Guest guest Posted March 11, 2009 Report Share Posted March 11, 2009 hare rama krishna dear members nad gurus I am using jaganatha hora program but I confuse about sudasa calculation Narasimha Rao mentioned about SL must starting always from SL sign but when I calculating my chart by jaganatha hora it begins from opposite of SL sign. do I change some menus? or not would it be possible to enlighten me did I undertsand this Sudasa wrong? best regards.. rozi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2009 Report Share Posted March 12, 2009 Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya. Om Namo Narayanaya Namaha. JHora 7.32 is the most comprehensive program ever written for Vedic Astrology that I have had the opportunity to use. But I believe there may still be some bugs. One of them appears to be in Sudasa calculations. According to PVR's book Vedic Astrology an Integrated Approach, he states that: Sudasa starts from the rasi having SL in it. Sudasa progresses from that SL rasi in quadrants first, followed by panaparas and apoklimas. The direction of progression depends on whether the rasi containing SL is odd or even. If the rasi containing SL is odd (say Leo), then the progression will be Leo, Scorpio, Aquarius, Taurus, Virgo, Saggitarius, Pisces, Gemini, Libra, Capricorn, Aries, Cancer. If the rasi containing SL is even (say Cancer), then the progression will be reverse (i.e. Cancer, Aries, Capricorn, Libra, Gemini, Pisces, Saggitarius, Virgo, Taurus, Aquarius, Scorpio, Leo). If Saturn is present with SL, then the progression is regular If Ketu is in SL then the order of progression is reversed (e.g. if Ketu is in Cancer with SL (but without Saturn), then progression will be Cancer, Libra, Capricorn, etc.) Dasa time periods are calculated just like Narayana Dasa time periods. There is a time period adjustment for the first dasa. (30 - SL)/30 times the period of the first dasa is the balance of the first dasa at birth. Sudasa is identical to Lagna Kendradi Dasa (LKD) with the exception that SL rasi has to be the starting sign. Another way to compute Sudasa in JHora 7.32 is to run the LKD on Jhora by forcing the start of dasa from the SL rasi by changing the default start of dasa rasi to the rasi having SL. (Normally, if you don't force select option, LKD will select the stronger of Lagna or 7th to start, but Sudasa necessarily starts from SL). then manually find out how many years the balance of dasa should be for the starting dasa by using the ((30-SL)/30) X (first dasa time period). Manually adjust all subsequent dasa periods to be consistent with the balance of dasa computed above. For example, if first dasa is 9 years and the fraction for balance of dasa is 0.4, the the first dasa is only 3.6 years for Sudasa (not 9 years as shown in the LKD calculations by the program). So all subsequent dasas will start (9-3.6) years = 5.4 years earlier than what is listed for LKD. So if the LKD calculations shows a subsequent dasa as starting in 1-1-1980, the Sudasa for that rasi will actually start in 5.4 years earlier than 1-1-1980. I noticed that JHora 7.32 does not progress in the reverse for SL in Cancer for example (without Ketu and Saturn in it). It starts as Cn, Ar, Cp, Li, then instead of going Ge, Pi, Sg, Vi - it goes Le, Sc, Aq, Ta - which is not what PVR's book says. The preceding is my understanding. Others, please feel free to correct me. Somnath Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya. Om Namo Narayanaya Namaha. On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:20 AM, rozi <astrologya wrote: hare rama krishna dear members nad gurus I am using jaganatha hora programbut I confuse about sudasa calculationNarasimha Rao mentioned about SL must starting always from SL signbut when I calculating my chart by jaganatha hora it begins from opposite of SL sign. do I change some menus? or not would it be possible to enlighten me did I undertsand this Sudasa wrong?best regards..rozi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 12, 2009 Report Share Posted March 12, 2009 Dear Somnath, Calculations and application of Sudasa is part of second year in course jaimini scholar,at the moment few people, in tradition has knowledge of it. If you have interest in SJC teachings. For people in India Delhi chapter is conducting jaimini scholar program and perhaps one interested may be benefited if they join it. Currently some dasa calculations in J hora are different than taught. Hope this information helps. On Behalf Of Sam Sivaskandan 12 March 2009 06:12 Re: [Om Krishna Guru] sudasa calc. Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya. Om Namo Narayanaya Namaha. JHora 7.32 is the most comprehensive program ever written for Vedic Astrology that I have had the opportunity to use. But I believe there may still be some bugs. One of them appears to be in Sudasa calculations. According to PVR's book Vedic Astrology an Integrated Approach, he states that: Sudasa starts from the rasi having SL in it. Sudasa progresses from that SL rasi in quadrants first, followed by panaparas and apoklimas. The direction of progression depends on whether the rasi containing SL is odd or even. If the rasi containing SL is odd (say Leo), then the progression will be Leo, Scorpio, Aquarius, Taurus, Virgo, Saggitarius, Pisces, Gemini, Libra, Capricorn, Aries, Cancer. If the rasi containing SL is even (say Cancer), then the progression will be reverse (i.e. Cancer, Aries, Capricorn, Libra, Gemini, Pisces, Saggitarius, Virgo, Taurus, Aquarius, Scorpio, Leo). If Saturn is present with SL, then the progression is regular If Ketu is in SL then the order of progression is reversed (e.g. if Ketu is in Cancer with SL (but without Saturn), then progression will be Cancer, Libra, Capricorn, etc.) Dasa time periods are calculated just like Narayana Dasa time periods. There is a time period adjustment for the first dasa. (30 - SL)/30 times the period of the first dasa is the balance of the first dasa at birth. Sudasa is identical to Lagna Kendradi Dasa (LKD) with the exception that SL rasi has to be the starting sign. Another way to compute Sudasa in JHora 7.32 is to run the LKD on Jhora by forcing the start of dasa from the SL rasi by changing the default start of dasa rasi to the rasi having SL. (Normally, if you don't force select option, LKD will select the stronger of Lagna or 7th to start, but Sudasa necessarily starts from SL). then manually find out how many years the balance of dasa should be for the starting dasa by using the ((30-SL)/30) X (first dasa time period). Manually adjust all subsequent dasa periods to be consistent with the balance of dasa computed above. For example, if first dasa is 9 years and the fraction for balance of dasa is 0.4, the the first dasa is only 3.6 years for Sudasa (not 9 years as shown in the LKD calculations by the program). So all subsequent dasas will start (9-3.6) years = 5.4 years earlier than what is listed for LKD. So if the LKD calculations shows a subsequent dasa as starting in 1-1-1980, the Sudasa for that rasi will actually start in 5.4 years earlier than 1-1-1980. I noticed that JHora 7.32 does not progress in the reverse for SL in Cancer for example (without Ketu and Saturn in it). It starts as Cn, Ar, Cp, Li, then instead of going Ge, Pi, Sg, Vi - it goes Le, Sc, Aq, Ta - which is not what PVR's book says. The preceding is my understanding. Others, please feel free to correct me. Somnath Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya. Om Namo Narayanaya Namaha. On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:20 AM, rozi <astrologya wrote: hare rama krishna dear members nad gurus I am using jaganatha hora program but I confuse about sudasa calculation Narasimha Rao mentioned about SL must starting always from SL sign but when I calculating my chart by jaganatha hora it begins from opposite of SL sign. do I change some menus? or not would it be possible to enlighten me did I undertsand this Sudasa wrong? best regards.. rozi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 Om Namah Sivaya Dear Rozi, Namaste, Probably the opposite sign to SL that is is the 7th house of SL is stronger than the sign in SL. Since it was programmed that dasa to start from the stronger of Lagna or its 7th house, sometime we get this problem which you can override with changing the settings of the dasa calculations using Options button on the Rasi dasas page. By the way, SL must be called as Tara Lagna, not Sri Lagna. But, SJC calls it Sri Lagna. Jaimini commentaries, for example, Phalaratnamala mentions Sri Lagna differently. And it is connected to Venus and Moon sign lord and hence that Shri Lagna is important for prosperity. Try your luck with this special dasa that SJC created. Regards, Shanmukha. sohamsa , " rozi " <astrologya wrote: > > hare rama krishna dear members and gurus > > I am