But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight > back or just ignore and move on.> > Destiny places you in different situations. What > you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some > cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, > it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may > not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your > destiny in a future birth.> > * > * *> > Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit > word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of > tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is > the sum total of those actions that will come back to you.> > Each action of yours that impacts other beings and > objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here > please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel > towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also > impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an > action.)> > Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, > committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which > are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as > destiny.> > It does not fix what you do in various situations > in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at > important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they > shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, > or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next > life.> > * > * *> > Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show > acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the > frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the > rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope > and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the > hands of the goat.> > The scope and options available to free will can be > estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable > based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been > used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has > an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. > The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny.> > * > * *> > I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the > original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics > in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone > is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has > a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a > prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low > probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using > astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology > worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying > that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings.> > When someone's free will works in a predictable > way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life > situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is > easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free > will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the > actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer > fail.> > Best > regards,> Narasimha> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------> Do > a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam> Do > Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana> Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom> Free > Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net> Free > Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org> Sri > Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > > > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote:> > > > Shyam V. Srivatsa > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...>> > Re: Re: Horoscope, free > will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi)> > sohamsa@ .com> > > Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM> > > > Namaste!> > > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like> > > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the> > > amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma,> > > it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases.> > > Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one> > > chooses to call it.> > > > In psychological terms, ones own thought > structures are the rope that> > ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts > us. What a horoscope reveals> > in this sense is often the ropes that bind > us. The grace of Guru and the> > power of sadhana burn away these > ropes/sanchita karma.> > > > Regards,> > > > Shyam> > > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote:> > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah ||> > > Dear Srinivasa,> > > > Let me give my opinion,> > > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for > free will. Upachaaya means to> > > increase or grow. These houses can > increase your level of karma. Most> > > of the houses are considered bad > (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we> > > should try to limit our free > will for loading our karma baggage.> > > > > > 3rd House : Kaama > or passion related karmas. > > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related > karmas. > > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc.> > > > > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the> > > > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to> > > > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative > karma.> > > > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha > (7th from 3rd is 9th> > > house).> > > 11th house worship > Shiva> > > 6th House worship Vishnu.> > > > > > Warm > Regards> > > Sanjay P> > > > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa > Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote:> > >> > > Om Vishnave > Namah> > > > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu> > > > > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and > accurately ascertain how much is the> > > destiny/baggage part and the > free will part.> > > May be this is where modern day astrologers are > lagging?> > > > > > Srinivasa> > > > > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote:> > > > Namaste,> > > > > > > > how do we know that free > will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > > be an > asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > but> > > > > still......