Guest guest Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 There we go again! Smart people stay away from battle-fields! They become public servants or businessmen or professors! But " Soft-hearted " ants get involved through an innocent bite or two! Now Ant has two burdens to carry! A Light machine gun on right shoulder and a Bazooka on the left! My shoulders are bowing down already and I do not even have a decent Kanya navamsha rising or kanya influence in my chart as KNR reminded us all some years ago -- based presumably on what Uttarkalamrita described for Kanya navamsha rising! Way back when this forum was blessed by Rao Saheb's personal and direct voice and presence! I must be getting old because I reminisce more these days than rejoice! Sorry for yet another NON-ASTROLOGICAL intervention! Rohiniranjan , " vinayjhaa16 " <vinayjhaa16 wrote: > > To Rohini Ji & c, > > Mr Sunil Ji says " If my memory serves me right even the Vishnu purana > also gives... " . > > I had provided the website address of Mahirishi Institute of management > (http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/ <http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/> ) > where all these debated texts are available. Why Sunil Ji relies on his > fallible memory instead of consulting the texts ? Neither Vishnu Purana > (or any other text) says Kaliyuga to be of 4800 years, nor Vayu Purana > says what he wrongly quotes. I possess many Puranas in my room, and many > more in electric form downloaded from reliable sites, but I do not > possess Vayu Purana at present, but I requested Dr Girija Shankar > Shastri, the foremost astrologer of Allahabad and HOD of sankrit there, > to scan Vayu purana. He did so and reported that Vayu Purana does not > support what Sunil ji claims. > > Dr Girija Shankar Shastri has edited and published many rare Sanskrit > manuscripts of Jyotisha and is invited by many universities as an expert > in PhD interviews (recently, he was a member of an expert committee > constituted by KSD Sanskrit University for interviewing those candidates > who were already PhD and were applicant for major research Project of > UGC, I was also a member there). Dr Girija Shankar Shastri is a busy > person, and not very deft in handling computers, but has agreed to join > this group. I hope Sunil Ji will will not abuse him in the manner he > does me, otherwise he may face libel suits, because many judges and > advocates of Allahabad are supportes and disciples of Dr Girija Shankar > Shastri due to erudition of the latter. A monk can neglect to file a > libel suit, but others may do. Mr Sunil should understand the meaning of > " erudite gentleman " . Mr Sunil is refuting the evidence of so many > Puranas & c sent by me and is refusing to cite verses which he wrongly > quotes. > > I have requested the General Secretary of Akhila Bhaaratiya Vidvat > Parishada (of Varanasi) to join these forums to see how Hindu scriptures > are being misquoted in astrological fora ; this person is also the > member of national executive of RSS and is a former weditor of Vishva > Panchanga of BHU, and is a firebrand opponent of fall falsehoods, and > has agreed to spend some time in these fora. > > If needed, I will request other reputed scholars of India to see the > state of things in internet fora. Mr Sunil is heading towards greater > troubles if he sticks to falsehood and abuses. > > -VJ > =================== === > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > <sunil_bhattacharjya@> wrote: > > > > Dear Rohini, > > > > Sometime back I suggested to Mr. Vinay Jha to read the Vayu Purana as > according to me the Vayu purana clearly defines what are the Divya > varsha and the Manushya varsha and that purana also gives the example > that 2700 Divya varsha (Sidereal Solar year) is equal to 3030 Sidereal > Lunar calendar, so that there would not be any confusion. If my memory > serves me right even the Vishnu purana also gives an example to > > show that the spam of Kali yuga is 48000 (360,000 / 75 = 4800) years, > > in human calculations. > > > > Then all of a sudden, even before he could read the Vayu purana on > that topic, he attacked me on the subject of the span of yuga again. > Instead of trying to sort out the issue he tried to show one-up-manship > and I have to will-nilly try to project what is the truth. > > > > I have already said more than once that > > let us agree to disagree. Let him say that he agrees to disagree and > > then this exchange automatically comes to an end. But I doubt if an > > egoist like him can agree to disagree and leave the topic. He thinks > that by hook or crook he can trounce me. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ wrote: > > > > Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ > > Re: Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, MrVinay > Jha. > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dada, > > > > > > > > Both You and Vinay-Ji are Mammoths in your own individual ways! > > > > > > > > What can we tiny insects do, other than to bite you from time to time > and remind you that we were trying to 'help'! > > > > > > > > Are both of you erudite gentlemen (I learned that word from BVRaman's > astrological magazines back when I was a teenager...! ) trying to: > > > > > > > > ? Register a public complaint so that current PANCHAAYAT may pronounce > a judgment in our cyber-village? > > > > > > > > ?? Educate us " great unwashed " with stuff that ... (I will leave that > unfinished and to all readers' imaginations to fill in the blanks! Just > as a mental exercise that has been recently found helpful, healthwise by > doctors) > > > > > > > > ??? Is this an ongoing expression of 'boredom' or something like that? > > > > > > > > Bhul chook leni deni! > > > > > > > > Rohini > > > > > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > <sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote: > > > > > > > > > > To all, > > > > > > > > > > Vinay Jha has again lying. I always said that Vayu purana gives the > explanation of Divya varsha as Solar year. One Saptarshi cycle = 2700 > Divya varsha = 3030 Mnusha varsha. > > > > > Let him explain this first. It is beacause of this verse he is > avoiding Vayu purana all along. > > > > > > > > > > When will he have the moral courage to speak the truth? He is citing > verses about " Devaanam varsha " , which is applicable to Devaloka and not > to Martyaloka. He does no sanskrit at all, rather he picked up some > wrong ideas about Sanskrit. > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> > > > > > Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, Mr Sunil > bhattacharjya! > > > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:02 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharjya said repeatedly that one divya varsha was > equal > > > > > > > > > > to one solar year according to Mahabharata and Puranas, and refuses > to > > > > > > > > > > accept documentary evidences. Two months ago, I sent him verses from > all > > > > > > > > > > those texts which he was falsely quoting. Thereafter, he hibernated > for > > > > > > > > > > two months, and came up with same falsehoods again, mixed with new > lies > > > > > > > > > > and new abuses for me !! Then, I had to spend some time, and I sent > > > > > > > > > > references from a lot of Puranas to expose this abusive liar, after > > > > > > > > > > which will come again after some time with same falsehoods, feigning > to > > > > > > > > > > forget all evidences provided so far by me. And he calls me " an > > > > > > > > > > incorrigible liar " . Here are the proofs which will convince > everyone > > > > > > > > > > that he does not know Sanskrit and cites scriptures wrongly, and is > too > > > > > > > > > > haughty to admit his errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I sent him reference from Vishnu Purana, which says > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " maasair-dvaadashab hir-varsham- ahoraatram tu tat divi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tribhir-varsha- shatair-varsham shashtyaa chaiva-asuradvishaa > m " (Amsha- vi, > > > > > > > > > > chapter-3, verse 10) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means : " 12 (human) months are (equal to) one divya day-night / > (and) > > > > > > > > > > 360 (human) years are (equal to) one varsha of gods > (=asuraodvishaam) . " > > > > > > > > > > Next verse says : " such 12000 yesrs are equal to one chaturyuga.. . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I had explained this verse word by word because Mr > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > does not know Sanskrit, but he refused to accept such clear verdict > and > > > > > > > > > > called the yuga calculation of ancient sages as " my " invention ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent the following prrof from Mahabharata > (khanda > > > > > > > > > > 5-chapter 231-verse15) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ahoraatre vibhajate Suryau maanushalaukike " , which means days and > > > > > > > > > > nights of manushya loka is made/divided by Surya. Verse 17 says > " Daive > > > > > > > > > > raatryahanee varsham pravibhaagastayoh punah , ahastatrodagayanam > > > > > > > > > > raatrih syad dakshinaayanam " : in which " Daive raatryahanee varsham " > > > > > > > > > > means " (human) varsha is equal to day+night of gods " . Here varsha is > > > > > > > > > > varsha of maanushalaukike which is to be taken from preceding two > > > > > > > > > > verses. Rest of verse 17 means " this daiva day+night is divided thus > : > > > > > > > > > > uttara (ayana) is divine day and dakshinaayana is divine night " . MBh > > > > > > > > > > clearly says that the maanushalaukika year is solar year : see verse > 15 > > > > > > > > > > above which says that Sun divides/makes day and night in > maanushalaukika > > > > > > > > > > (but not in devaloka). " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent evidences from all major ancient > Jyotisha > > > > > > > > > > Siddhantas : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ancient siddhantic texts invariably speak of 4320000 solar years for > a > > > > > > > > > > mahayuga. For instance, in the first verse of Dashageetikaa of > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya, Sun's bhagana number per (maha)yuga is 4320000 and > Earth's > > > > > > > > > > rotations are given to be 1582237500 (1582237828 in Suryasiddhanta, > > > > > > > > > > this minor difference being due to Sunrise system of day count in > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya in contrast to midnight system of Suryasiddhanta) . > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta( BSS) repeats the mathematics of > Mahabharata > > > > > > > > > > (MBh-v-231) in its first chapter verses 4-7, in which 4320000 normal > > > > > > > > > > solar years of humans are said to make one mahayuga (see verses 5-6) > and > > > > > > > > > > 1000 such mahayugas are said to make one Kalpa (BSS, ch-i, verse > 10). > > > > > > > > > > Hence, Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya and Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta all > > > > > > > > > > clearly say one mahayuga to be equal to 4320000 years and not > 43200000 > > > > > > > > > > days as Mr Sunil wrongly tried to prove by misquoting texts. His > stand > > > > > > > > > > is refuted by all these ancient texts : Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya > and > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta, Mahabharata, Narada Purana, Vishnu > Dharmottara > > > > > > > > > > Purana, etc, all of which unanimously say that one mahayuga is of > > > > > > > > > > 4320000 years or 1582237828 days which is equal to 12000 divine > years. > > > > > > > > > > How can he put " 1582237828 sunrises " in only 12000 " solar " years ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not only this, Mr Sunil reads Hindu scriptures in reverse direction > like > > > > > > > > > > Urdu (from my message two months ago) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vishnu Purana (Amsha-vi, chapter-3, verses 6-11) clearly say that > 360 > > > > > > > > > > " human " ( " maanusha " , see verse 6) years are equal to one divya year > and > > > > > > > > > > 12000 " divya " years constitute one Chaturyuga (ie, Mahayuga). > Exactly > > > > > > > > > > same thing is repeated in Vishnu Purana (Amsha-i, chapter-3, verses > > > > > > > > > > 8-14), with clarification that four yugas of a Chaturyuga have > lengths > > > > > > > > > > of 4800, 3600, 2400 and 1200 divya years. The sequence of yugas is > > > > > > > > > > Satyuga, Treta, Dvaapara and Kaliyuga, which means duration of > Satyuga > > > > > > > > > > is 4800, Treta 3600, Dvaapara 2400 and Kaliyuga 1200 " divya " years > > > > > > > > > > according to Vishnu Purana. Why Mr Sunil inverts the sequence of > four > > > > > > > > > > yugas of a Chaturyuga and read Kaliyuga as 4800 ? Even schoolboys do > not > > > > > > > > > > commit such blunders ! It is certainly a result of excessive > drinking, > > > > > > > > > > although he says that only two tolas of wine should be taken daily. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is his statement about Rgveda : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< " I said that that the Rig Veda says that we are all brothers. > Then > > > > > > > > > > to disprove what I said Vinay Jha did research and quoted several > > > > > > > > > > verses from the Rig Veda to show that nowhere in the Rig Veda it is > said > > > > > > > > > > that we are all brothers. Then I had to quote the exact verse where > it > > > > > > > > > > is said that we are all brothers and this shows that he missed the > most > > > > > > > > > > relevant verse. Such is his false scholarship. " >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I answered : The verses he quoted from Rgveda said that " all 49 > Marutas > > > > > > > > > > are equal bhraatara " . If anyone imagines 49 Maruts to be humans, > born > > > > > > > > > > simultaneously, it must be due to genetic cloning in Rgvedic times, > > > > > > > > > > because no mortal woman can beget 49 sons at a time ! Why Sunil > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya reduces deities like Maruts to mortals ? Rgveda never > said > > > > > > > > > > " we are all brothers " . Sunil Bhattacharjya is lying. He should cite > > > > > > > > > > texts honestly and properly, and should read scriptures without a > goblet > > > > > > > > > > in hand. A person incapable of understanding simple Puranic Sanskrit > and > > > > > > > > > > simple english and Hindi translations of the same should keep away > from > > > > > > > > > > difficult language of Rgveda. Pandits say that 12 years are needed > by > > > > > > > > > > Sanskrit scholars to master one Veda !! Now-a-days every fool may > pose > > > > > > > > > > as a Vedic expert, citing verses from internet out of context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All above exchanges took place over two months ago, after which he > went > > > > > > > > > > into hibernation because he could not refute the evidences, but > after > > > > > > > > > > two months came up again, repeating his old lies, believing that > members > > > > > > > > > > must have forgotten exchanges of two months ago. In this connection, > > > > > > > > > > another scholar Shri Venkata Krishnan in his own forum also cited > verses > > > > > > > > > > from Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana, chapter-142, Slokas 11-15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning: " Thirty yearsof men is one month for the Gods. A century of > men > > > > > > > > > > is three months and a few days of the Gods. 360 Human years make one > > > > > > > > > > year of the Devas ( Gods). ... 3,60,000 Human years make One > Thousand > > > > > > > > > > Divine years. " ( This verse-12 is exactly repeated in Verses18-19 > of > > > > > > > > > > Linga Purana cited below) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But Mr Sunil answered : " Thank you for the trouble takien. Let us > agree > > > > > > > > > > to disagree. I shall prefer to go by the definition of Vayu purana > > > > > > > > > > (57.17) " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil told me in this group : " Vayu purana says that Divyavarsha > is > > > > > > > > > > Solar year and Manushya varsha is the Sidereal Lunar year. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " Vayu Purana or no ancient text ever said that. Ask him to > > > > > > > > > > quote the verse verbatim. " In reply, I got abuses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, I had to send new evidences from a lot of Puranas as shown > below, > > > > > > > > > > and as expected he again refuses to accept his faults : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proof of length of Divya Varsha, this time from Narada Purana, which > > > > > > > > > > presents Ganita and Phalita portions of Jyotisha in more details > than > > > > > > > > > > any other Purana (Sage Sanaka says ) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Rturmaasadvayena syaattatrayenaayana m smritam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tatdvyena bhavedabdah sa devaanaam dinam bhavet " (verse-24, ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " uttaram divasam praahoo raatrirvai dakshinaayanam " (forst half of > > > > > > > > > > verse-25, ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse 24 defines ayana in first half, and then says two ayanas > > > > > > > > > > (uttaraayana and dakshinaayana) make one year (of humans) which is > one > > > > > > > > > > " din " of the gods. Next line says that uttaraayana is " divasa " while > > > > > > > > > > dakshinnayana is night (of gods). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same thing is said in Bhagavata Purana (and in Vishnu Purana, > > > > > > > > > > Suryasiddhanta, Brahmasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya, etc) , but SKB says it > is > > > > > > > > > > vague !!! SKB does not know Sanskrit which is " vague " to him, > hence > > > > > > > > > > it is impossible to convince him what the Puranas & c say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-5 of Koorma Purana says same thing : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-5 defines " maanusha " measure, and then " maasa' is defined in > same > > > > > > > > > > verse. Then, verse-6 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " taih shadbhir-ayanam varsham dve-ayane dakshinottare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ayanam dakshinam ratrir-devaanaam uttaram dinam " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " six (maanusha maasas) make up one ayana, two ayanas uttara and > dakshina > > > > > > > > > > make one year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshina ayana is night and uttara (ayana) is day of gods. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-1 of Linga Purana (verse 9-10) differentiates various types > of > > > > > > > > > > Varshas, and enumerates Divya and Maanusha, among others, as > different > > > > > > > > > > typres. It is clarified in chapter-3, verse 15-16 which say one > human > > > > > > > > > > year is equal to one divya day-night. In next verse, it is said that > " 30 > > > > > > > > > > years (of humans) constitute one divya month " , the language is copy > of > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana's definition of the same sent by me earlier > > > > > > > > > > ( " trinshadyaani tu varshaani divyo maasastu sa smritah " ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-18-19 of Linga Purana repeats verse of Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Treeni varsha-shataat anyeva shashti-varshaani yaani tu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > divyah samvatsaro hyesha maanushena prakeertitah " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means " 360 years of humans are equal to one divya samvatsara " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Later verses in Linga Purana repeat the verses of matsya Purana > about > > > > > > > > > > the length of Saptarshi Year, Dhruva Year, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Brahmaanda Purana which SKB needs so much (poorva-bhaaga > said by > > > > > > > > > > Vaayu) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ch-6, verse 44-45 says Krityuga measures 4800 divya varshas, verse > 61-62 > > > > > > > > > > repeats same thing in changed words. but actual details are in > > > > > > > > > > chapter-28 od second Anushamga of Poorvabhaaga said by Vayu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like other Puranas, verse -5 says Maanusha varsha is defined on the > > > > > > > > > > basis of laukika pramaana, ie, solar year, which is the measure of > year > > > > > > > > > > in this world. verse-7 clarifies it by saing that Sun divides day > and > > > > > > > > > > night in maanusha-loka, and other measures like month and year are > > > > > > > > > > measured in terms of this solar measure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verses 13-16 define divya dina and then divya varsha exactly in the > > > > > > > > > > manner of Matsya and Linga Puranas, clearly saying a divya varsha to > be > > > > > > > > > > equal to 360 maanusha varshas in verse-16, which is an exact replica > of > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Padma Purana , chapter-3, in the words of Sage Pulastya : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-7 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " dakshina ayana is night of gods and uttara (ayana) is day (of > gods) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verses say such 12000 divya varshas make one chaturyuga. Verses > 15- > > > > > > > > > > say that " one manvantara is equal to 852000 divya (suraadinaam) > varshas > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 human (paarthiva) years " : the ratio > is > > > > > > > > > > 360 maanusha varshas in one divya varsha : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 852000 divya varshas = > > > > > > > > > > " ashtau-shat- sahasraani- divyayaa- samkhyayaa- snritah / > > > > > > > > > > dvi-panchaashat- tathaa-anyaani- sahasraani- adhikaanicha " (verse > 15-16) ; > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 paarthiva varshas > > > > > > > > > > " trint-koti- astu-sampoornaah samkhyaataah samkgyayaanrpa / > > > > > > > > > > sapta-shashtih- tathaa-anyaani- niyutaani- mahaamate / > > > > > > > > > > vimshatishch- sahasraani- kaaloyamadhikamv inaa / > > > > > > > > > > manvantarasya- samkhyaeyam- maanushairiha- vatsareh / " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Vishnudharma Purana , ch-105 , in which Sage Shaunaka says > > > > > > > > > > (about the kaalamaana he got by worshipping Keshava) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-14 defines dakshina ayana as night and uttara ayana as day of > > > > > > > > > > gods, and says one samvatsara (of humans) is one ahoraatra of gods. > > > > > > > > > > Then, Verse-15 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Shatatrayena varshaanaam shashtyaa cha Prithivipate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manushya-samkhyayaa varsham devaanaam-api ganyate " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = " O Prithvipati (King Shataaneeka) ! 360 years of humans are one > > > > > > > > > > Varsha of Gods " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next line says " iti divyena maanena chaturyuga-vikalpan aam " , ie, > > > > > > > > > > chaturyuga (of 12000 divya years) is measured in this very divya > year > > > > > > > > > > (of 360 human years) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhagavata purana (3.11.18 - 20) says in verse 12 : " ayane chaahanee > > > > > > > > > > praahur-vatsaro dvaadasha smritah, samvatsarshatam nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > paramaayur-nirupita m " , ie, the ayanas (uttaraayana and > dakshinaayana > > > > > > > > > > described in preceding verse) are one day (of gods) but are called > > > > > > > > > > " varsha " or " dvaasha " (12 months) in the loka of nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > (maanusha-loka) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharya rejected all proofs and intensified his > abusive > > > > > > > > > > attack on me. I cannot prevent him from going from one falsehood to > > > > > > > > > > another. But ancient texts must be cited correctly. There are some > > > > > > > > > > scholars who believe that one divya varsha should be equal to one > solar > > > > > > > > > > year, but they do not cite scriptures falsely like Mr Sunil > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya to make their idea more acceptable. Mr Sunil makes a > mess > > > > > > > > > > of Saamkhya, Gita, Upanishada, Vedas, Puranas and Epics due to his > lack > > > > > > > > > > of knowledge of Sanskrit and lack of proper traning in indological > > > > > > > > > > studies, but instead of studying texts properly he starts posing as > an > > > > > > > > > > expert in everything, from Veda to liquor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============ ========= == === > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Dear Rohini ji, well,well the way you used ant exactly the same way i used the word little brain. unfortunately i joined this group after sri K.N.RAO ji's exit.Instead i am going through his old postings ...... somewhere he said that wise people allow destiny to pass willingly..... wise saying as well.... regards, gopi. , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani wrote: > > There we go again! > > Smart people stay away from battle-fields! They become public servants or businessmen or professors! > > But " Soft-hearted " ants get involved through an innocent bite or two! > > Now Ant has two burdens to carry! A Light machine gun on right shoulder and a Bazooka on the left! > > My shoulders are bowing down already and I do not even have a decent Kanya navamsha rising or kanya influence in my chart as KNR reminded us all some years ago -- based presumably on what Uttarkalamrita described for Kanya navamsha rising! Way back when this forum was blessed by Rao Saheb's personal and direct voice and presence! > > I must be getting old because I reminisce more these days than rejoice! > > Sorry for yet another NON-ASTROLOGICAL intervention! > > Rohiniranjan > > , " vinayjhaa16 " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > To Rohini Ji & c, > > > > Mr Sunil Ji says " If my memory serves me right even the Vishnu purana > > also gives... " . > > > > I had provided the website address of Mahirishi Institute of management > > (http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/ <http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/> ) > > where all these debated texts are available. Why Sunil Ji relies on his > > fallible memory instead of consulting the texts ? Neither Vishnu Purana > > (or any other text) says Kaliyuga to be of 4800 years, nor Vayu Purana > > says what he wrongly quotes. I possess many Puranas in my room, and many > > more in electric form downloaded from reliable sites, but I do not > > possess Vayu Purana at present, but I requested Dr Girija Shankar > > Shastri, the foremost astrologer of Allahabad and HOD of sankrit there, > > to scan Vayu purana. He did so and reported that Vayu Purana does not > > support what Sunil ji claims. > > > > Dr Girija Shankar Shastri has edited and published many rare Sanskrit > > manuscripts of Jyotisha and is invited by many universities as an expert > > in PhD interviews (recently, he was a member of an expert committee > > constituted by KSD Sanskrit University for interviewing those candidates > > who were already PhD and were applicant for major research Project of > > UGC, I was also a member there). Dr Girija Shankar Shastri is a busy > > person, and not very deft in handling computers, but has agreed to join > > this group. I hope Sunil Ji will will not abuse him in the manner he > > does me, otherwise he may face libel suits, because many judges and > > advocates of Allahabad are supportes and disciples of Dr Girija Shankar > > Shastri due to erudition of the latter. A monk can neglect to file a > > libel suit, but others may do. Mr Sunil should understand the meaning of > > " erudite gentleman " . Mr Sunil is refuting the evidence of so many > > Puranas & c sent by me and is refusing to cite verses which he wrongly > > quotes. > > > > I have requested the General Secretary of Akhila Bhaaratiya Vidvat > > Parishada (of Varanasi) to join these forums to see how Hindu scriptures > > are being misquoted in astrological fora ; this person is also the > > member of national executive of RSS and is a former weditor of Vishva > > Panchanga of BHU, and is a firebrand opponent of fall falsehoods, and > > has agreed to spend some time in these fora. > > > > If needed, I will request other reputed scholars of India to see the > > state of things in internet fora. Mr Sunil is heading towards greater > > troubles if he sticks to falsehood and abuses. > > > > -VJ > > =================== === > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > <sunil_bhattacharjya@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rohini, > > > > > > Sometime back I suggested to Mr. Vinay Jha to read the Vayu Purana as > > according to me the Vayu purana clearly defines what are the Divya > > varsha and the Manushya varsha and that purana also gives the example > > that 2700 Divya varsha (Sidereal Solar year) is equal to 3030 Sidereal > > Lunar calendar, so that there would not be any confusion. If my memory > > serves me right even the Vishnu purana also gives an example to > > > show that the spam of Kali yuga is 48000 (360,000 / 75 = 4800) years, > > > in human calculations. > > > > > > Then all of a sudden, even before he could read the Vayu purana on > > that topic, he attacked me on the subject of the span of yuga again. > > Instead of trying to sort out the issue he tried to show one-up-manship > > and I have to will-nilly try to project what is the truth. > > > > > > I have already said more than once that > > > let us agree to disagree. Let him say that he agrees to disagree and > > > then this exchange automatically comes to an end. But I doubt if an > > > egoist like him can agree to disagree and leave the topic. He thinks > > that by hook or crook he can trounce me. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ wrote: > > > > > > Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ > > > Re: Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, MrVinay > > Jha. > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dada, > > > > > > > > > > > > Both You and Vinay-Ji are Mammoths in your own individual ways! > > > > > > > > > > > > What can we tiny insects do, other than to bite you from time to time > > and remind you that we were trying to 'help'! > > > > > > > > > > > > Are both of you erudite gentlemen (I learned that word from BVRaman's > > astrological magazines back when I was a teenager...! ) trying to: > > > > > > > > > > > > ? Register a public complaint so that current PANCHAAYAT may pronounce > > a judgment in our cyber-village? > > > > > > > > > > > > ?? Educate us " great unwashed " with stuff that ... (I will leave that > > unfinished and to all readers' imaginations to fill in the blanks! Just > > as a mental exercise that has been recently found helpful, healthwise by > > doctors) > > > > > > > > > > > > ??? Is this an ongoing expression of 'boredom' or something like that? > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhul chook leni deni! > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini > > > > > > > > > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > <sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay Jha has again lying. I always said that Vayu purana gives the > > explanation of Divya varsha as Solar year. One Saptarshi cycle = 2700 > > Divya varsha = 3030 Mnusha varsha. > > > > > > > Let him explain this first. It is beacause of this verse he is > > avoiding Vayu purana all along. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When will he have the moral courage to speak the truth? He is citing > > verses about " Devaanam varsha " , which is applicable to Devaloka and not > > to Martyaloka. He does no sanskrit at all, rather he picked up some > > wrong ideas about Sanskrit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> > > > > > > > Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, Mr Sunil > > bhattacharjya! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:02 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharjya said repeatedly that one divya varsha was > > equal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to one solar year according to Mahabharata and Puranas, and refuses > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accept documentary evidences. Two months ago, I sent him verses from > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those texts which he was falsely quoting. Thereafter, he hibernated > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months, and came up with same falsehoods again, mixed with new > > lies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and new abuses for me !! Then, I had to spend some time, and I sent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > references from a lot of Puranas to expose this abusive liar, after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which will come again after some time with same falsehoods, feigning > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forget all evidences provided so far by me. And he calls me " an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incorrigible liar " . Here are the proofs which will convince > > everyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that he does not know Sanskrit and cites scriptures wrongly, and is > > too > > > > > > > > > > > > > > haughty to admit his errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I sent him reference from Vishnu Purana, which says > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " maasair-dvaadashab hir-varsham- ahoraatram tu tat divi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tribhir-varsha- shatair-varsham shashtyaa chaiva-asuradvishaa > > m " (Amsha- vi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-3, verse 10) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means : " 12 (human) months are (equal to) one divya day-night / > > (and) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 (human) years are (equal to) one varsha of gods > > (=asuraodvishaam) . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verse says : " such 12000 yesrs are equal to one chaturyuga.. . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I had explained this verse word by word because Mr > > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not know Sanskrit, but he refused to accept such clear verdict > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > called the yuga calculation of ancient sages as " my " invention ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent the following prrof from Mahabharata > > (khanda > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5-chapter 231-verse15) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ahoraatre vibhajate Suryau maanushalaukike " , which means days and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nights of manushya loka is made/divided by Surya. Verse 17 says > > " Daive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatryahanee varsham pravibhaagastayoh punah , ahastatrodagayanam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatrih syad dakshinaayanam " : in which " Daive raatryahanee varsham " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > means " (human) varsha is equal to day+night of gods " . Here varsha is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > varsha of maanushalaukike which is to be taken from preceding two > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses. Rest of verse 17 means " this daiva day+night is divided thus > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uttara (ayana) is divine day and dakshinaayana is divine night " . MBh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly says that the maanushalaukika year is solar year : see verse > > 15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above which says that Sun divides/makes day and night in > > maanushalaukika > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (but not in devaloka). " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent evidences from all major ancient > > Jyotisha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Siddhantas : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ancient siddhantic texts invariably speak of 4320000 solar years for > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mahayuga. For instance, in the first verse of Dashageetikaa of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya, Sun's bhagana number per (maha)yuga is 4320000 and > > Earth's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rotations are given to be 1582237500 (1582237828 in Suryasiddhanta, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this minor difference being due to Sunrise system of day count in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya in contrast to midnight system of Suryasiddhanta) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta( BSS) repeats the mathematics of > > Mahabharata > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (MBh-v-231) in its first chapter verses 4-7, in which 4320000 normal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solar years of humans are said to make one mahayuga (see verses 5-6) > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1000 such mahayugas are said to make one Kalpa (BSS, ch-i, verse > > 10). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya and Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly say one mahayuga to be equal to 4320000 years and not > > 43200000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days as Mr Sunil wrongly tried to prove by misquoting texts. His > > stand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is refuted by all these ancient texts : Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta, Mahabharata, Narada Purana, Vishnu > > Dharmottara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Purana, etc, all of which unanimously say that one mahayuga is of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4320000 years or 1582237828 days which is equal to 12000 divine > > years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How can he put " 1582237828 sunrises " in only 12000 " solar " years ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not only this, Mr Sunil reads Hindu scriptures in reverse direction > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Urdu (from my message two months ago) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vishnu Purana (Amsha-vi, chapter-3, verses 6-11) clearly say that > > 360 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " human " ( " maanusha " , see verse 6) years are equal to one divya year > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12000 " divya " years constitute one Chaturyuga (ie, Mahayuga). > > Exactly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same thing is repeated in Vishnu Purana (Amsha-i, chapter-3, verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8-14), with clarification that four yugas of a Chaturyuga have > > lengths > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of 4800, 3600, 2400 and 1200 divya years. The sequence of yugas is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Satyuga, Treta, Dvaapara and Kaliyuga, which means duration of > > Satyuga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is 4800, Treta 3600, Dvaapara 2400 and Kaliyuga 1200 " divya " years > > > > > > > > > > > > > > according to Vishnu Purana. Why Mr Sunil inverts the sequence of > > four > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yugas of a Chaturyuga and read Kaliyuga as 4800 ? Even schoolboys do > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit such blunders ! It is certainly a result of excessive > > drinking, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > although he says that only two tolas of wine should be taken daily. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is his statement about Rgveda : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< " I said that that the Rig Veda says that we are all brothers. > > Then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disprove what I said Vinay Jha did research and quoted several > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses from the Rig Veda to show that nowhere in the Rig Veda it is > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we are all brothers. Then I had to quote the exact verse where > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is said that we are all brothers and this shows that he missed the > > most > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relevant verse. Such is his false scholarship. " >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I answered : The verses he quoted from Rgveda said that " all 49 > > Marutas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are equal bhraatara " . If anyone imagines 49 Maruts to be humans, > > born > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simultaneously, it must be due to genetic cloning in Rgvedic times, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because no mortal woman can beget 49 sons at a time ! Why Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya reduces deities like Maruts to mortals ? Rgveda never > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " we are all brothers " . Sunil Bhattacharjya is lying. He should cite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > texts honestly and properly, and should read scriptures without a > > goblet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in hand. A person incapable of understanding simple Puranic Sanskrit > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simple english and Hindi translations of the same should keep away > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult language of Rgveda. Pandits say that 12 years are needed > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sanskrit scholars to master one Veda !! Now-a-days every fool may > > pose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as a Vedic expert, citing verses from internet out of context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All above exchanges took place over two months ago, after which he > > went > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into hibernation because he could not refute the evidences, but > > after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months came up again, repeating his old lies, believing that > > members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > must have forgotten exchanges of two months ago. In this connection, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another scholar Shri Venkata Krishnan in his own forum also cited > > verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana, chapter-142, Slokas 11-15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning: " Thirty yearsof men is one month for the Gods. A century of > > men > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is three months and a few days of the Gods. 360 Human years make one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year of the Devas ( Gods). ... 3,60,000 Human years make One > > Thousand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Divine years. " ( This verse-12 is exactly repeated in Verses18-19 > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Linga Purana cited below) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But Mr Sunil answered : " Thank you for the trouble takien. Let us > > agree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disagree. I shall prefer to go by the definition of Vayu purana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (57.17) " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil told me in this group : " Vayu purana says that Divyavarsha > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Solar year and Manushya varsha is the Sidereal Lunar year. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " Vayu Purana or no ancient text ever said that. Ask him to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > quote the verse verbatim. " In reply, I got abuses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, I had to send new evidences from a lot of Puranas as shown > > below, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and as expected he again refuses to accept his faults : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proof of length of Divya Varsha, this time from Narada Purana, which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presents Ganita and Phalita portions of Jyotisha in more details > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any other Purana (Sage Sanaka says ) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Rturmaasadvayena syaattatrayenaayana m smritam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tatdvyena bhavedabdah sa devaanaam dinam bhavet " (verse-24, ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " uttaram divasam praahoo raatrirvai dakshinaayanam " (forst half of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse-25, ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse 24 defines ayana in first half, and then says two ayanas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (uttaraayana and dakshinaayana) make one year (of humans) which is > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " din " of the gods. Next line says that uttaraayana is " divasa " while > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshinnayana is night (of gods). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same thing is said in Bhagavata Purana (and in Vishnu Purana, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suryasiddhanta, Brahmasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya, etc) , but SKB says it > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vague !!! SKB does not know Sanskrit which is " vague " to him, > > hence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is impossible to convince him what the Puranas & c say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-5 of Koorma Purana says same thing : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-5 defines " maanusha " measure, and then " maasa' is defined in > > same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse. Then, verse-6 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " taih shadbhir-ayanam varsham dve-ayane dakshinottare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ayanam dakshinam ratrir-devaanaam uttaram dinam " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " six (maanusha maasas) make up one ayana, two ayanas uttara and > > dakshina > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make one year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshina ayana is night and uttara (ayana) is day of gods. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-1 of Linga Purana (verse 9-10) differentiates various types > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varshas, and enumerates Divya and Maanusha, among others, as > > different > > > > > > > > > > > > > > typres. It is clarified in chapter-3, verse 15-16 which say one > > human > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year is equal to one divya day-night. In next verse, it is said that > > " 30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > years (of humans) constitute one divya month " , the language is copy > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana's definition of the same sent by me earlier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ( " trinshadyaani tu varshaani divyo maasastu sa smritah " ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-18-19 of Linga Purana repeats verse of Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Treeni varsha-shataat anyeva shashti-varshaani yaani tu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > divyah samvatsaro hyesha maanushena prakeertitah " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means " 360 years of humans are equal to one divya samvatsara " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Later verses in Linga Purana repeat the verses of matsya Purana > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the length of Saptarshi Year, Dhruva Year, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Brahmaanda Purana which SKB needs so much (poorva-bhaaga > > said by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vaayu) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ch-6, verse 44-45 says Krityuga measures 4800 divya varshas, verse > > 61-62 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repeats same thing in changed words. but actual details are in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-28 od second Anushamga of Poorvabhaaga said by Vayu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like other Puranas, verse -5 says Maanusha varsha is defined on the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis of laukika pramaana, ie, solar year, which is the measure of > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this world. verse-7 clarifies it by saing that Sun divides day > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > night in maanusha-loka, and other measures like month and year are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > measured in terms of this solar measure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verses 13-16 define divya dina and then divya varsha exactly in the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manner of Matsya and Linga Puranas, clearly saying a divya varsha to > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > equal to 360 maanusha varshas in verse-16, which is an exact replica > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Padma Purana , chapter-3, in the words of Sage Pulastya : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-7 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " dakshina ayana is night of gods and uttara (ayana) is day (of > > gods) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verses say such 12000 divya varshas make one chaturyuga. Verses > > 15- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > say that " one manvantara is equal to 852000 divya (suraadinaam) > > varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 human (paarthiva) years " : the ratio > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 maanusha varshas in one divya varsha : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 852000 divya varshas = > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ashtau-shat- sahasraani- divyayaa- samkhyayaa- snritah / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dvi-panchaashat- tathaa-anyaani- sahasraani- adhikaanicha " (verse > > 15-16) ; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 paarthiva varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " trint-koti- astu-sampoornaah samkhyaataah samkgyayaanrpa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sapta-shashtih- tathaa-anyaani- niyutaani- mahaamate / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vimshatishch- sahasraani- kaaloyamadhikamv inaa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manvantarasya- samkhyaeyam- maanushairiha- vatsareh / " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Vishnudharma Purana , ch-105 , in which Sage Shaunaka says > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (about the kaalamaana he got by worshipping Keshava) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-14 defines dakshina ayana as night and uttara ayana as day of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gods, and says one samvatsara (of humans) is one ahoraatra of gods. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, Verse-15 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Shatatrayena varshaanaam shashtyaa cha Prithivipate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manushya-samkhyayaa varsham devaanaam-api ganyate " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = " O Prithvipati (King Shataaneeka) ! 360 years of humans are one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varsha of Gods " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next line says " iti divyena maanena chaturyuga-vikalpan aam " , ie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chaturyuga (of 12000 divya years) is measured in this very divya > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (of 360 human years) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhagavata purana (3.11.18 - 20) says in verse 12 : " ayane chaahanee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > praahur-vatsaro dvaadasha smritah, samvatsarshatam nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paramaayur-nirupita m " , ie, the ayanas (uttaraayana and > > dakshinaayana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > described in preceding verse) are one day (of gods) but are called > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " varsha " or " dvaasha " (12 months) in the loka of nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (maanusha-loka) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharya rejected all proofs and intensified his > > abusive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attack on me. I cannot prevent him from going from one falsehood to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another. But ancient texts must be cited correctly. There are some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scholars who believe that one divya varsha should be equal to one > > solar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year, but they do not cite scriptures falsely like Mr Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya to make their idea more acceptable. Mr Sunil makes a > > mess > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Saamkhya, Gita, Upanishada, Vedas, Puranas and Epics due to his > > lack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of knowledge of Sanskrit and lack of proper traning in indological > > > > > > > > > > > > > > studies, but instead of studying texts properly he starts posing as > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expert in everything, from Veda to liquor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============ ========= == === > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 You missed my point, Gopi-ji :-( There is no little brain! Just " little utilization " of what we were supposed to or endowed with! I feel blessed to have experienced the direct presence of such great Astrologers and even greater Human Beings! And even when I gave some of them a hard time at times -- given with what I see and run into today, the prospects are SCARY! RR , " gopi_b927 " <gopi_b927 wrote: > > > Dear Rohini ji, > > well,well the way you used ant exactly the same way i used the word > little brain. > > unfortunately i joined this group after sri K.N.RAO ji's exit.Instead i > am going through his old postings ...... > > somewhere he said that wise people allow destiny to pass willingly..... > > wise saying as well.... > > regards, > > gopi. > > > > > , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani@> > wrote: > > > > There we go again! > > > > Smart people stay away from battle-fields! They become public servants > or businessmen or professors! > > > > But " Soft-hearted " ants get involved through an innocent bite or two! > > > > Now Ant has two burdens to carry! A Light machine gun on right > shoulder and a Bazooka on the left! > > > > My shoulders are bowing down already and I do not even have a decent > Kanya navamsha rising or kanya influence in my chart as KNR reminded us > all some years ago -- based presumably on what Uttarkalamrita described > for Kanya navamsha rising! Way back when this forum was blessed by Rao > Saheb's personal and direct voice and presence! > > > > I must be getting old because I reminisce more these days than > rejoice! > > > > Sorry for yet another NON-ASTROLOGICAL intervention! > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > To Rohini Ji & c, > > > > > > Mr Sunil Ji says " If my memory serves me right even the Vishnu > purana > > > also gives... " . > > > > > > I had provided the website address of Mahirishi Institute of > management > > > (http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/ <http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/> > ) > > > where all these debated texts are available. Why Sunil Ji relies on > his > > > fallible memory instead of consulting the