Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Gurus and Members, I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. January 17, 1976Time: 8:50:00Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" Korba, India The known facts are as follows; 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours (4pm to 3 am) 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - Current D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted to Capricorn. D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna correction. On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. Thanks and regards, Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 Jaya Jagannatha Dear Ramesh, Namaste For profession, look at 10th in rasi or Navamsa. Those criterias are met. For marriage, one does not necessarily need to time using the Sun's transit. love, Swee , " Ramesh F. Gangaramani " <ramesh.gangaramani wrote: > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. > > > January 17, 1976 > Time: 8:50:00 > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > Place: 82 E 41' 00 " , 22 N 21' 00 " > Korba, India > > The known facts are as follows; > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours > (4pm to 3 am) > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > Current > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted > to Capricorn. > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna > correction. > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also > looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is > looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. > > Thanks and regards, > Ramesh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Swee, Thank you for your comments. Is it the application of learning concept, 2, 6 and 10 houses in D9? 10L in Mercury is in 6H with Rahu. I want to use the marriage date to confirm if D9 lagna is ok. Any suggestions? Best Wishes, Ramesh On Behalf Of Swee Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:03 AM [Jaya Jagannatha] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna Jaya Jagannatha Dear Ramesh, Namaste For profession, look at 10th in rasi or Navamsa. Those criterias are met. For marriage, one does not necessarily need to time using the Sun's transit. love, Swee , " Ramesh F. Gangaramani " <ramesh.gangaramani wrote: > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. > > > January 17, 1976 > Time: 8:50:00 > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > Place: 82 E 41' 00 " , 22 N 21' 00 " > Korba, India > > The known facts are as follows; > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours > (4pm to 3 am) > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > Current > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted > to Capricorn. > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna > correction. > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also > looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is > looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. > > Thanks and regards, > Ramesh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 16, 2006 Report Share Posted March 16, 2006 Dear Ramesh, Are you not confusing between D-9 and D-1 with respect to Sun's progression there? Again why would the profession be shown in navamsha when it refers to spouse matter when viewed as a separate chart? I know some advocate that but do not find any textual reference to support that theory. Anyway, Mercury and lord of the 10th being in trine and Ketu acting like mars occupying the 3rd bhava would anyway suggest a job to do with communication (D-1), is that not so? Look at the Navamshesh of 10th lord in Lagna chart and matter should be clear. Chandrashekhar. Ramesh F. Gangaramani wrote: || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Gurus and Members, I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. January 17, 1976 Time: 8:50:00 Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" Korba, India The known facts are as follows; 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours (4pm to 3 am) 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - Current D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted to Capricorn. D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna correction. On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. Thanks and regards, Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2006 Report Share Posted March 17, 2006 || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Guruji, Thank you for your kind response. 10L in trine with Mercury and co-lord in 3H surely show the strong connection with communications. Now navamsesh is Moon placed in 6H(own) with Saturn. That should show bhagya related to 10H matters. Would this also explain abnormal working hours? Is there an error in my working Sun's progression in D9 to find out age of marriage incorrect? Can you correct me on that please? Can I also use dasa and transits on the day of marriage to verify correctness of D9 lagna. Best Wishes, Ramesh On Behalf Of ChandrashekharThursday, March 16, 2006 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [Jaya Jagannatha] Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna Dear Ramesh,Are you not confusing between D-9 and D-1 with respect to Sun's progression there? Again why would the profession be shown in navamsha when it refers to spouse matter when viewed as a separate chart?I know some advocate that but do not find any textual reference to support that theory. Anyway, Mercury and lord of the 10th being in trine and Ketu acting like mars occupying the 3rd bhava would anyway suggest a job to do with communication (D-1), is that not so? Look at the Navamshesh of 10th lord in Lagna chart and matter should be clear.Chandrashekhar.Ramesh F. Gangaramani wrote: || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Gurus and Members, I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. January 17, 1976Time: 8:50:00Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" Korba, India The known facts are as follows; 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours (4pm to 3 am) 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - Current D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted to Capricorn. D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna correction. On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. Thanks and regards, Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2006 Report Share Posted March 17, 2006 " Gopijana-vallabha-caranau sharanam prapadye. " " Namo gopijana-vallabhabhyam " Dear Ramesh, Namaste The criteria of marriage is met with transit Venus in trines to Navamsa Venus and Jupiter. Rahu and Mercury are in 4th from Karakamsa, Rahu and AK is also in exchange - you are looking at possibilities of latent/past knowledge, right? What does Jaimini say about planets in the 4th from Karakamsa? In education, consider looking at the D-24. Do consider the advice of Moon in satru and randhra and marana in navamsa. A Surya/Rama/Shiva mantra should help with his weak Sun. The Sun-Moon are in rapt opposition! The A11 and A2 are switched and Mars requires propitiation for RY to happen as it also aspects the 11th. A combo as described in Jyotisharnava Navanitam. Note that Jupiter is in Gopura - offer an Upaya to a Vaishnava Guru. Love, Swee On Behalf Of Ramesh F. Gangaramani Thursday, March 16, 2006 2:47 PM RE: [Jaya Jagannatha] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Swee, Thank you for your comments. Is it the application of learning concept, 2, 6 and 10 houses in D9? 10L in Mercury is in 6H with Rahu. I want to use the marriage date to confirm if D9 lagna is ok. Any suggestions? Best Wishes, Ramesh On Behalf Of Swee Thursday, March 16, 2006 5:03 AM [Jaya Jagannatha] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna Jaya Jagannatha Dear Ramesh, Namaste For profession, look at 10th in rasi or Navamsa. Those criterias are met. For marriage, one does not necessarily need to time using the Sun's transit. love, Swee , " Ramesh F. Gangaramani " <ramesh.gangaramani wrote: > > || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || > > Dear Gurus and Members, > > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. > > > January 17, 1976 > Time: 8:50:00 > Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) > Place: 82 E 41' 00 " , 22 N 21' 00 " > Korba, India > > The known facts are as follows; > 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. > 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. > 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours > (4pm to 3 am) > 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - > Current > > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only > Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to > see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! > > Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. > Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi > drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by > shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. > > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though > Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It > actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L > Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted > to Capricorn. > > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as > with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is > missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna > correction. > > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn > through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. > I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in > this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). > > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second > job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the > Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related > job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also > looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is > looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. > > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. > > Thanks and regards, > Ramesh > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 17, 2006 Report Share Posted March 17, 2006 Dear Ramesh, Saturn after all rules over night and is strong at that time is that not so? As to Surya's progression over D-9, there is not much data to support that. No harm in trying. I would fix Navamsha lagna by color of the person and 7th for the physical form of spouse. There is no harm in trying to use dasha and transits on the day of marriage to verify the correctness of D-9 lagna as that is being done by many these days. Again there is nothing t support this in the ancient texts. But no harm in finding out if this is a repeatable phenomenon when navamsha Lagna is known and then applying principles so developed. Take care, Chandrashekhar. Ramesh F. Gangaramani wrote: || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Guruji, Thank you for your kind response. 