Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 हरे राम कृष्ण Dear Chandan, Namaskar. In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna degree being the midpoint. Heres more: http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti chandan486 skrev: sri ganeshaya namah dear all, namaste. as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely based on house placements and not signs , the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is very accurate. if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much difference in the resulting compound relationships. however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been mentioned outright. equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. comments and experiences please, humbly, chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Namskar visti ji Plz give me setting for baha chalit kundli in Jhora and thro some more light on reddy's chart regard 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Chandan, Namaskar. In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna degree being the midpoint. Heres more: http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti chandan486 skrev:  sri ganeshaya namah dear all, namaste. as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely based on house placements and not signs , the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is very accurate. if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much difference in the resulting compound relationships. however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been mentioned outright. equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. comments and experiences please, humbly, chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 sri ganeshaya namah dear visti, namaste. i understand that the tradition teches certain concepts in their own way and im no one to doubt or question that. but just based on pure curiosity and understanding, when maharsi parasara mentioned that a bhava can extend across two rasis , does he mean that a bhava will also always be 30 degrees , or a bhava can be more than 30 degrees? or a bhava can simply start from the middle of a rasi , extend into a part of the next rasi and thus in this way occupy 2 rasis ? the lord of the bhava would be the graha owning the mid point of the bhava... humbly, chandan s sabarwal. , Visti Larsen <visti wrote: > > ??? ??? ????? > Dear Chandan, Namaskar. > In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna > degree being the midpoint. > Heres more: > http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhav\ a-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37> > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > ---------- > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > www: http://srigaruda.com > @: visti > > chandan486 skrev: > > > > > > sri ganeshaya namah > > > > dear all, > > namaste. > > > > as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and > > also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely > > based on house placements and not signs , > > > > the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and > > effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. > > > > considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st > > bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good > > results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava > > chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is > > very accurate. > > > > if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika > > positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much > > difference in the resulting compound relationships. > > > > however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and > > debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been > > mentioned outright. > > > > equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 > > rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. > > > > comments and experiences please, > > > > humbly, > > chandan s sabarwal. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 dear visti, and based upon what your article says , we would use this bhava chakra to see tatkalika sambamdha right? since this is one the that deals with bhavaas??? for example the same monroe chart .. in rasi chakra , jupiter is placed in neutral sign (permanent) in bhavaa chakra , jupiter is placed 4 houses away from sat, thus friendly (tatkalika) thus combining both , jupiter is placed in neutral sign . whereas if we just consider rasi chakra , based on pachadha sambandha , jupiter is placed in inmical sign and thus 0 & auspicious. the predictions for a neutral jupiter and inmical jupiter would be very different humbly, chandan s sabarwal. , Visti Larsen <visti wrote: > > ??? ??? ????? > Dear Chandan, Namaskar. > In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna > degree being the midpoint. > Heres more: > http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhav\ a-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37> > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > ---------- > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > www: http://srigaruda.com > @: visti > > chandan486 skrev: > > > > > > sri ganeshaya namah > > > > dear all, > > namaste. > > > > as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and > > also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely > > based on house placements and not signs , > > > > the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and > > effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. > > > > considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st > > bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good > > results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava > > chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is > > very accurate. > > > > if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika > > positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much > > difference in the resulting compound relationships. > > > > however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and > > debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been > > mentioned outright. > > > > equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 > > rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. > > > > comments and experiences please, > > > > humbly, > > chandan s sabarwal. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Amit, Namaskar. Software questions are for the software creators and software list. But look for the option to select equal houses (i think). Death is quite real and we do not need to use the Bhava Chalit Chakra to predict it. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti Amit Puri skrev:  Namskar visti ji Plz give me setting for baha chalit kundli in Jhora and thro some more light on reddy's chart regard 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Chandan, Namaskar. In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna degree being the midpoint. Heres more: http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com chandan486 skrev:  sri ganeshaya namah dear all, namaste. as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely based on house placements and not signs , the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is very accurate. if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much difference in the resulting compound relationships. however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been mentioned outright. equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. comments and experiences please, humbly, chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Namskar Visit jithanks for answer visti ji as far as bhava chalit is consrnd i was just want to its calculation from lagna or moon and my second question was not related bahva chalit.. this was separate question and i was more consrnd about kumbha lagna and arudha calculation and combination third from AL ..... rest is ok regardAmit puri 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Amit, Namaskar. Software questions are for the software creators and software list. But look for the option to select equal houses (i think). Death is quite real and we do not need to use the Bhava Chalit Chakra to predict it. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti Amit Puri skrev:  Namskar visti ji Plz give me setting for baha chalit kundli in Jhora and thro some more light on reddy's chart regard 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Chandan, Namaskar. In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna degree being the midpoint. Heres more: http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti chandan486 skrev:  sri ganeshaya namah dear all, namaste. as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely based on house placements and not signs , the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is very accurate. if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much difference in the resulting compound relationships. however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been mentioned outright. equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. comments and experiences please, humbly, chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Amit, Namaskar. Calculations are of 15 degrees before and after the degree of Lagna ( & Moon) which is then extended to the following bhavas. His aerial accident is very much confirmed from nodes in dual signs in third from AL. So kumbhaarudha is most accurate. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti Amit Puri skrev:  Namskar Visit ji thanks for answer visti ji as far as bhava chalit is consrnd i was just want to its calculation from lagna or moon and my second question was not related bahva chalit.. this was separate question and i was more consrnd about kumbha lagna and arudha calculation and combination third from AL ..... rest is ok regard Amit puri 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Amit, Namaskar. Software questions are for the software creators and software list. But look for the option to select equal houses (i think). Death is quite real and we do not need to use the Bhava Chalit Chakra to predict it. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com Amit Puri skrev:  Namskar visti ji Plz give me setting for baha chalit kundli in Jhora and thro some more light on reddy's chart regard 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Chandan, Namaskar. In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna degree being the midpoint. Heres more: http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com chandan486 skrev:  sri ganeshaya namah dear all, namaste. as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely based on house placements and not signs , the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is very accurate. if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much difference in the resulting compound relationships. however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been mentioned outright. equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. comments and experiences please, humbly, chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 हरे राम कृष्ण Dear Chandan, Namaskar. Did I say that? Are you sure? It doesn't seem so from my analysis of Mrs. Monroes chart. Please go through it again and indicate if you have any doubts in this regard. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti chandan486 skrev: dear visti, and based upon what your article says , we would use this bhava chakra to see tatkalika sambamdha right? since this is one the that deals with bhavaas??? for example the same monroe chart .. in rasi chakra , jupiter is placed in neutral sign (permanent) in bhavaa chakra , jupiter is placed 4 houses away from sat, thus friendly (tatkalika) thus combining both , jupiter is placed in neutral sign . whereas if we just consider rasi chakra , based on pachadha sambandha , jupiter is placed in inmical sign and thus 0 & auspicious. the predictions for a neutral jupiter and inmical jupiter would be very different humbly, chandan s sabarwal. , Visti Larsen <visti wrote: > > ??? ??? ????? > Dear Chandan, Namaskar. > In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna > degree being the midpoint. > Heres more: > http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37> > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > ---------- > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > www: http://srigaruda.com > @: visti > > chandan486 skrev: > > > > > > sri ganeshaya namah > > > > dear