texts ? Neither Vishnu > Purana > > > (or any other text) says Kaliyuga to be of 4800 years, nor Vayu > Purana > > > says what he wrongly quotes. I possess many Puranas in my room, and > many > > > more in electric form downloaded from reliable sites, but I do not > > > possess Vayu Purana at present, but I requested Dr Girija Shankar > > > Shastri, the foremost astrologer of Allahabad and HOD of sankrit > there, > > > to scan Vayu purana. He did so and reported that Vayu Purana does > not > > > support what Sunil ji claims. > > > > > > Dr Girija Shankar Shastri has edited and published many rare > Sanskrit > > > manuscripts of Jyotisha and is invited by many universities as an > expert > > > in PhD interviews (recently, he was a member of an expert committee > > > constituted by KSD Sanskrit University for interviewing those > candidates > > > who were already PhD and were applicant for major research Project > of > > > UGC, I was also a member there). Dr Girija Shankar Shastri is a busy > > > person, and not very deft in handling computers, but has agreed to > join > > > this group. I hope Sunil Ji will will not abuse him in the manner he > > > does me, otherwise he may face libel suits, because many judges and > > > advocates of Allahabad are supportes and disciples of Dr Girija > Shankar > > > Shastri due to erudition of the latter. A monk can neglect to file a > > > libel suit, but others may do. Mr Sunil should understand the > meaning of > > > " erudite gentleman " . Mr Sunil is refuting the evidence of so many > > > Puranas & c sent by me and is refusing to cite verses which he > wrongly > > > quotes. > > > > > > I have requested the General Secretary of Akhila Bhaaratiya Vidvat > > > Parishada (of Varanasi) to join these forums to see how Hindu > scriptures > > > are being misquoted in astrological fora ; this person is also the > > > member of national executive of RSS and is a former weditor of > Vishva > > > Panchanga of BHU, and is a firebrand opponent of fall falsehoods, > and > > > has agreed to spend some time in these fora. > > > > > > If needed, I will request other reputed scholars of India to see the > > > state of things in internet fora. Mr Sunil is heading towards > greater > > > troubles if he sticks to falsehood and abuses. > > > > > > -VJ > > > =================== === > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > <sunil_bhattacharjya@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Rohini, > > > > > > > > Sometime back I suggested to Mr. Vinay Jha to read the Vayu Purana > as > > > according to me the Vayu purana clearly defines what are the Divya > > > varsha and the Manushya varsha and that purana also gives the > example > > > that 2700 Divya varsha (Sidereal Solar year) is equal to 3030 > Sidereal > > > Lunar calendar, so that there would not be any confusion. If my > memory > > > serves me right even the Vishnu purana also gives an example to > > > > show that the spam of Kali yuga is 48000 (360,000 / 75 = 4800) > years, > > > > in human calculations. > > > > > > > > Then all of a sudden, even before he could read the Vayu purana on > > > that topic, he attacked me on the subject of the span of yuga again. > > > Instead of trying to sort out the issue he tried to show > one-up-manship > > > and I have to will-nilly try to project what is the truth. > > > > > > > > I have already said more than once that > > > > let us agree to disagree. Let him say that he agrees to disagree > and > > > > then this exchange automatically comes to an end. But I doubt if > an > > > > egoist like him can agree to disagree and leave the topic. He > thinks > > > that by hook or crook he can trounce me. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ > > > > Re: Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, > MrVinay > > > Jha. > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dada, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both You and Vinay-Ji are Mammoths in your own individual ways! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What can we tiny insects do, other than to bite you from time to > time > > > and remind you that we were trying to 'help'! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are both of you erudite gentlemen (I learned that word from > BVRaman's > > > astrological magazines back when I was a teenager...! ) trying to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ? Register a public complaint so that current PANCHAAYAT may > pronounce > > > a judgment in our cyber-village? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ?? Educate us " great unwashed " with stuff that ... (I will leave > that > > > unfinished and to all readers' imaginations to fill in the blanks! > Just > > > as a mental exercise that has been recently found helpful, > healthwise by > > > doctors) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ??? Is this an ongoing expression of 'boredom' or something like > that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhul chook leni deni! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > <sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay Jha has again lying. I always said that Vayu purana gives > the > > > explanation of Divya varsha as Solar year. One Saptarshi cycle = > 2700 > > > Divya varsha = 3030 Mnusha varsha. > > > > > > > > > Let him explain this first. It is beacause of this verse he is > > > avoiding Vayu purana all along. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When will he have the moral courage to speak the truth? He is > citing > > > verses about " Devaanam varsha " , which is applicable to Devaloka and > not > > > to Martyaloka. He does no sanskrit at all, rather he picked up some > > > wrong ideas about Sanskrit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> > > > > > > > > > Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, Mr Sunil > > > bhattacharjya! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:02 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharjya said repeatedly that one divya varsha was > > > equal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to one solar year according to Mahabharata and Puranas, and > refuses > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accept documentary evidences. Two months ago, I sent him verses > from > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those texts which he was falsely quoting. Thereafter, he > hibernated > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months, and came up with same falsehoods again, mixed with > new > > > lies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and new abuses for me !! Then, I had to spend some time, and I > sent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > references from a lot of Puranas to expose this abusive liar, > after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which will come again after some time with same falsehoods, > feigning > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forget all evidences provided so far by me. And he calls me " an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incorrigible liar " . Here are the proofs which will convince > > > everyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that he does not know Sanskrit and cites scriptures wrongly, and > is > > > too > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > haughty to admit his errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I sent him reference from Vishnu Purana, which > says > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " maasair-dvaadashab hir-varsham- ahoraatram tu tat divi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tribhir-varsha- shatair-varsham shashtyaa chaiva-asuradvishaa > > > m " (Amsha- vi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-3, verse 10) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means : " 12 (human) months are (equal to) one divya day-night > / > > > (and) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 (human) years are (equal to) one varsha of gods > > > (=asuraodvishaam) . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verse says : " such 12000 yesrs are equal to one > chaturyuga.. . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I had explained this verse word by word because > Mr > > > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not know Sanskrit, but he refused to accept such clear > verdict > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > called the yuga calculation of ancient sages as " my " invention ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent the following prrof from Mahabharata > > > (khanda > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5-chapter 231-verse15) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ahoraatre vibhajate Suryau maanushalaukike " , which means days > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nights of manushya loka is made/divided by Surya. Verse 17 says > > > " Daive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatryahanee varsham pravibhaagastayoh punah , > ahastatrodagayanam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatrih syad dakshinaayanam " : in which " Daive raatryahanee > varsham " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > means " (human) varsha is equal to day+night of gods " . Here > varsha is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > varsha of maanushalaukike which is to be taken from preceding > two > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses. Rest of verse 17 means " this daiva day+night is divided > thus > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uttara (ayana) is divine day and dakshinaayana is divine night " . > MBh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly says that the maanushalaukika year is solar year : see > verse > > > 15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above which says that Sun divides/makes day and night in > > > maanushalaukika > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (but not in devaloka). " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent evidences from all major ancient > > > Jyotisha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Siddhantas : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ancient siddhantic texts invariably speak of 4320000 solar years > for > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mahayuga. For instance, in the first verse of Dashageetikaa of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya, Sun's bhagana number per (maha)yuga is 4320000 and > > > Earth's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rotations are given to be 1582237500 (1582237828 in > Suryasiddhanta, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this minor difference being due to Sunrise system of day count > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya in contrast to midnight system of Suryasiddhanta) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta( BSS) repeats the mathematics of > > > Mahabharata > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (MBh-v-231) in its first chapter verses 4-7, in which 4320000 > normal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solar years of humans are said to make one mahayuga (see verses > 5-6) > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1000 such mahayugas are said to make one Kalpa (BSS, ch-i, verse > > > 10). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya and Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly say one mahayuga to be equal to 4320000 years and not > > > 43200000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days as Mr Sunil wrongly tried to prove by misquoting texts. His > > > stand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is refuted by all these ancient texts : Suryasiddhanta, > Aryabhatiya > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta, Mahabharata, Narada Purana, Vishnu > > > Dharmottara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Purana, etc, all of which unanimously say that one mahayuga is > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4320000 years or 1582237828 days which is equal to 12000 divine > > > years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How can he put " 1582237828 sunrises " in only 12000 " solar " years > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not only this, Mr Sunil reads Hindu scriptures in reverse > direction > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Urdu (from my message two months ago) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vishnu Purana (Amsha-vi, chapter-3, verses 6-11) clearly say > that > > > 360 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " human " ( " maanusha " , see verse 6) years are equal to one divya > year > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12000 " divya " years constitute one Chaturyuga (ie, Mahayuga). > > > Exactly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same thing is repeated in Vishnu Purana (Amsha-i, chapter-3, > verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8-14), with clarification that four yugas of a Chaturyuga have > > > lengths > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of 4800, 3600, 2400 and 1200 divya years. The sequence of yugas > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Satyuga, Treta, Dvaapara and Kaliyuga, which means duration of > > > Satyuga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is 4800, Treta 3600, Dvaapara 2400 and Kaliyuga 1200 " divya " > years > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > according to Vishnu Purana. Why Mr Sunil inverts the sequence of > > > four > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yugas of a Chaturyuga and read Kaliyuga as 4800 ? Even > schoolboys do > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit such blunders ! It is certainly a result of excessive > > > drinking, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > although he says that only two tolas of wine should be taken > daily. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is his statement about Rgveda : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< " I said that that the Rig Veda says that we are all > brothers. > > > Then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disprove what I said Vinay Jha did research and quoted > several > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses from the Rig Veda to show that nowhere in the Rig Veda it > is > > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we are all brothers. Then I had to quote the exact verse > where > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is said that we are all brothers and this shows that he missed > the > > > most > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relevant verse. Such is his false scholarship. " >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I answered : The verses he quoted from Rgveda said that " all 49 > > > Marutas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are equal bhraatara " . If anyone imagines 49 Maruts to be humans, > > > born > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simultaneously, it must be due to genetic cloning in Rgvedic > times, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because no mortal woman can beget 49 sons at a time ! Why Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya reduces deities like Maruts to mortals ? Rgveda > never > > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " we are all brothers " . Sunil Bhattacharjya is lying. He should > cite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > texts honestly and properly, and should read scriptures without > a > > > goblet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in hand. A person incapable of understanding simple Puranic > Sanskrit > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simple english and Hindi translations of the same should keep > away > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult language of Rgveda. Pandits say that 12 years are > needed > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sanskrit scholars to master one Veda !! Now-a-days every fool > may > > > pose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as a Vedic expert, citing verses from internet out of context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All above exchanges took place over two months ago, after which > he > > > went > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into hibernation because he could not refute the evidences, but > > > after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months came up again, repeating his old lies, believing that > > > members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > must have forgotten exchanges of two months ago. In this > connection, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another scholar Shri Venkata Krishnan in his own forum also > cited > > > verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana, chapter-142, Slokas 11-15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning: " Thirty yearsof men is one month for the Gods. A > century of > > > men > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is three months and a few days of the Gods. 360 Human years make > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year of the Devas ( Gods). ... 3,60,000 Human years make One > > > Thousand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Divine years. " ( This verse-12 is exactly repeated in > Verses18-19 > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Linga Purana cited below) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But Mr Sunil answered : " Thank you for the trouble takien. Let > us > > > agree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disagree. I shall prefer to go by the definition of Vayu > purana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (57.17) " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil told me in this group : " Vayu purana says that > Divyavarsha > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Solar year and Manushya varsha is the Sidereal Lunar year. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " Vayu Purana or no ancient text ever said that. Ask him > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > quote the verse verbatim. " In reply, I got abuses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, I had to send new evidences from a lot of Puranas as > shown > > > below, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and as expected he again refuses to accept his faults : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proof of length of Divya Varsha, this time from Narada Purana, > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presents Ganita and Phalita portions of Jyotisha in more details > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any other Purana (Sage Sanaka says ) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Rturmaasadvayena syaattatrayenaayana m smritam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tatdvyena bhavedabdah sa devaanaam dinam bhavet " (verse-24, > ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " uttaram divasam praahoo raatrirvai dakshinaayanam " (forst half > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse-25, ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse 24 defines ayana in first half, and then says two ayanas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (uttaraayana and dakshinaayana) make one year (of humans) which > is > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " din " of the gods. Next line says that uttaraayana is " divasa " > while > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshinnayana is night (of gods). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same thing is said in Bhagavata Purana (and in Vishnu Purana, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suryasiddhanta, Brahmasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya, etc) , but SKB > says it > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vague !!! SKB does not know Sanskrit which is " vague " to him, > > > hence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is impossible to convince him what the Puranas & c say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-5 of Koorma Purana says same thing : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-5 defines " maanusha " measure, and then " maasa' is defined > in > > > same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse. Then, verse-6 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " taih shadbhir-ayanam varsham dve-ayane dakshinottare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ayanam dakshinam ratrir-devaanaam uttaram dinam " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " six (maanusha maasas) make up one ayana, two ayanas uttara and > > > dakshina > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make one year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshina ayana is night and uttara (ayana) is day of gods. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-1 of Linga Purana (verse 9-10) differentiates various > types > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varshas, and enumerates Divya and Maanusha, among others, as > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > typres. It is clarified in chapter-3, verse 15-16 which say one > > > human > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year is equal to one divya day-night. In next verse, it is said > that > > > " 30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > years (of humans) constitute one divya month " , the language is > copy > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana's definition of the same sent by me earlier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ( " trinshadyaani tu varshaani divyo maasastu sa smritah " ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-18-19 of Linga Purana repeats verse of Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Treeni varsha-shataat anyeva shashti-varshaani yaani tu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > divyah samvatsaro hyesha maanushena prakeertitah " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means " 360 years of humans are equal to one divya > samvatsara " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Later verses in Linga Purana repeat the verses of matsya Purana > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the length of Saptarshi Year, Dhruva Year, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Brahmaanda Purana which SKB needs so much (poorva-bhaaga > > > said by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vaayu) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ch-6, verse 44-45 says Krityuga measures 4800 divya varshas, > verse > > > 61-62 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repeats same thing in changed words. but actual details are in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-28 od second Anushamga of Poorvabhaaga said by Vayu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like other Puranas, verse -5 says Maanusha varsha is defined on > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis of laukika pramaana, ie, solar year, which is the measure > of > > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this world. verse-7 clarifies it by saing that Sun divides > day > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > night in maanusha-loka, and other measures like month and year > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > measured in terms of this solar measure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verses 13-16 define divya dina and then divya varsha exactly in > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manner of Matsya and Linga Puranas, clearly saying a divya > varsha to > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > equal to 360 maanusha varshas in verse-16, which is an exact > replica > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Padma Purana , chapter-3, in the words of Sage Pulastya > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-7 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " dakshina ayana is night of gods and uttara (ayana) is day (of > > > gods) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verses say such 12000 divya varshas make one chaturyuga. > Verses > > > 15- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > say that " one manvantara is equal to 852000 divya (suraadinaam) > > > varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 human (paarthiva) years " : the > ratio > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 maanusha varshas in one divya varsha : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 852000 divya varshas = > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ashtau-shat- sahasraani- divyayaa- samkhyayaa- snritah / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dvi-panchaashat- tathaa-anyaani- sahasraani- adhikaanicha " > (verse > > > 15-16) ; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 paarthiva varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " trint-koti- astu-sampoornaah samkhyaataah samkgyayaanrpa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sapta-shashtih- tathaa-anyaani- niyutaani- mahaamate / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vimshatishch- sahasraani- kaaloyamadhikamv inaa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manvantarasya- samkhyaeyam- maanushairiha- vatsareh / " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Vishnudharma Purana , ch-105 , in which Sage Shaunaka > says > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (about the kaalamaana he got by worshipping Keshava) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-14 defines dakshina ayana as night and uttara ayana as day > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gods, and says one samvatsara (of humans) is one ahoraatra of > gods. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, Verse-15 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Shatatrayena varshaanaam shashtyaa cha Prithivipate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manushya-samkhyayaa varsham devaanaam-api ganyate " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = " O Prithvipati (King Shataaneeka) ! 360 years of humans are > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varsha of Gods " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next line says " iti divyena maanena chaturyuga-vikalpan aam " , > ie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chaturyuga (of 12000 divya years) is measured in this very divya > > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (of 360 human years) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhagavata purana (3.11.18 - 20) says in verse 12 : " ayane > chaahanee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > praahur-vatsaro dvaadasha smritah, samvatsarshatam nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paramaayur-nirupita m " , ie, the ayanas (uttaraayana and > > > dakshinaayana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > described in preceding verse) are one day (of gods) but are > called > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " varsha " or " dvaasha " (12 months) in the loka of nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (maanusha-loka) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharya rejected all proofs and intensified his > > > abusive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attack on me. I cannot prevent him from going from one falsehood > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another. But ancient texts must be cited correctly. There are > some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scholars who believe that one divya varsha should be equal to > one > > > solar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year, but they do not cite scriptures falsely like Mr Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya to make their idea more acceptable. Mr Sunil makes > a > > > mess > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Saamkhya, Gita, Upanishada, Vedas, Puranas and Epics due to > his > > > lack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of knowledge of Sanskrit and lack of proper traning in > indological > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > studies, but instead of studying texts properly he starts posing > as > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expert in everything, from Veda to liquor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============ ========= == === > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 No,no Rohini ji, i got it.but said what iwanted to say..... why should you be scary when when you got , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani wrote: > > You missed my point, Gopi-ji :-( > > There is no little brain! Just " little utilization " of what we were supposed to or endowed with! > > I feel blessed to have experienced the direct presence of such great Astrologers and even greater Human Beings! And even when I gave some of them a hard time at times -- given with what I see and run into today, the prospects are SCARY! > > RR > > , " gopi_b927 " gopi_b927@ wrote: > > > > > > Dear Rohini ji, > > > > well,well the way you used ant exactly the same way i used the word > > little brain. > > > > unfortunately i joined this group after sri K.N.RAO ji's exit.Instead i > > am going through his old postings ...... > > > > somewhere he said that wise people allow destiny to pass willingly..... > > > > wise saying as well.... > > > > regards, > > > > gopi. > > > > > > > > > > , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani@> > > wrote: > > > > > > There we go again! > > > > > > Smart people stay away from battle-fields! They become public servants > > or businessmen or professors! > > > > > > But " Soft-hearted " ants get involved through an innocent bite or two! > > > > > > Now Ant has two burdens to carry! A Light machine gun on right > > shoulder and a Bazooka on the left! > > > > > > My shoulders are bowing down already and I do not even have a decent > > Kanya navamsha rising or kanya influence in my chart as KNR reminded us > > all some years ago -- based presumably on what Uttarkalamrita described > > for Kanya navamsha rising! Way back when this forum was blessed by Rao > > Saheb's personal and direct voice and presence! > > > > > > I must be getting old because I reminisce more these days than > > rejoice! > > > > > > Sorry for yet another NON-ASTROLOGICAL intervention! > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " vinayjhaa16@ wrote: > > > > > > > > To Rohini Ji & c, > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Ji says " If my memory serves me right even the Vishnu > > purana > > > > also gives... " . > > > > > > > > I had provided the website address of Mahirishi Institute of > > management > > > > (http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/ <http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/> > > ) > > > > where all these debated texts are available. Why Sunil Ji relies on > > his > > > > fallible memory instead of consulting the texts ? Neither Vishnu > > Purana > > > > (or any other text) says Kaliyuga to be of 4800 years, nor Vayu > > Purana > > > > says what he wrongly quotes. I possess many Puranas in my room, and > > many > > > > more in electric form downloaded from reliable sites, but I do not > > > > possess Vayu Purana at present, but I requested Dr Girija Shankar > > > > Shastri, the foremost astrologer of Allahabad and HOD of sankrit > > there, > > > > to scan Vayu purana. He did so and reported that Vayu Purana does > > not > > > > support what Sunil ji claims. > > > > > > > > Dr Girija Shankar Shastri has edited and published many rare > > Sanskrit > > > > manuscripts of Jyotisha and is invited by many universities as an > > expert > > > > in PhD interviews (recently, he was a member of an expert committee > > > > constituted by KSD Sanskrit University for interviewing those > > candidates > > > > who were already PhD and were applicant for major research Project > > of > > > > UGC, I was also a member there). Dr Girija Shankar Shastri is a busy > > > > person, and not very deft in handling computers, but has agreed to > > join > > > > this group. I hope Sunil Ji will will not abuse him in the manner he > > > > does me, otherwise he may face libel suits, because many judges and > > > > advocates of Allahabad are supportes and disciples of Dr Girija > > Shankar > > > > Shastri due to erudition of the latter. A monk can neglect to file a > > > > libel suit, but others may do. Mr Sunil should understand the > > meaning of > > > > " erudite gentleman " . Mr Sunil is refuting the evidence of so many > > > > Puranas & c sent by me and is refusing to cite verses which he > > wrongly > > > > quotes. > > > > > > > > I have requested the General Secretary of Akhila Bhaaratiya Vidvat > > > > Parishada (of Varanasi) to join these forums to see how Hindu > > scriptures > > > > are being misquoted in astrological fora ; this person is also the > > > > member of national executive of RSS and is a former weditor of > > Vishva > > > > Panchanga of BHU, and is a firebrand opponent of fall falsehoods, > > and > > > > has agreed to spend some time in these fora. > > > > > > > > If needed, I will request other reputed scholars of India to see the > > > > state of things in internet fora. Mr Sunil is heading towards > > greater > > > > troubles if he sticks to falsehood and abuses. > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > =================== === > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > > <sunil_bhattacharjya@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rohini, > > > > > > > > > > Sometime back I suggested to Mr. Vinay Jha to read the Vayu Purana > > as > > > > according to me the Vayu purana clearly defines what are the Divya > > > > varsha and the Manushya varsha and that purana also gives the > > example > > > > that 2700 Divya varsha (Sidereal Solar year) is equal to 3030 > > Sidereal > > > > Lunar calendar, so that there would not be any confusion. If my > > memory > > > > serves me right even the Vishnu purana also gives an example to > > > > > show that the spam of Kali yuga is 48000 (360,000 / 75 = 4800) > > years, > > > > > in human calculations. > > > > > > > > > > Then all of a sudden, even before he could read the Vayu purana on > > > > that topic, he attacked me on the subject of the span of yuga again. > > > > Instead of trying to sort out the issue he tried to show > > one-up-manship > > > > and I have to will-nilly try to project what is the truth. > > > > > > > > > > I have already said more than once that > > > > > let us agree to disagree. Let him say that he agrees to disagree > > and > > > > > then this exchange automatically comes to an end. But I doubt if > > an > > > > > egoist like him can agree to disagree and leave the topic. He > > thinks > > > > that by hook or crook he can trounce me. > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ > > > > > Re: Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, > > MrVinay > > > > Jha. > > > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dada, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both You and Vinay-Ji are Mammoths in your own individual ways! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What can we tiny insects do, other than to bite you from time to > > time > > > > and remind you that we were trying to 'help'! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are both of you erudite gentlemen (I learned that word from > > BVRaman's > > > > astrological magazines back when I was a teenager...! ) trying to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ? Register a public complaint so that current PANCHAAYAT may > > pronounce > > > > a judgment in our cyber-village? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ?? Educate us " great unwashed " with stuff that ... (I will leave > > that > > > > unfinished and to all readers' imaginations to fill in the blanks! > > Just > > > > as a mental exercise that has been recently found helpful, > > healthwise by > > > > doctors) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ??? Is this an ongoing expression of 'boredom' or something like > > that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhul chook leni deni! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > > <sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay Jha has again lying. I always said that Vayu purana gives > > the > > > > explanation of Divya varsha as Solar year. One Saptarshi cycle = > > 2700 > > > > Divya varsha = 3030 Mnusha varsha. > > > > > > > > > > > Let him explain this first. It is beacause of this verse he is > > > > avoiding Vayu purana all along. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When will he have the moral courage to speak the truth? He is > > citing > > > > verses about " Devaanam varsha " , which is applicable to Devaloka and > > not > > > > to Martyaloka. He does no sanskrit at all, rather he picked up some > > > > wrong ideas about Sanskrit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, Mr Sunil > > > > bhattacharjya! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:02 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharjya said repeatedly that one divya varsha was > > > > equal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to one solar year according to Mahabharata and Puranas, and > > refuses > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accept documentary evidences. Two months ago, I sent him verses > > from > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those texts which he was falsely quoting. Thereafter, he > > hibernated > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months, and came up with same falsehoods again, mixed with > > new > > > > lies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and new abuses for me !! Then, I had to spend some time, and I > > sent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > references from a lot of Puranas to expose this abusive liar, > > after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which will come again after some time with same falsehoods, > > feigning > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forget all evidences provided so far by me. And he calls me " an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incorrigible liar " . Here are the proofs which will convince > > > > everyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that he does not know Sanskrit and cites scriptures wrongly, and > > is > > > > too > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > haughty to admit his errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I sent him reference from Vishnu Purana, which > > says > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " maasair-dvaadashab hir-varsham- ahoraatram tu tat divi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tribhir-varsha- shatair-varsham shashtyaa chaiva-asuradvishaa > > > > m " (Amsha- vi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-3, verse 10) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means : " 12 (human) months are (equal to) one divya day-night > > / > > > > (and) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 (human) years are (equal to) one varsha of gods > > > > (=asuraodvishaam) . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verse says : " such 12000 yesrs are equal to one > > chaturyuga.. . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I had explained this verse word by word because > > Mr > > > > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not know Sanskrit, but he refused to accept such clear > > verdict > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > called the yuga calculation of ancient sages as " my " invention ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent the following prrof from Mahabharata > > > > (khanda > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5-chapter 231-verse15) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ahoraatre vibhajate Suryau maanushalaukike " , which means days > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nights of manushya loka is made/divided by Surya. Verse 17 says > > > > " Daive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatryahanee varsham pravibhaagastayoh punah , > > ahastatrodagayanam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatrih syad dakshinaayanam " : in which " Daive raatryahanee > > varsham " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > means " (human) varsha is equal to day+night of gods " . Here > > varsha is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > varsha of maanushalaukike which is to be taken from preceding > > two > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses. Rest of verse 17 means " this daiva day+night is divided > > thus > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uttara (ayana) is divine day and dakshinaayana is divine night " . > > MBh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly says that the maanushalaukika year is solar year : see > > verse > > > > 15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above which says that Sun divides/makes day and night in > > > > maanushalaukika > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (but not in devaloka). " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent evidences from all major ancient > > > > Jyotisha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Siddhantas : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ancient siddhantic texts invariably speak of 4320000 solar years > > for > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mahayuga. For instance, in the first verse of Dashageetikaa of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya, Sun's bhagana number per (maha)yuga is 4320000 and > > > > Earth's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rotations are given to be 1582237500 (1582237828 in > > Suryasiddhanta, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this minor difference being due to Sunrise system of day count > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya in contrast to midnight system of Suryasiddhanta) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta( BSS) repeats the mathematics of > > > > Mahabharata > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (MBh-v-231) in its first chapter verses 4-7, in which 4320000 > > normal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solar years of humans are said to make one mahayuga (see verses > > 5-6) > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1000 such mahayugas are said to make one Kalpa (BSS, ch-i, verse > > > > 10). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya and Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly say one mahayuga to be equal to 4320000 years and not > > > > 43200000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days as Mr Sunil wrongly tried to prove by misquoting texts. His > > > > stand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is refuted by all these ancient texts : Suryasiddhanta, > > Aryabhatiya > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta, Mahabharata, Narada Purana, Vishnu > > > > Dharmottara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Purana, etc, all of which unanimously say that one mahayuga is > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4320000 years or 1582237828 days which is equal to 12000 divine > > > > years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How can he put " 1582237828 sunrises " in only 12000 " solar " years > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not only this, Mr Sunil reads Hindu scriptures in reverse > > direction > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Urdu (from my message two months ago) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vishnu Purana (Amsha-vi, chapter-3, verses 6-11) clearly say > > that > > > > 360 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " human " ( " maanusha " , see verse 6) years are equal to one divya > > year > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12000 " divya " years constitute one Chaturyuga (ie, Mahayuga). > > > > Exactly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same thing is repeated in Vishnu Purana (Amsha-i, chapter-3, > > verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8-14), with clarification that four yugas of a Chaturyuga have > > > > lengths > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of 4800, 3600, 2400 and 1200 divya years. The sequence of yugas > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Satyuga, Treta, Dvaapara and Kaliyuga, which means duration of > > > > Satyuga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is 4800, Treta 3600, Dvaapara 2400 and Kaliyuga 1200 " divya " > > years > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > according to Vishnu Purana. Why Mr Sunil inverts the sequence of > > > > four > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yugas of a Chaturyuga and read Kaliyuga as 4800 ? Even > > schoolboys do > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit such blunders ! It is certainly a result of excessive > > > > drinking, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > although he says that only two tolas of wine should be taken > > daily. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is his statement about Rgveda : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< " I said that that the Rig Veda says that we are all > > brothers. > > > > Then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disprove what I said Vinay Jha did research and quoted > > several > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses from the Rig Veda to show that nowhere in the Rig Veda it > > is > > > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we are all brothers. Then I had to quote the exact verse > > where > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is said that we are all brothers and this shows that he missed > > the > > > > most > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relevant verse. Such is his false scholarship. " >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I answered : The verses he quoted from Rgveda said that " all 49 > > > > Marutas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are equal bhraatara " . If anyone imagines 49 Maruts to be humans, > > > > born > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simultaneously, it must be due to genetic cloning in Rgvedic > > times, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because no mortal woman can beget 49 sons at a time ! Why Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya reduces deities like Maruts to mortals ? Rgveda > > never > > > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " we are all brothers " . Sunil Bhattacharjya is lying. He should > > cite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > texts honestly and properly, and should read scriptures without > > a > > > > goblet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in hand. A person incapable of understanding simple Puranic > > Sanskrit > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simple english and Hindi translations of the same should keep > > away > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult language of Rgveda. Pandits say that 12 years are > > needed > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sanskrit scholars to master one Veda !! Now-a-days every fool > > may > > > > pose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as a Vedic expert, citing verses from internet out of context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All above exchanges took place over two months ago, after which > > he > > > > went > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into hibernation because he could not refute the evidences, but > > > > after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months came up again, repeating his old lies, believing that > > > > members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > must have forgotten exchanges of two months ago. In this > > connection, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another scholar Shri Venkata Krishnan in his own forum also > > cited > > > > verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana, chapter-142, Slokas 11-15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning: " Thirty yearsof men is one month for the Gods. A > > century of > > > > men > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is three months and a few days of the Gods. 360 Human years make > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year of the Devas ( Gods). ... 3,60,000 Human years make One > > > > Thousand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Divine years. " ( This verse-12 is exactly repeated in > > Verses18-19 > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Linga Purana cited below) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But Mr Sunil answered : " Thank you for the trouble takien. Let > > us > > > > agree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disagree. I shall prefer to go by the definition of Vayu > > purana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (57.17) " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil told me in this group : " Vayu purana says that > > Divyavarsha > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Solar year and Manushya varsha is the Sidereal Lunar year. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " Vayu Purana or no ancient text ever said that. Ask him > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > quote the verse verbatim. " In reply, I got abuses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, I had to send new evidences from a lot of Puranas as > > shown > > > > below, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and as expected he again refuses to accept his faults : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proof of length of Divya Varsha, this time from Narada Purana, > > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presents Ganita and Phalita portions of Jyotisha in more details > > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any other Purana (Sage Sanaka says ) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Rturmaasadvayena syaattatrayenaayana m smritam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tatdvyena bhavedabdah sa devaanaam dinam bhavet " (verse-24, > > ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " uttaram divasam praahoo raatrirvai dakshinaayanam " (forst half > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse-25, ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse 24 defines ayana in first half, and then says two ayanas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (uttaraayana and dakshinaayana) make one year (of humans) which > > is > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " din " of the gods. Next line says that uttaraayana is " divasa " > > while > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshinnayana is night (of gods). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same thing is said in Bhagavata Purana (and in Vishnu Purana, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suryasiddhanta, Brahmasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya, etc) , but SKB > > says it > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vague !!! SKB does not know Sanskrit which is " vague " to him, > > > > hence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is impossible to convince him what the Puranas & c say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-5 of Koorma Purana says same thing : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-5 defines " maanusha " measure, and then " maasa' is defined > > in > > > > same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse. Then, verse-6 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " taih shadbhir-ayanam varsham dve-ayane dakshinottare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ayanam dakshinam ratrir-devaanaam uttaram dinam " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " six (maanusha maasas) make up one ayana, two ayanas uttara and > > > > dakshina > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make one year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshina ayana is night and uttara (ayana) is day of gods. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-1 of Linga Purana (verse 9-10) differentiates various > > types > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varshas, and enumerates Divya and Maanusha, among others, as > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > typres. It is clarified in chapter-3, verse 15-16 which say one > > > > human > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year is equal to one divya day-night. In next verse, it is said > > that > > > > " 30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > years (of humans) constitute one divya month " , the language is > > copy > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana's definition of the same sent by me earlier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ( " trinshadyaani tu varshaani divyo maasastu sa smritah " ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-18-19 of Linga Purana repeats verse of Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Treeni varsha-shataat anyeva shashti-varshaani yaani tu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > divyah samvatsaro hyesha maanushena prakeertitah " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means " 360 years of humans are equal to one divya > > samvatsara " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Later verses in Linga Purana repeat the verses of matsya Purana > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the length of Saptarshi Year, Dhruva Year, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Brahmaanda Purana which SKB needs so much (poorva-bhaaga > > > > said by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vaayu) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ch-6, verse 44-45 says Krityuga measures 4800 divya varshas, > > verse > > > > 61-62 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repeats same thing in changed words. but actual details are in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-28 od second Anushamga of Poorvabhaaga said by Vayu : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like other Puranas, verse -5 says Maanusha varsha is defined on > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis of laukika pramaana, ie, solar year, which is the measure > > of > > > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this world. verse-7 clarifies it by saing that Sun divides > > day > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > night in maanusha-loka, and other measures like month and year > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > measured in terms of this solar measure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verses 13-16 define divya dina and then divya varsha exactly in > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manner of Matsya and Linga Puranas, clearly saying a divya > > varsha to > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > equal to 360 maanusha varshas in verse-16, which is an exact > > replica > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Padma Purana , chapter-3, in the words of Sage Pulastya > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-7 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " dakshina ayana is night of gods and uttara (ayana) is day (of > > > > gods) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verses say such 12000 divya varshas make one chaturyuga. > > Verses > > > > 15- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > say that " one manvantara is equal to 852000 divya (suraadinaam) > > > > varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 human (paarthiva) years " : the > > ratio > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 maanusha varshas in one divya varsha : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 852000 divya varshas = > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ashtau-shat- sahasraani- divyayaa- samkhyayaa- snritah / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dvi-panchaashat- tathaa-anyaani- sahasraani- adhikaanicha " > > (verse > > > > 15-16) ; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 paarthiva varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " trint-koti- astu-sampoornaah samkhyaataah samkgyayaanrpa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sapta-shashtih- tathaa-anyaani- niyutaani- mahaamate / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vimshatishch- sahasraani- kaaloyamadhikamv inaa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manvantarasya- samkhyaeyam- maanushairiha- vatsareh / " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Vishnudharma Purana , ch-105 , in which Sage Shaunaka > > says > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (about the kaalamaana he got by worshipping Keshava) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-14 defines dakshina ayana as night and uttara ayana as day > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gods, and says one samvatsara (of humans) is one ahoraatra of > > gods. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, Verse-15 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Shatatrayena varshaanaam shashtyaa cha Prithivipate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manushya-samkhyayaa varsham devaanaam-api ganyate " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = " O Prithvipati (King Shataaneeka) ! 360 years of humans are > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varsha of Gods " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next line says " iti divyena maanena chaturyuga-vikalpan aam " , > > ie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chaturyuga (of 12000 divya years) is measured in this very divya > > > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (of 360 human years) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhagavata purana (3.11.18 - 20) says in verse 12 : " ayane > > chaahanee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > praahur-vatsaro dvaadasha smritah, samvatsarshatam nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paramaayur-nirupita m " , ie, the ayanas (uttaraayana and > > > > dakshinaayana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > described in preceding verse) are one day (of gods) but are > > called > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " varsha " or " dvaasha " (12 months) in the loka of nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (maanusha-loka) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharya rejected all proofs and intensified his > > > > abusive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attack on me. I cannot prevent him from going from one falsehood > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another. But ancient texts must be cited correctly. There are > > some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scholars who believe that one divya varsha should be equal to > > one > > > > solar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year, but they do not cite scriptures falsely like Mr Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya to make their idea more acceptable. Mr Sunil makes > > a > > > > mess > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Saamkhya, Gita, Upanishada, Vedas, Puranas and Epics due to > > his > > > > lack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of knowledge of Sanskrit and lack of proper traning in > > indological > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > studies, but instead of studying texts properly he starts posing > > as > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expert in everything, from Veda to liquor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============ ========= == === > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Dear Gopi jee! Galat samjhay jee! I am not scary :-) Ask anyone who has known me! I am the " scared " one!! What is scary is that " scared " and 'sacred' are but anagrams as I believe those are called! Another wasted breath I suppose... Then there are enneagrams ... yet another level of complexity and confusion! Rohiniranjan , " gopi_b927 " <gopi_b927 wrote: > > > No,no Rohini ji, > > i got it.but said what iwanted to say..... > > why should you be scary when when you got > , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani@> > wrote: > > > > You missed my point, Gopi-ji :-( > > > > There is no little brain! Just " little utilization " of what we were > supposed to or endowed with! > > > > I feel blessed to have experienced the direct presence of such great > Astrologers and even greater Human Beings! And even when I gave some of > them a hard time at times -- given with what I see and run into today, > the prospects are SCARY! > > > > RR > > > > , " gopi_b927 " gopi_b927@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dear Rohini ji, > > > > > > well,well the way you used ant exactly the same way i used the word > > > little brain. > > > > > > unfortunately i joined this group after sri K.N.RAO ji's > exit.Instead i > > > am going through his old postings ...... > > > > > > somewhere he said that wise people allow destiny to pass > willingly..... > > > > > > wise saying as well.... > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > gopi. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , " Rohiniranjan " <jyotish_vani@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > There we go again! > > > > > > > > Smart people stay away from battle-fields! They become public > servants > > > or businessmen or professors! > > > > > > > > But " Soft-hearted " ants get involved through an innocent bite or > two! > > > > > > > > Now Ant has two burdens to carry! A Light machine gun on right > > > shoulder and a Bazooka on the left! > > > > > > > > My shoulders are bowing down already and I do not even have a > decent > > > Kanya navamsha rising or kanya influence in my chart as KNR reminded > us > > > all some years ago -- based presumably on what Uttarkalamrita > described > > > for Kanya navamsha rising! Way back when this forum was blessed by > Rao > > > Saheb's personal and direct voice and presence! > > > > > > > > I must be getting old because I reminisce more these days than > > > rejoice! > > > > > > > > Sorry for yet another NON-ASTROLOGICAL intervention! > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan > > > > > > > > , " vinayjhaa16 " vinayjhaa16@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > To Rohini Ji & c, > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Ji says " If my memory serves me right even the Vishnu > > > purana > > > > > also gives... " . > > > > > > > > > > I had provided the website address of Mahirishi Institute of > > > management > > > > > (http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/ > <http://is1.mum.edu/vedicreserve/> > > > ) > > > > > where all these debated texts are available. Why Sunil Ji relies > on > > > his > > > > > fallible memory instead of consulting the texts ? Neither Vishnu > > > Purana > > > > > (or any other text) says Kaliyuga to be of 4800 years, nor Vayu > > > Purana > > > > > says what he wrongly quotes. I possess many Puranas in my room, > and > > > many > > > > > more in electric form downloaded from reliable sites, but I do > not > > > > > possess Vayu Purana at present, but I requested Dr Girija > Shankar > > > > > Shastri, the foremost astrologer of Allahabad and HOD of sankrit > > > there, > > > > > to scan Vayu purana. He did so and reported that Vayu Purana > does > > > not > > > > > support what Sunil ji claims. > > > > > > > > > > Dr Girija Shankar Shastri has edited and published many rare > > > Sanskrit > > > > > manuscripts of Jyotisha and is invited by many universities as > an > > > expert > > > > > in PhD interviews (recently, he was a member of an expert > committee > > > > > constituted by KSD Sanskrit University for interviewing those > > > candidates > > > > > who were already PhD and were applicant for major research > Project > > > of > > > > > UGC, I was also a member there). Dr Girija Shankar Shastri is a > busy > > > > > person, and not very deft in handling computers, but has agreed > to > > > join > > > > > this group. I hope Sunil Ji will will not abuse him in the > manner he > > > > > does me, otherwise he may face libel suits, because many judges > and > > > > > advocates of Allahabad are supportes and disciples of Dr Girija > > > Shankar > > > > > Shastri due to erudition of the latter. A monk can neglect to > file a > > > > > libel suit, but others may do. Mr Sunil should understand the > > > meaning of > > > > > " erudite gentleman " . Mr Sunil is refuting the evidence of so > many > > > > > Puranas & c sent by me and is refusing to cite verses which he > > > wrongly > > > > > quotes. > > > > > > > > > > I have requested the General Secretary of Akhila Bhaaratiya > Vidvat > > > > > Parishada (of Varanasi) to join these forums to see how Hindu > > > scriptures > > > > > are being misquoted in astrological fora ; this person is also > the > > > > > member of national executive of RSS and is a former weditor of > > > Vishva > > > > > Panchanga of BHU, and is a firebrand opponent of fall > falsehoods, > > > and > > > > > has agreed to spend some time in these fora. > > > > > > > > > > If needed, I will request other reputed scholars of India to see > the > > > > > state of things in internet fora. Mr Sunil is heading towards > > > greater > > > > > troubles if he sticks to falsehood and abuses. > > > > > > > > > > -VJ > > > > > =================== === > > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > > > <sunil_bhattacharjya@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Rohini, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sometime back I suggested to Mr. Vinay Jha to read the Vayu > Purana > > > as > > > > > according to me the Vayu purana clearly defines what are the > Divya > > > > > varsha and the Manushya varsha and that purana also gives the > > > example > > > > > that 2700 Divya varsha (Sidereal Solar year) is equal to 3030 > > > Sidereal > > > > > Lunar calendar, so that there would not be any confusion. If my > > > memory > > > > > serves me right even the Vishnu purana also gives an example to > > > > > > show that the spam of Kali yuga is 48000 (360,000 / 75 = 4800) > > > years, > > > > > > in human calculations. > > > > > > > > > > > > Then all of a sudden, even before he could read the Vayu > purana on > > > > > that topic, he attacked me on the subject of the span of yuga > again. > > > > > Instead of trying to sort out the issue he tried to show > > > one-up-manship > > > > > and I have to will-nilly try to project what is the truth. > > > > > > > > > > > > I have already said more than once that > > > > > > let us agree to disagree. Let him say that he agrees to > disagree > > > and > > > > > > then this exchange automatically comes to an end. But I doubt > if > > > an > > > > > > egoist like him can agree to disagree and leave the topic. He > > > thinks > > > > > that by hook or crook he can trounce me. > > > > > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohiniranjan jyotish_vani@ > > > > > > Re: Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, > > > MrVinay > > > > > Jha. > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:16 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Dada, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Both You and Vinay-Ji are Mammoths in your own individual > ways! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What can we tiny insects do, other than to bite you from time > to > > > time > > > > > and remind you that we were trying to 'help'! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are both of you erudite gentlemen (I learned that word from > > > BVRaman's > > > > > astrological magazines back when I was a teenager...! ) trying > to: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ? Register a public complaint so that current PANCHAAYAT may > > > pronounce > > > > > a judgment in our cyber-village? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ?? Educate us " great unwashed " with stuff that ... (I will > leave > > > that > > > > > unfinished and to all readers' imaginations to fill in the > blanks! > > > Just > > > > > as a mental exercise that has been recently found helpful, > > > healthwise by > > > > > doctors) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ??? Is this an ongoing expression of 'boredom' or something > like > > > that? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhul chook leni deni! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Rohini > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > , Sunil Bhattacharjya > > > > > <sunil_bhattacharjy a wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vinay Jha has again lying. I always said that Vayu purana > gives > > > the > > > > > explanation of Divya varsha as Solar year. One Saptarshi cycle = > > > 2700 > > > > > Divya varsha = 3030 Mnusha varsha. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Let him explain this first. It is beacause of this verse he > is > > > > > avoiding Vayu purana all along. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > When will he have the moral courage to speak the truth? He > is > > > citing > > > > > verses about " Devaanam varsha " , which is applicable to Devaloka > and > > > not > > > > > to Martyaloka. He does no sanskrit at all, rather he picked up > some > > > > > wrong ideas about Sanskrit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sunil K. Bhattacharjya > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- On Fri, 7/17/09, vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vinayjhaa16 <vinayjhaa16@ ...> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do Not Cite Scriptures Falsely, Mr > Sunil > > > > > bhattacharjya! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Friday, July 17, 2009, 8:02 AM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To All : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharjya said repeatedly that one divya varsha > was > > > > > equal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to one solar year according to Mahabharata and Puranas, and > > > refuses > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > accept documentary evidences. Two months ago, I sent him > verses > > > from > > > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > those texts which he was falsely quoting. Thereafter, he > > > hibernated > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months, and came up with same falsehoods again, mixed > with > > > new > > > > > lies > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and new abuses for me !! Then, I had to spend some time, and > I > > > sent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > references from a lot of Puranas to expose this abusive > liar, > > > after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which will come again after some time with same falsehoods, > > > feigning > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > forget all evidences provided so far by me. And he calls me > " an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incorrigible liar " . Here are the proofs which will convince > > > > > everyone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that he does not know Sanskrit and cites scriptures wrongly, > and > > > is > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > haughty to admit his errors. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I sent him reference from Vishnu Purana, > which > > > says > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " maasair-dvaadashab hir-varsham- ahoraatram tu tat divi > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tribhir-varsha- shatair-varsham shashtyaa > chaiva-asuradvishaa > > > > > m " (Amsha- vi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-3, verse 10) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means : " 12 (human) months are (equal to) one divya > day-night > > > / > > > > > (and) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 (human) years are (equal to) one varsha of gods > > > > > (=asuraodvishaam) . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verse says : " such 12000 yesrs are equal to one > > > chaturyuga.. . " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I had explained this verse word by word > because > > > Mr > > > > > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > does not know Sanskrit, but he refused to accept such clear > > > verdict > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > called the yuga calculation of ancient sages as " my " > invention ! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent the following prrof from > Mahabharata > > > > > (khanda > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 5-chapter 231-verse15) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ahoraatre vibhajate Suryau maanushalaukike " , which means > days > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > nights of manushya loka is made/divided by Surya. Verse 17 > says > > > > > " Daive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatryahanee varsham pravibhaagastayoh punah , > > > ahastatrodagayanam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > raatrih syad dakshinaayanam " : in which " Daive raatryahanee > > > varsham " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > means " (human) varsha is equal to day+night of gods " . Here > > > varsha is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > varsha of maanushalaukike which is to be taken from > preceding > > > two > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses. Rest of verse 17 means " this daiva day+night is > divided > > > thus > > > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > uttara (ayana) is divine day and dakshinaayana is divine > night " . > > > MBh > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly says that the maanushalaukika year is solar year : > see > > > verse > > > > > 15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > above which says that Sun divides/makes day and night in > > > > > maanushalaukika > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (but not in devaloka). " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Two months ago, I also sent evidences from all major ancient > > > > > Jyotisha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Siddhantas : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ancient siddhantic texts invariably speak of 4320000 solar > years > > > for > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mahayuga. For instance, in the first verse of Dashageetikaa > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya, Sun's bhagana number per (maha)yuga is 4320000 > and > > > > > Earth's > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > rotations are given to be 1582237500 (1582237828 in > > > Suryasiddhanta, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this minor difference being due to Sunrise system of day > count > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Aryabhatiya in contrast to midnight system of > Suryasiddhanta) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta( BSS) repeats the mathematics of > > > > > Mahabharata > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (MBh-v-231) in its first chapter verses 4-7, in which > 4320000 > > > normal > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > solar years of humans are said to make one mahayuga (see > verses > > > 5-6) > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1000 such mahayugas are said to make one Kalpa (BSS, ch-i, > verse > > > > > 10). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, Suryasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya and Brahma-sphuta- > siddhaanta > > > all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > clearly say one mahayuga to be equal to 4320000 years and > not > > > > > 43200000 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > days as Mr Sunil wrongly tried to prove by misquoting texts. > His > > > > > stand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is refuted by all these ancient texts : Suryasiddhanta, > > > Aryabhatiya > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Brahma-sphuta- siddhaanta, Mahabharata, Narada Purana, > Vishnu > > > > > Dharmottara > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Purana, etc, all of which unanimously say that one mahayuga > is > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 4320000 years or 1582237828 days which is equal to 12000 > divine > > > > > years. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > How can he put " 1582237828 sunrises " in only 12000 " solar " > years > > > ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Not only this, Mr Sunil reads Hindu scriptures in reverse > > > direction > > > > > like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Urdu (from my message two months ago) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vishnu Purana (Amsha-vi, chapter-3, verses 6-11) clearly say > > > that > > > > > 360 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " human " ( " maanusha " , see verse 6) years are equal to one > divya > > > year > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 12000 " divya " years constitute one Chaturyuga (ie, > Mahayuga). > > > > > Exactly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > same thing is repeated in Vishnu Purana (Amsha-i, chapter-3, > > > verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 8-14), with clarification that four yugas of a Chaturyuga > have > > > > > lengths > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of 4800, 3600, 2400 and 1200 divya years. The sequence of > yugas > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Satyuga, Treta, Dvaapara and Kaliyuga, which means duration > of > > > > > Satyuga > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is 4800, Treta 3600, Dvaapara 2400 and Kaliyuga 1200 " divya " > > > years > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > according to Vishnu Purana. Why Mr Sunil inverts the > sequence of > > > > > four > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > yugas of a Chaturyuga and read Kaliyuga as 4800 ? Even > > > schoolboys do > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit such blunders ! It is certainly a result of excessive > > > > > drinking, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > although he says that only two tolas of wine should be taken > > > daily. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here is his statement about Rgveda : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< " I said that that the Rig Veda says that we are all > > > brothers. > > > > > Then > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disprove what I said Vinay Jha did research and quoted > > > several > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verses from the Rig Veda to show that nowhere in the Rig > Veda it > > > is > > > > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that we are all brothers. Then I had to quote the exact > verse > > > where > > > > > it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is said that we are all brothers and this shows that he > missed > > > the > > > > > most > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > relevant verse. Such is his false scholarship. " >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I answered : The verses he quoted from Rgveda said that " all > 49 > > > > > Marutas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > are equal bhraatara " . If anyone imagines 49 Maruts to be > humans, > > > > > born > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simultaneously, it must be due to genetic cloning in Rgvedic > > > times, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > because no mortal woman can beget 49 sons at a time ! Why > Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya reduces deities like Maruts to mortals ? > Rgveda > > > never > > > > > said > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " we are all brothers " . Sunil Bhattacharjya is lying. He > should > > > cite > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > texts honestly and properly, and should read scriptures > without > > > a > > > > > goblet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in hand. A person incapable of understanding simple Puranic > > > Sanskrit > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > simple english and Hindi translations of the same should > keep > > > away > > > > > from > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > difficult language of Rgveda. Pandits say that 12 years are > > > needed > > > > > by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sanskrit scholars to master one Veda !! Now-a-days every > fool > > > may > > > > > pose > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > as a Vedic expert, citing verses from internet out of > context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > All above exchanges took place over two months ago, after > which > > > he > > > > > went > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > into hibernation because he could not refute the evidences, > but > > > > > after > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > two months came up again, repeating his old lies, believing > that > > > > > members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > must have forgotten exchanges of two months ago. In this > > > connection, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another scholar Shri Venkata Krishnan in his own forum also > > > cited > > > > > verses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <<< > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana, chapter-142, Slokas 11-15 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Meaning: " Thirty yearsof men is one month for the Gods. A > > > century of > > > > > men > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > is three months and a few days of the Gods. 360 Human years > make > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year of the Devas ( Gods). ... 3,60,000 Human years make One > > > > > Thousand > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Divine years. " ( This verse-12 is exactly repeated in > > > Verses18-19 > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Linga Purana cited below) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But Mr Sunil answered : " Thank you for the trouble takien. > Let > > > us > > > > > agree > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to disagree. I shall prefer to go by the definition of Vayu > > > purana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (57.17) " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil told me in this group : " Vayu purana says that > > > Divyavarsha > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Solar year and Manushya varsha is the Sidereal Lunar year. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I said : " Vayu Purana or no ancient text ever said that. Ask > him > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > quote the verse verbatim. " In reply, I got abuses. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hence, I had to send new evidences from a lot of Puranas as > > > shown > > > > > below, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and as expected he again refuses to accept his faults : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proof of length of Divya Varsha, this time from Narada > Purana, > > > which > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > presents Ganita and Phalita portions of Jyotisha in more > details > > > > > than > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > any other Purana (Sage Sanaka says ) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Rturmaasadvayena syaattatrayenaayana m smritam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > tatdvyena bhavedabdah sa devaanaam dinam bhavet " (verse-24, > > > ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " uttaram divasam praahoo raatrirvai dakshinaayanam " (forst > half > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse-25, ch-5) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse 24 defines ayana in first half, and then says two > ayanas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (uttaraayana and dakshinaayana) make one year (of humans) > which > > > is > > > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " din " of the gods. Next line says that uttaraayana is > " divasa " > > > while > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshinnayana is night (of gods). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Same thing is said in Bhagavata Purana (and in Vishnu > Purana, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Suryasiddhanta, Brahmasiddhanta, Aryabhatiya, etc) , but SKB > > > says it > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vague !!! SKB does not know Sanskrit which is " vague " to > him, > > > > > hence > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is impossible to convince him what the Puranas & c say. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-5 of Koorma Purana says same thing : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-5 defines " maanusha " measure, and then " maasa' is > defined > > > in > > > > > same > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > verse. Then, verse-6 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " taih shadbhir-ayanam varsham dve-ayane dakshinottare > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ayanam dakshinam ratrir-devaanaam uttaram dinam " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " six (maanusha maasas) make up one ayana, two ayanas uttara > and > > > > > dakshina > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > make one year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dakshina ayana is night and uttara (ayana) is day of gods. " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chapter-1 of Linga Purana (verse 9-10) differentiates > various > > > types > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varshas, and enumerates Divya and Maanusha, among others, as > > > > > different > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > typres. It is clarified in chapter-3, verse 15-16 which say > one > > > > > human > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year is equal to one divya day-night. In next verse, it is > said > > > that > > > > > " 30 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > years (of humans) constitute one divya month " , the language > is > > > copy > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana's definition of the same sent by me earlier > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ( " trinshadyaani tu varshaani divyo maasastu sa smritah " ). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-18-19 of Linga Purana repeats verse of Matsya Purana : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Treeni varsha-shataat anyeva shashti-varshaani yaani tu > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > divyah samvatsaro hyesha maanushena prakeertitah " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It means " 360 years of humans are equal to one divya > > > samvatsara " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Later verses in Linga Purana repeat the verses of matsya > Purana > > > > > about > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the length of Saptarshi Year, Dhruva Year, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Brahmaanda Purana which SKB needs so much > (poorva-bhaaga > > > > > said by > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Vaayu) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Ch-6, verse 44-45 says Krityuga measures 4800 divya varshas, > > > verse > > > > > 61-62 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > repeats same thing in changed words. but actual details are > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chapter-28 od second Anushamga of Poorvabhaaga said by Vayu > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Like other Puranas, verse -5 says Maanusha varsha is defined > on > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > basis of laukika pramaana, ie, solar year, which is the > measure > > > of > > > > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > in this world. verse-7 clarifies it by saing that Sun > divides > > > day > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > night in maanusha-loka, and other measures like month and > year > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > measured in terms of this solar measure. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verses 13-16 define divya dina and then divya varsha exactly > in > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manner of Matsya and Linga Puranas, clearly saying a divya > > > varsha to > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > equal to 360 maanusha varshas in verse-16, which is an exact > > > replica > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Matsya Purana. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Padma Purana , chapter-3, in the words of Sage > Pulastya > > > : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-7 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " dakshina ayana is night of gods and uttara (ayana) is day > (of > > > > > gods) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next verses say such 12000 divya varshas make one > chaturyuga. > > > Verses > > > > > 15- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > say that " one manvantara is equal to 852000 divya > (suraadinaam) > > > > > varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 human (paarthiva) years " : the > > > ratio > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 360 maanusha varshas in one divya varsha : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 852000 divya varshas = > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " ashtau-shat- sahasraani- divyayaa- samkhyayaa- snritah / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > dvi-panchaashat- tathaa-anyaani- sahasraani- adhikaanicha " > > > (verse > > > > > 15-16) ; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are equal to 306720000 paarthiva varshas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " trint-koti- astu-sampoornaah samkhyaataah samkgyayaanrpa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sapta-shashtih- tathaa-anyaani- niyutaani- mahaamate / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vimshatishch- sahasraani- kaaloyamadhikamv inaa / > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > manvantarasya- samkhyaeyam- maanushairiha- vatsareh / " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now see Vishnudharma Purana , ch-105 , in which Sage > Shaunaka > > > says > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (about the kaalamaana he got by worshipping Keshava) : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Verse-14 defines dakshina ayana as night and uttara ayana as > day > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > gods, and says one samvatsara (of humans) is one ahoraatra > of > > > gods. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Then, Verse-15 says : > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Shatatrayena varshaanaam shashtyaa cha Prithivipate > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Manushya-samkhyayaa varsham devaanaam-api ganyate " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > = " O Prithvipati (King Shataaneeka) ! 360 years of humans > are > > > one > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Varsha of Gods " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next line says " iti divyena maanena chaturyuga-vikalpan aam " > , > > > ie, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chaturyuga (of 12000 divya years) is measured in this very > divya > > > > > year > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (of 360 human years) " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXX > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhagavata purana (3.11.18 - 20) says in verse 12 : " ayane > > > chaahanee > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > praahur-vatsaro dvaadasha smritah, samvatsarshatam nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paramaayur-nirupita m " , ie, the ayanas (uttaraayana and > > > > > dakshinaayana > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > described in preceding verse) are one day (of gods) but are > > > called > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " varsha " or " dvaasha " (12 months) in the loka of nrrnaam > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (maanusha-loka) . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mr Sunil Bhattacharya rejected all proofs and intensified > his > > > > > abusive > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > attack on me. I cannot prevent him from going from one > falsehood > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > another. But ancient texts must be cited correctly. There > are > > > some > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > scholars who believe that one divya varsha should be equal > to > > > one > > > > > solar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > year, but they do not cite scriptures falsely like Mr Sunil > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bhattacharjya to make their idea more acceptable. Mr Sunil > makes > > > a > > > > > mess > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of Saamkhya, Gita, Upanishada, Vedas, Puranas and Epics due > to > > > his > > > > > lack > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of knowledge of Sanskrit and lack of proper traning in > > > indological > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > studies, but instead of studying texts properly he starts > posing > > > as > > > > > an > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > expert in everything, from Veda to liquor. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Vinay Jha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ============ ========= == === > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2009 Report Share Posted July 18, 2009 Interesting, Rohini jee! Sacred-Scared-Scarred – from infancy to adulthood, in that order! Reverse gear when growing (or going!) back into childhood! Wondering why the order has to do with soul-mind-body and then back from body-mind-soul!! Isn’t it all about reminiscences though! Of what we are meant to FACE! Regards Neelam Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.