10L in trine with Mercury and co-lord in 3H surely show the strong connection with communications. Now navamsesh is Moon placed in 6H(own) with Saturn. That should show bhagya related to 10H matters. Would this also explain abnormal working hours? Is there an error in my working Sun's progression in D9 to find out age of marriage incorrect? Can you correct me on that please? Can I also use dasa and transits on the day of marriage to verify correctness of D9 lagna. Best Wishes, Ramesh On Behalf Of Chandrashekhar Thursday, March 16, 2006 3:14 PM Re: [Jaya Jagannatha] Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna Dear Ramesh, Are you not confusing between D-9 and D-1 with respect to Sun's progression there? Again why would the profession be shown in navamsha when it refers to spouse matter when viewed as a separate chart? I know some advocate that but do not find any textual reference to support that theory. Anyway, Mercury and lord of the 10th being in trine and Ketu acting like mars occupying the 3rd bhava would anyway suggest a job to do with communication (D-1), is that not so? Look at the Navamshesh of 10th lord in Lagna chart and matter should be clear. Chandrashekhar. Ramesh F. Gangaramani wrote: || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Gurus and Members, I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. January 17, 1976 Time: 8:50:00 Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT) Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" Korba, India The known facts are as follows; 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours (4pm to 3 am) 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - Current D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted to Capricorn. D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna correction. On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. Thanks and regards, Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 20, 2006 Report Share Posted March 20, 2006 || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Swee, Many thanks for your comments. Was on the move and hence delayed reply. May I continue this discussion a bit more? Please see my comments below. Best Wishes, Ramesh On Behalf Of Swee ChanFriday, March 17, 2006 8:35 AM Subject: RE: [Jaya Jagannatha] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna"Gopijana-vallabha-caranau sharanam prapadye.""Namo gopijana-vallabhabhyam"Dear Ramesh,NamasteThe criteria of marriage is met with transit Venus in trines to Navamsa Venus and Jupiter. Ramesh: Venus on 8th Dec 03 is in Sagittarius in 7th navamsa (Libra). So it is in trines to navamsa Venus and Jupiter which are in Aquarius. Rahu and Mercury are in 4th from Karakamsa, Rahu and AK is also in exchange- you are looking at possibilities of latent/past knowledge, right? What does Jaimini say about planets in the 4th from Karakamsa? In education, consider looking at the D-24. Ramesh: I agree D24 is more appropriate for education. Mercury in 4H from karkamsa indicates a great yogi and Rahu a proficiency in making machinery. Can you comment on exchange of AK and Rahu please? The standard interpretation would be planets in their own houses. It would also be seen as yoga between PK and AK in D9! Are you hinting at more? Do consider the advice of Moon in satru and randhra and marana in navamsa. A Surya/Rama/Shiva mantra should help with his weak Sun. The Sun-Moon are in rapt opposition! Ramesh: Sun is weak. It is also his ishta devta. Will 'Om namah shivaya' be good for him? or 'om namah shivaya rameshwaraaya' as Aries is in trine to AL and kendra to Moon in D1, though he may prefer a shorter mantra! What does Sun-Moon in opposition mean to a native born on Poornima? The A11 and A2 are switched and Mars requires propitiation for RY to happen as it also aspects the 11th. A combo as described in Jyotisharnava Navanitam. Note that Jupiter is in Gopura - offer an Upaya to a Vaishnava Guru. Ramesh: I will read Jyotisharnava Navanitam. Mars is in even sign, will be good to pray to Chamundi devi? He also has Rahu in 9H in D1!Can you please explain gopura to me? Love,Swee On Behalf Of Ramesh F. GangaramaniThursday, March 16, 2006 2:47 PM Subject: RE: [Jaya Jagannatha] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna|| Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat ||Dear Swee,Thank you for your comments.Is it the application of learning concept, 2, 6 and 10 houses in D9? 10L in Mercury is in 6H with Rahu.I want to use the marriage date to confirm if D9 lagna is ok. Any suggestions?Best Wishes,Ramesh On Behalf Of SweeThursday, March 16, 2006 5:03 AM Subject: [Jaya Jagannatha] Re: Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagnaJaya JagannathaDear Ramesh,NamasteFor profession, look at 10th in rasi or Navamsa. Those criterias are met.For marriage, one does not necessarily need to time using the Sun's transit.love,Swee , "Ramesh F. Gangaramani"<ramesh.gangaramani wrote:>> || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat ||> > Dear Gurus and Members,> > I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native.> > > January 17, 1976> Time: 8:50:00> Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)> Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00"> Korba, India>> The known facts are as follows;> 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall.> 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage.> 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, oddworking hours> (4pm to 3 am)> 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 272003 -> Current> > D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in12H and only> Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one wouldexpect to> see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines!> > Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running28th year.> Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sunhaving rashi> drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validatedeven by> shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side.> > He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time ofmarriage. Though> Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9lagna. It> actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragalawith 7L> Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagnais shifted> to Capricorn.