using jaganatha hora program > > but I confuse about sudasa calculation > > > Narasimha Rao mentioned about SL must starting always from SL sign > > but when I calculating my chart by jaganatha hora it begins from opposite of SL sign. > > do I change some menus? or not > > would it be possible to enlighten me did I undertsand this Sudasa wrong? > > > best regards.. > > rozi > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 13, 2009 Report Share Posted March 13, 2009 हरे राम कृष्ण Dear Shamukha, Namaskar. To clarify, the term 'Tara Lagna' is not the name that Jaimini gives to this special point. Some have derived it from the calculation: 'tara-arka-amshe...'. The tradition which began SJC calls it Shri Lagna because of the following: The nakshatra of the Moon indicates the mind and its sense of happiness. This is the true meaning of Shrii. The 1/12th division of the nakshatra shows how this is manifesting as all wealth and fortune manifests through the Rasi. The addition of the derived longitude in the previous step with that of the Lagna's longitude shows how the individual is experiencing this manifestation. Otherwise how can we say its our Shri Lagna unless lagna is involved. Somebody can call it something else, but Jaimini never called it Tara Lagna, so that name is a creation from some who didn't learn it from this tradition, or maybe even just derived it. Further, the calculation that PVR Narasimha Rao has used in the software and in his previous writings (he also published a lesson in the Varahamihira list reg. this) is different from the Dasa that we are taught in the Maharishi Jaimini Upadesa Sutra course taught by Pt. Sanjay Rath. The Su-Dasa that Jagannath Hora has is not the Su-Dasa taught in the tradition but has its use. Hence, again the Su-Dasa given in Jagannath Hora is not the creation of the tradition which began SJC. I hope this clarifies the given points. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti Shanmukha skrev: Om Namah Sivaya Dear Rozi, Namaste, Probably the opposite sign to SL that is is the 7th house of SL is stronger than the sign in SL. Since it was programmed that dasa to start from the stronger of Lagna or its 7th house, sometime we get this problem which you can override with changing the settings of the dasa calculations using Options button on the Rasi dasas page. By the way, SL must be called as Tara Lagna, not Sri Lagna. But, SJC calls it Sri Lagna. Jaimini commentaries, for example, Phalaratnamala mentions Sri Lagna differently. And it is connected to Venus and Moon sign lord and hence that Shri Lagna is important for prosperity. Try your luck with this special dasa that SJC created. Regards, Shanmukha. sohamsa , "rozi" <astrologya wrote: > > hare rama krishna dear members and gurus > > I am using jaganatha hora program > > but I confuse about sudasa calculation > > > Narasimha Rao mentioned about SL must starting always from SL sign > > but when I calculating my chart by jaganatha hora it begins from opposite of SL sign. > > do I change some menus? or not > > would it be possible to enlighten me did I undertsand this Sudasa wrong? > > > best regards.. > > rozi > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 हरे राम कृष्ण Dear Shanmukha, Namaskar. Thank you for sharing your inputs, I appreciate them. I understand that Sanjayji wishes to use this forum for sharing and discussing the knowledge that he was taught by his Guruji Pt. Kashinath Rath and thus also the Gurus which preceded him. Your questions are therefore completely welcome. At the outset let me clarify that these mails are for discussion and not with the intention to convince you or change your mind, but intend to clarify what has been taught in the tradition to the best of my knowledge. I hope for a scholarly approach to a spiritual subject. Its important to note that within SJC are Gurus who have learnt from different teachers previously with many very different approaches which cannot be said to represent the knowledge that Sanjayji has, and which they themselves have admitted. Therefore know that SJC in its present form may not represent the Parampara of Sri Achyutananda Dasa which Sanjayji hails from. I will do my best to relay what Sanjayji has taught me in this regard. Here are my replies to the points you have raised: You wrote: If Jaimini never called it Tara Lagna, kindly let me know what he called this special point. Kindly let me know the reference sutra in Jaimini Sutras that calls this as Shri Lagna. Visti: I hope the following will be displayed properly for you in Unicode: Adhyaya 2, Pada 4, Sloka 27: तारार्कांशे मन्दाद्यो दशेशः॥ tārārkāṁśe mandādyo daśeśaḥ|| The above is the actual calculation of the point, i.e. tara: nakshatra; arka: the sun or twelve sunsigns; amsha: division, i.e. the division by twelve; manda: Saturn, numerologicaly indicating 1 or Lagna; adya: increase, addition, adding, hence adding the previously mentioned division to Manda, which here is more likely to indicate Lagna and not Saturn; dasha; means servant or ten. Most likely an error is here and should read daasha, i.e. period or a dasha; isha: lord, hence daashesha indicates the lord of the Dasha. Another derivation can indicate that we must see the lord of this point, which also finds reference in the slokas which follow this one. So Jaimini defined a point for a daasha system, but has nowhere given the name for the specific point. Parashara has also referred to this point and this dasha system on page 102 & 103 of Vol 2 of GC Sharma's translation edition of BPHS. Its the Dasha-adhyaya sloka 188. Parashara calls the dasa Lagnadi-Rasi Dasa. So, based on these two references some call this dasa: lagnadi dasa, rasi dasa, some call it Su-Dasa also, but read another of my points below regarding this. The reason why the specific point is called Shri Lagna in this tradition I will also indicate in answer to another point below, but one reason the term has been used in this tradition is because of the understanding of the use of this special point which Maharishi Jaimini also gives: तस्मिन्नुच्चे नीचे वा श्रीमन्तः॥ tasminnucce nīce vā śrīmantaḥ|| This sloka is given just after the previous one and can refer to the lord of the specific point because of the word 'isha' in the end of the previous sloka. A clear reference to one becoming a Shrimantah, i.e. one endowed with Shri is indicated, hence this tradition treats this Lagna to understand ones level of Shri in ones life. More below. You wrote: I am compelled to understand from writings of SJC Gurus like you is that only the students following SJC only can write on this list. And also, it becomes apparent that you guys believe that your tradition of SJC is only the authenticated one to comment/interpret on Jaimini. And whatever the name you give for anything is the word of the mouth of Jaimini. Thanks for your scholarly approach. Visti: I have clarified the initial point in your sentence earlier. I cannot speak on behalf of others w.r.t. beliefs. Our tradition traces back to Shrii Achyutananda Dasa whom was responsible for ensuring the continuity of the Jyotish traditions in Kalinga in the 1400's. We have been taught that Maharishi Jaimini is much much older than that, and if there is any connection between them then it is surely due to the existence of the Guru-Sishya Paramparas since that time, and they have surely been responsible for all the other Paramparas existing all over India. When taught the sutras we are taught opinions on the slokas from different Paramparas also, and based on this also the opinion of the Parampara in this regard. Specifically input has been borrowed from the Bengal school as well. I do have a point which I am sure you agree with: right now my Guruji is speaking the loudest on the Maharishi Jaimini Upadesa Sutras. But this is not a big achievement to compare with as very few are speaking on these sutras and even fewer Guru's are available in India to relay these sutras to others. So far I only know of one other Guru who has such qualifications. You wrote: At least they followed the sutra and followed their tradition as SJC follow its own tradition. The good thing about the *Some* is they followed the Jaimini Sutra, not coined a new term at their will. Visti: Oh, we are just following what has been taught earlier... Sanjayji didn't make up this term. I am not really concerned about the term we choose as long as we know what we are talking about. You wrote: So pity. Kindly let me know the version of Su-Dasa you were taught before this new Jaimini Upadesha Program began. Is it not the one that JHora gives? Then, for the last so many years Narasimha Rao has been teaching a Su-Dasa which was not endorsed by SJC and you all guys were silent on this until a new Jaimini Upadesa course crops up. And this new secret Su-Dasa which is accessible to the participants of