Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Topic for US Chart..

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Hello List members,

 

Drug safety- Saturn on Rahu..Scandals and drugs, Cancer chart..

 

Aloha, Sally

 

 

 

Senator Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican who

held hearings on recent

 

F.D.A. actions, said, "At this point, no one can say with confidence

 

whether the worst drug safety problems are behind us or ahead of us."

 

 

The Celebrex disclosure came on the heels of a decision by Merck to

 

withdraw its arthritis drug Vioxx from the market after a study showed

a

 

link between long-term use of the drug and an increased risk of heart

 

attacks and strokes.

 

 

Two weeks ago, an article in The British Medical Journal suggested that

 

Eli Lilly & Company had long concealed evidence that the

antidepressant

 

Prozac could cause violent and suicidal behavior. The company denies

the

 

accusation, which the journal forwarded to the F.D.A.

 

 

 

 

Connie Gipple, President

 

 

HealthQuest International

 

 

A Gift for Drug Makers

 

By Bob Herbert

 

 

Published: January 14, 2005

 

 

Vioxx, Celebrex, Prozac. ...

 

 

With all the problems and the bad publicity that drug companies have

been

 

facing recently, you might think that this would not be a good time for

 

the Bush administration to toss yet another bonanza their way.

 

 

But the administration is like an ardent lover in its zeal to shower

the

 

rich and powerful with every imaginable benefit. So tucked like a

gleaming

 

diamond in proposed legislation to curb malpractice lawsuits is a

 

provision that would give an unconscionable degree of protection to

firms

 

responsible for drugs or medical devices that turn out to be harmful.

 

 

The provision would go beyond caps on certain damages. It would

actually

 

prohibit punitive damages in cases in which the drug or medical device

had

 

received Food and Drug Administration approval. We know the F.D.A. has

 

failed time and again to ensure that unsafe drugs are kept off the

market.

 

To provide blanket legal protection against punitive damages in such

cases

 

is both unwarranted and dangerous.

 

 

We learned just last month that Celebrex, the phenomenally popular

 

painkiller from Pfizer, more than tripled the risk of heart attacks,

 

strokes and death among those taking high doses in a national trial.

Those

 

findings, "raised new questions about how well federal drug regulators

 

protect the public and worsened drug makers' already dismal image."

 

 

Senator Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican who held hearings on recent

 

F.D.A. actions, said, "At this point, no one can say with confidence

 

whether the worst drug safety problems are behind us or ahead of us."

 

 

The Celebrex disclosure came on the heels of a decision by Merck to

 

withdraw its arthritis drug Vioxx from the market after a study showed

a

 

link between long-term use of the drug and an increased risk of heart

 

attacks and strokes.

 

 

Two weeks ago, an article in The British Medical Journal suggested that

 

Eli Lilly & Company had long concealed evidence that the

antidepressant

 

Prozac could cause violent and suicidal behavior. The company denies

the

 

accusation, which the journal forwarded to the F.D.A.

 

 

If the malpractice legislation so relentlessly touted by President Bush

 

became law, Pfizer, Merck and Eli Lilly would be immunized against even

 

the possibility of punitive damages arising from any harm to patients

that

 

resulted from use of these drugs - as long as the companies followed

 

F.D.A. rules. All three drugs were approved by the F.D.A.

 

 

The whole idea behind punitive damages is to severely punish the most

 

egregious offenders. Huge punitive damage awards are supposed to serve

as

 

a deterrent to extremely bad behavior.

 

 

"It's an important system to have in place," said Joanne Doroshow,

 

executive director of the Center for Justice and Democracy, a nonprofit

 

consumer advocacy group. "The F.D.A. is certainly not doing its job.

The

 

legal system is a very important backup. It's really the last line of

 

defense to ensure that the marketplace only has safe products."

 

 

If Mr. Bush has his way, that line of defense will be substantially

 

weakened. With the possibility of punitive damages eliminated, drug

 

companies will be even less vigilant than they are now about problems

with

 

products that pose a serious - even fatal - threat to patients.