> > > > > > Well, > free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no > destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's > destiny.> > > > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in "Yoga > Vaasishtham" that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is > your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will > catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This > destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at > you.> > > > > > Just as a person who spends all his > monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in > the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be > faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. > Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will.> > > > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may > vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that > free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future.> > > > > > > Best regards,> > > Narasimha> > > > > > > , "gopi_b927" > <gopi_b927@> wrote:> > > > > > > > > > > Narasimha garu,> > > > > > > > > > how do we know > that free will exists?.The so called free will can also> > > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed> > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > but> > > > > still......> > > > > > , "Narasimha P.V.R. Rao" <pvr@>> > > > > > wrote:> > > > > >> > > > > > > Namaste,> > > > > >> > > > > > I will share > some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question.> > > > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from> > > > > > the mail.> > > > > >> > > > > > > * * *> > > > > >> > > > > > For those who are > unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is> > > > > a > little background.> > > > > >> > > > > > I had > predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi> > > > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political> > > > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such > indications on> > > > > the ground. But he did come into politics > in the same timeframe. The> > > > > initial talk was in 2007, he > finally formed a party in 2008 and> > > > > elections were in > 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a> > > > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009.> > > > > >> > > > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I > upped> > > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' > s party would do well> > > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not > specific regarding his level of> > > > > success and did not > predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I> > > > > was > honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus,> > > > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure.> > > > > > >> > > > > > * * *> > > > > >> > > > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high > profile> > > > > political predictions is less than in regular > predictions like marriage,> > > > > job, childbirth etc in > "regular" charts.> > > > > >> > > > > > In > some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and> > > > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make > bad> > > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be > a human error in> > > > > judging various factors. However, that > human error seems to be a little> > > > > more common in high > profile political predictions than in regular> > > > > > predictions. What could be the reason?> > > > > >> > > > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of > astrology> > > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will > try to think loud and> > > > > elaborate what I mean.> > > > > > >> > > > > > * * *> > > > > > >> > > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions > committed in previous> > > > > lives using one's free will that > are to give their reactions in this> > > > > life. However, as > life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed> > > > > in > THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in> > > > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until > that> > > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in > THIS life until now.> > > > > Some key actions committed using > one's free will in THIS life,> > > > > especially at important > crossroads in life, should impact the life> > > > > events from > then onwards.> > > > > >> > > > > > Many > people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a> > > > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous > lives> > > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty > and free will in this> > > > > life has little scope. When the > options available for the free will in> > > > > this life are > limited, there may not be significant actions using free> > > > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this> > > > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to > predict> > > > > events.> > > > > >> > > > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile > public> > > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more > options available for> > > > > their free will. With their free > will being more free and powerful, the> > > > > actions committed > by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we> > > > > are > able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise> > > > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in > this> > > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our > predictions.> > > > > >> > > > > > Whether a > political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the> > > > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying> > > > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to > enjoy> > > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power > and make an accurate> > > > > prediction, is the horoscope > sufficient always? Could the exercise of> > > > > free will in > this life until now make a difference in some high profile> > > > > > charts?> > > > > >> > > > > > * * > *> > > > > >> > > > > > I am just thinking > loud here. Rather than posing a question and> > > > > answering it > myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for> > > > > > themselves.. .> > > > > >> > > > > > Best > regards,> > > > > > Narasimha> > > > > > >> > > > > > -> > > > > > > Dear PVR garu,> > > > > >> > > > > > > Namaste.> > > > > >> > > > > > If you don't > mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on> > > > > > Chiranjeevi failed ?