western aspect in k.p.Readers

[Guest guest]

Dear members

Mr.KSK has strongly recommended to use the western aspect. Whereas, his son Mr.Hariharan, in his book "k.p. alone is correct" first edition in 2001, Rs.60/- in the page 21 states as below.

"In western astrology, the square aspect has been considered as un favourable by most of the authorities. As far as experience goes the effect of square aspect is not evil in the real sense...............we cannot lay much store by the so called evil effects of square or opposition aspects. On the other hand, they have been instrumental in bringing to pass on auspicious even."

 

The k.p.Reader II is almost 100% reproduction from the volume I of sagar publication. Throughout the book Mr.KSK used the western aspect. i.e. good aspect and bad aspect. In vedic system we are not distingusing the aspect as good and bad. Even in the 4 step theory there is no distingusion as good and bad vedic aspect by the author.

 

Whether Mr.Hariharan wants to disprove his father. Whether he wants to disprove the vedic Tajak system of aspect.

 

Please go through Mr.B.V.Raman's book "Prasanna tantra", in which the western aspect is dealt clearly with examples. This book is mere translation from sanskrit by Mr.B.V.Raman.

 

R.Dhanabalan