The exchanges between me and Mr.Lalit

[Guest guest]

It is professional decency that I cannot disclose all the exchanges

that occured between me and mr. Lalit. Though he often claims that I

have made a private mail public, I have actually not done that yet. I

don't intend to also. But supposing he makes it public and you find

it " fishy " he might edit it to suit his convenience, members who wish

to still make an " inquiry " in this may request me to post all the

exchanges which I will then make public.

 

Reading through those exchanges, and the words he had used even then,

you will come to know what prompted me to come out to the public with

my grienvance about him at all. I failed to convince him after

repeated attempts over one week and in my exhaustion I resorted to

that step.

 

otherwise, i have never ever discussed whatever has transpired

between me and a client. Secrets of many lives are safe in my

heart. This is the truth. Even after all this irritation, I have

still not made his mails public only out of respect to his privacy.

One thing I can say is, that even then, he was saying I was

" unprofessional " in one mail, and praising me " heaven-high " in some

mails, and was always judgemental. A client comes to an astrologer

to get help; and definitely I am not an astrologer who allows clients

to pronounce " judgements " over me, and that too offhand without

adequate consideration!

 

I will not post any other thing on this matter. As Shri. Sushil

rightly said, let this matter end here. As already stated, I

rejoined only to refute the charges and to offer clarification to

Shri. Sushil about my intentions; I have done that. I have no other

purpose left here. If he offers his challenge inthis group again, I

will not be here to defend myself any more. I am leaving.

 

Blessed be.

Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

[Guest guest]

dear pandit dakshinamoorthiji

 

all the baseless false accusations hurled by you by the evil lalit

made him got the punishment of getting banned by the group members as

majority of the members demanded his ouster. if he shamelessly

enters this group again and continue the same evil acts which he is

doing, he will be banned again and again till he realises that he has

no place in this august forum. i am also planning to advise his

employer to take disciplinary action against him for using his office

time and resources to spoil a spiritual group peace and how he is

disturbing peaceloving spiritual forums by entering again even after

banning. his perversions are visible in his many mails on sex

sadhana in another group. he was also posing himself as an

astrologer and confirmed in his own mails that he is in the office.

he has sent dozens of mails during office hours which itself is

sufficient for him to make guilty for swindling the employer who is

paying a whopping seventy five thousand rupees for doing this dirty

job.

 

for the evil poision he thrown, i have already cursed him to suffer

and he will surely repent for the evils he hurled against me. as all

members may be aware, sages are kept above par with gods and many a

time sages have cursed even gods and hence the sages shall not be

insulted if one cannot respect them. same is the case with gurus.

 

on the other hand, you were invited by the group moderator to rejoin

gracefully after your condition of lalit getting banned was fulfilled.

 

hence i request you to kindly be in this group and keep contributing

to share the knoweldge. if and when this banned evil comes again in

this group, he will be banned again and shown the door.

 

i request you to DEMAND mr. sushil dakshit to substantiate, support,

corroborate and prove the conclusive allegation that you and

mohanraamji are one which he is making. he is making this statement

from his own surmise and he is not offering any proof for that and

hence he must tender an apology to you for making a conclusive

statement in a public forum.

 

any member can express his or her own personal observations but can

never present it as a confirmed fact unless substantitated by proof.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

vedic astrology , " dakshinastrologer "

<dakshinastrologer wrote:

>

> It is professional decency that I cannot disclose all the exchanges

> that occured between me and mr. Lalit. Though he often claims that

I

> have made a private mail public, I have actually not done that yet.

I

> don't intend to also. But supposing he makes it public and you

find

> it " fishy " he might edit it to suit his convenience, members who

wish

> to still make an " inquiry " in this may request me to post all the

> exchanges which I will then make public.

>

> Reading through those exchanges, and the words he had used even

then,

> you will come to know what prompted me to come out to the public

with

> my grienvance about him at all. I failed to convince him after

> repeated attempts over one week and in my exhaustion I resorted to

> that step.

>

> otherwise, i have never ever discussed whatever has transpired

> between me and a client. Secrets of many lives are safe in my

> heart. This is the truth. Even after all this irritation, I have

> still not made his mails public only out of respect to his

privacy.

> One thing I can say is, that even then, he was saying I was

> " unprofessional " in one mail, and praising me " heaven-high " in some

> mails, and was always judgemental. A client comes to an astrologer

> to get help; and definitely I am not an astrologer who allows

clients

> to pronounce " judgements " over me, and that too offhand without

> adequate consideration!

>

> I will not post any other thing on this matter. As Shri. Sushil

> rightly said, let this matter end here. As already stated, I

> rejoined only to refute the charges and to offer clarification to

> Shri. Sushil about my intentions; I have done that. I have no

other

> purpose left here. If he offers his challenge inthis group again,

I

> will not be here to defend myself any more. I am leaving.

>

> Blessed be.

> Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI.

>