> > > > > >> > > > > > I > am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to> > > > > > understand if> > > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be > you ignored some data ? )> > > > > > 2) You still can't > understand why it failed and you think that was the> > > > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge.> > > > > > >> > > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago > and after coming to know> > > > > about you / your lessons I > developed strong faith and I thought all the> > > > > failures are > not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack> > > > > > of knowledge.> > > > > >> > > > > > If it is > case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a> > > > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is> > > > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be > accurate.> > > > > >> > > > > > Best > Regards,> > > > > > > <deleted> Email slow, clunky, unreliable? Switch to Xtra Mail, New Zealand's new email address. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 5, 2009 Report Share Posted June 5, 2009 Dear Narasimha ji and Michal-jee, If I may introduce some deliberate mastication into this ongoing thread: Perhaps goats have long ropes or short ropes, but perhaps we should remember another aspect of free-will that the goat possesses and the 'ability' that is destined within it right from the day it was born and till it dies! When one visualizes a goat, what does one 'see'? An animal standing in one place and chewing, chewing, chewing! Chewing is the intrinsic tendency that was God-given and using that ability, instead of jumping all over the place and worrying about whether its rope is short or long, if it begin to use its inherent gift of chewing, it may take a long time but eventually the rope that limits would not remain an issue! Would it? Just as a goat was sent down to this earthly reality with the exceptional ability and life-long practice to chew (destiny?), perhaps so was human being sent down with his/her intrinsic ability and god-given gift to try and exert freedom of choice and discretion! In that sense, perhaps our " Freedom of choice and free-will " was our destiny, our Gift from God! The important thing is to figure out, " What is it that has been with me since birth or soon thereafter? What am I really good at and do or have beeing doing all my life, without thinking and naturally? " . Therein lies the personal key! I think!! But like most goats, we can get complacent and keep chewing leaves instead of the " rope " , but that would be a personal choice! Goat or human!! Rohiniranjan , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr wrote: > > Dear Michal, > > > If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are > > usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we > > can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. > > Yes, the world is vast. But the space that matters to the goat is small and the goat's maneuvres within that small space are quite important - they decide how much the goat is able to accomplish and how happy it is. See the example below of river and bucket of water. In that example, goat's choice decides whether its thirst is quenched or not. > > Similarly, an ordinary person's free will works within a limited space. There may be millions of things that are out of reach for an ordinary person. But, the maneuvres made within the limited space of possibilities can have a considerable impact on that person's life. > > * * * > > Assuming that life and one's actions are predetermined based on horoscope, we are effectively saying that actions in one of the previous lives (which determined the current horoscope) are determining all actions in this life, hence the next life's horoscope, hence all actions in next life, hence the horoscope in the life after that one, and so on. This line of thinking implies that choices made in one particular life predetermine a sequence of lives. What a proposition! > > * * * > > BTW, Prasad, thanks for an awesome link. Seekers of knowledge who are genuinely interested in this topic (the play of destiny and free will) should find this article quite insightful. I bow to the wisdom of Swami Chandrashekhara Bharati, who is clearly a knower of Brahman. > > > http://www.advaita-vedanta.org/articles/The_Riddle_of_Fate_and_Free.htm > > Best regards, > Narasimha > > Do a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/homam > Do Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAstrologer.org/tarpana > Spirituality: > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net > Free Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAstrologer.org > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagannath.org > > > > sohamsa , Michal Dziwulski <nearmichal@> wrote: > > > > Hare Rama Krsna || > > > > Dear Narasimha, > > > > I see you are in a philosophical mood:) > > > > In my observations and studies I have found that people generally are largely predetermined. When you witness incredible chart analysis by a gifted astrologer there is little choice but to have this view. Though a person may think, feel, and act as if they are making choices in their life, this view may be completely compromised by an astrologer describing exactly where they are, what they have been doing, and how they got there. If someone can do this with a few symbols nicely arranged on a piece of paper then it really questions the idea of 'free will'. > > > > The analogy of the goat having 'free will' within the range of its tether is really saying that given the huge size of the world the goat is extremely restricted. And so are we. If you compare 'free will' to this short rope that goats are usually tied by, and the vastness of the world, then we can only conclude that life is largely predetermined. This being so, we cannot use 'free will' as an excuse for our inability to make accurate predictions consistently. > > > > Warm regards, > > Michal > > > > ________________________________ > > Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> > > sohamsa ; vedic astrology ; ; > > Cc: Jyotish_Ganga > > Friday, 29 May, 2009 3:35:00 PM > > Ramakrishna's analogy on destiny & free will (Re: Horoscope, free will..) > > > > Namaste friends, > > > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results > > of past actions to be like > > > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free > > will is