all, > > namaste. > > > > as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and > > also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely > > based on house placements and not signs , > > > > the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and > > effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. > > > > considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st > > bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good > > results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava > > chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is > > very accurate. > > > > if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika > > positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much > > difference in the resulting compound relationships. > > > > however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and > > debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been > > mentioned outright. > > > > equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 > > rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. > > > > comments and experiences please, > > > > humbly, > > chandan s sabarwal. > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 dear visti, namaste. well maybe i way i wrote it , made it a big ambigious. well you didnt say that. but thats what i assumed. since jupiter now falls in the 7th bhava,it is just 4 houses away from saturn, thus the tatkalika sambandha would change and ultimately would the compound relationship? or are you saying that both natural and temporal sambandha need to be seen from rasi chakra itself and the bhava chart will just show where planets make their influence felt ? hope its clear this time... humbly, chandan s sabarwal. , Visti Larsen <visti wrote: > > ??? ??? ????? > Dear Chandan, Namaskar. > Did I say that? Are you sure? It doesn't seem so from my analysis of > Mrs. Monroes chart. Please go through it again and indicate if you have > any doubts in this regard. > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > ---------- > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > www: http://srigaruda.com > @: visti > > chandan486 skrev: > > > > > > dear visti, > > > > and based upon what your article says , we would use this bhava chakra > > to see tatkalika sambamdha right? since this is one the that deals > > with bhavaas??? > > > > for example the same monroe chart .. > > in rasi chakra , jupiter is placed in neutral sign (permanent) > > in bhavaa chakra , jupiter is placed 4 houses away from sat, thus > > friendly (tatkalika) > > > > thus combining both , jupiter is placed in neutral sign . > > whereas if we just consider rasi chakra , based on pachadha sambandha > > , jupiter is placed in inmical sign and thus 0 & auspicious. > > > > the predictions for a neutral jupiter and inmical jupiter would be > > very different > > > > humbly, > > chandan s sabarwal. > > > > > > <%40>, Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > ??? ??? ????? > > > Dear Chandan, Namaskar. > > > In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna > > > degree being the midpoint. > > > Heres more: > > > > > http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhav\ a-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 > > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37> > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 > > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37>> > > > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > > > ---------- > > > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > > > www: http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com> > > > @: visti@ > > > > > > chandan486 skrev: > > > > > > > > > > > > sri ganeshaya namah > > > > > > > > dear all, > > > > namaste. > > > > > > > > as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and > > > > also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely > > > > based on house placements and not signs , > > > > > > > > the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and > > > > effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. > > > > > > > > considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st > > > > bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good > > > > results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava > > > > chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is > > > > very accurate. > > > > > > > > if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika > > > > positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much > > > > difference in the resulting compound relationships. > > > > > > > > however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and > > > > debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been > > > > mentioned outright. > > > > > > > > equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 > > > > rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. > > > > > > > > comments and experiences please, > > > > > > > > humbly, > > > > chandan s sabarwal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 also , is there a particular sloka in the bphs that specifically mentions that the lagna degree be the midpoint of the 1st bhava? because as per my understanding , if all divisional charts are calculated on basis of lagna degree , shouldnt the house distribution also start from the lagna degree itself? could you please point me to the sloka in bphs ? i read it several times , but couldnt locate any such thing. humbly, chandan s sabarwal. , " chandan486 " <wavelogix wrote: > > dear visti, > namaste. > > well maybe i way i wrote it , made it a big ambigious. > > well you didnt say that. but thats what i assumed. since jupiter now falls in the 7th bhava,it is just 4 houses away from saturn, thus the tatkalika sambandha would change and ultimately would the compound relationship? > > or are you saying that both natural and temporal sambandha need to be seen from rasi chakra itself and the bhava chart will just show where planets make their influence felt ? > > > hope its clear this time... > > humbly, > chandan s sabarwal. > > , Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote: > > > > ??? ??? ????? > > Dear Chandan, Namaskar. > > Did I say that? Are you sure? It doesn't seem so from my analysis of > > Mrs. Monroes chart. Please go through it