that program is the new Su-Dasa that your time old tradition now supports. Visti: What secret? If you read Sanjayji's translation of the the Jaimini Sutras you will see that Jagannath Hora is doing something completely different. The calculation is published in Sanjayjis translation and given very clearly also in BPHS have been available for more than 10 years now. So who is to blame? Us who didn't read the books and just used whatever was given to us (earlier versions of JHora had an option to calculate Su-Dasa based on Sanjayjis and Sharma's translation), or those who wrote but didn't point fingers? Again my exclamations here are only to show the futility of the situation one is put in when faced with such questions. You wrote: And SJC supports Jagannatha Hora and distributes it. So scholarly approach. Visti: I must raise a complaint towards this idea, despite people who held this idea being well justified in having the same: When did SJC get the opportunity to support? The software was made, updated and changed by PVR Narasimha Rao alone. He did a monumental job, but other than acknowledging who his Guru is in the software, SJC has not directly had any hands in the software for some time now. It has been distributed earlier because it was free and versatile, but we cannot say its an SJC production... its a PVR production at most. You wrote: I fear I don't understand this. Sri has much more than you mentioned. Sri is Goddess Lakshmi and She is prosperity. Excuse my previous brevity of words. Shrii is indeed the Goddess Lakshmi, but what I was trying to relay is the impact that she has on us personally as individuals and that this is found based on the calculations I mentioned and hence the reason we can understand if a person is endowed with her blessings (shrimantah) or otherwise due to the state of this Shri, Tara, etc. Lagna. You wrote: I wrote that how Shri Lagna should be calculated. It shall be calculated from the longitudes of Moon sign lord and Venus and the firth house. Now you can understand why that particular point is called Shri Lagna. Visti: Yes, I indeed can accept that as a means to analyse Shrii in our lives. Is this used specifically to predict marriage and the fruits thereof, i.e. children? You wrote: Please remember that I was referring to the commentary called "PHALRATNAMALA" by Krishna Mishra. He is the one who gave the parameters like Yogada, Kevala, and Somanatha Drekkana etc. that your esteemed tradition kindly recognizes. It is the documentary evidence about these Jaimini Parameters, which astonishingly never referred by any SJC Guru in their teachings. If you want to equate Krishna Mishra, the author of Phalaratnamala with any living commentator including your Guru or to any tradition including SJC, I am really sorry. Only GOD can save us. Krishna Mishra wrote Phalaratnamala by referring to the TWO THOUSAND texts available with him. He was the real Raja Jyotisha of supreme repute and was awarded millions of Gold coins for his work by erstwhile Vikramaditya. You never know how many paramparas he referred in his commentary. You know only one parampara which largely based on Kalpalatha and Phalaratnamala and unfortunately nobody here tried to read it. Of course, I am here referring to only Jaimini parameters and I don't know much of Parasara concepts in your parampara. Visti: Thank you for the reference. Does Pt. Krishna Mishra give a name for this Tara, Shri, etc. Lagna? If we are to nitpick on terms we might find many double-names, i.e. the Kalpadruma Yoga of BPHS, has three quite different variations as per Chandra Kala Nadi as do many other yogas. This doesn't mean the term is wrong, but the use and effect may be different. Thank you for a healthy discussion, and the opportunity to write about Shrii. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti Shanmukha skrev: Om Namah Sivaya Dear Visti, Namaste, Thank you very much for responding to my mail. I know I am not welcome on this list, yet I write the following. Kindly have a look at the following points. Visti: Somebody can call it something else, but Jaimini never called it Tara Lagna, so that name is a creation from some who didn't learn it from this tradition, or maybe even just derived it. If Jaimini never called it Tara Lagna, kindly let me know what he called this special point. Kindly let me know the reference sutra in Jaimini Sutras that calls this as Shri Lagna. I am compelled to understand from writings of SJC Gurus like you is that only the students following SJC only can write on this list. And also, it becomes apparent that you guys believe that your tradition of SJC is only the authenticated one to comment/interpret on Jaimini. And whatever the name you give for anything is the word of the mouth of Jaimini. Thanks for your scholarly approach. Visti: Some have derived it from the calculation: 'tara-arka-amshe...'