Do not Cite Scriptures Falsely, Mr Sunil Bhattachatjya !!!

July 16, 2009

, Sunil Bhattacharjya

<sunil_bhattacharjya wrote:

>

> Friends,

>

> The facts are as follows:

>

> 1)

> Quote

>

> SKB is trying to cheat others by posting false statements. I have

myself given him links of websites from which he can download ancient

texts. He knew many links beforehand. He can ask for further links if he

wants. A large number of ancient Indian texts can be freely downloaded

from internet, and the rest can be procured from reputed publishers from

any part part of the world. He lives in Sydney, which has many world

class libraries.

>

> I have definitely seen the Vayu Purana, but the text is not in my home

for at least two decades. Why should I quote without the text before me

? It is deplorable that SKB is abusing me as a liar on the " evidence "

that he imagines Vayu Purana lies in my house. I live in a backwack town

of North Bihar. If SKB is unable to procure texts in advanced City like

Sydney, why he expects me to get texts at my will in a flood-affected

backward town in world's most backward (economically) region of the

world ?? Abusing me without proofs speaks something about his character.

>

> Unquote

>

> As he lies he thinks that everybody lies. Let him find out from Sydney

through his sources and prove to the group as to how easy or

difficult to get the Indian scriptural texts in Sydney public

libraries. Now he says he read the Vayu purana, which is definitely

a lie as showed that he was completely unaware of what Vayu purana

says about the Yuga. He told that I will not give the reference4s as I

want to escape but I gave the references to Vayu purana, Bhagavata

purana and Vishnu purana. Now he says he is unable to get it even after

more than a couple of months. He is great liar.

>

> 2)

> Quote

>

> I have asked my friends in other towns about Vayu Purana, because the

bookseller is taking too much of time. Pt Girija Shankar Shanlkara

Shasti, the foremost astrologer of Allahabad (chief editor of its only

panchanga, HOD of Sanskrit, editor and author of many important books)

has told me on telephone that Vayu Purana says that the yuga values are

in " divya " varsha and not not in terms of " maanusha " varsha, and he also

said that he has not found any clear value of " divya " varsha " in Vayu

Purana as yet (he is still searching), if the same author Vyaasa Ji says

in other Puranas and MBh that divya varsha is of 360 maanusha varshas,

why his opinions should not apply to his own text (Vayu purana), and we

should use the definitions given by miderners which do not tally with

original definitions of Vyaasa Ji ??

>

> Unquote

>

> Yuga Varsha is in terms of Divya varsha which is the Solar year.

Manushya varsha is the Sidereal Lunar year. 2700 Divya varsha (Solar

year) = 3030 Manushya varsha, ie. Sidereal Lunar year. Nowhere

Vedavyasji had said that Divyavarsha is 360 Manusha year. It is one of

Vinay Jha;s lies.

>

> 3)

>

> Quote

>

> SKB is skilfully skipping to answer my mail which narrates how he

shifted his stances so many times : initially he said Siddhantas and MBh

were his evidences, when I showed him verses from MBh and Siddhantas, he

shifted to Vishnu Purana, thereafter to Bhagavata Purana, and after

learning that all these texts falsify him, now he says Vayu Purana is

the ONLY proof (and all other Puranas and MBh are false texts) !!! But

he quotes Vayu Purana, which says yugas are measured in divya varshas

and not in maanusha or saura varshas.

>

> I have already sent him the measure of Divya Varsha in detail, from

all extant ancient Siddhnatas, MBh, Vishnu Purana and Bhagavata Purana,

which have now become false to SKB and Vayu Purana is the only proof

just because I do not possess it. But Vayu Purana also refutes his

statement : no ancient text says a divya varsha is equal to maanuahs or

saura varsha, and all texts mnentioned above say one divya dina is equal

to one maanuisha year, which falsifies SKB's stand. In spite of so many

evidences, he sticks to falsehood and is now resorting to abuses.

Abusing is the weapon of a weaker mind which fails in argumentation and

shifts stands.

>

> Unquote

>

> What he writes is vague. I have not shifted from one purana to another

just for the heck of it. I quoted from the appropriate purana such as

the Bhagavata purana, Vishnu purana and Vayu purana whenever the

occasion demanded. I already gave above from the Vayu purana (chapter

57) that 2700 Divya varsha ,ie. Solar year, is equal to 3030

Manusha year, ie. Sidereal Lunar year just in one sentence.

>

> Let him give reference to a purana, where according to

him Vedavyasa had given that one Divyavarsha is equal to 360 Human

years. I have not said anything bad to him. Is it not natural that if

an intelligent person reads the Svetasvatara upanishad he would

obviously find the mention of Sankhya in that. Now if anybody claims

that he had read the Svetasvatara upanishad and yet claims that

Sankhya is not mentioned there then he has to be either an idiot or

a liar. Other people may even use other terms such as crook or

hypocrite. On the otherhand Vinay Jha had called me, who is a

teetotaller, many times that I am addicted to drinking. He abused me

like that just because I did not agree to his denigration of

Tantra. Is it not an abuse?

>

> -SKB

>

> --- On Wed, 7/15/09, Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16 wrote:

>

> Vinay Jha vinayjhaa16

> Re: Re: Rashi in the Fifth Veda and value of

the nakshatras

>

> Wednesday, July 15, 2009, 11:17 PM