again and indicate if you have > > any doubts in this regard. > > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > > ---------- > > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > > www: http://srigaruda.com > > @: visti@ > > > > chandan486 skrev: > > > > > > > > > dear visti, > > > > > > and based upon what your article says , we would use this bhava chakra > > > to see tatkalika sambamdha right? since this is one the that deals > > > with bhavaas??? > > > > > > for example the same monroe chart .. > > > in rasi chakra , jupiter is placed in neutral sign (permanent) > > > in bhavaa chakra , jupiter is placed 4 houses away from sat, thus > > > friendly (tatkalika) > > > > > > thus combining both , jupiter is placed in neutral sign . > > > whereas if we just consider rasi chakra , based on pachadha sambandha > > > , jupiter is placed in inmical sign and thus 0 & auspicious. > > > > > > the predictions for a neutral jupiter and inmical jupiter would be > > > very different > > > > > > humbly, > > > chandan s sabarwal. > > > > > > > > > <%40>, Visti Larsen <visti@> wrote: > > > > > > > > ??? ??? ????? > > > > Dear Chandan, Namaskar. > > > > In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna > > > > degree being the midpoint. > > > > Heres more: > > > > > > > http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhav\ a-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 > > > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37> > > > > > > > > > > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 > > > <http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bha\ va-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37>> > > > > Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen > > > > ---------- > > > > Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) > > > > www: http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com> > > > > @: visti@ > > > > > > > > chandan486 skrev: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sri ganeshaya namah > > > > > > > > > > dear all, > > > > > namaste. > > > > > > > > > > as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and > > > > > also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely > > > > > based on house placements and not signs , > > > > > > > > > > the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and > > > > > effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. > > > > > > > > > > considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st > > > > > bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good > > > > > results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava > > > > > chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is > > > > > very accurate. > > > > > > > > > > if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika > > > > > positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much > > > > > difference in the resulting compound relationships. > > > > > > > > > > however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and > > > > > debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been > > > > > mentioned outright. > > > > > > > > > > equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 > > > > > rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. > > > > > > > > > > comments and experiences please, > > > > > > > > > > humbly, > > > > > chandan s sabarwal. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2009 Report Share Posted September 3, 2009 Namskar visti ji thanks for guidance..regardAMitPuri2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Amit, Namaskar. Calculations are of 15 degrees before and after the degree of Lagna ( & Moon) which is then extended to the following bhavas. His aerial accident is very much confirmed from nodes in dual signs in third from AL. So kumbhaarudha is most accurate. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti Amit Puri skrev:  Namskar Visit ji thanks for answer visti ji as far as bhava chalit is consrnd i was just want to its calculation from lagna or moon and my second question was not related bahva chalit.. this was separate question and i was more consrnd about kumbha lagna and arudha calculation and combination third from AL ..... rest is ok regard Amit puri 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Amit, Namaskar. Software questions are for the software creators and software list. But look for the option to select equal houses (i think). Death is quite real and we do not need to use the Bhava Chalit Chakra to predict it. Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti Amit Puri skrev:  Namskar visti ji Plz give me setting for baha chalit kundli in Jhora and thro some more light on reddy's chart regard 2009/9/3 Visti Larsen <visti  हरे राम कृषà¥à¤£ Dear Chandan, Namaskar. In the tradition we are taught only to use equal houses with the lagna degree being the midpoint. Heres more: http://srigaruda.com/visti/index.php?option=com_content & view=article & id=177:bhava-chalit-chakra & catid=34:articles & Itemid=37 Yours sincerely, Visti Larsen ---------- Jyotish Guru (Vedic Astrologer) www: http://srigaruda.com @: visti chandan486 skrev:  sri ganeshaya namah dear all, namaste. as mentioned in the bhps that a bhava can extend over 2 signs , and also stressing the important of determing tatkalika sambhanda purely based on house placements and not signs , the bhava chakra becomes very essential and also , all yogas and effects must be seen from the bhava chakra. considering the rising ascendant degree to be the midpoint of the 1st bhava , i have found out that koch houses method gives very good results and after applying the sambandha obtained from this bhava chakra with rasi naisargika , the compund relationships of planets is very accurate. if normally a rasi would be considered as a house , the tatkalika positions remain the same as signs and thus , there is not much difference in the resulting compound relationships. however planets in exaltation , mulatrikona , own house and debiliation are to be excluded since their explicit results have been mentioned outright. equal house system cannot be used , since a bhava can extend over 2 rasis and thus , a house cannot be merely confined to 30 degrees. comments and experiences please, humbly, chandan s sabarwal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.