Kind Attn : Mr Kanak TSP kindly comment

[Guest guest]

Dear Kanak Ji,

May I request you to kindly comment on the following analysis :

 

No.123 , 28-6-2007 , Delhi

Question : will my phone ring within next ten minutes ?

 

Asc sub sub is Jup

Jup in subsub of sat

 

Asc sub sub is Jup

Jup in star of Mer

 

Asc sub sub is Jup

Jup in subsub of sat

Sat in star of Mer

 

 

Moon in star of sat

Moon sub sub is venus ( new KP ayanamsha )

Asc sub sub is Jup

Asc star is Mars

 

 

Since the planets in data table and tally table are not matching so

fone will not ring.

BUT moon in star of saturn so result should be opposite.hence fone

should ring.

 

RRESULT : fone did not ring.

 

Is it due to Retro Mercury ? or Moon in star of sat is not

applicable here or something wrong in my analysis ?

 

Kindly reply

Rajeev K Khattar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

l , " Rajeev K Khattar " <lalkitab

wrote:

>

> Dear Kanak Ji,

> YES , you are right ...I was using KP Old ayanamsha ...on changing

> to new ayanamsha, moon sub sub is venus.

>

> kindly let me know Rahu should be taken as Mean or True value ?

> Regards

> Rajeev K Khattar

>

>

> l , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Rajeev ji,

> > If you wnat to use sub sub theoiry you have to use proper

> software and specialy KP new Aynamsha, other wise you do not get

> proper result.

> > I found Moon's sub sub lord VEN( You have mention SUN).

> > in this case there is no rol of Ven or Sun so it was not

iffect

> on your pridiction but otherwise it will turn you pridiction wrong.

> > all your analysis is OK and as you pridict Deal will not

> Materialise.

> > regards

> > Kanak Bosmia

> >

> > Rajeev K Khattar <lalkitab@> wrote:

> > Dear Kanak Bhai,

> > Kindly comment on the following analysis.

> >

> > 28-6-2007 , Delhi , Horary Number 249

> >

> > Question : Will my deal with Mr.Nitin materialise in july 2007 ?

> >

> > Analysis

> >

> > DATA TABLE

> > 1.Subsub lord of Asc subsub lord ( Sat ) = Sat

> > 2.Star lord of Asc sub sub lord ( sat ) = Mer

> > 3.Star lord of Subsub lord of Asc subsub lord ( Sat )= Mer

> >

> > TALLY TABLE

> > Moon star = sat

> > moon sub sub = sun

> > asc star = mer

> > asc sub sub = sat

> >

> > since all the three parameters from DATA TABLE tallies with

TALLY

> > TABLE, so the answer should be positive.

> >

> > BUT moon being in the star of sat,prediction should be wrong

hence

> > final answer is : DEAL WILL NOT MATERIALISE

> >

> > kindly comment

> > Regards

> > Rajeev K Khattar

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > " A person should not be too honest.

> > Straight trees are cut first

> > And Honest people are screwed first. "

> > Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350

BC

> 75 BC)

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Sick sense of humor? Visit TV's Comedy with an Edge to

see

> what's on, when.

> >

> >

[Guest guest]

horary number is 123

Rajeev K Khattar

 

l , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia

wrote:

>

> Dear Rajiv ji,

> what is the horary number?

> regards

> Kanak Bosmia

>

> Rajeev K Khattar <lalkitab wrote:

> Dear Kanak Ji,

> May I request you to kindly comment on the following analysis :

>

> No.123 , 28-6-2007 , Delhi

> Question : will my phone ring within next ten minutes ?

>

> Asc sub sub is Jup

> Jup in subsub of sat

>

> Asc sub sub is Jup

> Jup in star of Mer

>

> Asc sub sub is Jup

> Jup in subsub of sat

> Sat in star of Mer

>

> Moon in star of sat

> Moon sub sub is venus ( new KP ayanamsha )

> Asc sub sub is Jup

> Asc star is Mars

>

> Since the planets in data table and tally table are not matching

so

> fone will not ring.

> BUT moon in star of saturn so result should be opposite.hence fone

> should ring.

>

> RRESULT : fone did not ring.

>

> Is it due to Retro Mercury ? or Moon in star of sat is not

> applicable here or something wrong in my analysis ?

>

> Kindly reply

> Rajeev K Khattar

>

> l , " Rajeev K Khattar " <lalkitab@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Kanak Ji,

> > YES , you are right ...I was using KP Old ayanamsha ...on

changing

> > to new ayanamsha, moon sub sub is venus.

> >

> > kindly let me know Rahu should be taken as Mean or True value ?

> > Regards

> > Rajeev K Khattar

> >

> >

> > l , Kanak Bosmia <kanakbosmia@>

> > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Rajeev ji,

> > > If you wnat to use sub sub theoiry you have to use proper

> > software and specialy KP new Aynamsha, other wise you do not get

> > proper result.

> > > I found Moon's sub sub lord VEN( You have mention SUN).

> > > in this case there is no rol of Ven or Sun so it was not

> iffect

> > on your pridiction but otherwise it will turn you pridiction

wrong.

> > > all your analysis is OK and as you pridict Deal will not

> > Materialise.

> > > regards

> > > Kanak Bosmia

> > >

> > > Rajeev K Khattar <lalkitab@> wrote:

> > > Dear Kanak Bhai,

> > > Kindly comment on the following analysis.

> > >

> > > 28-6-2007 , Delhi , Horary Number 249

> > >

> > > Question : Will my deal with Mr.Nitin materialise in july

2007 ?

> > >

> > > Analysis

> > >

> > > DATA TABLE

> > > 1.Subsub lord of Asc subsub lord ( Sat ) = Sat

> > > 2.Star lord of Asc sub sub lord ( sat ) = Mer

> > > 3.Star lord of Subsub lord of Asc subsub lord ( Sat )= Mer

> > >

> > > TALLY TABLE

> > > Moon star = sat

> > > moon sub sub = sun

> > > asc star = mer

> > > asc sub sub = sat

> > >

> > > since all the three parameters from DATA TABLE tallies with

> TALLY

> > > TABLE, so the answer should be positive.

> > >

> > > BUT moon being in the star of sat,prediction should be wrong

> hence

> > > final answer is : DEAL WILL NOT MATERIALISE

> > >

> > > kindly comment

> > > Regards

> > > Rajeev K Khattar

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > " A person should not be too honest.

> > > Straight trees are cut first

> > > And Honest people are screwed first. "

> > > Chanakya quotes (Indian politician, strategist and writer, 350

> BC

> > 75 BC)

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Sick sense of humor? Visit TV's Comedy with an Edge to

> see

> > what's on, when.

> > >

> > >