[l] To Kanakji regarding election query

[Guest guest]

Dear Rajiv ji,

thanks for kind word.

After sunil ji's mail i have past some more mail in this group, and you will

read my mail regularly in this group.

regards

kanak Bosmia

 

Rajeev K Khattar <lalkitab wrote:

Dear Kanak Bhai,

I am thankful to sunil ji for requesting you not to leave the forum.

I also request you the same.

Indeed i have learnt TSP system from you and your mails only.I am

still learning it.

Many students like me need you.

Hope to get a favourable reply from you very soon.

with folded hands _/\_

Rajeev K Khattar

 

l , sunil gondhalekar <sunilalaka

wrote:

>

> dear kanakji,

> you told right that group is great and not individuals,so i

request you to not to quit

> from forum.

> KSK s direction is for research and that you are maintening by

doing TSP theory,

> nothing wrong,but i have shown the drawbacks of the theory.you

have also mentioning

> the fact openly.which is a good sign.i have seen some so called

reaserchers hiding

> the facts and dont reply to the queries asked by the students

> pl.note that no one is hurt from your mail,be remain with us

> thanks

> -sunil gondhalekar

>

> Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia wrote:

> Dear Rahul ji and Sunil ji,

> as sunil ji mention this theory only usefull when we wnat answer

YES or NO.and he give proper answer so i do not have to add any more.

> there are many question which do not need answer WHEN. in my

prctice i found this theory work much, in past in other group we all

member use many theory to pridict cricket match and ALL THEORY

failed, so i try with this theory and found very usefull if we need

answer only yes or no.

> about contradictorey with KSK ji,many theory we found that not

discuss by KSK ji like Gulbarga theory, and many more,but KSK ji

advice us to continue research work and if some one do work which is

usefull and come correct in precticale use there is no hearm to use

it. but what heppan now a day , people want to show his theory work

when KP not work, this is not good in my personal thinking, he has

to present his work without blame that KP not work, may be many are

not agree with me, but this is the point we have to think on it. to

find out hall in KP is not good tendency bcoze we are start our

journy from KP, and if we blame KP to prove our self it not good any

how.

> it is fact that i am not ready to accept anything if it was

present as KP not work then my theory work.

> I am very sorry if any one heart by my writing and i am ready to

stop writeing in this group too.allways group is great not

individual.

> with best regards

> Kanak Bosmia

>

> sunil gondhalekar <sunilalaka wrote:

> Dear dr.rahul,

> you have asked query to kanakaji,he will reply you,but i want to

post

> my opinion.

> horary have got most drawback that other than cusp sublord of 1-4-

7-10 may vary

> depends on the use of tables and ayanamsha and lattitude used.

> dr.kar is using sub-sub in his therory.so cuspal sub-sublord are

not at all definate

> in query other than 1-4-7-10 houses.this fact must be known to

dr.kar.

> so he looks at asc.cuspal lord and moon's subsub which never vary.

> to use this aspect is contradictory to the theory of KSK thats why

i have studied

> this theory and will not study it.TSP theory is giving only yes/no

answer,no future events

> that is also second reason for not going to this theory

> sorry to write my opposite opinions about theory

> -sunil gondhalekar

>

> Rahul <meetdoctorrahul wrote:

> Dear Kanakji,

> the 6th sublord is seen in KP for election query analysis.

> what is the principle in looking for the ascendants sublord ?

> please clarify as i am new to Dr. Kars theory.

>

> thanks,

> dr.rahul.

>

>

> Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative

vehicles.

> Visit the Auto Green Center.

>

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Rajiv ji,

Sorry that is not possible ,

regards

Kanak Bosmia

 

Rajeev K Khattar <lalkitab wrote:

Dear Kanak Ji,

Thanks for your decision to write in this forum.You can also

consider to write in other forum also.

Regards

Rajeev K Khattar

 

l , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Rajiv ji,

> thanks for kind word.

> After sunil ji's mail i have past some more mail in this group,

and you will read my mail regularly in this group.

> regards

> kanak Bosmia

>

> Rajeev K Khattar <lalkitab wrote:

> Dear Kanak Bhai,

> I am thankful to sunil ji for requesting you not to leave the

forum.

> I also request you the same.

> Indeed i have learnt TSP system from you and your mails only.I am

> still learning it.

> Many students like me need you.

> Hope to get a favourable reply from you very soon.

> with folded hands _/\_

> Rajeev K Khattar

>

> l , sunil gondhalekar <sunilalaka@>

> wrote:

> >

> > dear kanakji,

> > you told right that group is great and not individuals,so i

> request you to not to quit

> > from forum.

> > KSK s direction is for research and that you are maintening by

> doing TSP theory,

> > nothing wrong,but i have shown the drawbacks of the theory.you

> have also mentioning

> > the fact openly.which is a good sign.i have seen some so called

> reaserchers hiding

> > the facts and dont reply to the queries asked by the students

> > pl.note that no one is hurt from your mail,be remain with us

> > thanks

> > -sunil gondhalekar

> >

> > Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@> wrote:

> > Dear Rahul ji and Sunil ji,

> > as sunil ji mention this theory only usefull when we wnat answer

> YES or NO.and he give proper answer so i do not have to add any

more.

> > there are many question which do not need answer WHEN. in my

> prctice i found this theory work much, in past in other group we

all

> member use many theory to pridict cricket match and ALL THEORY

> failed, so i try with this theory and found very usefull if we

need

> answer only yes or no.

> > about contradictorey with KSK ji,many theory we found that not

> discuss by KSK ji like Gulbarga theory, and many more,but KSK ji

> advice us to continue research work and if some one do work which

is

> usefull and come correct in precticale use there is no hearm to

use

> it. but what heppan now a day , people want to show his theory

work

> when KP not work, this is not good in my personal thinking, he has

> to present his work without blame that KP not work, may be many

are

> not agree with me, but this is the point we have to think on it.

to

> find out hall in KP is not good tendency bcoze we are start our

> journy from KP, and if we blame KP to prove our self it not good

any

> how.

> > it is fact that i am not ready to accept anything if it was

> present as KP not work then my theory work.

> > I am very sorry if any one heart by my writing and i am ready to

> stop writeing in this group too.allways group is great not

> individual.

> > with best regards

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> > sunil gondhalekar <sunilalaka@> wrote:

> > Dear dr.rahul,

> > you have asked query to kanakaji,he will reply you,but i want to

> post

> > my opinion.

> > horary have got most drawback that other than cusp sublord of 1-

4-

> 7-10 may vary

> > depends on the use of tables and ayanamsha and lattitude used.

> > dr.kar is using sub-sub in his therory.so cuspal sub-sublord are

> not at all definate

> > in query other than 1-4-7-10 houses.this fact must be known to

> dr.kar.

> > so he looks at asc.cuspal lord and moon's subsub which never

vary.

> > to use this aspect is contradictory to the theory of KSK thats

why

> i have studied

> > this theory and will not study it.TSP theory is giving only

yes/no

> answer,no future events

> > that is also second reason for not going to this theory

> > sorry to write my opposite opinions about theory

> > -sunil gondhalekar

> >

> > Rahul <meetdoctorrahul@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanakji,

> > the 6th sublord is seen in KP for election query analysis.

> > what is the principle in looking for the ascendants sublord ?

> > please clarify as i am new to Dr. Kars theory.

> >

> > thanks,

> > dr.rahul.

> >

> >

> > Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative

> vehicles.

> > Visit the Auto Green Center.

> >

> >