> > D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagnaas well as> with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti ofVenus is> missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not changewith lagna> correction.> > On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo andSaturn> through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn toocomes to 7H.> I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage(though in> this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L).> > D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sundasa. Second> job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun5L, so the> Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with callcenter related> job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. Iam also> looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! Thenative is> looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours.> > I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve mylearning.> > Thanks and regards,> Ramesh> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 22, 2006 Report Share Posted March 22, 2006 || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Guruji, Thank you for your continued guidance. Best Wishes, Ramesh On Behalf Of ChandrashekharFriday, March 17, 2006 4:42 PM Subject: Re: [Jaya Jagannatha] Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagna Dear Ramesh,Saturn after all rules over night and is strong at that time is that not so? As to Surya's progression over D-9, there is not much data to support that. No harm in trying. I would fix Navamsha lagna by color of the person and 7th for the physical form of spouse.There is no harm in trying to use dasha and transits on the day of marriage to verify the correctness of D-9 lagna as that is being done by many these days. Again there is nothing t support this in the ancient texts. But no harm in finding out if this is a repeatable phenomenon when navamsha Lagna is known and then applying principles so developed.Take care,Chandrashekhar.Ramesh F. Gangaramani wrote: || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Guruji, Thank you for your kind response. 10L in trine with Mercury and co-lord in 3H surely show the strong connection with communications. Now navamsesh is Moon placed in 6H(own) with Saturn. That should show bhagya related to 10H matters. Would this also explain abnormal working hours? Is there an error in my working Sun's progression in D9 to find out age of marriage incorrect? Can you correct me on that please? Can I also use dasa and transits on the day of marriage to verify correctness of D9 lagna. Best Wishes, Ramesh On Behalf Of ChandrashekharThursday, March 16, 2006 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [Jaya Jagannatha] Confirmation of D9 and D10 lagnaDear Ramesh,Are you not confusing between D-9 and D-1 with respect to Sun's progression there? Again why would the profession be shown in navamsha when it refers to spouse matter when viewed as a separate chart?I know some advocate that but do not find any textual reference to support that theory. Anyway, Mercury and lord of the 10th being in trine and Ketu acting like mars occupying the 3rd bhava would anyway suggest a job to do with communication (D-1), is that not so? Look at the Navamshesh of 10th lord in Lagna chart and matter should be clear.Chandrashekhar.Ramesh F. Gangaramani wrote: || Satyam Bruyat Priyam Bruyat || Dear Gurus and Members, I need help in confirming D9 and D10 lagna of this native. January 17, 1976Time: 8:50:00Time Zone: 5:30:00 (East of GMT)Place: 82 E 41' 00", 22 N 21' 00" Korba, India The known facts are as follows; 1. Nature: Gentle, Soft spoken and tall. 2. Marriage date: 8th Dec 2003, love marriage. 3. Profession: Computer engineer working in call centers, odd working hours (4pm to 3 am) 4. Job start: 1st job: Oct 30 2000 - Oct 24 2003, 2nd job: Oct 27 2003 - Current D9: The reason for doubt related to lagna is because of Ketu in 12H and only Saturn in trine. Considering his education and career, one would expect to see planets like Rahu, Ketu, Mercury in trines! Sun's progression technique: He got married when he was running 28th year. Progressed Sun in D9 would then be in Aries. Requirement of Sun having rashi drishti on 7H is not fulfilled. Now this does not get validated even by shifting lagna by 1 rashi on either side. He was running Mercury-Sun-Venus-Ketu dasa at the time of marriage. Though Mercury is 7L, it does not have association or aragala with D9 lagna. It actually has virodha aragala. Sun should have association/ aragala with 7L Mercury which is also not the case. This gets validated if lagna is shifted to Capricorn. D9 ND was of Ta-Le- Sc. Taurus MD could be ok with current lagna as well as with lagna shifted by 1 rashi on either side. Rashi drishti of Venus is missing on MD, AD and PD rashis, a factor that would not change with lagna correction. On the date of marriage Jupiter was transiting through Leo and Saturn through Gemini. Jupiter does aspect the D9 lagna but Saturn too comes to 7H. I am not sure if Saturn's transit through 7H would give marriage (though in this case Saturn is the dispositor of D1 7L). D10: With Aries lagna Sun is 5L. First job was in Merc-Ven-Sun dasa. Second job start was in Merc-Sun-Ven dasa. Now Venus is aspected by Sun 5L, so the Aries lagna could be right. Mercury in 10H matches with call center related job but there is no influence of Rahu, Ketu to show computers. I am also looking for indications that show abnormal working hours! The native is looking for a change to a job that may have normal working hours. I shall appreciate inputs that may help the native and improve my learning. Thanks and regards, Ramesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.