[Jagannath] Subordinate Count from D10 & miscellaneous

[Guest guest]

Pranaams Sanjay,

 

[ Reference Mail #670( I have obsereved this number changes ) : Please

refer to the reply-mail preceeding this one by Sanjay Rath titled

" Narayana Dasa D10 & GL " for subject content ]

 

There are few points I would like to make clear based on your recent

posting

on this matter.

 

1.

Although I said that I have 5 people under me. 3 of them are permanent.

The other 2 are " leased " on an as-need basis. Just wanted to clarify

this.

 

2.

Regarding the process of finding out which Dasa Rasi is the right one.

For example Leo or the 5th or 6th from it, I would like to clarify

another point.

These subordinates are from the client side. They are not from my

consulting company. So shouldnt the 7H from Dasa Rasi(Leo ) be the

actual house to be considered. Moreover they are very senior people.

 

3.

Regarding your comment " SOME SENIOR BOSS SEEMS TO HAVE A LOT OF FAITH

IN HIM. "

This is absolutely true. The Boss is a very good friend of mine. And

the trust cannot be conveyed in words. I am also learning a lot from

him. As is shown in my D-24 Sg Dasa running with 9L Sun aspecting it.

 

4.

I have a question concerning the the follwing reply :

" RATH: YOU MISSED MOON OBSTRUCTED BY MARS. OBSTRUCTIONS ONLY REPLACE.

THUS,

THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUPITER BY VENUS SHOWS THAT VENUS REPLACES JUPITER.

THUS,

INSTEAD OF MOON, MARS, SATURN, MERCURY AND JUPITER, WE HAVE A DIFFERENT

SET.

HOWEVER, THIS IS STILL NOT THE CORRECT ANSWER AS IT DOES NOT RELATE TO

HIS

NATURAL FIFTH HOUSE IN THE D-10. "

 

Why should it be from Natural 5H in D-10 i.e Cp.

As Dasa/AD change it brings with it the significations of new Dasa/AD.

So shouldn't the specific Dasa/AD and 5h or 6H give a better picture????

 

Thanks

Regards

Narayan