. At least they followed the sutra and followed their tradition as SJC follow its own tradition. The good thing about the *Some* is they followed the Jaimini Sutra, not coined a new term at their will. Vishti: Further, the calculation that PVR Narasimha Rao has used in the software and in his previous writings (he also published a lesson in the Varahamihira list reg. this) is different from the Dasa that we are taught in the Maharishi Jaimini Upadesa Sutra course taught by Pt. Sanjay Rath. The Su-Dasa that Jagannath Hora has is not the Su-Dasa taught in the tradition but has its use. Hence, again the Su-Dasa given in Jagannath Hora is not the creation of the tradition which began SJC. So pity. Kindly let me know the version of Su-Dasa you were taught before this new Jaimini Upadesha Program began. Is it not the one that JHora gives? Then, for the last so many years Narasimha Rao has been teaching a Su-Dasa which was not endorsed by SJC and you all guys were silent on this until a new Jaimini Upadesa course crops up. And this new secret Su-Dasa which is accessible to the participants of that program is the new Su-Dasa that your time old tradition now supports. And SJC supports Jagannatha Hora and distributes it. So scholarly approach. Kindly refer me to the manuscript or the relevant verse that mentions SJC's new teaching of Su-Dasa. As you may know the Parampara of India is based on slokas. And the Indian tradition always documents in a sloka form even it be a family secret. Vishti: The nakshatra of the Moon indicates the mind and its sense of happiness. This is the true meaning of Shrii. I fear I don't understand this. Sri has much more than you mentioned. Sri is Goddess Lakshmi and She is prosperity. I wrote that how Shri Lagna should be calculated. It shall be calculated from the longitudes of Moon sign lord and Venus and the firth house. Now you can understand why that particular point is called Shri Lagna. Please remember that I was referring to the commentary called "PHALRATNAMALA" by Krishna Mishra. He is the one who gave the parameters like Yogada, Kevala, and Somanatha Drekkana etc. that your esteemed tradition kindly recognizes. It is the documentary evidence about these Jaimini Parameters, which astonishingly never referred by any SJC Guru in their teachings. If you want to equate Krishna Mishra, the author of Phalaratnamala with any living commentator including your Guru or to any tradition including SJC, I am really sorry. Only GOD can save us. Krishna Mishra wrote Phalaratnamala by referring to the TWO THOUSAND texts available with him. He was the real Raja Jyotisha of supreme repute and was awarded millions of Gold coins for his work by erstwhile Vikramaditya. You never know how many paramparas he referred in his commentary. You know only one parampara which largely based on Kalpalatha and Phalaratnamala and unfortunately nobody here tried to read it. Of course, I am here referring to only Jaimini parameters and I don't know much of Parasara concepts in your parampara. Please don't respond to this mail if you want to convince/ prove the authenticity of your tradition without referring any manuscript/slokas of your tradition. To the other persons who responded my mail: Sri Partha, you are a SJC Guru and don't downgrade your reputation by writing Jokes here. If you don't know who practically used Hora lagna or Ghati lagna, please keep quite. Don't show your ignorance here. I think you don't know that Jaimini scholars used 19 lagnas for their interpretation. How many of us know who first used the Vriddha Karika method of Longevity in the recent times? How many of us know which work given the 8th house reckoning and the reason behind the peculiar calculation of 8th house? There are a lot more and its not the time to put all here. Sri Souvik, I can write the mails like you wrote one per each day. I have great regard for those scholars you referred to. Nobody disputes the service they did here. Yet, it's a forum for