To Prabodh: Why Kundalini Awakening impossible in women?devika pls your opinion

[Guest guest]

i have been requesting see mata nirmala give power to

all to raise kundilini

in her sahaj yoga

what about her chart no one responded me please

guru ji check if she has great yogas in her horroscope

here is horoscope of avery powerful palnet i just need

assuarance is it

tru this person is taking care of earth and has shakti

born march 23 1923

asc is gemini

 

shani in 4th house

sun is in tenth house

venus mercury ketu in 9th

rahu in 3rd

has gajakesri yoga

she originate sahaj yoga in west

 

nirmala devi

any deatils

ram

-study we can do as a group will be appreciTED

If one does not know the

> subject, then they should state that it is their

> assumption. Jyotish on the other hand, is full of

>few hurdles). If a particular group of people

> cannot have Kundalini activation, it is no big deal

> and not an insult. So that is not where I am coming

> from. But the bottomline is that what Prabodh said

> is simply incorrect. I can accept such

> >

> > Kundalini is nothing but the shakti of one's ego

> consciousness, which makes one think of oneself as a

> separate entity (as opposed being the supreme

> Brahman that everybody in reality is). Kundalini is

> normally in Mooladhara chakra and coils around

> Swayambhoo Linga. One's ego consciousness binds one

> to the idea of self that encompasses one's body,

> name etc.

> >

> > At this level, there is a difference based on

> the sex. But, as Kundalini rises and one's ego

> consciousness reaches higher planes of

> consciousness, one's sex is immaterial.

> >

> > In fact, soul has no sex. It is only the body

> that is male or female. And, one's ego consciousness

> is bound to body at very low levels of

> self-consciousness (i.e. Kundalini in lower

> chakras). As self-consciousness reaches higher

> planes of consciousness, one's ego consciousness is

> no longer bound to body. Then how important is one's

> sex?

> >

> > In answer to Prabodh's point, women can be Hatha

> Yogis. However, one does not need hatha yoga to

> activate Kundalini or make Kundalini rise. Hatha

> yoga is but one path. Bhakti yoga, jnaana yoga etc -

> there are so many paths.

> >

> > If you want to see the characteristics of one's

> consciousness, when it is in the 14 different planes

> of consciousness (corresponding to 14 chakras and 14

> lokas), read " Yoga Vaasishtham " (a dialog between

> Rama and Vasishtha that was described by Valmiki).

> It is a fascinating and masterly book. It is a

> masterpiece of Advaita philosophy. In fact, I

> haven't read a better book - or a book that

> influenced me more profoundly - in my life so far.

> Anyway, whether you are pursuing Raja yoga or Jnaana

> yoga or Bhakti yoga or Karma yoga or whatever, your

> Kundalini will rise only when your

> self-consciousness reaches higher planes of

> consciousness (which can happen in men and women).

> The way to make that happen is different in

> different paths.

> >

> > In fact, animals can also reach higher planes of

> consciousness according to Vasishtha and he gave an

> example where a bird got moksha. Moksha cannot come

> without self-consciousness reaching the highest

> plane of consciousness (i.e. consciousness that one

> is simply supreme Brahman and nothing else), i.e.

> Kundalini reaching Sahasrara. If Kundalini can reach

> Sahasrara in a bird, why not in a woman?

> >

> > BTW, one more philosophical rambling:

> >

> > As we are born as human beings and blessed with

> some intellect, we should try to understand " self "

> better, instead of tying ourselves down with

> nonsensical concepts of " self " that only take us

> further and further away from who we truly are.

> One's concept of " self " (ego) is what one truly

> believes one's " self " to be. By practice and

> conditioning, it can be altered. Whether one

> succeeds or not, it is worthwhile for every human

> being to ask oneself " who am I? What exactly is my

> " self " ? " This may sound like a stupid question, but

> do ask yourself this question everyday and, believe

> me, it will slowly start making a difference.

> >

> > OK, good night now!

> >

> > May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> > Narasimha

> >

>

-------------------------------

> > Free Jyotish lessons (MP3):

> http://vedicastro.home.comcast.net

> > Free Jyotish software (Windows):

> http://www.VedicAstrologer.org

> > Sri Jagannath Centre (SJC) website:

> http://www.SriJagannath.org

> >

>

-------------------------------

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > Dear Jyothi and others,

> > > In reply to the question " Why awakening is

> impossible in women? " , Prabodh wrote the following:

> > > " When I said that women will not have

> kundalini activation I did not mean to belittle

> them. I respect all women. All the people whom I met

> who had Kundalini activation have told me that women

> are not allowed into this. I never dared to ask why

> but I can guess. "

> > > Does Prabodh think that people are that much

> gullible to buy his story? It is his own idea. He

> should have wrote " I think " or " I assume " , but

> instead he wrote: " Activation of Chakras in female

> body is possible but no Kundalini activation "

> > > It appeared that he had total confidence even

> though he knows nothing about the subject. What I

> would like to say here is that before making such a

> radical remark, think millions of times. What does

> he think happened to Mira bai, Amritanandamayi,

> Hazrat Babajaan, Anandamayi Maa, etc? Were they all

> men and not women? Normally I am a calm person, but

> Prabodh has definately touched my nerve with this.

> His statement can mislead and disappoint women. My

> urge to all women is to continue on your earnest

> search for yourself. Life is too short. And not only

> that, but human life is rare. Make the best out of

> this life time. You are not limited to anything.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Devika.

> > >

> > >

> > > jyothi_b_lakshmi <jyothi_b_lakshmi> wrote:

> > > Dear Sir,

> > >

> > > It is understood that you didnt mean to

> belittle women. But

> > > I was thinking whether it was just your personal

> opinion (which I

> > > knew it is) or you had any scientific reason.I

> have read the

> > > experiences narrated by several women about

> their KA in the net. If

> > > my memory is correct, even in this group much

> earlier some body had

> > > written about that. (That was how I started

> reading of it with more

> > > curiosity).

> > >

> > > Since you said it so authentically, I

> thought you might have some

> > > reliable reason. If it is the problem of only

> " allowance' and

> > > not 'impossible' , then ok. Because personally I

> feel women are more

> > > capable of awakening Kundalini more quickly and

> less dangerously than

> > > men because of their inherent fine nature and

> strong mental

> > > faculties. (No controversy meant...plz).

>

=== message truncated ===