restricted to the > > > amount of freedom the rope allows > > one. > > > > Ramakrishna is a master of explaining the toughest > > of philosophical points using the simplest of analogies. His analogies are > > usually quite apt and brilliant. > > > > Yes, karma or destiny (i.e. the result of past > > actions) is like a rope tied to the neck of a goat. The rope restricts the movement of the goat, but does not determine where the goat > > goes and what it does! That is upto the goat's free will. > > > > A thirsty goat may look at a river nearby and > > despair as it cannot reach the river due to the rope. It may try and struggle > > continually, without reaching the river. Another thirsty goat may realize that > > it cannot reach the river, accept that, look around, find a small bucket of > > water behind it within reach if it negotiates with the rope and the obstacles. > > It may turn back, go, drink that water in the bucket and be happy. > > > > While the destiny as frozen at the time of birth > > (and as reflected in the horoscope) is like the rope tying the goat and the > > surroundings of the goat, the actions of free will after birth are like the > > actions of the goat - how it accepts and negotiates the rope and its > > surroundings to get what it wants. > > > > * > > * * > > > > Today's actions (karma) are tomorrow's destiny (karma). Some of today's > > actions may impact destiny in a future life. Some of today's actions may modify > > destiny for tomorrow (in this life itself!). Let me > > extend Ramakrishna' s analogy to explain it. > > > > A goat tied to a tree with a rope may go around the tree a few times in one > > direction and the rope may get shorter. It may now be unable to reach places it > > was able to reach earlier. Similarly, some bad acts of free will in this life > > may tighten the destiny, make things worse and reduce one's options. > > > > It may go around the tree a few times in another direction and the rope may > > get longer. It may now be able to reach places it was unable to reach earlier. > > Similarly, some good acts of free will in this life may improve the destiny and > > make more things possible. > > * > > * * > > > > One's mind is conditioned based on one's destiny. > > One's surroundings and life situations faced by one are influenced by one's > > destinty. One will be pulled in certain directions. One may feel attraction > > for another person. Another person may hate one an, abuse one and throw > > obstacles. One may not have enough money to live happily. One may be adored by > > millions of people. And so on. One faces different life situations at different > > times and in different matters. > > > > However, destiny only shows how one (and one's > > mind) is pulled in various directions and what life situations one finds oneself > > in. Irrespective of the mental conditioning and one's circumstances, one can > > still choose between different actions. The actions taken by one are not fixed > > based on the horoscope. For example, one person may abuse one badly and one may > > feel great anger towards that person, all on account of a previous karmik debt. > > But, when badly provoked, one can either succumb to the temptation and fight > > back or just ignore and move on. > > > > Destiny places you in different situations. What > > you do in those situations is based on how you use your free will. In some > > cases, free will has a lot of wiggle room and many options and, in some cases, > > it has fewer options. But, usually, you do have several options that may or may > > not be obvious and the action you finally choose shapes your > > destiny in a future birth. > > > > * > > * * > > > > Please note that the Sanskrit word for destiny is karma and the Sanskrit > > word for action is also karma. Basically, actions of today become destiny of > > tomorrow. You will get reaction in future to your current actions and destiny is > > the sum total of those actions that will come back to you. > > > > Each action of yours that impacts other beings and > > objects of this universe will go towards forming your destiny for future. (Here > > please note that both physical and mental actions count. Any emotions you feel > > towards someone else and do not necessary express outwardly will also > > impact that person in a subtle manner and hence counts as an > > action.) > > > > Horoscope captures the good and bad actions, > > committed physically or mentally to other beings, until the current birth, which > > are to give their reactions in this life. This is also known as > > destiny. > > > > It does not fix what you do in various situations > > in your current life. You have the ability to make different choices at > > important crossroads. The choices you make are your karma (actions) and they > > shape your destiny for future. They may either impact your current life itself, > > or become part of the destiny (as reflected in the horoscope) in the next > > life. > > > > * > > * * > > > > Anybody who tells you that so and so houses show > > acts of free will does not understand what free will is. Horoscope is the > > frozen list of past karmas that form one's destiny for this life. It is like the > > rope tying the goat. Acts of free will are like how the goat negotiates the rope > > and moves around within the possible area to do its stuff. That is in the > > hands of the goat. > > > > The scope and options available to free will can be > > estimated from the horoscope, but the exact acts of free will are unpredictable > > based on horoscope. To complicate things further, how exactly free will has been > > used until now in this life (which cannot be seen from the horoscope) has > > an impact on the scope and options available to free will at this time. > > The exertion of free will until now may have modified the destiny. > > > > * > > * * > > > > I am not downplaying astrology. Going back to the > > original Chiranjeevi prediction, the prediction that he would come into politics > > in 2007-2009 and enjoy some kind of power was made using astrology. When someone > > is already a candidate, even a random prediction of success or failure has > > a 1/2 or 1/3 probability. But, when there are no signs on the ground, a > > prediction on one's political entry in a specific timeframe has a very low > > probability. Such a low probability prediction made 7 years ahead using > > astrology came true. Moreover, we have all seen many cases where astrology > > worked