[Jagannath] KP's SUB Vs SR SUB (Latest Invention)

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannath

Dear Narasimha,

That is not what I want to say. The focus is on the ownership of Pusya.

This is owned by brihaspati and umpteen Puja , Ganesha Yantra, wearing of

Pokhraj, etc are done on the Lunar transit of this star. With the advent of

kali, this foundation is getting wiped out as the ownership of Vimsottari is

getting the focus. This is a temporary ownership and is applicable to

Vimsottari dasa alone.

If you can have " KP Sub's " with 243 Parts which is numerically a very

vague number, why can't we have " SR Sub's " (Thanks to the Research potential

of Rahu, I have just started another system where the sub lordship of

Astottari dasa is used- Just now as I type this letter!!) with 64 parts or

maybe three times that number? Do you feel this can be experimented, and why

can we not use this vis-a vis the KP System?

The answer is simple, the question of ownership is disputed i.e. the

star is owned by one, but is used as the realm of another during a

particular Dasa. Thus, the ownership of PUSYA is that of Brihaspati..and

this continues.

The question is why then do we use the star disposition and Sookshma

Parivartana in Vimsottari Dasa? That's because of the Jeeva being the same

for stars having similar lordship in Vimsottari.

Best Wishes,

Sanjay Rath

Sri Jagannath Vedic Center

152-B Pocket-C, Mayur Vihar Ph-2, Delhi,

INDIA 110091.Tel:+91-11-2489531

Website: http://www.sjvc.net

 

>

> > and the sub-sub are nothing else but Pratyantar portion. Thu Brihaspati

> > loses the ownership of Pusya once and for all and the star becomes a

> > saturnine star. Aslesha which is extremely evil becomes a mercurial

star.

> > This is contrary to vedic Jyotish.

>

> You are now questioning the nakshatra ownerships based on Vimsottari. That

is

> used by many Vedic astrologers and not just KP people. Do you think all

that is

> contrary to Vedic Jyotish?? Many classics mention it.

>