Astrology. My business here is Astrology. Tell me how many times the dasa calculation was changed in these 10 years? If we don't have access to the teaching of a Guru, its our fate. Do you mean to say that the scholars contributed to Astrological magazines are doing selfishly or they did for the 20 or 100 bucks that Dr. Raman or the editors used to offer to the contributing authors. We are here to contribute selflessly and it's the service to GOD. It is the Rishi rina that we are indebted to do. If you want to praise, please include the creators of Internet to the list, which aided, us all to contribute to this science. And it is great time to do that, b'coz somebody reminded me that its been 20 years since Internet came in. I am vey sorry, if I hurt anyone here. Kindly forgive me if I cross limits of any kind. Warm regards, Shanmukha sohamsa , "rozi" <astrologya wrote: > > hare rama krishna > Dear Visti > > so as a result what I understand is that I can use Sudasa calc. in jaganath hora program by changing Dasa beginning to SL sign > > > right? > best regards > Rozi > > > > > sohamsa , Visti Larsen visti@ wrote: > > > > ??? ??? ????? > > Dear Shamukha, Namaskar. > > To clarify, the term 'Tara Lagna' is not the name that Jaimini gives to > > this special point. Some have derived it from the calculation: > > 'tara-arka-amshe...'. > > The _tradition_ which began SJC calls it Shri Lagna because of the > > following: > > > > * The nakshatra of the Moon indicates the mind and its sense of > > happiness. This is the true meaning of Shr ii. > > * The 1/12th division of the nakshatra shows how this is > > *manifesting *as all wealth and fortune manifests through the Rasi. > > * The addition of the derived longitude in the previous step with > > that of the Lagna's longitude shows how the individual is > > *experiencing *this *manifestation*. Otherwise how can we say its > > _our_ Shri Lagna unless lagna is involved. > > > > Somebody can call it something else, but Jaimini never called it Tara > > Lagna, so that name is a creation from some who didn't learn it from > > this tradition, or maybe even just derived it. > > > > Further, the calculation that PVR Narasimha Rao has used in the software > > and in his previous writings (he also published a lesson in the > > Varahamihira list reg. this) is different from the Dasa that we are > > taught in the Maharishi Jaimi ni Upadesa Sutra course taught by Pt. > > Sanjay Rath. The Su-Dasa that Jagannath Hora has is not the Su-Dasa > > taught in the tradition but has its use. Hence, again the Su-Dasa given > > in Jagannath Hora is not the creation of the tradition which began SJC. > > > > I hope this clarifies the given points. > > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > > ---------- > > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > > www: www: http://srigaruda.com > > @: visti@ > > > > Shanmukha skrev: > > > > > > Om Namah Sivaya > > > > > > Dear Rozi, Namaste, > > > > > > Probably the opposite sign to SL that is is the 7th house of SL is > > > stronger than the sign in SL. Since it was programmed that dasa to > > > start from the stronger of Lagna or its 7th house, sometime we get > > > this problem which you can override with changing the settings of the > > > dasa calculations using Options button on the Rasi dasas page. > > > > > > By the way, SL must be called as Tara Lagna, not Sri Lagna. But, SJC > > > calls it Sri Lagna. Jaimini commentaries, for example, Phalaratnamala > > > mentions Sri Lagna differently. And it is connected to Venus and Moon > > > sign lord and hence that Shri Lagna is important for prosperity. > > > > > > Try your luck with this special dasa that SJC created. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Shanmukha. > > > > > > sohamsa <sohamsa%40>, > > > "rozi" <astrologya@> wrote: > > > > > > > > hare rama krishna dear member s and gurus > > > > > > > > I am using jaganatha hora program > > > > > > > > but I confuse about sudasa calculation > > > > > > > > > > > > Narasimha Rao mentioned about SL must starting always from SL sign > > > > > > > > but when I calculating my chart by jaganatha hora it begins from > > > opposite of SL sign. > > > > > > > > do I change some menus? or not > > > > > > > > would it be possible to enlighten me did I undertsand this Sudasa wrong? > > > > > > > > > > > > best regards.. > > > > > > > > rozi > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.