confused with this saptamsa?

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjayji/friends,

I am at a loss to explain why this lady has a first pregnancy and

birth-daughter.It is female chart.If we take 9.house as a first

pregnancy

than guru would be in 8.house. Everything was

normal about a pregnancy/childbirth..Guru mahadasha gave birth of a

child.Guru should have argal over saptamsa lagna/its lord or prevent

papargal or having connection to saptamsa lagna.Guru is preventing pap

argal of sun/rahu,and aspecting by rasi dristi saptamsa lagna.Venus

antara is aspecting guru/lord of 9.house,and having subhargala over it.

However,venus is placed in 12.house from moon in saptamsa(as sustainer

of children,however being subhapati)Having in mind that antara lord

should also be seen from the moon,shouldn't that position create

problems?

If we take 5.house as a 1.st pregnancy,than its lord is sun(male) with

rahu(male)in fruitful sign cancer(male)?There is no parivarthan yoga,

Could you help,

One question still bothers me.IN FEMALE CHARTS,DO WE TAKE 9.HOUSE

IN SAPTAMSA AS A FIRST PREGNANCY?

The birthtime is quite correct,so another d-7 is doubtful.Even if it

goes to next saptamsa,it is again not showing female child

BTW:HAVE A LOOK AT LADIES DASHAMSA.SHE TEACHES AT UNIVERSITY(LINGUISTICS

LITERATURE)BUT,MERCURY IS IN 12.HOUSE WITH LAGNESH MOON.I HAVE THOUGHT

OF CHANGING

HER BIRTH TIME AND FIXING LEO DASMASA,THAT WOULD PUT GURU IN 6.HOUSE AND

MERCURY IN

11.HOUSE,BUT THAN SAPTAMSA WOULD CHANGE,AND A BIRTH OF DAUGHTER WOULD BE

IMPOSSIBLE WITH TAURUS SAPTAMSA.WHAT DO YOU THINK OF HER DASMASA AS

WELL?

Yours,

Zoran

P.S.

In the first attachment are rasi/navamsa

in second saptamsa