 

 

The Democratic leader in the Senate, Harry Reid of Nevada, was blunt on

 

the matter. He said, "Congress should not be giving a free pass to big

 

drug companies at a time when millions of Americans may have had their

 

health put at risk by pharmaceutical giants."

 

 

The drug companies have an incredible racket going, as Marcia Angell,

the

 

former editor in chief of The New England Journal of Medicine,

documents

 

in her book "The Truth About the Drug Companies."

 

 

"Now primarily a marketing machine to sell drugs of dubious benefit,"

she

 

wrote, "this industry uses its wealth and power to co-opt every

 

institution that might stand in its way, including the U.S. Congress,

the

 

Food and Drug Administration, academic medical centers, and the medical

 

profession itself. (Most of its marketing efforts are focused on

 

influencing doctors, since they must write the prescriptions.)"

 

 

Among those co-opted is the president himself. Nothing's too good for

the

 

drug companies. If ordinary Americans got the same sweet treatment from

 

this administration as the great pharmaceutical houses, we'd all be in

a

 

much better place.

 

 

FDA is "Virtually Incapable of Protecting You From Unsafe Drugs"

 

 

Most people are familiar with the scrupulous claims against the FDA's

 

inability to protect Americans from unsafe drugs. It has been an issue

 

flooding the headlines of newspapers and the nightly news for the past

few

 

months.

 

 

Accusations against the FDA started when Merck was pulled Vioxx from

the

 

market in 2004. Apparently the FDA had been aware of the drug's adverse

 

side effects as early as 1999. Since Vioxx's removal, other drugs have

 

been placed under the microscope and the agency's credibility has been

 

questioned. One FDA drug safety reviewer, Dr. David Graham, told a

 

Congressional panel that federal drug regulators were "virtually

incapable

 

of protecting America."

 

 

Previously "Approved" Drugs in Question

 

 

a.. Crestor (cholesterol-lowering drug): Causes acute kidney failure

 

b.. Bextra (painkiller): Increases risk of heart attack in those

 

undergoing cardiac surgery and may also cause a fatal skin reaction

c..

 

Meridia (weight-loss pill): Causes substantial increases in blood

 

pressure and has been associated with 124 reports of serious

 

cardiovascular problems d.. Serevent (asthma medication): Increases

 

risk of asthma-related deaths and life-threatening episodes e..

 

Accutane (acne drug): Causes birth defects

 

The director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research

opposed

 

Graham's accusations; arguing Graham's findings and numbers "constitute

 

junk science" and were nonetheless "irresponsible." The director

continued

 

on by stating that all of the agency's decisions and drugs are not only

 

safe but also effective.

 

 

New York Times - November 19, 2004

 

 

*********************

 

 

Important Announcements

 

 

 

OPC Plus

 

An Exceptional Antioxidant Boost

 

 

We are pleased to announce a product improvement…

 

 

HQI OPC PLUS Now Features Grape Seed Extract Standardized to 95%

 

Polyphenols - The Highest Guaranteed Amount Available!

 

 

Also Includes:

 

 

 

 

a.. Milk Thistle - Antioxidant that assists in protecting the liver.

 

a.. Bilberry - Antioxidant that assists in protecting the eyes. a..

 

CoQ10 - Antioxidant that assists in protecting the heart.

 

Oligomeric proanthocyanidins (OPC's) featured in HQI OPC Plus are some

of

 

the strongest antioxidants known today. These bioflavonoid complexes

are

 

50 times stronger than vitamin E and 20 times stronger than vitamin C.

 

 

Questions: HQI Distributor Services – 847-836-3010 – Mon thru Fri 9-5

cst

 

 

***********

 

 

Did You Know?

 

 

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) cause an estimated 7600

 

deaths and 76,000 hospitalizations in the U.S. each year.

 

 

Alternative Medicine, March 2003

 

 

 

 

See our new health facts: http://www.hqintl.net/didyouknow.cfm

 

Submit your health facts to info

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...