[Jagannath] KP's SUB Vs SR SUB (Latest Invention)

[Guest guest]

Pranaam Sanjay,

 

> Jaya Jagannath

> Dear Narasimha,

> That is not what I want to say. The focus is on the ownership of Pusya.

> This is owned by brihaspati and umpteen Puja , Ganesha Yantra, wearing of

> Pokhraj, etc are done on the Lunar transit of this star. With the advent of

> kali, this foundation is getting wiped out as the ownership of Vimsottari is

> getting the focus. This is a temporary ownership and is applicable to

> Vimsottari dasa alone.

 

I will not argue about what you write below on subs, because

I don't use them at all. But I want to say something about what

you wrote on constellation ownership.

 

I always wondered why the constellation ownerships as per

Vimsottari are so popular and not the constellation ownerships

as per other dasa systems or the natural ownership.

 

So I can understand what you are getting it. But what you are

downplaying - the importance of Vimsottari based star

lordships - is very popular among many traditional pundits of

India and it is all-pervasive. For example, taras (janma tara,

sampat tara, vipat tara etc), which are heavily used in

muhurtas (electional astrology) and gochara (transit analysis),

are based on Vimsottari based ownership of constellations.

 

Is all that baseless and the maya of Kali??? Or, are we

missing something here?

 

> If you can have " KP Sub's " with 243 Parts which is numerically a very

> vague number, why can't we have " SR Sub's " (Thanks to the Research potential

> of Rahu, I have just started another system where the sub lordship of

> Astottari dasa is used- Just now as I type this letter!!) with 64 parts or

> maybe three times that number? Do you feel this can be experimented, and why

> can we not use this vis-a vis the KP System?

>

> The answer is simple, the question of ownership is disputed i.e. the

> star is owned by one, but is used as the realm of another during a

> particular Dasa. Thus, the ownership of PUSYA is that of Brihaspati..and

> this continues.

> The question is why then do we use the star disposition and Sookshma

> Parivartana in Vimsottari Dasa? That's because of the Jeeva being the same

> for stars having similar lordship in Vimsottari.

> Best Wishes,

> Sanjay Rath

 

Your sishya,

Narasimha