Guest guest Posted January 15, 2003 Report Share Posted January 15, 2003 Dear group members, when we look at a sub of cusp for event signification, usually we see all the 4 steps. what are your experiences by only studying 2 levels instead of 4 levels ? example - we look at 4th sub for admission to any educational institute. it should be significator of 11th house. here we see at all the 4 levels. i.e. suppose if 4th sub is moon. moon - its star lord- venus- its sub - mercury- sub's star lord - rahu. i think we should see only the top two levels. i.e. the planet itself and its starlord level. we should not take into account the last two levels as these belong to the sub and the sub only has the authority of saying yes or no for the event to take place. kindly post your views on this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 18, 2003 Report Share Posted January 18, 2003 Dr.Rahul, You are right - Even I use top 2 levels for every aspect of prediction and sub for yes/no. Sometimes (probably more often) I try to get as many significators as possible and then check the strength. Regards, Nagesh l , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > > Dear Dr. Rahul, > It is nice to hear u after a gap. Hope that you are fine. > I want to know that how to judge the yes/no from the sub lavel if we do not take it's star. In the example you have given, if we do not take the star of mercury that is rahu , how we can arrive on the behaviour of mercury? > What i do is that i take the star of the sub that is , in the given case., i will take the star of mercury that is rahu to decide the nature . > > Please enlight with your views on it. > with regards. > anurodh. > " Rahul <dr_rahul_99> " <dr_rahul_99> wrote:Dear group members, > when we look at a sub of cusp for event signification, usually we see > all the 4 steps. what are your experiences by only studying 2 levels > instead of 4 levels ? > example - we look at 4th sub for admission to any educational > institute. it should be significator of 11th house. here we see at > all the 4 levels. i.e. > suppose if 4th sub is moon. > moon - > its star lord- venus- > its sub - mercury- > sub's star lord - rahu. > i think we should see only the top two levels. i.e. the planet itself > and its starlord level. we should not take into account the last two > levels as these belong to the sub and the sub only has the authority > of saying yes or no for the event to take place. > kindly post your views on this. > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2003 Report Share Posted January 19, 2003 hi, if we consider all the four levels for event signification, the results are misleading and wrong. so the sub of cusp should be considered for only first two levels. the last two levels should only be considered for yes/no result. dr.rahul. l , " Vizkid <nd44130> " <nd44130> wrote: > Dr.Rahul, > You are right - Even I use top 2 levels for every aspect of > prediction and sub for yes/no. Sometimes (probably more often) I try > to get as many significators as possible and then check the strength. > > Regards, > Nagesh > > l , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > > > > Dear Dr. Rahul, > > It is nice to hear u after a gap. Hope that you are fine. > > I want to know that how to judge the yes/no from the sub lavel if we > do not take it's star. In the example you have given, if we do not > take the star of mercury that is rahu , how we can arrive on the > behaviour of mercury? > > What i do is that i take the star of the sub that is , in the given > case., i will take the star of mercury that is rahu to decide the nature . > > > > Please enlight with your views on it. > > with regards. > > anurodh. > > " Rahul <dr_rahul_99> " <dr_rahul_99> wrote:Dear group members, > > when we look at a sub of cusp for event signification, usually we see > > all the 4 steps. what are your experiences by only studying 2 levels > > instead of 4 levels ? > > example - we look at 4th sub for admission to any educational > > institute. it should be significator of 11th house. here we see at > > all the 4 levels. i.e. > > suppose if 4th sub is moon. > > moon - > > its star lord- venus- > > its sub - mercury- > > sub's star lord - rahu. > > i think we should see only the top two levels. i.e. the planet itself > > and its starlord level. we should not take into account the last two > > levels as these belong to the sub and the sub only has the authority > > of saying yes or no for the event to take place. > > kindly post your views on this. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.