spectacularly. I am not saying astrology is nonsense. But I am saying > > that we do not attempt to understand its shortcomings. > > > > When someone's free will works in a predictable > > way, i.e. when one's free will has very few options and/or one reacts to life > > situations thrown up by the destiny in predictable ways, job of an astrologer is > > easier. But, when free will has a wide range of options and/or one used the free > > will powerfully, the gap between the destiny as reflected by horoscope and the > > actual destiny as a result of those actions may make an astrologer > > fail. > > > > Best > > regards, > > Narasimha > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > > Do > > a Short Homam Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ homam > > Do > > Pitri Tarpanas Yourself: http://www.VedicAst rologer.org/ tarpana > > Spirituality: http://groups. / group/vedic- wisdom > > Free > > Jyotish lessons (MP3): http://vedicastro. home.comcast. net > > Free > > Jyotish software (Windows): http://www.VedicAst rologer.org > > Sri > > Jagannath Centre (SJC) website: http://www.SriJagan nath.org > > ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- > > > > > --- On Wed, 5/27/09, Shyam V. Srivatsa > > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > Shyam V. Srivatsa > > <shyam.srivatsa@ ...> > > > Re: Re: Horoscope, free > > will and high profile charts (Re: Your prediction on Chiranjeevi) > > > sohamsa@ .com > > > Date: > > Wednesday, May 27, 2009, 11:08 AM > > > > > > Namaste! > > > > > > > > Ramakrishna Paramahamsa compared the results of past actions to be like > > > > > a rope tied around the neck of a goat. Free will is restricted to the > > > > > amount of freedom the rope allows one. As one burns more of past karma, > > > > > it is like the rope being loosened and the freedom given increases. > > > > > Ultimately we are all bound by the power of prakriti or maya as one > > > > > chooses to call it. > > > > > > In psychological terms, ones own thought > > structures are the rope that > > > ties us. Our own conditioned mind restricts > > us. What a horoscope reveals > > > in this sense is often the ropes that bind > > us. The grace of Guru and the > > > power of sadhana burn away these > > ropes/sanchita karma. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Shyam > > > > > > On Wed, 2009-05-27 at 13:38 +0530, Sanjay Prabhakaran wrote: > > > > > > > > > > || Om Gurave Namah || > > > > Dear Srinivasa, > > > > > > Let me give my opinion, > > > > Upachaaya houses 3,6,10 and 11 are for > > free will. Upachaaya means to > > > > increase or grow. These houses can > > increase your level of karma. Most > > > > of the houses are considered bad > > (except 10th) by Parashara. Hence we > > > > should try to limit our free > > will for loading our karma baggage. > > > > > > > > 3rd House : Kaama > > or passion related karmas. > > > > 11th house: Desire or Wants related > > karmas. > > > > 6th house: Hatred, revenge etc. > > > > > > > > > > All the above are one of prime causes of increasing karma. Look at the > > > > > > grahas in above places to see how many factors are forcing you to > > > > > > indulge in those karmas. Malefics generally add more negative > > karma. > > > > > > > > 3rd house remedy is best to take Guru Upadesha > > (7th from 3rd is 9th > > > > house). > > > > 11th house worship > > Shiva > > > > 6th House worship Vishnu. > > > > > > > > Warm > > Regards > > > > Sanjay P > > > > > > sohamsa@ .com, Srinivasa > > Sunchu <padmanu@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Om Vishnave > > Namah > > > > > > > > Namasthe Narasimha Garu > > > > > > > > > > Is there a way or techniques to quantitatively and > > accurately ascertain how much is the > > > > destiny/baggage part and the > > free will part. > > > > May be this is where modern day astrologers are > > lagging? > > > > > > > > Srinivasa > > > > > > > > > > --- On Tue, 5/26/09, Narasimha P.V.R. Rao <pvr@> wrote: > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > how do we know that free > > will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > > > be an > > asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > > but > > > > > > still...... > > > > > > > > Well, > > free will DOES exist. In fact, what exactly is destiny anyway? There is no > > destiny if there is no free will, for today's act of free will shapes tomorrow's > > destiny. > > > > > > > > In fact, Vasishtha tells Rama in " Yoga > > Vaasishtham " that there is nothing called destiny. He says all that is there is > > your free will. He says that actions done in the past using your free will will > > catch up with you and that catching up is given the name of destiny. This > > destiny is thus nothing external, but acts of your own free will getting back at > > you. > > > > > > > > Just as a person who spends all his > > monthly salary in the first 10 days of the month may have no money to spend in > > the next 20 days, similarly people who abused their free will in the past may be > > faced with such a weighty destiny that their free will is useless right now. > > Such people may feel that there is nothing called free will. > > > > > > > > The amount of leeway and wiggle room available for free may may > > vary from person to person and situation to situation, but it is a fact that > > free will exists and that acts of free will shape one's future. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > > , " gopi_b927 " > > <gopi_b927@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Narasimha garu, > > > > > > > > > > > > how do we know > > that free will exists?.The so called free will can also > > > > > > > > be an asumption.As far as my experience goes whatever freewill existed > > > > > > > > for humans might have exited.I know majority will never agree > > but > > > > > > still...... > > > > > > --- In > > , " Narasimha P.V.R. Rao " <pvr@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will share > > some freewheeling thoughts, in response to your question. > > > > > > > > I am cc'ing this to some astrology lists after removing your name from > > > > > > > > the mail. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For those who are > > unaware of the prediction referred to below, here is > > > > > > a > > little background. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had > > predicted in print in 2000 that Telugu film actor Chiranjeevi > > > > > > > > would come into politics in 2007-2009 and and enjoy some political > > > > > > > > power. At the time of that prediction, there were no such > > indications on > > > > > > the ground. But he did come into politics > > in the same timeframe. The > > > > > > initial talk was in 2007, he > > finally formed a party in 2008 and > > > > > > elections were in > > 2009. Though his party did badly, he was elected as a > > > > > > > > legislator (MLA) in May 2009. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thus, the original prediction was quite successful. However, I > > upped > > > > > > the ante last year by suggesting that Chiranjeevi' > > s party would do well > > > > > > in 2009 elections. Though I was not > > specific regarding his level of > > > > > > success and did not > > predict that he would become the Chief Minister, I > > > > > > was > > honestly expecting his party to do better than they managed. Thus, > > > > > > > > the followup of my original prediction is a failure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is my personal observation that the success rate in high > > profile > > > > > > political predictions is less than in regular > > predictions like marriage, > > > > > > job, childbirth etc in > > " regular " charts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In > > some cases, the reason is that the birthdata is not accurate and > > > > > > > > yet we are eager to make predictions. But sometimes we make > > bad > > > > > > predictions with good data too. Of course, it can be > > a human error in > > > > > > judging various factors. However, that > > human error seems to be a little > > > > > > more common in high > > profile political predictions than in regular > > > > > > > > predictions. What could be the reason? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if the factor of free will that is left out of > > astrology > > > > > > plays a bigger role in political charts. I will > > try to think loud and > > > > > > elaborate what I mean. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One's birth chart contains the list of actions > > committed in previous > > > > > > lives using one's free will that > > are to give their reactions in this > > > > > > life. However, as > > life goes on, one accumulates newer actions committed > > > > > > in > > THIS life using one's free will. What happens at any point of time in > > > > > > > > one's life is a function of ALL actions committed by one until > > that > > > > > > point of time, INCLUDING the actions committed in > > THIS life until now. > > > > > > Some key actions committed using > > one's free will in THIS life, > > > > > > especially at important > > crossroads in life, should impact the life > > > > > > events from > > then onwards. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many > > people are weighed down by too many karmas and always playing a > > > > > > > > catchup. In other words, destiny (sum of the actions of previous > > lives > > > > > > which are to give a reaction now) is too weighty > > and free will in this > > > > > > life has little scope. When the > > options available for the free will in > > > > > > this life are > > limited, there may not be significant actions using free > > > > > > > > will and hence the modifications to destiny based on actions of this > > > > > > > > life may not be big enough. Thus, horoscope may be sufficient to > > predict > > > > > > events. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > However, highly popular, successful and high profile > > public > > > > > > personalities may have less restrictions and more > > options available for > > > > > > their free will. With their free > > will being more free and powerful, the > > > > > > actions committed > > by their free will may have a higher weightage. As we > > > > > > are > > able to see only their destiny in the horoscope (free will exercise > > > > > > > > upto birth) and unable to factor in how free will was exercised in > > this > > > > > > life until now, we are perhaps handicapped in our > > predictions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whether a > > political leader is in limelight and becomes MP or the > > > > > > > > leader of opposition in parliament or the Prime Minister, he is enjoying > > > > > > > > some political power. Previous karmas placed him in a position to > > enjoy > > > > > > that power. To predict the specific degree of power > > and make an accurate > > > > > > prediction, is the horoscope > > sufficient always? Could the exercise of > > > > > > free will in > > this life until now make a difference in some high profile > > > > > > > > charts? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > * * > > * > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am just thinking > > loud here. Rather than posing a question and > > > > > > answering it > > myself, I will let learned friends ponder on this for > > > > > > > > themselves.. . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > > regards, > > > > > > > Narasimha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > Dear PVR garu, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Namaste. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If you don't > > mind, could you please look in to why your prediction on > > > > > > > > Chiranjeevi failed ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I > > am not asking this question with a wrong intent. I wanted to > > > > > > > > understand if > > > > > > > 1) It is a human error (May be > > you ignored some data ? ) > > > > > > > 2) You still can't > > understand why it failed and you think that was the > > > > > > > > correct prediction to be best of your knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I had a 50-50 faith on astrology 3 years ago > > and after coming to know > > > > > > about you / your lessons I > > developed strong faith and I thought all the > > > > > > failures are > > not because of astrology but because of astrologer's lack > > > > > > > > of knowledge. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If it is > > case #1, it is okay. But if it is case #2, then we have a > > > > > > > > problem. We will have to conclude that the Jyotish knowledge that is > > > > > > > > available to us at this age is very limited and may not be > > accurate. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Best > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > <deleted> > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.